Supreme Court Victory!

Top Headlines of the Week Press Releases

Judicial Watch Statement on Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling on Trump Ballot Dispute

The United States Supreme Court today made a powerful and unified statement against the brazen, unconstitutional coup by leftists against the constitutional rights of tens of millions of Americans. And, thankfully, a Supreme Court majority seems prepared to stop any shady Biden administration and leftist congressional efforts to overturn a Trump victory based on false allegations of insurrection.

Judicial Watch Files Senate Ethics Complaint against Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse over Conflicts of Interest Concerning His Consultant Wife

“There is strong evidence that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse may have violated Senate ethics conflicts of interest rules. The Senate Ethics Committee should immediately investigate this serious issue,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Senator Whitehouse seems to have stepped over the line of standard environmental legislative advocacy and used his Senate office to advance his and his wife’s personal and financial interests.”

Chinese Mining Co. Sold to Swiss Firm, Hires Biden Clean Energy Czar’s Brother to Lobby U.S.

A Canadian-based mining company long owned by a Chinese syndicate was recently transferred to a Swiss firm, in an apparent effort to escape scrutiny under Canada’s new rules to crack down on foreign investments (mainly Chinese) in the critical minerals sector for national security reasons. The original company, Canadian Royalties Inc. (CRI) is now run by Canadian Assets SA, but the President and CEO is the same Chinese mining executive and investor, James Xiang, who ran it for China, according to Quebec public records.

Judicial Watch Files Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Three Illinois Federal Judges for Ordering Woke Discriminatory Preferences

Judicial Watch announced recently it filed a judicial misconduct complaint against three federal judges in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois for standing orders that grant special preferences to lawyers who appear before them based on the lawyers’ race, ethnicity, or gender/sex.

In The News

Judicial Watch Statement on Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling on Trump Ballot Dispute

Senator Whitehouse Accused of Supporting Legislation Beneficial to Wife’s Financial Interests

Judicial Watch Sues Illinois to Force Clean Up of Voting Rolls

The NVRA requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove” from the official voter rolls “the names of ineligible voters” who have died or changed residence. The law requires registrations to be cancelled when voters fail to respond to address confirmation notices and then fail to vote in the next two general federal elections. In 2018, the Supreme Court confirmed that such removals are mandatory (Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 138 S. Ct. 1833, 1841-42 (2018)). In July 2023, Judicial Watch successfully sued Illinois for failing to provide access voting list data to a citizens group as federal law requires.

Video Highlights

• • • FARRELL: Radical Left Unfazed by 9-0 SCOTUS Smackdown on Ballot Fixing
    • Clinton Email Scandal Update—State Dept. PAYS Judicial Watch $97k!
    • Chris Farrell’s On Watch Podcast: Rep. Scott Perry on Biden Border Crisis and Gov’t Overreach

The post SUPREME COURT VICTORY! appeared first on Judicial Watch.