Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By American Everyman (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Jill Stein Parrots the Dem’s Discredited “The Russians Did It” Narrative in Her Official Petition to Recount Wisconsin Votes

Saturday, November 26, 2016 12:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

by Scott Creighton

Sounds to me like John Podesta wrote her petition to Wisconsin.

Jill Stein’s petition to recount Wisconsin votes has been published online (PDF). Does she cite issues with electronic voting machines being proven to be susceptible to rigging by the companies that own them? No. Does she have any evidence at all to show the official count in Wisconsin was rigged for Trump to win? No.

Her entire argument to recount the votes in Wisconsin comes down to two things which she summarizes in section F of her petition;

f. The well-documented and conclusive evidence of foreign interference in the presidential race before the election, along with the irregularities observed in Wisconsin (more absentee ballots than usual), call into question the results and indicate the possibility that widespread breach occurred.

Stein also included an exhibit from J. Alex Halderman to further support her claims. Halderman, if you recall, met with Soros operators John Podesta, John Bonifaz and Mark Elias to discuss how they were going to move forward with a recount process without making Hillary Clinton look like a sore loser.

In his exhibit offered by Jill Stein as evidence of the stolen election, J. Alex Halderman makes these statements:

6. The 2016 presidential election was subject to unprecedented cyberattacks apparently intended to interfere with the election… The Department of Homeland Security has stated that senior officials in the Russian government commissioned these attacks... Russia has sophisticated cyber-offensive capabilities and it has shown a willingness to use them to hack elections elsewhere.

Another exhibit Stein included in her petition is an article written by April Glaser titled “Here’s What We Know About Russia and the DNC Hack”. This is part of it:

DNC officials allege that the Russian government is behind the breach. The New York Times reports that the US intelligence agencies increasingly share that opinion. According to a number of top cybersecurity researchers, they’re probably right

Another exhibit she offers as proof is a New York Times article titled “Private Security Group Says Russia was Behind John Podesta Email Hack

Jill Stein tosses in a couple more MSM articles about Russians hacking everything in sight.

And that’s it. That’s her argument. The Russians did it.

This, too me, signifies the final straw of evidence we need to conclude Jill Stein is acting as John Podesta’s proxy candidate in his bid to get Hillary installed in the White House.

Jill Stein never bought into the “Russians Hacked Us!” narrative. Never once. In fact, she thought it was silly.

lying-hyporcrite

“…when WikiLeaks exposed massive corruption at the highest levels of the Democratic Party, high-ranking Democratic Party officials and their supporters in the media began attacking WikiLeaks as an alleged agent of Russia, despite their inability to produce any hard evidence to support this claim.” Jill Stein

This “Russia did it” meme coming from Stein is laughable because it is CLEARLY where the Clinton team was setting us up to go right before the election when they were worried they might lose.

The only thing is, they couldn’t have Hillary do it because it would look bad for them.

This morning Hillary’s Soros-paid lawyer, Mark Elias wrote a statement about this process in which he clearly states the Clinton team will be working with Stein and the others as this recount process continues.

“… , we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides. If Jill Stein follows through as she has promised and pursues recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan, we will take the same approach in those states as well.” Mark Elias

There is no doubt that this motion from Jill Stein originated in the minds of the Clinton team. Anyone saying otherwise at this point is a fool.

Please help keep AE up and running if you can.

Thank you all so much

(For my mailing address, please email me at RSCdesigns@tampabay.rr.com)

output_95f0q7

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Oh the irony.

    “Democrats are now accusing Russia of manipulating our presidential election…exactly what the DNC was caught doing”.

    That’s hilarious, sure, she got funded to have that shit checked out by rather dubious, desperate characters. And still, it makes no difference.

    Putin is sitting there facepalming. “Don’t you guys get it, Clinton or Trump, it’s the same shit, you’re already in a dystopian socialist society riddled by the illusion of choice, as a function of the department of engineering consent”

    • Let me make it clear. Jill pointed it out, for good measure.

      “Democrats are now accusing Russia of manipulating our presidential election…exactly what the DNC was caught doing”.

      She is saying, the DNC, democrats are corrupt and no financial funding changes that. Who paid for the recounts? And yet, even after recounts, that didn’t change a thing. Dense motherfuckers.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.