by Scott Creighton
Let me ask you a question. If the U.S. intelligence agencies hacked various people and institutions in order to derail the campaign of one of the candidates in a U.S. election (like they have done repeatedly in other nations) do you think they would go to any lengths in order to cast blame elsewhere? And do you think they would also try to tie that blame into another project of theirs since they have been taught since high school to never let a good manufactured crisis go to waste?
Keep that question in mind while reading the following.
The stories are so convoluted it’s hard to keep up with all the “hacks” and “leaks” and subpoenas surrounding Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential bid.
For the record while keeping in mind not ONE of the published leaked/hacked emails has been proven to be a fake or forgery. Not a single, solitary one of them…
– Guccifer, taxi-driver Marcel Lehel Lazar, supposedly hacked into Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email server, the one she used to keep incriminating records from public view while serving as Secretary of State. He was found out and caught in Romania. They extradited him to Virginia where he was tried in a kangaroo court and sentenced to 7 years in prison. It is likely that without his efforts (or those of whoever really did it) we may never have known of Hillary Clinton’s criminal behavior while serving as Secretary. We certainly would never have known about her illegal use of a private email server as the State Department certainly wouldn’t have come forward with that information.
– Guccifer 2.0 came to light when he set up his own WordPress page and started publishing his own hacked troves of emails from various sources. Round about June of 2016 he published some emails from the DNC hack. In July he (?) published donor lists and financial reports and their plans to destroy Trump and things of that nature. Nothing terribly ground-breaking. In Aug. of the same year he got into the DCCC and published some stuff on Pelosi, some info on the Pennsylvania congressional districts and disclosures from the Florida primary. Again, not very earth-shattering. 2.0’s biggest contribution which was the most damaging to Hillary’s campaign was the release he (?) did of some stuff he got from the Clinton Foundation in Oct. of 2016. That stuff made some waves.
– DC Leaks claims to be a collection of U.S. hackers who want a better future and present for the average U.S. citizen and are sick and tired of the “politics as usual” level of corruption of our system.
“The project was launched by the American hacktivists who respect and appreciate freedom of speech, human rights and government of the people. We believe that our politicians have forgotten that in a democracy the people are the highest form of political authority so our citizens have the right to participate in governing our nation. The authorities are just lobbying interests of Wall Street fat cats, industrial barons and multinational corporations’ representatives who swallow up all resources and subjugate all markets.”
They released files on the RNC, Bill Clinton, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Colin Powell just to name a few. They got a lot of attention toward the end of the general election when their website was shut down and Twitter suspended their account after releasing some documents on George Soros. A week later they released some documents from Hillary Clinton’s statement days. They were probably more influential in the short term on Hillary’s election bid.
– Wikileaks, as many of you know, is a U.S. intelligence operation and it was crafted as such from the very first days of it’s inception. It’s a honey-pot trap designed to garner some respect among potential whistle-blowers who don’t know any better and get them to hand over their leaks so Wikileaks can essentially bury the ones they want to bury and publish the ones they want published. It also gives the intel agencies the chance to fabricate incriminating “evidence” against regimes they want demonized and publish them without anyone tracing the disinformation back to the intelligence agencies. Wikileaks did that MANY TIMES during the Obama administration by the way, helping set up a number of regime change operations in the process. Assange is a manufactured hero much like “Edward Snowden” was. That’s just a fact.
Take for example none other than their LATEST batch of “leaks”… some supposedly taken from the son-in-law of Recep Erdogan. It’s a carbon copy of the predictable batch of disinformation efforts they have used on many other targeted leaders in the past. Yes boys and girls, they want to regime change Turkey as well because they are standing with Assad and Syria and Russian and Iran in opposition to our Greater Kurdistan project over there. In July of 2016 they started their regime change propaganda against Erdogan and the AKP.
In July of 2012 they released the Syrian Files, which was nothing more than an intelligence agency operation making ready to regime change that nation.
Over the course of the past few years, they have garnered some street credibility by releasing bits and pieces of the TTIP , TiSA and the TPP none of which were ground-breaking and none of which did much to expand the global movement that already existed against these fascist “trade” deals.
Wikileaks got into the Clinton email business in March of 2016. None of these were hacked of course, they were the 30,000 or so that she turned over from her private server after being forced to a year after leaving office. They were given to Wikileaks by the State Department after a FOIA request. Hillary held back another 33,000 emails she claimed were of a personal basis.
In July of 2016 they got their hands on some hacked emails from the DNC server and released those. These are the ones that Assange suggests came from Seth Rich before he was found shot twice in the head in D.C. for no apparent reason. They had a significant effect on the election in that they exposed the DNC for colluding with the Clinton campaign against the other candidates for nomination, specifically Bernie Sanders. DWS had to resign from the head of the DNC for her efforts to that end and a lot of Dems never forgave them for that treachery.
In October of 2016, Wikileaks released the Podesta files which garnered most of the attention right before the election. John Podesta’s password was “password” and a simple fishing email hooked that idiot. The Podesta files were crippling to the Clinton campaign, so much so that other intel ops decided to try to derail it with the Pizzagate disinfo, but the damage was done.
– The FBI. Yes I know, seems strange that some of the most damaging “hacks/leaks” came directly from the FBI themselves. But it is a fact. They have been trickling out various emails recovered from Hillary’s private email server since early 2016. The steady drip-drip-drip has kept her criminality in the news cycle throughout the general election season. They just released YET ANOTHER 300 pages of stuff she tried to hide from the State Department 5 days ago for God’s sake and remarkably the fake left is still blaming Putin for all of this. Maybe that is the “big secret” as to why a bunch of neoliberal dems got mad at Comey yesterday and stormed out of a secret briefing they were holding with him in congress. No wonder the Clinton apologists in congress didn’t want to explain to the press why they were mad.
In Sept. of 2016 they took the highly unusual step of releasing the notes of their investigation into the criminality of Hillary Clinton. That probe referred to what they called the “shadow government” that was backing the Clinton regime.
They kicked 350 hidden Clinton emails out into the public light on Nov. 3rd, just days before the election.
And of course we all know what happened when Comey had to announce right before the election that they got their hands on Hillary’s back-up laptop obtained from Anthony Weiner as he tried to weasel his way out of prison. That was apparently the final straw as it looked like a video of Trump on a bus would be the final straw in her campaign of hatred and fear to push her unlikable ass over the top and usher her into the White House.
While the Clintonistas were trying their best to get EC voters to vote against the will of the people who sent them to congress to vote for Donald Trump, the FBI ended up releasing the search warrant they got for the Weiner laptop which further implicated Hillary Clinton in criminal behavior and put the final nail in the coffin of that effort to usurp American democracy by the previously mentioned “shadow government”
Talk about a tit-for-tat power struggle behind closed doors, yet being fought right out in the open for all too see, if they really wanted to.
Does anyone wish to try to suggest Vladamir Putin is running the FBI?
Because, with the possible exception of the original Guccifer (the ONLY ONE in jail mind you), the FBI did more to expose Hillary Clinton’s corruption than did most of the “hackers/leakers” that came before them. That’s undeniable. And that leads me to wonder, since the FBI got into the act and since Wikileaks was a U.S. intelligence operation (proven) and the other “hackers” at DC Leaks have never been identified much less arrested, that this ENTIRE THING was a construct of one or more tentacles of U.S. intelligence services.
Keep this in mind. Not only did Obama NOT fire James Comey for helping crush Killary’s campaign right before the election, he recently praised him for his work while the corporate Dems of congress walked out on Comey during that conference they just had.
With all of that in mind, try this on for size:
“The U.S. intelligence agencies have published several reports of late claiming I have ties with Russia.
I’d like to make it clear enough that these accusations are unfounded. I have totally no relation to the Russian government. I’d like to tell you once again I was acting in accordance with my personal political views and beliefs.
The technical evidence contained in the reports doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. This is a crude fake.
Any IT professional can see that a malware sample mentioned in the Joint Analysis Report was taken from the web and was commonly available. A lot of hackers use it. I think it was inserted in the report to make it look a bit more plausible.
I already explained at The Future of Cyber Security Europe conference that took place in London in last September, I had used a different way to breach into the DNC network. I found a vulnerability in the NGP VAN software installed in the DNC system.” Guccifer 2.0
Does that sound like some hipster hacker to you or does it sound more like one intelligence industry asset taking a shot at another? “acting in accordance with my personal political views and beliefs”? A hacker writing that?
Motherboard says he’s bullshitting us since he does seem to speak Romanian. Guccifer 2.0 went dark right before the election which makes one wonder if his “political beliefs and views” were about nothing more than influencing the election, which isn’t much of a political view or belief in my book.
Guccifer 2.0 is still out there with his WordPress website, which is still up and running.
Wikileaks is still online with all their regime change propaganda still published online for anyone to read.
D.C. Leaks is still in D.C. and to my knowledge not a single one of them are serving time alongside the cab driver from Romania.
And of course, Obama still employs James Comey and his staff and still stands by his man while Clintonistas fume and throw tantrums outside congressional meeting rooms.
Meanwhile, at every turn, Dems are being conditioned to love our Big Brother intel agencies like the CIA and all the others. We are being told to “BELIEVE” in them no matter what unsubstantiated claims they make.
VP Biden just did a little stunt on The View yesterday morning and when he mentioned the “intel agencies” the gaggle of hens on-stage swooned at the mere mention of them and the audience, undoubtedly triggered by the “applause” sign, went WILD for them.
Fascinating isn’t it? In the wake of the fake intel of the Iraq WMDs and the illegal wars of aggression and all the lies our various intel chiefs told congress and the press about spying on congress and the rest of the country, the Dems are stupid enough to buy into this latest “GO BIG BROTHER!” propaganda coming out from the Mockingbird press and the puppet politicians.
Of course, in the context of what I have written above, it makes perfect sense:
“BELIEVE all you ObamaBOTS how the ebil Roooskies stole Killary’s coronation from you no matter how thin our “evidence” and no matter how FUCKING OBVIOUS IT IS that WE actually sidelined the corrupt war-monger’s political ambitions on behalf of a different set of globalist American oligarchs.” Your friends at the CIA… worship us now… WORSHIP US…
There is certainly a war on for your mind. It’s not the ebil commies verses the Shining City on the Hill, but it is there and it is very, very real.
Yes, the last thing they want is for the average U.S. citizen to know there is a gang war taking place in post intel industry coup America. In all likelihood, Hillary Clinton was one of the first casualties. It had nothing to do with Russia or Donald Trump getting hookers to pee on a bed somewhere in Moscow. If you believe that, it’s because you want to believe it because, quite frankly, it’s about as dumb as the Magic Bullet theory or office fires bringing down skyscrapers.
Gee, when you think about it, the intel industry comes up with some mighty stupid shit don’t they?