Profile image
By American Everyman (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

CNN Guest Suggests Your Constitutional Rights are a Threat to National Security and Should be Done Away With If You Make “wild statements”

Sunday, January 8, 2017 6:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

by Scott Creighton

Just think for a minute about how scary that title is.

I have often written that the point of the American Gladio project that has been taking place here in the U.S. since the Aurora shooting is not about grabbing everyone’s guns but rather giving the establishment the ability to nullify anyone’s right to due process based on arbitrary decisions made in the back rooms of various law enforcement agencies. And with that determination, erase all of your constitutional rights as well.

Yes, they want to get certain types of weapons off the streets so to speak (what they call “assault” weapons and riot shotguns for instance) but they don’t wish to completely repeal the 2nd amendment to the constitution. Not for everyone at least.

Here we are in the last days of the Obama administration and we have our last (hopefully) example of an American Gladio mass casualty event, one which seems tailor made to fulfill their overall agenda.

The story of Esteban Santiago, as I wrote yesterday, fits their needs to a tee. It’s perfect in every way.

  1. A former military service member “goes crazy” after returning from combat duty
  2. he recites some “conspiracy theory” material to the FBI (according to them, no recording of interview mind you)
  3. he is therefore detained and handed over to the local police for evaluation (for saying things about the CIA and “ISIS”?)
  4. the gun he owns is confiscated (because he conveniently brought it with him to the FBI office… along with his newborn child ಠ_ಠ  )
  5. he is evaluated and released after only 4 days in psychiatric care
  6. his firearm is returned to him because “its the law” (same gun of course that he used later)
  7. month later he books a flight to Florida (no idea WHY he chose Florida) and sets out to shoot a bunch of people and then lay down on the ground peacefully so he could be arrested and handed BACK to the FBI where he “confesses” (again, no interview recordings allowed by FBI… so we have to take their word for that)
  8. so far there is no known motive for his actions (however we now know Florida has a bill coming to the state congress about allowing civilians to carry weapons in airports so that’s one hell of a coincidence isn’t it?)

I wrote that the story should shape up this way:

  1. They will argue that the due process needed to strip a citizen of his/her rights is what ultimately caused this event because of the time it takes to have a medical professional evaluate and determine the suspect’s mental stability and because of the time it takes a court system to rule on pending criminal charges which could end up making said suspect into a felon, both circumstances are how someone’s constitutional right to own a weapon can be voided.
  2. They will say had the FBI been allowed by law to add Esteban Santiago to a new list that would have prevented his ownership of a firearm due to the FBI’s evaluation of said subject, he would never have had his firearm returned to him and the people in Florida would still be alive.
  3. They will call for immediate congressional action to pass such a law.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly what is happening.

Tom Fuentes is a frequent contributor on CNN. He is a former Assistant Director to the FBI.

Fuentes has said in three separate CNN interviews that the main problem law enforcement faces right now in cases like that of Esteban Santiago is the law itself and called this morning for congress to take action. And by “law” I mean… the constitution.

Yesterday, speaking with Wolf Blitzer, Fuentes laid out the exact “solution” to the “crisis” I detailed above (remember, the way they work is “create crisis… control the reaction… present solution“)

WB: “Is there more that needs to be done? Is this individual, should he have been on a “no fly” list for example? He went to the FBI in Alaska a few months ago, said he was hearing voices in his head, they were obviously worried about him, they took some steps but he got on a plane with a gun and ammunition in a checked bag.

TF: If someone goes into a law enforcement office… and this happens on an almost daily basis… everyday someone comes in, makes wild statements and the authorities think they have mental problems, now they can refer him to a mental institution, but they cant track him the rest of his life… and so the next step is they are not in a position to deny somebody, unless they are ajudged (sic) mentally ill in a formal process, if that doesn’t happen, then they are not going to be able to keep them from obtaining a weapon.” CNN

In another interview, Fuentes laid out the problem once again:

He hadn’t been adjudicated a felon and he hadn’t been adjudicated mentally ill,” former FBI assistant director and CNN senior law enforcement analyst Tom Fuentes said. “So again, you know we have this situation where he slipped through the cracks.” CNN

And this morning I saw him give an interview where they spoke directly about getting congress to enact some sort of legal process by which they can fix the “crisis” of people “making wild statements” and not having their constitutional rights taken away willy-nilly by the Feds. That video interview is not up on CNN’s Youtube page yet or their website, but when it is, I will add it as an update.

But you see where he has been going with his spin since the inception of this mass casualty event.

Tom Fuentes went on CNN and on several occasions lamented the fact that law enforcement can’t separate you from your constitutional rights if they say you made some “wild statements”

That is exactly what what Tom Fuentes is saying.

No due process. No psychological evaluation and diagnosis from a mental health professional. No criminal act determining you are a felon.


Just let the FBI stick you on a list that nullifies your constitutional rights because THEY SAY you made some “wild statements”

Now, I don’t own firearms nor will I ever but I absolutely respect and defend your right to do so. But again, this is about much more than meets the eye. Because ultimately once one or two rights can be denied somebody, in the end ALL OF THEM can be denied to ANYBODY.

Constitutional rights are either indivisible to everyone or they are meaningless. And they will not stop at the Second Amendment.

Proof of that is right there in Fuentes’ statement about ‘wild comments”. What is “wild”? Who decides? Is that a not so veiled threat to citizens to watch what they say? Of course it is. So what does that mean for our First Amendment rights?

What about the right to due process?

Slippery slope right?

By all accounts, Esteban was a decent human being. He was a new father and veteran and worked full time in Alaska. You don’t get much more “responsible” than that here in the States.

Yet, on the word of the FBI alone, we have public figures lamenting the fact that an arbitrary decision was not made to strip the man of his constitutional rights, several of them in fact, all because of something… he said.

This seems to be the final act in the endgame of the American Gladio project and as you can see, it appears custom made to fit the bill.

Hopefully we still have folks in congress who understand and admire our constitutional rights and like them just as they are. Hopefully they watch things like that fascist apologist on CNN and are just as repulsed by his words as I am. As you are.


Please help keep AE up and running if you can.

Thank you all so much

(For my mailing address, please email me at


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 7 comments
  • AmbrociousXP

    It’s a wild statement to say that our constitutional rights are a threat.

    • without prejudice

      It’s just another example that CNN and these main stream news corporations are full of crap.

      The sad thing about all of this is those who actually believe they are getting real news and real information from them… It’s a joke.

  • without prejudice

    Here is a perfect example of how to frame an argument or question without giving the People all the facts such as:

    1. The people are being compelled against having the arms to protect themselves (and others) from lunatics with mental problems who snap and do harm. If the people were armed at that airport, then that man would have been most-likely neutralized.

    2. All these assurances of “Homeland Security” and “TSA” and all other security measures have not provided any additional safety which leads to increased confusion and wasted time of quickly resolving this problem.

    3. If this man suffered mental issues, then what was done to help ease his fears?

    4. If that federal corporate government was being honest and was not creating wars, false flag operations, spreading disinformation and propaganda, and acting with consideration of the People, they would not need to feel as concerned about the level of corruption going on in practically every area of that system.

    5. If the People were truly educated and empowered how to stand properly with the power of the pen (contract), they would not lose hope and resort to violence. Once people have knowledge, the pen is truly mightier than the sword. There is no need for violence people.

    6. If these corporations stop poisoning the people through their water, food, and air, maybe the people can become healthier which leads to less mental illness.

    7. If the churches would stop telling their congregations to submit to people in these corporate governments who are actors in offices or even submit to “patterns of the world” instead of being transformed and set-apart of this world and encourage the people to go back to God as the only true government, then this is where God is invoked and takes over in their lives. Also, any church registered as a 501 (c) (3) non-profit corp., has sold themselves down the river to get a privilege to exist and “tax breaks” in contracts to the Right to exist and the Right to speak out against corruption from the pulpit. Nearly all churches and ministers are in dishonor and misleading their flocks.

    I am aware and awake and know that what is going on is so disgusting, but who am I to determine for another who they contract themselves with or to? If People want to abandon the American Constitutional Republic and exist in a foreign Legislative Democracy, that is their choice. Everyone gets to contract with whomever or whatever they want because a free society and a free people involves the right to contract or not contract.

    Every people has the right to self determine their political will.
    This means that if you knew how these political systems work, you get to decide which one you want to be a part of. However, if you do not understand, it is presumed you are in a legislative Democracy.

    Have peace everyone. This war is a spiritual one and when you stop participating in the wrong state of affairs, then you will start to become empowered and ordained with the authority to control your own lives.


  • zak1955

    CNN is against Your Constitutional Rights are a Threat to National Security and Should be Done Away With!!!

  • charlie2dogs

    fuk cnn, communist news network

  • desertspeaks

    our natural rights are antecedent to the formation of any government/country and words on a piece of paper do nothing to secure of limit that which has always been.

    • Citizen of Arizona

      the other words to examine is:

      The condition precedent set forth prior to the Constitution of the United States of America (A.D. 1789) and the first ten articles in amendment is the Declaration of Independence on A.D. 1776. The condition precident in the Declaration of Independence is the People’s god-given and unalienable Rights. These Rights were given to us by the laws of nature or the laws of nature’s creator. No man can give us rights that they do not have the authority to do so in the first place. This is why Civil Rights is a joke because these rights have already been granted to the people.

      Civil Rights are rights granted by a state or a nation-state which are actually nothing but corporations or trust agreements or corporate charters. This means that all governments are corporations or what is known as a “fiction of law” for the only true law is God’s law. The only true government is god. They true rights comes from God. And if people remember reading the Bible, we were all given free will to decide if we wanted to follow God or not. We have the free will to use the Amercian Constitutional Republic even though it’s a fiction of law corporate charter, but it was established with the condition precident that God is the only true law in relations to our god-given unalienable Rights. We also have the right to give away our birth right to that system and contractually agree to another corporate charter known as the U.S. constitution where it is a corporate charater or a municipal charter for the District of Columbia and covers those who are “U.S. citziens” and in this system, you do not have god-given and unalienable Rights, you have benefits and privileges such as licenses and permits and other devices where that government can determine what rights you have or not and so they can give or take away your “Civil Rights” via that state of affairs.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.