The Real History of Trump’s First 100 Days: Crazy Warmongering Corporate Press Accuses Trump of Being Crazy for Not Being a Warmonger

by Scott Creighton

From Mika and Joe to hacks like CNN’s Chris Cillizza, members of the complicit media are beside themselves this morning screeching about President Trump’s “bizzare” comments regarding Andrew Jackson, Obama’s surveillance of the Trump campaign and a possible meeting with Kim Jung Un.

On Morning Joe they suggested in no uncertain terms that Trump looks like he is suffering from dementia mainly because he called the leader of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea a “smart cookie” and said he would be “honored” to meet with him to work out their differences. This practically sent the entire globalist cabal of talking heads into a frenzy. Later they had Sen. John McCain scheduled to come on and give his sane opinion of this development.

Let that sink in for a second.

Whenever this president hints at normalizing relationships with various regime-change targets or when he seems to oppose a vital part of our globalist, neoliberal economy or foreign policy, the  lying media, complicit in their servitude to neoliberal globalization, goes absolutely bat-shit crazy just like they are today. This is the real history of Trump’s first 100 days in office.

• They did it before when Trump congratulated Recep Erdogan for his successful referendum result (Erdogan is next on the regime change plan so they can bust off a piece of Turkey and hand it over to KurdISIS for the northern part of Greater Kurdistan)
• They did it when his administration announced they felt the people of Syria should determine President Assad’s fate (the CIA got their contractors in Syria to stage a false flag chemical weapons attack after that one)
• They did it when Trump appeared ready and willing to normalize relations with Russia and President Putin (they’ve been saying he is Putin’s Manchurian Candidate ever since and some are even calling for his impeachment as a result)
• They did it when President Trump sent an open invitation to meet with Rodrigo Duterte, the leader of a country that has been one of our client states for decades (I wonder how long til the CIA’s Neo-Gladio team stages an event in the Philippines to scuttle that plan)
• They did it when Trump was pushing to back out of NAFTA (and the corporatist media got their marching orders from corporate America and unleashed a devastating attack on him for that one)
• They went crazy when The Donald backed Brexit and said the UK was “doing great” since the vote.
• And of course, Trump’s support of Marine La Pen drives them bonkers  (Say what you will about La Pen, her main goal for France is a Frexit and getting their nation off the euro. France backing out of the EU could be the straw that broke the camel’s back and the globalist machine is terrified of the possibility)

How is opening up a dialog with a nation like the DPRK, that seems like it could potentially cost American service men and women their lives in a pending conflict, not a good, reasonable, mature idea for a leader of this country? I thought avoiding war was a good thing. Perhaps not.

How is speaking with the leader of a NATO country and patting him on the back after a tense referendum result not a positive step? After all, Turkey is slaughtering “ISIS” members by the dozens. Aren’t we at war with “ISIS” or am I missing something?

And how exactly is letting the people of a nation decide who ultimately leads them considered a bad thing? Is that not democracy? Isn’t Syria a secular nation?

This past weekend President Trump skipped the White House Correspondence Dinner because, according to him, the press has treated him very badly.

At one point during that little echo chamber party some speaker said they were there to defend the 1st amendment which of course they didn’t with their promotion of the “fake news” list of websites they all wanted to see shut down, you know, the ones that spend a lot of time exposing just how many times these White House correspondents lie to us all day, every day.

And they also said they weren’t “fake news” and they weren’t “a threat to the American people”

Nothing could be further from the truth. They are absolutely “fake news”. They are useful idiots at best and ladder-climbing Mockingbird propagandists at worst.

Trump was right to skip out on the dinner. The press is trying their level best to influence foreign and domestic policy as is set by the White House. But they aren’t doing so in a way as to actually help the American people. They are doing so in order to help push neoliberal globalist agendas handed down to them by their various handlers, publishers or owners. And this is becoming so widespread, so obvious, it’s literally painful to watch.

Joe Scarborough this morning kept trying to get his guests to say they have never seen a president so out of touch with reality because of some ignorant comment he made about Andrew Jackson. When Mark Halprin reasonably said he wasn’t going to diagnose the seated president based on some comment he made, you should have seen the looks Joe and Mika hit him with. It was like he just admitted to raping children or something.

We have seen the press take odds with a president’s actions in the past. But nothing like this. All of these issues reflect a desire to improve various situations rather than escalate them to the point of armed conflict and the complicit media are beside themselves in their efforts to derail them.

According to them, it is simply madness to seek peace before conflict.

The reason for this is simple: if you peacefully resolve and issue with the nations of the world our masters of the universe have tagged for bloody regime change a number of industries stand to lose vast sums of profits. The MIC is obviously the first but after them there are literally a hundred different special interests who will be denied their opportunity to pick the decimated nation clean to the bone for their profit. When you negotiate a peace you don’t end up with the glorious chaos they wish to create in that nation. A chaos that they can exploit for their own gains like they did in Yugoslavia, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Ukraine for example.

Giving up on the North Korea regime change operation is deeply troubling to a certain class of folks because that nation has so many nationalized industries and services that they can buy up for pennies on the dollar and liquidate.

In Syria, not only do they have the privatizations waiting in the wings, but the Greater Kurdistan project is a trillion dollar a year proposition which will also go a long way to winning the Grand Chessboard match with Russia. And that’s too say nothing of Israel getting a large chunk of Syria to add to their Greater Israel project.

But for all of these things to come to fruition military intervention has to be the vehicle of transition. That’s because they wont give up voluntarily and because they WANT the decimation of the nation, they want the chaos, they want the total demolition of the national identity of the people living in those countries. They want them reduced to child-like states so they will not resist the occupation and remaking of their countries. They want the infrastructure destroyed so they can rebuild it, for a profit.

On the surface it seems crazy, wanting war over peace. But in reality, when you look at it through their eyes, it’s the most logical and rational path they could hope for.

The thing about a corporation is this: it is, by definition and by law, designed to be sociopath. Regardless of the detriment caused to others, the corporate bylaws mandate putting profit above all else. The never-ending demand to consume more and more of the market share.

Thus the corporate media reflect this mandate, this sociopathic drive for more.

Ironic isn’t it? We have so internalized the corporate state that we find the pursuit of peaceful resolutions to conflict to be insane. Remarkable. Lewis Powell would be proud.