Tucker Talked Vaccines With R. Kennedy Jr. on Prime Time: Said “No Subject Should Be Off Limits” – What About 9/11?

by Scott Creighton

Tucker Carlson had Robert Kennedy Jr. on the other night to talk about vaccines and the harm they can do to children. For this I applaud him.

Kennedy was allowed to bring up controversial topics like the pharmaceutical industry’s blanket protection from prosecution and lawsuits that, by all rights should result from that harm their vaccines do to our youngest and most vulnerable citizens.

He also talked about how Big Pharma controls the discussions about vaccines through their advertising dollars paid to the major networks. Given the fact that Fox, the network which hosts the Tucker Carlson Show, receives revenues from large pharmaceutical companies, I give Mr. Carlson a great deal of credit for allowing that discussion as well. As Robert pointed out, not many networks will allow him access for that very reason.

They didn’t talk about parents being forced to vaccinate their children or keep them out of public schools which is a serious discussion we should be having since education is a right in this country as so is a parent’s right about making decisions about the health and well being of your own offspring.

And it was only a 4 minute interview, which seems pretty short for a Tucker Carlson interview.

But all that aside, at least he put Kennedy on during prime time and allowed him to make his case when so many others wouldn’t dare do that for fear of losing their Big Pharma money. Cudos for that, Tucker.

In the follow-up interview, because Tucker’s choice to bring Kennedy on and actually talk about this topic is such an rarity in the MSM today, another Fox host asked him how (and I guess the implicit question was “why?”) he did that.  Tucker said he was responding to emails and text messages and he thought that no topic should be off limits no matter how demonized they are.

“But I also think IT’S LEGITIMATE TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT NOBODY IS. People try to bully you into not asking those questions and I don’t like that. I don’t like people… IT’S A RED FLAG FOR ME when people say “you aren’t allowed to ask that question” NO MATTER WHAT IT IS ABOUT. I think you ought to be allowed to ask legitimate respectful questions and you ought to press for an answer. That’s not threatening to me AND PEOPLE WHO ARE THREATENED BY THAT ARE USUALLY TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING” Tucker Carlson (video below)

Now, most of you know I am not a huge Fox “News” fan. Never have been. And I certainly don’t follow Mr. Carlson on Twitter or watch his show with any regularity and in fact, I didn’t see this exchange in real time, I found the video on Black Listed News.

And I am certainly not a fan of Mr. Carlson’s economic ideology or at least, not a fan of all of it. He and I do agree on the economic impact of unregulated immigration on the standards of living of the average indigenous workers be they here in the states or in Germany or Dubai. And we agree on things like the need to hold public officials accountable for their crimes, like Hillary Clinton for example.

Furthermore, I certainly agree with him, as most reasonable, rational humans should, that open honest debate on any subject is not only healthy for a society, but it should be almost mandatory. When any subject become so taboo that we start off the discussion of it with the words “the debate is over… the science is in…” then we are not doing ourselves or our culture any sort of service whatsoever and in fact, as Tucker said, in all likelihood, someone is trying to hide something. Which in the end, leads us back to that whole “accountability” thing.

With that in mind…

We are nearly 16 years into this post 9/11 world we live in and many things have changed since that horrible day. We know so much more today.

We know the Patriot Act, passed only after another terror attack (Amerithrax anthrax attack that was originally framed as coming from Iraq but actually came from here in the U.S. via Department of Defense anthrax), had nothing to do with making us safer as it was sold at the time and had everything to do with controlling the population.

We know that 9/11 and al Qaeda have been used as justification for attacks on numbers of countries above and beyond Afghanistan and Iraq (which had nothing to do with 9/11) and to this day still serves as the ultimate justification for our military involvement in others (Somalia and Yemen for example)

We know, in fact, every military endeavor we fight today finds it’s roots buried deeply in 9/11 since the only congressional Authorization for Use of Military Force they have right now comes from Sept. 18, 2001 and specifically targets al Qaeda or their affiliated organizations.

We know al Qaeda and their affiliates are currently fighting on our behalf in Syria and there have been many who have written that we must SUPPORT al Qaeda and their affiliates in this effort just like we supported them when we used them to change the political landscape in the past in countries like Afghanistan and Yugoslavia.

We know al Qaeda was created for just such purposes by our very own Deep State.

We know that 9/11 was used by the neocons (and neoliberals) as the justification for many foreign military excursions and the expansion of the Military Industrial Complex which is right in line with PNAC’s “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” paper published Sept. 10th, 2000 and which called for a “New Pearl Harbor type event” to facilitate a faster process.

We now see over and over again the use of the term “false flag” creeping into our national discourse as many of them have been revealed over the past couple of years. False flags were once only discussed among the “conspiracy theorists” and now we see pastors painting “heil Trump” on their churches in order to motivate resistance to his presidency, we see Israelis and former reporters calling in false flag terror threats in order to demonize a certain segment of the population and we see an active duty German soldier arrested for preparing a false flag attack to demonize the leftists and the immigrants in his country. And apparently he did so with the full support of at least some of his superiors. And these are just a few of the ones we have seen recently.

We know now that false flags have been used in this country since 9/11 to sway public opinion or to motivate congressional action. The anthrax attack for example.

We also know false flag events were recommended long ago to the Kennedy administration and rejected via the now disclosed “Operation Northwoods” documents. That document posed false flag events as a way to motivate the American people toward accepting an all out war with Cuba.

We know for a fact that the vast majority of terror plots broken up by the FBI since 9/11 were actually planned, organized and facilitated by the FBI themselves using mentally challenged, deranged or desperately poor people they set up to be the patsies for these operations.

We know that agent provocateurs, a form of false flag operation, are used regularly here in the states in an effort to demonize protesters and create an atmosphere conducive to shutting down dissent.

And we know the effort to silence dissent on the internet and in the general discussions here in the states as well as in other Westernized “5 Eyes” countries across the world is reaching a fevered pitch. Facebook, Google and internet service providers are working diligently to stop the spread of what they call “fake news” and in fact, this very discussion about vaccines is a fine example of that. As is the discussion of what really happened on Sept. 11th, 2001.

Here are just a few of the other things we know about 9/11 specifically:

The 9/11 Commission Report was fraught with mistakes and holes in their theories. It was ultimately based almost entirely on the testimony of two men who were tortured until they gave that testimony and when congressional investigators demanded the records of those torture sessions, the CIA illegally destroyed all the records. We know that.

We know that the R.J. Lee study of the dust from 9/11 of 2003 titled “Composition and Morphology” concluded the thousands of tons of metallic micro-spheres found in the dust, micro-spheres that made up the key fingerprint of 9/11 dust, were determined, in their words, to have been caused by a “combustion event” and could not have been caused by any other factor.

“Various metals (most notably iron and lead) were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles. Exposure of phases to high heat results in the formation of spherical particles due to surface tension. Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel).”  2003 RJ Lee Group report page 17

“In addition to the spherical iron and aluminosilicate particles, a variety of heavy metal particles including lead, cadmium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, bismuth, and barium particles were produced by the pulverizing, melting and/or combustion of the host materials such as solder, computer screens, and paint during the WTC Event. Combustion-related products are significant WTC Dust Markers, particularly if seen in combination. However, it is worth noting that fly ash and partially combusted products can occur in trace concentrations in ordinary building dusts, but not in the concentrations observed in WTC Dust.”  2003 RJ Lee Group page 19

We know that over 2,000 architects and engineers have signed onto a call for a new independent investigation into the collapse of building 1,2 and 7 of the World Trade Center complex because they all agree that the explanation offered by the Nation Institute for Science and Technology is a physical impossibility.

We know that it is impossible for Building 7 to have collapse nearly perfectly into it’s own footprint falling at near free fall acceleration could not have been caused by office fires and in fact NIST has never released the full data on how they came to the conclusions that they did.

We know that a high school science teacher (David Chandler) forced NIST to change their interpretation of the evidence of the collapse of Building 7, having to admit it came down at near free fall acceleration which is impossible without the assistance of a controlled demolition using high explosives.

And we know NIST never tested for trace residual elements in any of the 9/11 debris that would have proven one way or another if conventional high explosives were used on Sept. 11th, 2001. They made the determination that they didn’t need to because an owner of a controlled demolition company told them they didn’t have to. That same company owner was on site during the events of 9/11 and was subsequently granted a contract to oversee the clean-up operation of Ground Zero.

If we look back over the years we will find many of the real 9/11 Truth advocates predicted the foreign policy we see developing today. And we see that many other agencies seem to be incorporating the false flag into their normal everyday operating procedures. We see false flags being used everywhere from churches here in the states to attacks on UN aid convoys in Syria to the downing of airliners flying over Ukraine to chemical weapons attacks in Idlib province. We see this normalization of this extreme tactic because, quite frankly, there has been no accountability since 9/11 in this regard.

What is laid out before you is not a conclusive determination of fault or even one that proves a larger conspiracy. It implies both but proves neither.

What it does do is show, I believe conclusively, is that we need to have this discussion (to borrow a catchphrase) a real, open discussion, about the events of 9/11 which is the primary catalyst for many of the developments we have seen since that day. Developments that many of us, most of us, oppose.

Mr. Carlson says he believes there should be no sacred cows when it comes to public discussions and on this, just as with his opinion about unregulated open borders and even the need to prosecute Hillary Clinton, I agree with him. In fact, I couldn’t agree with him more.

Tucker Carlson says he takes his cues from his texts and his emails. I wonder if that is true. Maybe we should find out. You can send him a message via Twitter here. Or you might be able to contact him via Fox News Insider at [email protected]

We are an older and much wiser nation today than we were 16 years ago. For the most part, the Deep State is something that has come out of the “conspiracy theory” closet and made it’s appearance on the main stage of public discussion. So to has the term “false flag”

For that matter, so too have the terms “fascism”, “globalization” and “New World Order” which many 9/11 Truth advocates believe is the over-arching motivation behind the New American Century the neocons envisioned all those years ago.

If we can openly discuss “false flags” and “globalization” today in public and we can watch advocates try to explain just how dangerous some vaccines are to our children on prime time network news, I wonder if we are ready to sit down and have a talk about what has led us to this point we find ourselves in today. I wonder how far someone like Tucker Carlson is willing to go in order to uphold his stated objection to the groupthink that says some topics must never see the light of day in this, the post 9/11 world we find ourselves in.

With all due respect to those who lost loved ones on 9/11 or in the ensuing military engagement since, I think it would be good to see a real 9/11 Truth advocate on Tucker’s show. Not some disinformation hack spouting on and on about “ray beams from space” or “mini nukes” but someone posing legitimate questions about parts of the official story that don’t add up. Questions like those raised by folks when they read what I have posted above.

We are 16 years older than we were when we were “shocked and awed” by 9/11 and we have learned a great deal since then. The American public is much less naive and far more sophisticated in terms of seeing the Deep State for what it is and more importantly, what it wants.

I wonder if a rational, well spoken, well informed advocate for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 could be found and drafted for the purpose of having a little chat with Mr. Carlson. See if he really believes no subject is off limits.

No single event in this nation’s recent history is more foundational in terms of how and where we went off track than 9/11. Therefore, nothing is more important in terms of changing course than exposing the event for what it was and holding those accountable who designed and orchestrated it.

The evidence shows 9/11 was used at the key event in their pursuit of the New American Century and the evidence overwhelmingly shows we have been constantly lied to about the events of that day. And now we are not even allowed to seriously discuss them in public.

It was written that “those who control the past control the future… and those who control the present control the past” and this is especially true when it comes to the events of Sept. 11th, 2001. If we wish to regain a modicum of control of the direction this country is headed, we have to challenge their control of the story of 9/11 because in that truth lies the path to our freedom.

Are there anymore sacred cows that must not be disturbed? The evidence is before you. The science speaks for itself. The debate is not over and it will never be until we have it. All else comes from that humble beginning.

The only truth of 9/11 is we don’t know the truth. But someone does. Lets’ find it.

(For the record, I do not suggest for a minute that I be considered for that little project. I am not worthy of being a spokesman for any cause, much less one this important. However, just so you know I am a long-time advocate for 9/11 Truth, for a list of my research on 9/11, go here)

Tucker Carlson interviews Robert Kennedy Jr.

—

Please help keep us up and running if you can. Speaking truth ABOUT power since 2007

Thank you all so much

(For my mailing address, please email me at [email protected])