The Benghazi Difference -We The People & The Serious Business of Cleaning House. Insisting On Hearing The Truth About Benghazi Would Be A Good Place To Start

 

 

Jim O’Neill / Canada Free Press

 

Sean Smith, a 34-year-old information management officer…emailed a friend: “Assuming we don’t die tonight. We saw one of our ‘police’ that guard the compound taking pictures.” Hours later, he was dead.—Chris Stephen “US consulate attack in Benghazi: a challenge to official version of events”

 

”…we have four dead Americans. Whether it was because of a protest or because guys outside for a walk one night decided togo kill some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?” —Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

 

“I’d like to convey the following message to Obama. Listen, Obama: We are Egyptian women. You are listen, Obama? Shut up your mouth, Obama. Shut up your mouth, Obama! Our message to you, you donkey: No matter what you do, we will not restore the ousted president [‘Muslim Brotherhood’ leader Mohammed Morsi].”—Anonymous Egyptian woman on viral video

 

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Kabuki theater performance last year of fauxoutrage was one for the books, no doubt. On second thought…perhaps it was notphony outrage after all: how dare the Senate question her—her. The nerve.

 

In any event, not only did she dutifully provide the various media propaganda outlets with an emotive performance worthy of Hitler (”The indignation. And then, the tears in her eyes….”), but along the way she managed to plant not just one, but two, red herrings designed to mislead and misdirect: that is, the Benghazi attacks were the result of (1) protests, or (2) guys out for a walk.

 

Alas for Ms. Clinton, neither of her red herrings stands up to much scrutiny. Perhaps if they did it would indeed not make much of a difference which one caused the attacks in Benghazi on 9/11/12—but the real reason(s) make a great deal of difference.

 

Would you say that an element within the US government aiding and abetting America’s enemies during a time of war makes a difference? I would, and essentially that is what we are dealing with here.

 

I am not referring to the arms shipments to the Syrian rebels that were funneled from Libya via Turkey and Lebanon (although that is, or rather should be, of great concern to Congress). What I am chiefly concerned with is the aborted prisoner swap of Ambassador Stevens for “Muslim Brotherhood” icon Sheikh Omar abdel Rahman (the “Blind Sheikh”)—currently serving a life sentence in the US for his role in the deadly1993 WTC bombing.

 

For those of you who may not know, the imprisonment of the “Blind Sheikh” is very much a cause célèbre amongst Muslims, at least among its more radical factions. For example, according to a “CBS News” article:

 

Al Qaeda’s current leader, Ayman Al-Zawahri, has repeatedly invoked Rahman [the “Blind Sheikh”] as a reason for kidnapping and killing Westerners. In an undated two-hour videotape posted last October on militant forums, he said that abducting nationals of “countries waging wars on Muslims” is the only way to free “our captives, and Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman.”

 

continue reading at Canada Free Press:

 

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61760