The Late Great Planet Earth Redux

Ever since we took on the topic of the Large Hadron Collider and how its powerful tool in particle physics, we aimed at giving you facts to chew on and especially the dangers of what can happen if something at CERN was to go awry. We know that the scientists there are taking various risks and many feel that these risks drive us closer to an extinction level event.

CERN itself as a contained experiment, that safely does its job is not the problem.

The problem is the mad science that has gone into the building of such a machine, and the idea that something that powerful becoming a tool of war, a tool of environmental tinkering, or a tool of manipulating space time, opening dimensions and allowing strange particles or even stranger entities enter into our timeline.

CERN’s particle accelerators of course have been scrutinized as contributors to the various seismic disturbances that have rounded the planet during their stream dumps and fire ups.

Anthony Patch appeared on ground zero in Early March to get the word out about the power of these accelerators. Contrary to popular argument the information we presented was factual. We had even cited various other researchers that had determined that the powerful magnets at CERN could very well cause a small disturbance underground that would be quite capable of causing a “Butterfly effect” that would trigger seismic activity in the form of earthquakes and volcanic activities.

But what is a “butterfly effect” and how is it that we can point CERN’s experiments and contributors to a violent earth?

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions, where a small change at one place in a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences to a later state.

Chaos theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions, an effect which is popularly referred to as the butterfly effect. Small differences in initial conditions yield widely diverging outcomes for chaotic systems, rendering long-term prediction impossible in general. This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved. In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable. This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos.

The magnetic core of the earth can at times move about inside the earth creating all kinds of anomalous activity that theoretically can be manipulated by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in Geneva. Perhaps the particle accelerator can provide a butterfly effect capable of triggering earthquakes in places that are the most vulnerable.

In 1995, geophysicist Markus Gurk completed a study where he theorized that the Alps, an extensive mountain range in Europe, had areas deep underneath the mountains of highly charged electric currents that flowed through what is called a “crustal conductor.”

He also cited areas in the Himalayas near Nepal, the Andes near Chile, Southeast Asia and the islands that are Deep South near Antarctica. He stated then that any disturbance intentional or natural would trigger possible earthquakes and volcanoes in these regions.

Ever since CERN has fired it beams and has done their experiments we may have been witnessing a butterfly effect, which has triggered an earthquake or volcano in every region that was specified in the report.

Applying Hypothetical Event Analysis it is proposed that a spatial decoupling of the induction processes with depth and a conductivity anomaly is presumably due to the northward indentation by the Adriatic plate.

Today people believe that they are powerless to make significant change in the world. The Butterfly Effect and Chaos Theory prove that even trivial actions will have consequential outcomes. I would surmise that while the immediate foreseeable future may be predictable, the long-term future remains random. We can then conclude that the future “is not” static, and that we are in fact, the masters of our own destiny.

However a new wave of science creates a political Hegelian dialectic which once again pushes toward a late great planet earth philosophy.

According to the new technocratic thought, no matter what happens we are doomed. That is of course if we shift our thoughts and pay restitution to struggling countries who believe that Americans are selfish devourers of resources on this planet.

Doom and catastrophe are a constant on this planet; however no one in the mainstream media is speaking about complexity theory of even the idea that from the chaos comes order and that most the things regenerate and repair themselves over time, including ecosystems.

Climate change is a constant of nature and everyone agrees that climate over time can change the way we live on the planet. The only problem is, one weather anomaly shows up and immediately that grand narrative begins to say “Unprecedented” or “record breaking.”

I total and with statistical data we can see that the media has jumped on to weather anomalies as some proof that what is happening as a result of anthropogenic global warming. Oh, bit no longer are we to use such an archaic statement and so to be fair and to go full circle we must repeat until we are blue in the face that the climate is indeed changing and transforming in ways not conducive to humans and other beings.

Now let us set aside all political arguments about just who or what is responsible for the change in climate, and open up a dialogue with regard to those who are set on eliminating all complexity theories, ushering in an attitude of climate catastrophism and even worse climate extremism.

The idea of a climate catastrophism or even Climate Determinism, however, so prevalent in the rhetoric of historical climate change research, has given the media and others carte blanche in telling us that the floods in Texas are rare, that the droughts in California are unprecedented, and that two tornadoes forming in a cloud are proof of climate change turned up in volume to that of climate apocalypse.

If our fate is apocalypse, then what can we do about the so called change? How is it that some grass roots effort in changing our habits is going to mean anything at all, especially when it seems that proton cannons and ionospheric heaters are showing that they may be contributing to our end time’s determinism.

Moreover, the false panic of apocalyptic rhetoric provides the rationale to ignore the current suffering of the marginalized and the disenfranchised.

When we strip away the apocalyptic rhetoric, we can see that we are not all in this together. But apocalyptic rhetoric forecloses the possibility of radical democratic politics.

We are seeing that within the hollow speeches of apocalyptic meltdown, we hear of starvation in Africa, and overpopulation leading to reproductive laws being introduced in Egypt.

It makes politics, in fact, negligible. In its place we are forced to entrust our futures to a non-democratic technocratic elite, who do nothing but profit from climate catastrophism and logic naiveté.

Are we to believe that a false rapid descent into climate determinism has been caused by our industrial age?

Take for example an ABC news story that was filed in 2008.

Appearing on Good Morning America in 2008, Bob Woodruff hyped Earth 2100, a special that pushed apocalyptic predictions of the then-futuristic year of 2015.

The segment included supposedly prophetic videos, such as a teenager declaring, “It’s June 8th, 2015. One carton of milk is $12.99.”

On the actual June 8, 2015, a gallon of milk cost, on average, $3.39.

Another clip featured this prediction for the current year: “Gas reached over $9 a gallon.” In reality, gas costs an average of $2.75. A gallon. Furthermore the video takes several sound bites out of context and even extends a prediction that in 2015 most of New York would be underwater and that most of the Gulf States would be destroyed due to heavy hurricane activity.

None of the dire predictions given seven years ago have come true.

The national news media outlets had creative license to scare everyone into believing that eight years ago we would be under water or worse it comes to weather coverage, or climate monitoring.

Which brings us back to the Houston flooding and how the news outlets have sold the gullible on this being part of manmade global climate disruption.

It was reported as “unprecedented and that Houston was “under water due to manmade global warming.

No doubt the flooding in Houston was severe; it was also a serious threat to life and property. It was a natural disaster but absolutely not “unprecedented”. Flooding from Tropical Storm Allison in 2001 was more widespread, and flood waters were deeper. There is no comparison. Many pictures that were used in the media were accidentally those that were taken during the Allison disaster.

Flood events in 2009, 2006, 1998, 1994, 1989, 1983, and 1979 brought higher water levels to most of Houston, and there were many very serious flood events before the 1970s.

No one will laundry list statistics, they will only inform you of the catastrophe, and the determinism that signals there is now way out.

This is why the fatalistic views provided by paid of scientists are obvious now, and with the acknowledgements that the military can control the weather brings up yet another argument about just who is responsible for the weather changes.

The US Air Force and DARPA would like us to believe that they have stopped using HAARP for research and experiment. Now it is believed that the main array was taken down in Alaska, however we have been told that there are other HAARP systems out there in the form of radar communication and surveillance systems that are rigged on top of mobile platforms that are deployable anywhere in the world.

Unnatural weather patterns suggest HAARP is still here. However just saying so is not enough. Political people will overlook HAARP as a tool for climate disruption because it does not fit their agenda.

It is something that is overlooked in the mainstream dialectic, because ten the balm would be on the military industrial complex and not on common people who now have developed a sense of Stockholm syndrome thinking that we should all pay for are carbon sins.

One year ago a Senate hearing was held. David Walker, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering, dropped a bombshell in answer to a question asked by Lisa Murkowski in relation to the dismantling of the $300 million High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program in Gakona.

Walker said this is “not an area that we have any need for in the future” and it would not be a good use of Air Force research funds to keep HAARP going. “We’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do,” he said.

“To inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it. But that work has been completed.”

Therefore HAARP and all of its different models are now capable of weather control.

So now there is a question over just who or what is commanding super cell storms to perform on cue for climate change catastrophists?

There is more to the story, sure there is climate change, however the disruptions are conveniently happening so that we can apply a climate Hegelian dialectic that convinces meteorological chicken little’s to get all red faced at the government because they are dragging their feet on some solution.

I am not a skeptic of Climate change, I am not at all opposed to saying that CERN’s experiments are doing nothing to the Geosphere—however looking at the data of what was proposed early on and now what can be seen as apocalyptic determinism by Climate doomsayers – I believe it is time to reign ourselves in and say that the science is not conclusive. Theory and fear have given us many things to speculate on – and maybe we can all be correct. However leaving it up to the technocrats to push their agenda towards are doom is something I cannot accept and will not accept at face value.

Text – Check out Ground Zero Radio with Clyde Lewis Live Nightly @ http://www.groundzeromedia.org