You End: Uninvolved In Peace

While the world is discussing the battle being waged in Syria, the United Nations has been busy making plans for the world and those plans sound like something from a very bad science fiction movie.

After their summit wrapped up at the end of the month, the mainstream narrative was unable to inform the people about what can be seen as the United Nation’s attempt at creating a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world’s most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.

The 2030 blueprint for what is called “sustainable development” sounds like it got all of its ideas from the John Lennon song, “Imagine.”

In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine voted John Lennon’s song, “Imagine,” the third greatest song of all time. Former president Jimmy Carter observed that “in many countries around the world… you hear John Lennon’s song, ‘Imagine,’ used almost equally with national anthems.” The song is indeed beautiful.

However, Lennon was quoted in the book, Lennon in America, by Geoffrey Giuliano as saying that the song is “an anti-religious, anti-nationalist, anti-conventional, anti-capitalist song, but because it’s sugar-coated, it’s accepted.” Lennon also described the song as “virtually, the Communist Manifesto.”

Songs like “Imagine” were believed to be a product of the age old philosophy of “collectivism,” philosophies emphasizing the collective over the individual fighting for a common cause or threat. Marxism, more than any other philosophy, has influenced modern collectivist thinking by adding equality and fraternity to the traditional collectivist values.

However, there is a line in that famous song that says “Imagine all the people living lives in peace” –and where this verse ends it continues with the idea being a dream and that only dreamers think of world peace. It is most certainly an understatement because while some people believe that this 2030 agenda will bring world peace, the U.N. is demonstrating that they are uninvolved in peace keeping efforts with regards to the enforcement of such an agenda. Marxism always moves in to fill the vacuum left behind by anarchy. That is why the U.N. has seen fit to flex its muscles in the United States to try and bring order.

Blue helmeted United Nations personnel will be replacing municipal police forces whose ranks have been harassed and hollowed out because of civil unrest and violent activism that critics say will increase because of proposals that will limit personal freedoms in the United States.

There have now been several reports about a secret meeting that took place during the U.N. Summit that proposed the idea of something called the Strong Cities Network.

The Strong Cities Network is being launched in a timely or somewhat coincidental moment when millions of illegal aliens are flooding American borders. This of course is the alternative to the “wall” proposed by Republican presidential nominee, Donald Trump.

Trump tells us that the wall would be paid for by Mexico but the United Nations sees fit to move into the United States to oversee the borders and of course, we hear nothing about this from the Obama administration.

It is only left to be reported by concerned independent sources and Canadian and European news sources. Unfortunately, if it is reported by any other sources that are not bought and paid for by the elite, it becomes more conspiracy “crank” new world order talk that will immediately be seized upon by trolls and supporters of the Obama betrayal.

The Strong Cities Network is being launched at a time when citizens who dare to stand up for individual rights are automatically branded as dissenters who must be cowed into silence.

The project came from out of nowhere and was introduced at United Nations headquarters on September 30th, 2015 by Attorney General, Loretta Lynch.

It has been stated that The Strong Cities Network will be implemented “to strengthen community resilience against violent extremism” With no public input, no Congress debate or vote, it will be blue helmets and not local cops who will be policing the streets of America.

This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself.

The Department of Justice issued a press release that stated:

“Cities are vital partners in international efforts to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism. Local communities and authorities are the most credible and persuasive voices to challenge violent extremism in all of its forms and manifestations in their local contexts. While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.

The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”

The Strong Cities Network (SCN) – which launches September 29th at the United Nations – will empower municipal bodies to fill this gap while working with civil society and safeguarding the rights of local citizens and communities.

The SCN will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.

Nowhere does the 2030 agenda and the Strong Cities Network enforcement indicate that “achieving human freedom” is one of its goals. This is a nightmare that has been spoken of by conspiracy theorists for decades and now by some stroke of irony, the notion becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Mostly all talk and no action, the U.N. has never in its entire history strengthened community resilience against violent extremism, no matter how compelling the need and is, in fact, on the public record for standing down in many instances.

Where was the U.N. enforcement when the desperate call for more troops came from a genocide conducted in Rwanda?

So the question is why now, and why the United States?

As an international body ever expanding its power base, and ever failing at the international level, the U.N. has been active at the municipal level of government where it first advanced its intrusive Agenda 21, now Agenda 2030.

Anyone who questions these moves will be painted with the conspiracy theorist brush.

The act of U.N. “enforcement” seems to now be the clandestine military police unit for the entire planet. The prophetic words of Henry Kissinger, which can be found in a quote taken from a Bilderberg meeting, shows the passivity of American citizens towards the ever encroaching U.N. jackboot of the new world.

At the 1991 Bilderberg Conference at Evian, France, Kissinger allegedly remarked that:

“Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.”

Back in 2014, it was proposed at the Bilderberg Conference that in order to move U.N. troops into the United States, the country would have to be driven to the point of becoming a rogue state.

It seems a bit too late to revive the Constitution and Americans are too stunned to move out of the way of the steam roller called tyranny that will flatten any and all that defy. The implications of many Americans from the lowly to the high and mighty in crimes against the state will become the norm in just a few short months.

Not enough Americans will admit that the whole threat of terrorism was used in order to open the dialogue about the police state and the dialogue has been favorable because whenever we witness the lights and sirens chasing someone, we immediately think that the police state is good thing and that the surveillance apparatus is working.

Americans are not aware that they are facing a privacy danger, a danger of being murdered by their own government.

The United Nations has been warned that its protracted negotiations over the future of lethal autonomous weapons or “killer robots” are moving too slowly to stop robot wars becoming a reality. They are moving too slowly to enforce the use of drones to destroy “extremists.”

Lobbying for a pre-emptive ban on the weapons is intensifying at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, but a deal may not emerge quickly enough to prevent devices from being deployed, experts say.

It appears that the foot dragging over use of Artificial Intelligence and robot weapons and autonomous drones is also part of the plan.

After all, we all know now that the Jade Helm 15 exercises were not going to create the need for Martial Law, but to prepare the military to apply Operational Analysis of “War Gaming” and JADE holographic imaging in order to find “extremists” and to generate human terrain systems in geographic population centric locations to identify and eliminate targets, insurgents, rebels or whatever labels that can be flagged as targets in a Global Information Grid for Network Centric Warfare environments.

I am sure that the need for the monitoring of urban settings in what were called “problem areas” – was pretext for the “Strong Cities Network.”

No fully autonomous weapons are yet in use, but many semi-autonomous lethal precursors are in development. One such weapon is the South Korean sentry robot SGR-1, which patrols the country’s border with North Korea and detects intruders as far as two miles away using heat and light sensors.

The robots are armed with machine guns and although currently controlled by humans from a distance, they are reportedly capable of making a decision to kill without human intervention.

Israel is deploying machine-gun turrets along its border with the Gaza Strip to target Palestinian infiltrators automatically. And the UK’s Taranis fighter jet flies autonomously and can identify and locate enemies. Although it does not yet act completely autonomously, it was described by a defense procurement minister as having “almost no need for operator input.”

Campaigners from across the fields of robotics and technology have made several high-profile pleas for a pre-emptive ban on offensive autonomous weapons in the past two years, including in a letter in July that was signed by more than 1,000 artificial intelligence researchers.

The letter said offensive weapons that operate on their own would lower the threshold of going to battle and result in greater loss of human life.

Only five countries have backed a ban so far, with countries such as the US, the UK and France arguing that a human will always have “meaningful control” over a robots decision to kill – a concept that is much debated.

The idea of enforcement in the proposed New World Order will consist of blue helmeted troops being assisted by the most advanced technology and mechanized death. It is devastating and demeaning that our leaders are willingly allowing to happen, the very things we fought two world wars to stop.

Finally, The Strong Cities Network will include an International Steering Committee of approximately 25 cities and other sub-national entities from different regions that will provide the Strong Cities Network with its strategic direction. The Strong Cites Network will also convene an International Advisory Board, which includes representatives from relevant city-focused networks, to help ensure the Strong Cities Network builds upon their work. It will be run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a leading international “think-and-do” tank with a long-standing track record of working to prevent violent extremism.

Remember no Congress decisions, no input from the people, and no talk of how this will create a means for more freedom and safety.

This plan amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.

Take a look at what violent extremism looks like in other countries – and then let us talk about the expansion of a U.N. Strong Cities Network and police actions that justify deadly force in a country that says it is the “Home of the Free.”

Those who live under the gun and wish to rebel will be the new terrorists.

Text – Check out Ground Zero Radio with Clyde Lewis Live Nightly @ http://www.groundzeromedia.org