Around here, that’s asking a lot.

“The Big Bang Never Happened” by Eric Lerner is an old one, but a good one.

Of course we’ve learned since that book that the “uniform” glow of the cosmic background is not at all uniform. And if you combine that with the fact that the frequency/temperature didn’t match Big Bang predictions to start with….they got nothin’.

“Seeing Red” by Halton Arp is important.

Curved space, well, you could read Tesla’s remarks, or just think it through.

It’s absurd to claim that something without substance can have shape, like the grin that remains after the Cheshire Cat disappears, in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.

And if space had curvature, what forces us to follow the curve instead of cutting across it.

And if gravity is space curvature, then by definition, an absence of gravity would be flat space. So, the barycenter of two bodies, between them, where the “gravity” is balanced, would be flat space. By definition.

And if there were flat space between them, they wouldn’t be affecting each other gravitationally.

It wouldn’t hurt you to think these things through. Or, you could just parrot the nonsense that is being peddled, for billions of dollars of public money. If those guys had any idea what they were talking about, there wouldn’t be any mysteries left to solve after over a century of this crap.