Loading...
Profile image
By Jeffery Pritchett
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

NASA Got Sick of Moon Landing Conspirators and Released 10,000 Photos From Apollo Mission

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Some say it was a giant leap for humanity, some say it was fake, some even say Stanely Kubrick directed it. However, the landing on the moon is still a subject that evokes mixed emotions.

Recently,  NASA uploaded just about every image captured by Apollo astronauts on lunar missions,  which you can find on their Project Apollo Archive Flickr account.

There are some 8,400 photographs in all at a resolution of 1800 dpi, and they’re sorted by the roll of film they were on.

Here are some of them:

Loading...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source TheVintageNews.com

Check out more contributions by Jeffery Pritchett ranging from UFO to Bigfoot to Paranormal to Prophecy

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at
www.mitocopper.com


Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets"  with  Natural Cures THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver! Destroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens with Oxygen plus Silver!

Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Organic Hemp Extract (CBD) - Full Spectrum high CBD (3300mg) hemp extract eases stiff joints, relieves stress and more!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)


FINAL WARNING!  Diseases are EXPLODING!  Watch this Video about APeX and You'll THROW AWAY Your Colloidal Silver!  APeX destroys Viruses, Bacteria and other Pathogens with the power of Oxygen PLUS Silver!  Nobody else has a product like THIS!   See why the inventor hasn't been sick in 16 years and why you'll never hear about it on the FAKE NEWS!  Get some now and tell your friends about it too so we can reach more people!  


APeX Interview - Superior to Colloidal Silver from Lee Canady on Vimeo.


Learn about APeX Here and Get the 50 Page Report in PDF format.   Call us at 888-809-8385 to order by phone.



Report abuse
Loading...
    Loading...

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 83 comments
    • The Thinning Veil Report

      LOL

      OH JEFFERY.

      answer this:

      who filmed the ‘astronauts’ leaving the surface of the moon?
      did they leave someone behind?

      also, why is the ground below the lander undisturbed from the ‘thrusters’?

      and….

      the earth rise pic’s size is all wrong. the earth should be much, much larger as filmed from the moon.

      10,000 or ten million, nobody went to the moon because we can’t. not then, not now, not ever.

      the moon is a luminary, not terra firma.

      jeesh. how much evidence do you need? do you need an admission on cnn?

      BAHAHAHA

      • unidentified

        you think its just a nightlight nothing else :roll:

      • The Clucker

        “the moon is a luminary, not terra firma.”

        To quote you in response to your own statement…

        “BAHAHAHA”

        I don’t know if we ever went to the moon, but to say it is just a luminary is stupid beyond belief. I liked you more when you were trying to convince people to drink their own urine, TLS.

        • FAT AXL!!!

          Why, urine therapy (aka as piss-drinking) just might be to blame for all of this flat-earth nonsense!!!

          Don’t drink your own urine folks!!!

          It will do terrible things to your brain.

          [I would thank TLS for demonstrating this for us, so that we could learn from her mistakes rather than suffer the consequences ourselves, but which of us was ever going to drink our own piss in the first place?]

          But we should definitely take a poll and find out how many flat-earthers have ingested their own bodily waste.

          Good job Cluckenhammergoldenstainstein.

          • Jeffery Pritchett

            What they apparently fail to realize Elvis is that I put up these posts to induce flat earth moon landing bar brawls for my own Loki trickster like amusement.

            • iamamerican

              I haven’t been on here in awhile, so Jeffrey have you heard that NASA announced they were shutting down the live feed camera on Sept. 1? There is too much a activity going on up there around the ISS and they aren’t quick enough to shut down the live feed so they’re just going to shut it down to the public.

            • Jeffery Pritchett

              Yep Iamamerican I put up an article about it yesterday if you look on my bio list.

          • Mayhem

            Unless Uropathy is known to keep stupidity in a closed loop in which case exactly half the folk should be encouraged to drink up and i bet that a rule about it would make lazy people smarten their act up real quick.

          • The Clucker

            “…but which of us was ever going to drink our own piss in the first place?”

            Interesting question indeed. More than likely the answer is 0.

            “Good job Cluckenhammergoldenstainstein”

            Thanks, King. I’m guessing that by the end of that moniker you just threw out that you’ve got “Mandella Effect” on your brain. Stein, stain, whatever. They were bears and there was possibly some porridge involved but at the end of the day we’re all just roaming around like zombies, I guess.

            It’s a good day to die.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8nRgAK-Qc4

            • RAIN

              Hey Cluck! Ask me why I haven’t added any comments here.

              Call me on the Bat Phone.

              time to rev up the Batmobile.. heh

            • The Clucker

              Sorry for the late response RAIN man. Bat phone tomorrow if I can remember anything these days.

      • Real Expert

        Veil! Houston Anon here! Aren’t ya happy to see me? Well good!
        Remember a long time ago when I told you they used gold foil
        to protect them from radiation, and you told me I was crazy?
        Look at all that gold foil and gold panels all over that LEM huh?
        Wow! You surely didn’t make a monkey out of me!

        Now, why isn’t the soil disturbed so much under the LEM?
        I thought I explained that to you as well. With 1/6th gravity,
        you cannot run the motor anywhere near the surface, or you
        would fly way up into space.. As I told you back then, download
        the game called “Lunar Lander” and try to run the engine near
        the surface and see what happens to you.. So that one is not
        a viable question, since they actually soft bounce onto the surface.

        You have yet to explain to everyone, what power source the
        moon uses for your luminary theory. And you also have not
        explained how the phases of the moon would work if it was a
        luminary.. What do vast sections just decide to black out, in
        perfect sync with how the sun’s shadows would affect it? Wow,
        what a coincidence, huh? So your luminary just decides to
        to blank out for no apparent reason? How silly! Just that
        in itself makes any thinking person, able to see through your
        fabricated lies!

        Now, how can you tell if the moon’s size is all wrong?
        Do you know how much telephoto lens is being used
        to make your accusations?? Didn’t think so! Unless you
        know exactly what settings they have dialed in on the lens,
        you can’t possibly know if the size is off or not!

        And my other question, you simply refuse to answer is:
        IF it’s so close, it should be easy to get to, so you can
        land on the luminary and check it out.. Why has not
        any nation gone and proved it to be just a luminary
        by now? Reason, it has been visited by us, and we
        proved it to be a small planetoid in earth’s orbit.
        Want proof? Look above!

        • JKnTX

          And I would believe that almost as much as in little green men from Alpha Centauri.

          • Real Expert

            That’s what’s wrong with you ! You don’t believe in anything!
            Go jump off the Clear Lake lighthouse!

            • JKnTX

              Your problem it seems is that you do.

              “Belief is the enemy of the Truth”.

              Plato

              The lighthouse is a fairly recent addition, and you can lead the way, and I am NOT kidding.
              If you were in the local area as long as you claim, then surely you remember Mueke’s at Kemah, no? Ball is in your court.

            • Real Expert

              Dear JKnTX, I didn’t get on here to
              get into a pissing contest with you on who
              has lived in the Houston area the longest!
              As old of a fart as you, I will digress and let
              you win that one old man! By the sound
              of it, you were one of the first settlers in
              the area! I am pretty sure you had to
              fight off dinosaurs to claim your part
              of the swamp. You win! We never went
              to the moon, you can win that in your
              little pea brain too.. I will let you be as
              stupid as you are, and as ancient as
              dirt! Do us proud old boy! Help these
              degenerates spread their false theories.
              And shame on you! You should know
              better! Have at it old man!

          • Real Expert

            Ah, Just kidding JKnTX. Don’t go near that lighthouse.
            Since it’s so close to NASA, it’s probably not real either.

        • LifeIs

          Foil is no protection at all from high energy electrons. They produce X rays when they hit metal. And foil is no protection from neutrons, from the Sun and from the Moon’s surface. (Check out the radiation information from the most recent LRO.) It’s no protection from gamma rays either.

          And the Van Allen probes told us just a few years ago that the intensity changes constantly, and unpredictably, and can increase by a factor of 1,000 in a period of 12 hours. Electrons. The X ray producers.

          I don’t know WHAT makes you think rockets fly by ground effects. What the hell? No. It’s the 3rd law of motion. Ah, but you have a magic rocket engine, powerful enough that a FRACTION of its propellant, the part that isn’t going sideways in all directions, can BLAST the spacecraft up, up, and away! Without disturbing the dust on the ground.

          I don’t know what makes you think you can “bounce” without power onto the lunar surface. There is no way to soft-land without rocket power, and rocket engines blow away dust. Rocket engines blow away dust.

          LEAF BLOWERS blow dust.

          It’s not easy, either, to soft-land. Luna 5 and Luna 7 and Luna 8 tried and failed. Before Luna 9 succeeded.

          And no, the lag time was not 20 seconds. It’s more like 3 seconds, for a signal to go both ways. And I don’t know why I ever believed that a remote control camera was tracking the ascent stage. The same “remote control” that tracked the astronauts. It’s ludicrous.

      • Real Expert

        Veil, Houston here again. “Who filmed the astronauts
        leaving the moon?” .. This gives it away either how young
        you are, or how you failed to pay attention back in the day.
        Story time for ya!

        Back after the very first landings, on subsequent landings
        they set a camera up on a tripod that was controlled by
        a tech sitting right here at a console in good old Houston!
        There was a good 20 second lag time in the signal from when
        he moved his toggle control, until the camera actually responded.
        We who watched it all “live” knew all about the lag, as they told us
        alll about it as we watched.. It was a big drama to everyone at the
        time as for if the operator was going to be able to move the
        camera with enough lead time to follow them up as they rose
        off the surface. It was a big drama thing at the time!
        Will he be able to do it? Or will he fail miserably? The whole
        earth was watching his ability to guess right and control the
        camera to follow it! Sure enough, he did a great job and
        caught it very well indeed! We all cheered as we watched
        it happen in real time.. the news guys, and technicians at
        NASA, and all of us roared with out approval that the dude
        did it! He was the hero of the day! (Of which your have no
        heroes), but now you know who filmed them taking off!
        A guy who was an extremely good guesser, and planner
        sitting at his HOUSTON console did it!

        Question: What was the first word spoken from the surface
        of the moon?

        Answer: HOUSTON!

        • JKnTX

          I have lived in good old hot humid Houston since before NASA existed at Clear Lake, and what you are saying is BS. You write like someone who was born in the 1980s or later, not old enough to have been onsite in the late ’60s to early 70s.

          • Real Expert

            How I write determines my age? Trust in this captain JKnTx, I was
            born decades before the 80′s.. I was of age when I watched every
            EVA happen live on the moon. However, thanks for the compliment!
            I wish I was as young as you think I must be! Less aches and pains!
            That would rule!

            • JKnTX

              BS.
              I wouldn’t trust you as far as I can spit you out through a soda straw.

              “That would rule”!

              If what you say is so, then why are you using a valley girl term that nobody in my generation or earlier ever heard of or would use?

      • chefjim

        You are right about the earth being much larger when viewed from the earth’s surface – it would be an AMAZING sight (probably shown as small by NASA because the attempt to show the earth as how it would appear to someone standing on the moon would surely expose the whole thing as being fake otherwise, why would they show it being so small?) and I admit that there is much evidence against man’s claims to have landed on the moon but as far as the moon not being real, I beg to differ.

        “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.”

        There. It’s settled forever as TRUTH. (but won’t be taken as truth because foolish mankind has determined that everything came from NOTHING, not from God and has thrown away God’s written word without ever really reading it. Have you really read the bible? Has anyone reading THIS ever really read the bible to try and understand what it REALLY says and what it REALLY is?)

        • chefjim

          Sorry, I meant to say “the earth being much larger when viewed from the MOON’S surface”. (the very first sentence in the comment above. This comment thread needs an EDIT function!)

        • el martini

          I strive my best to never discuss religion even if it topic of discussion. if I want to argue my version of if there is a god, gods, or goddesses or whether they are fictitious then I will always go to a site or forum Designed for such discussions. Many of those exist. I will not do so because I personally believe that what 90 percent of the people on this earth, including mr chefjim, fail to realize is that they are all wrong and retarded. I laughed my ass off though at your comment so thank you.

          Really, truly is funny “thrown away gods written word” hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha you are a special one, aren’t you? Did god tell that as well?

      • Syco247

        You are a special kind of dense aren’t you, the moon is a night light and the sun is a spot light hanging from your dome. Get real, jeran, nobody buys this crap. You are possibly nuttier than geir.

        • Mongoose

          I checked with my telescope to see if there were shadows in the moons craters indicative of the moon reflecting the suns light as opposed to being a luminary itself and the evidence was conclusive.

          There were obvious shadows in the craters in indicative of the moon reflecting light from the sun. The moon is not a luminary.

          Also, the sun does not hang from the dome, if there is a dome it is separate from the sun. There is alot of disinformation being thrown out in order to make the flat earth stuff look and sound stupid.

          Nasa did not go to the moon. Duh.

          • RAIN

            YES Mongoose, the Earth is flat, resting on a pillar and covered by a dome.

            This is all commonly represented by the Cake Dish.

            and we’re all baked cake.

      • RAIN

        I’m a luminary too! Just watch me glow.

    • woggy

      funny they posted some of they pictures that show the usual shadows being cast from several light sources. look closely you will see shadows moving up down while others are diagonal. one light source ie. ‘ The Sun’ creates shadows that go in same direction. no scientific method or fancy equipment to see. go outside and look at the shadows. they all go same way here on earth with just the sun illuminating.

      • Mongoose

        yeah, mythbustes supposedly debunked this but they use a light source that was very close to the objecsts casting shadows.

        It is completely different when the supposed light source is supposedly 93,000,000 miles away, or even several thousand miles away.

    • Gittyup

      Same ole’, same ole’ stuff!

    • jtricer1973

      NASA is a bunch of liars!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • chefjim

        Never
        A
        Straight
        Answer

        • Busta Myth

          Nazi
          American
          Spy
          Agency

    • Mica Molecule

      Did NASA ever release the details and specifications of all their equipment designs? I don’t believe they did. Until they release the details and specifications of all their equipment designs and calculations for scientists and engineers to review & check NASA should remain under suspicion as big time liars.

      • Real Expert

        Okay Mica, at the time, we were in a space race with the Russians. Why
        would we spill out all of our designs for all to see? That was (back then)
        notional secrets! If you want to analyze those designs today, go to the
        Smithsonian Institute in DC and look to your hearts content! They are all
        sitting there for your detailed scientific scrutiny.

        • TuffENuff

          Would that be the same Smithsonian keeping all the giant skeletons in their basement? :mrgreen:

          • Syco247

            Yeah… sure they are

        • LifeIs

          I have seen complaints about people unable to get the design specs of the LEM. The specific interest is in the size of the doorway, and whether there’s room inside for an astronaut in a suit, with backpack, to maneuver through that door.

          I wouldn’t care to quibble about such a thing. There are too many obvious and irrefutable facts, that prove we did not send manned vehicles to the Moon.

          Soviet cooperation with the Apollo hoax is seen in their return of an Apollo capsule, which they found in the ocean in 1970. A US Coast Guard ship went to Murmansk to pick it up.

          The Russians were bought. (1) We kept quiet about their space hoaxes, starting with the Gagarin flight. (2) The “Great Grain Robbery” of 1972 was a large amount of American grain “sold” to the Soviet Union with US government financing.

          It’s not a matter of suspecting that Apollo-era NASA folk were big time liars, swindlers, murderers. We know that much.

    • Don - 1

      Hasselblad was the maker of the ”moon” cameras. The engineer who modified the camera for moon duty states that he cannot explain the strange lighting anomalies in the moon photos. Anomalies such as non-parallel shadows and secondary-lighting effects. His suggestion was to ask NASA. NASA has refused to reply.

      Also, please explain how raw old fashioned film could survive in an unshielded cameras from earth to moon and back.
      That raw film would have been fried to a crisp and totally fogged.

      All of the fake Apollo odyssey was filmed in a movie stage.

      • Real Expert

        Hey Don, who did the filming? About a month ago, Stanley Kubrick’s daughter
        said that her father did not do any such a thing! She also bitches people out for
        even thinking her father would deceive his fellow countrymen in such a manner!
        She says he absolutely did not do it. If not STanley Kubrick, (who everyone says
        did it) who else then did it? Waiting for your proof of who did it!

      • unidentified

        everything they reported in the media could have been faked just to get people thinking about traveling to the moon, now they want to excite the public about going to mars and starting the first human colony, they might also be working with non humans to get there

      • atomant

        Have a look at the size of the gloves those astronauts wear.Now ask yourself how on earth could they possibly operate a camera?

        • JKnTX

          Better question is how a film camera can operate in extreme cold or heat in the airless space such as supposedly exists on Luna. Or how the film itself managed to remain useable under such conditions? This was back long before digital cameras, remember?

    • Shorty

      1800 DPI images … wow … and look at all the stars.

    • Knuxyl

      pay me NASA’s salary and I will come up with 30,000 photos of me walking on the moon.

    • carolina4

      no stars. no natural sunlight.

      • Busta Myth

        All those photos and not a star in sight :roll:

        which is kinda strange for a HollyWeired Movie :wink:

        If anything that Herd of Project Paperclip NASA NAZIS like Werner von Braun would have weaponized Space, which is what he told Carol Rosin

        “You vil stop ze weaponisation of Space” ….swine hund pig doggies (Nazis always say that) :twisted:

        Alien Attack Planned as described by the Disclosure Project – Carol Rosin

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-wsBFSsCbI

      • TuffENuff

        They knew if they tried to fake the stars, amateur astronomers would figure it out right away.

        The earth is (according to NASA) four times larger than the moon, yet in one shot looking from the moon at earth it looks smaller than the moon, in another it looks much bigger.

        We used to think these NASA engineers were the Best and Brightest because they could put a man on the moon using slide rules. Total BS from top to bottom.

    • desertspeaks

      yay, more FAKE PHOTO’S FROM NASA!

    • guibus

      Everything about moon landing is obviously fake and there is material evidence in this : the moon rocks supposedly coming from the moon, and given to the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, is finally after examination just PETRIFIED WOOD certainly coming from ARIZONA !!!
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_lunar_sample_displays
      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32581790/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moon-rock-museum-just-petrified-wood/
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

      • Busta Myth

        Wow, petrified wood from Arizona eh?

        I’ve never seen that article before :lol:

        Yet another reasons why this smells like a BIG NAZI LIE

    • DK

      Well yes release the stock photos, but they are evidence of stock photos. what we wanted was the negatives which were subjected to days of RADIATION damage proving beyond doubt extra terrestrial origins.

    • pulltabjunkie

      NASA might as well have built the lunar lander out of plywood. It wouldn’t have been any more unbelievable than the crap in these photos. I’m embarrassed for the idiots on here defending them. There is just too much inconsistency here to list. This is just a case of ‘Same SH#T-Different Day”. It’s sunny and 200 degrees out today folks, but our astroNOTS are safe inside their tinfoil covered fort. They are going to take the huge ass rover (how did they get it there on the little tinfoil fort) out for a spin later and take some pictures. Don’t worry, the film is magical and won’t melt. Also, our magic fort can fly in and out without ground disturbance, and the magical golden tinfoil that we taped on will not come off, even when there is rocket thrust. Buzz Aldren flashing the Masonic ring AGAIN is my favorite.

      • Theron

        Plywood would have been stronger than mylar, aluminum foil and an erector set. :wink:

    • VirusGuard

      I am not sure if we went to the moon or not but soemthing sure as hell has stopped us from returning

      Advancements in designs and computers should make it a walk in the park to return so what is NASA playing at unless Russia and the USA signed a secret deal to never return to the moon.

      Somthing is not right, thats 4 sure

    • Mayhem

      The Moon, huh, how come we never went back?

      A solar array and a series of radio controlled, earth facing, nifty gadgets wouldn’t be of some use?

      How about “dark side” telescopes looking out?

      We built IRAIT & SPT, by the plane load, near the south pole so it’s doable.

      • Mayhem

        Doable based on the Apollo missions load carrying capacity and presuming it wasn’t just tinfoil covered plywood filmed in a Hollywood basement.

    • The Jesus Myth

      So NASA has released a bunch of better quality fakes. It just shows how far CGI has come in 47 years. The problem with higher-definition photos is that the masking tape, carboard and cooking foil are all the more obvious! Poor Buzz Lightyear. What a dreadful, ignominious legacy to leave to your kids…

    • Mark

      All fake photos dude… come on… don’t do like crazy flat earth promoters… be quiet about this lies… better!! :cool:

    • Dan the Man

      It’s just more trash. Where are the stars?

      • Busta Myth

        Hollywood :wink:

    • Look up...Wake up

      Where are all the STARS????
      Totally fake!
      NOT ONE STAR IN ANY OF THE ABOVE PHOTOS!!!!!

    • Ted

      Stanley takes good Still Photos. The guy was a Genius.

    • Emanuel

      Photo 22
      https://m.thevintagenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/561229bcc3618858358b4581.jpg

      Spacedude has a shadow with different angle than the lunar module…

      and the flag, has no shadow -.-

    • Don - 1

      Of the thousands of photos from the moon’s surface there is not one photo of an astronauts face. [Yes, I've seen the two blurry distant photos....they do not count.]

      For cripes’ sake wouldn’t you think that the uber famous Apollo Astronauts would want a photo of their face actually standing on the moon? At least to give to their kids.

      There’s a reason for no face photos. Ready? They were never on the moon. The people inside those space suits are on a movie sound stage and are…probably DOD or NSA actors.

    • Don - 1

      If anyone really believes that the Lander shown in pics 31 and 32 [above] landed on the moon, you have got to be gullible in the extreme. Look closely, its nothing but black cardboard, Scotch Tape, curtain rods and other miscellaneous flotsam.

      I visited JPL back in 1985 and they had a similar space vehicle in the lobby, built the same way…black cardboard and lots of Scotch tape. The duty engineer told me it was a MOCK-UP.

      • Busta Myth

        And it only cost about $10 Trillion dollars +++ lol :wink:

        But think how much money they made selling space movies and space toys to Gazillions of little kiddies that saved up with their pocket money to buy them

    • JKnTX

      Methinks they protest too much. All they did was prove twice nothing is still nothing.

      • Real Expert

        “Methinks” is a valley girl term.. Straighten up antique man, and talk
        like a dinosaur!

    • HAPPY chem TRAILS 2 you

      I cannot fully commit to saying that I know for a fact that the moon landings were faked, however based on what I’ve discovered in recent years about our dishonest and corrupt gobernment and how it works and who controls it, I would say that there’s a good chance that it was Hollywood smoke and mirrors. When you see the Nasa logo’s and mission emblems and symbols that have paganistic orgins and have links to Freema$onry and know doubt the Je$uits are probably involved as well, then it all starts to smell fishy. If I had to put a percent on it I would say that there is a 70 percent chance that it was FAKED and a thirty percent chance that it was real. Nasa put out a video a while back talking about going to Mars, well in the video this Nasa engineer is explaining about the difficult challenges of how to get a maned space craft through the Van Allen radiation belts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt :idea: :idea: ..AAHH did they just let the cat out of the bag??… If they’re trying to figure out TODAY how to get a man through the dangerous Van Allen radiation belt for a Mars mission, then how did they do it back in 1969?? check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlXG0REiVzE

      • HAPPY chem TRAILS 2 you

        And just a side note to my above comment. They would have had to travel through those same radiation belts to get to the moon as they would to go to Mars.

    • Anonymous

      If you Google “NASA Pics No Stars”, you get the answer as to why the stars don’t show up in the photos. That’s what I did and it sounds reasonable to me. But, they made me learn critical thinking while I was in graduate school, the bastards. That has really made life difficult.

      • JKnTX

        I learned a long time ago to always think for yourself, you will live longer. And whom exactly is it that foots the bills for both Google and NASA?
        Well Shazam! It is probably the same guys that painted the fake NASA markings on the U-2 after Gary Powers got zapped and tried to pass the whole thing off as a navigational error.

      • LifeIs

        But we already know why there are no stars in the pictures.

        It’s the reason no one has even pretended to send humans out of low Earth orbit, except the US between the years 1966 and 1972. (Radiation.)

        If you were knowledgeable or thoughtful, you’d know that the Van Allen probes in the 21st century established that the radiation intensity can increase by a factor of 1,000 in a period of 12 hours.

        The belts constantly change intensity, and it has nothing to do with the sun, and it is unpredictable.

        You should be thinking, why didn’t we know this before. And, NASA had no way to estimate what the radiation dosage would be for take off or return.

        These are high energy electrons, and when they strike metal, they produce X rays. And X rays expose photographic film and wreck peoples’ body chemistry.

        You would ALSO know that the 21st century LRO found that the Moon’s surface emits radiation, from atoms split by cosmic rays. And that astronauts on the surface would experience 30% to 40% more radiation “than previously estimated.”

        You should be thinking, how could we not know that already? And why didn’t that radiation damage photographic film? Why didn’t any of the radiation damage photographic film?

        But you are neither knowledgeable nor are you thinking.

    • Solar)Geometry

      Oh, look who still believes in luciferian NASA.

    • truth hertz
    • DWood

      Setting all the lighting issues aside, have you ever put film images to digital? The film grain is intense! These photos are so clean they were heavily photoshopped, they used noise reduction so intense that many places are actually pixelated from it. If there were historic reason to release them all, you would leave all film grain as is. Since we know from this alone that every image was photoshopped what else in the photos were changed?

    • Anonymous

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC7jXpGy_Ik Keep up the good work, NASA!!

    • Enderdog

      Love the pictures, no doubt!

      My question is….what is happening now, in real time….that they are attempting to distract us from?

      Thinkers always get up their craws….

    • caribbean critic

      Picture37in this story that of the lander with the flag on the left of the lander! How come there are deep inprints in the dust and sand from astrnauts boots but not a grain of sand or dust moved or disturbed by the 10,000 pound thrust rocket engine only inches away from the surface? fake landing is the only conclusion!

    • pulltabjunkie

      Hey thanks for the awesome pics. They galvanize me even more in my belief that it was all a hoax. So, the astroNOTS could make footprints 2″ deep, and yet the lander made no crater or blast marks from the thrusters. This was more a commercial for Freemasonry, with their special model “Buzzed” Aldrin. Just had to flash the ringy poo. Whether you want to believe it or not, the pictures tell a story, and we never went to the moon. Get over it.

    MOST RECENT
    Loading...
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.