Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Man Opens Portal in His Bedroom Using 525 Hz Frequency – Fake or Real?

Wednesday, November 15, 2017 15:42
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

Man Opens Portal in his Bedroom using 525 Hz Frequency – Fake or Real?

[Zurich Times - November 15, 2017]

These videos and this article will be an exercise in Discernment the likes of which will test your Faith and your Belief Systems. Because we live in a Time when we cannot Discern or Understand the Difference between what is Real and what is Fake because the Special Effects and the Visuals are so Good we do not know what to believe.

Here is the original footage;

Man Opens Portal in his Bedroom using 432 Hz Frequency

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgUfopXqDOg

Now for added Creepiness he can also summon a Black Mass using another Tone using the 432 Hz Frequency.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7btgvzjADpk

Now he uses the 528 Hz Frequency on his Bluetooth Speaker to Fracture Spacetime and Open a Rift in Time?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q9-bqQcZDA

This Portal is according this FunkyFatHead a Gateway to Sedona. Now comes the part where we have to start Discerning.

Now to burst your Bubble or Gateway or Portal. Using Adobe Affect Effects which is ironic just on its own you can create such Portals on Videos as part of the Special Effects that are used on Hollywood Movies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw3FCM93oy4

However, before we get too excited the story does not end here. This man has apparently been puzzled by the Artwork and the Painting and the influence it has on his Gateways, Portals and Rifts so he decides to mix things up a little and gets rid of the Tree of Life Blanket Artwork.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEZqAj8FPZ0

Before we dismiss this entire series of Videos as meaningless please watch this Video Interview from a British Super Solider named Matt Todd and what he says about Remote Viewers and how Rifts and a Black/Blue Mass is a Sign of their Presence. According to Matt Todd such a Presence is a Sign of Teleportation from either Humans or Small Greys and Signs of Intrusions in our Dimension of Space and Time.

Skip to the 5:00 minute and start listening carefully.

Matt Todd being Interviewed by Miles Johnston for the Ammach/Bases Project.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfxfTkkjoI0

His descriptions Exactly Match what was happening in the Bedroom. See the Videos above if you skipped ahead.

So the conclusion we can reach is this footage was faked and FunkyFatHead went to the trouble of Faking all of this footage and even watched this interview recorded years ago and cut and paste the details in a Hoax? We find that theory not plausible because of more evidence below.

Now here is where it Discernment and Observation will start to make a Difference. This same Man is claiming that these Portals and Gateways in his Bedroom is Causing the Mandela Effect in particular with the Berenstain or Berenstein Bear Controversy which occurs in Real Time as he goes into his Strange Bedroom.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zidffuS_lQ

Even the Bible seems to Change in his Bedroom. And we have reported on this Phenomena before about how the Mandela Effect is changing Bible Verses.

Holy Mandela Affect even the Bible has been Changed! @ Kev Baker Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce10gGBcTE4

If we made it this far then thank for you for following the entire argument and evidence all the way through. We cannot solve this puzzle without considering all of the data points to be able to connect such disparate dots.

10-04; Over and Out.

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 18 comments
  • 2QIK4U

    I used to watch mythbusters and remember several time’s they brought in their sound tech to achieve the brown note which is very low and relates to police and military crowd control today and they also used him to shatter a wine glass like a soprano.. He used very high frequency in that one… I think if it was true and only relying on the hertz level I think they would of found it then? And there’s a guy since the eighties in America that claims he levitates anything with the same process. If it’s real I think something extra has to be done? Or a million musicians would have vanished by now? Anything is possible in the right environment…

    • 2QIK4U

      Sketchy…. This same guy has a Mandela effect video and when he walks in his room the bible words change. (The lion lays with the lamb line?) And when he walks out of his room the words change. It’s all one continued shot and it’s either real or this guy is very very good at making video’s with a movie program.. It’s one of the rare channels where it seems to clean to be real? But tricks you very well if fake.

      • Geeper

        Mapping one completely flat image onto another (so that the lighting and angle are consistent as the shot changes) is video editing 101, these days. It’s the same concept as these face-changing apps. A flat book cover is literally the easiest thing to do this with.

    • PaulTarsuss

      ….”Or a million musicians would have vanished by now?”….

      lol

      Elvis, Michael Jackson, Prince….no wonder people keep seeing them. Enough people refuse to believe they’re dead, that the multiverse keeps kicking back a live one now and again.

      (insert Rod Serling theme here)

      I’ll just let myself out….

      Or have I ?

      …….

      :cool:

      • 2QIK4U

        That must be it Paul, at the time of the bataclan false flag. I did see a video that showed Michael Jackson in Paris with security covering him with an umbrella in the middle of the night. (But I think in this case it was another Hollywood fakery to up his sales which did happen. Seen that recent video of Joan river’s leaving a restaurant and actually spoke to the reporter!??? What the? The reporter originally asked her partner something but she was holding his hand so she looked make up less but you could see it was her or her twin? ). This is where I need this to make links to show u. Might have to spend a dollar finally…

      • 2QIK4U

        I was about to joke with you but then you reminded me of these two video’s.. But yeah if they’re real it’s just another Illuminati lie. Or they cleverly changed the time stamp.

  • truthseeker4809

    Thanks for uploading this video infos.

  • Fringe Design Lab

    We live in a quantum entangled multidimensional universe. The dimensions are stacked like cards in a deck. The farther away from the current card or dimension you are on the more weird things get. Here is an example of a multidimensional effect. My really good friend since middle school was with this girl off and on for like 10 years. They have a daughter together. During their “off” time they hadn’t seen or spoke for a year or two. My friend said he really loved this girl during this off time and wanted to be with her, had dreams of her often and being with her. He got tickets for him and a buddy to go see a hockey game. They get there to their seats and his girl is in the seat right next to his. They got married this year and are together. This is a multidimensional effect that was “measurable” showing that they were still together in a very close “dimension.”

    You can experience these types of effects using intention. Many hermetic circles use this as “magic.” If you completely intend on doing some “thing” or visualize it this “thing” can manifest or begin to effect the current dimension as if you had actually done it. The idea being that you did do it in another dimension or it did happen in a near by dimension and the effects will spill over to this dimension depending on the probabilty of the happening.

    If you are intune with your body and this effect here is an interesting experiment to see if you “feel” it. If you like to drink or smoke cigarettes you may have noticed this effect. It seems to be related to a placebo effect as well.

    Say you got off work and you bust out a cold one but you don’t drink it. You surf the net for few minutes with the beer right there unopened. You could have opened it at any moment but you refrain but not completely consciously i.e. your not just sitting their thinking about how you want it you relax as if you have already opened it you are only seconds away from opening it anyway. If you do this long enough you will start to feel like you drank it. Your body will start to feel the effects because it is quantumly entangled with the you in the very near universe who has already opened it and is drinking it.

    Something to consider. Thanks for sharing the mandela effect;) I was telling this story to a buddy of mine a week ago and he was describing this effect a happening to him since he was a kid but didn’t know that it was a thing.

    I think some mandela type effects can be explained like an optical illusion with most brains making the same mistakes. However, I think some may be experienced multidimensional effects.

    • PaulTarsuss

      Thanks for the good vibes….

      I focused on your words being completely accurate in all expressions of the multiverse and bought a thousand lottery tickets with cash advances from my credit card. I focused on each number already having won and imagined hyper realistically….like what I did with the cash from each winning ticket. I must have downed about a case and a half of multi-dimensional mental brewskis during the ‘all nighter’ I pulled with these tickets….

      I’m pretty hung over this morning, not gonna lie, I’m so sure about this I can taste it! (mixed with some psychic puke from last night. Went a little overboard on the quantum Heinekens)

      Called the boss this morning, told him where to shove the job AND the recent promotion!

      I really feel like a huge winner, already!

      I don’t have a clue how I’m gonna make my rent or car payment yet…..

      In who knows how many dimensions, I may already be a winner!

      Woo! High on life over here!

      Just can’t wait for it all to sink in…..Ohm….Ohm…..

      OhmygodwhathaveIdone……..OhmygodwhathaveIdone….

      • 2QIK4U

        YouTube this! IRISH LOTTERY 33

  • Anonymous

    The verses on false prophets must have changed, too.

    I am not against the discussion of fantasy and scientific fringe material, just don’t believe that psychotic people should have command of useful resources.

  • Fry

    Fake or Real? …. F A K E

  • spure

    i dont know. I am very skeptical of 99% of videos, but this really appears to be genuine!

  • allendaves

    america has “lots of faith”…….just in the wrong things….123’s of true Christianity v popular & damnable heresies

    #1 “ANOTHER JESUS”:
    -“ONE” not triune: Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is….. IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON LOVE & SIN IS MOOT….. (NOTE: And yes, the specific Greek and Hebrew words used also and only define one person contrary to the ridiculous obfuscation attempts of some!?!)
    PART 4 & 5 HOW MANY GODS ARE THERE FOR THE ONE GOD TO TALK TO?? Who was Jesus praying to??!?…. The real question should be … How does having multiple different persons keep this one God/being/entity from praying to himself?! (The trinitarian “schizophrenic” “god-head”) The Trinitarians want to have their cake and eat it too as the saying goes. On the one hand they need to say they only worship one indivisible God being/ entity but on the other hand they feel the need for some reason to keep Jesus or God from praying and talking to himself by dividing him up into different persons!?! It never occurs to them that that since there is only one indivisible God to pray too and Jesus is that indivisible God come in the flesh that he would need to talk to himself as to show us how to live, suffer, pray and die for our/ flesh) benefit not his!?!….. So while Trinitarians are quick to complain that God was not talking to himself at Christ baptism or in Gen “let us” they ignore the logical demands of their own theology! If Jesus is the ONE GOD in flesh and the Father is the SAME ONE GOD in heaven then Trinitarianism demands THE ONE GOD is talking to HIMSELF! Claiming that God is multiple different persons as the reason for why God is not talking to himself (because God is three different “selfs”) only demonstrates that what they really worship is in fact not a ONE GOD who talks to himself but three different god “selfs”/ and they all talk to each other! When they speak about who God was talking and praying to, they are quick to say “the other person, NOT HIMSELF!” But if you ask them how many gods do they pray to then they will say “ONLY ONE”!?! They expect you to believe that those three different persons are THE ONE GOD-BEING” which is like calling three different cars “THE ONE VEHICLE” (text book examples of prov 26:12)

    -PART 5 Echad, Echad, my God, God is Echad!….:The Greek word pros in Jn 1:1 does not inherently demand multiple different persons because:

    1. The definitions (without forced conclusions stuffed in) are just as equally valid as reference to parts of the same person (modalisim) Your head and your right arm have close relationship to each other; can be facing, towards, relating to, moving to, in the direction of, to, unto, looking to; even at home with, a living union, in the presence of, a common ground, closeness They are still both distinct and different from each other and yet they are of both the same person. Ironically the scriptures use the very same terms to describe father and son.

    2. Ironically and most hypocritically, the trinitarians are trying to appeal to the anthropomorphisms (they claim this passage implies) to demonstrate different persons while at the same time denying the very anthropomorphisms that God himself specifically in scriptures uses to define the son and the son’s relationship to the father. Apparently only the literal anthropomorphisms that trintiarins “see’ exist while the one’s that God himself uses should not be taken too literal or too anthropomorphic or seriously. Is the face anthropomorphic and or literal face or just some metaphor? Either way the problem for trinitarians still exist and simply does not cease with linguistic distractions. There are many different types of faces; face of a clock; face of a mirror; face of one’s palm. Further, the face of one’s palm would be totally consistent with the anthropomorphism that God uses when discussing his own right arm as the son! So either way, a literal and or anthropomorphic face or a metaphorical face in close relationship only leaves the trinitarinas peddling an empty argument hoping no one notices the fact that this argument is nothing more then delusional smoke and mirrors for “the faithful” and for everyone else, well, just “never mind that man behind the curtain”.

    3. You cant appeal to your own desired and or preconceived conclusions as evidence that your methodology in arriving at your conclusions are valid. [ie the use of Jn 1:18 et al as proof that Jn1:1 supports different persons in Jn1:18 et al or visa versa ] How difficult can they make these simple things? The God in heaven is a he but cannot be known except by the he who is the same God in flesh! So why can’t they be the same he again? It should not be difficult to understand since:

    A. The same God who is in heaven is on earth and the difference need only be of circumstance which at least we know that much to be factually true [spirit only v spirit in human flesh] There is no further need or demand for different individual persons since all the different he’s are in fact the same HE!. Trying to claim that God is multiple different “He(s)” who make up the one being either leaves your God to be a “it” that consist of different he(s) or a“God being” who is a he while simultaneously consisting of different individual he(s) [Father-he; Son=he; Holy Spirit=he].

    B. If you find no difficulty in accepting that God is a he that consist of father son and holy spirit also referred to each as a different he and yet all the same he then what is the point to claiming different persons again? How is the multitude of hes who are all the same he show or demand different persons rather than different circumstances of the same person who is in fact “HE”?

    In any case, the trinitarian inconsistency and or incoherence will never be resolved by simply chalking it all up to “how great thou art” unless you willingly and blindly “drink the cool aid” calling it “faith”. True faith is in the words of God (including the specific anthropomorphism God himself uses) not in wild created imaginations of three different persons with different minds, locations and instructions for each other that is somehow not a pantheon of three gods who are “one”!….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh! Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

    -JOHN 14: 8-20 ….[Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father] ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!
    Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

    -The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural) Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense

    -Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5; TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…

    -This should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……Today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into the image of your vain imaginations!
    You can download the complete FREE book from
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920799

    #2 “ANOTHER GOSPEL”:
    -If you ask most people what the Good news or Gospel is they will probably tell you about the virgin birth or Christ death burial and resurrection. This would be rather humorous if it was not so sad considering that for the three and half years of Christ ministry he does not mention hardly ever. However, Christ does spend a lot of time preaching out of the OT scriptures. Now imagine given a report or manual to read and understand, that makes reference to and even quotes other source material and then ignoring that source material when it comes to defining the context and meanings of words in the report or manual you are trying to make sense of. If that seems dysfunctional that is because it is. This is, however, what most people are doing when it comes to understanding sound NT doctrine and or even what the Gospel message of Jesus was. The mystery of the gospel was not the death, burial and resurrection although it is part of it. In fact, death, burial and resurrection was the sign, the only sign, that Jesus gave to validate that the gospel message he was preaching all that time was true……and yet most deny it!?!?!

    -The “2nd coming”… “I come quickly” so “Hold fast till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 years I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 (in their lifetime) are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the Lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES. The “idea”/ doctrine that Jesus has not yet returned but “soon any day now soon” does not just make God out a liar; it is not just ridiculous but makes Christianity a mockery, A pathetic “ship of fools”!?!
    -The following example excerpt from Bertrand Russell: sometimes quoted by atheist et al and from his published work “Why I Am Not A Christian”
    Defects in Christ’s Teaching
    Having granted the excellence of these maxims, I come to certain points in which I do not believe that one can grant either the superlative wisdom or the superlative goodness of Christ as depicted in the Gospels; …. I am concerned with Christ as He appears in the Gospels, taking the Gospel narrative as it stands, and there one does find some things that do not seem to be very wise. For one thing, he certainly thought that His second coming would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that. He says, for instance, “Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come.” Then he says, “There are some standing here which shall not taste death till the Son of Man comes into His kingdom”; and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that His second coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living. That was the belief of His earlier followers, and it was the basis of a good deal of His moral teaching. When He said, “Take no thought for the morrow,” and things of that sort, it was very largely because He thought that the second coming was going to be very soon, and that all ordinary mundane affairs did not count. I have, as a matter of fact, known some Christians who did believe that the second coming was imminent. I knew a parson who frightened his congregation terribly by telling them that the second coming was very imminent indeed, but they were much consoled when they found that he was planting trees in his garden. The early Christians did really believe it, and they did abstain from such things as planting trees in their gardens, because they did accept from Christ the belief that the second coming was imminent. In that respect, clearly He was not so wise as some other people have been, and He was certainly not superlatively wise.
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/5455069
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM
    Amazon/Barns & Nobel et al
    978-1-4907-0590-3 (SC ISBN)

    #3 GOD LOVES EVERYONE; Jesus Died for “you”…… Just “come as you are”
    Does God love you?….”Probably” NOT!….and NO Jesus did not die for everyone!?!……There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups : A. The predestined damned B. the “many” called C. The “Few” Chosen
    Predestination….its true..its all true… God does NOT love everyone:

    Prov 8: 17. I LOVE THEM THAT LOVE ME …………
    1John 5:3. For THIS IS THE LOVE OF GOD, that we keep his commandments:

    (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

    (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

    (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
    will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

    PS: “The world” that God so loved was not the Roman world nor the world of the Maya nor the world you imagined in your head that God specifically told them NOT TO LOVE!?!
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920800
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

    THE THIEF-BAPTISM-GRACE& THE NAME-LORD & LT

    “whosoever shall call on THE NAME OF THE LORD shall be saved”
    ………So WHAT “NAME” did you “CALL UPON”?……
    Rev 19:13. .. and HIS NAME IS called THE WORD OF GOD
    Ps 138:2. praise THY NAME … for thou hast magnified THY WORD ABOVE ALL THY NAME -
    NOTE: God placed His “THE WORD” ABOVE all of God’s various NAMEs – and Jesus NAME IS called “THE WORD” no other name saves. The MOST important name we should KNOW and CALL UPON is “THE WORD”; Not letters that spell “word” but the sayings/ doctrine/commands. It does NOT say “thy word is given a name above other names because here THY WORD is identified as the name that is placed above all other names.
    Isaiah 52:1. . 6. Therefore MY PEOPLE SHALL KNOW MY NAME: ..What NAME do you “KNOW”.?
    1Jn 2:3. And HEREBY WE DO KNOW that we KNOW HIM, if we KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS./ Titus 1: 16. They profess that THEY KNOW God; but IN WORKS THEY DENY him…
    “AT the name OF JESUS”…..Jesus has a name that belongs to Jesus…just like the name OF GOD means a name that belongs to GOD but it is ridiculous to suggest that the letters G-O-D is that name…likewise the name OF JESUS is NOT the letters J-E-S-U-S. Why would anyone think that you could pronounce THE HIGHEST NAME OF GOD letter by letter…. (ie Judges 13:18; 2Cor 12:4 but God’s name is not as great and or “unspeakable )
    Rev 3:8 kept MY WORD, and hast not DENIED MY NAME; …
    .Jn 17:6. I have MANIFESTED THY NAME And they have KEPT THY WORD.;
    THE WORD is THE NAME above every name that saves us 1Pt 3:21 The ONE baptism(Eph 4:5) is into THE WORD ( which is also baptism in the Holy spirit Jn 6:63the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit ) ..ALL the sayings doctrines and commands….what did THE WORD that became flesh command? (Mat 28:19)…..what did THE WORD exemplify? (Mat 3:15/ Jn 4:1)………among other things…..YES .water baptism is just as essential and necessary for much a part of salvation (1Pt 3:21) as is keeping one self away from works of the flesh (Gal 5:21)….In fact obedience to the command of water baptism is specifically identified as the act of calling on the name of the Lord (Col 2:12 “……though the operation[work] of God” CAN ANY MAN BE SAVED WITHOUT GOD WORKING ON HIM?) …..THE WORD OF GOD is the name of God that men call upon OR…OR ..they DENY with their disobedience
    The scriptures tell us almost nothing about the thief’s life. However, the scriptures tell us a great deal about Christ life……Jesus had been around for 3.5 years before the cross and was Baptizing (Jn 4:1-2 in fact He instructed his disciples to do so and did many more then John the Baptist ever did) …..Those who try to appeal to the thief on the cross assume the thief had never heard of Jesus preaching and had never ever been baptized….The burden of Proof is on those who say baptism is not essential! ………..You can’t claim a logically valid “non-essentiality” doctrinal argument on ANYTHING based on what the scriptures do not say and in spite of the things it clearly does state to the opposite effect!…That is like looking at the constitutional law and then basing a argument against a constitutional principle in law based on the fact that history did not record for us what some unknown cattle thief did or did not do a 150 years ago?!?! What??..Who cares?? We know what the constitution did say 150 years ago. I don’t know of any Law school that bases its teaching on constitutional law based on what history does not tell us about unknown cattle thieves!?! ..Jesus command, preached & practiced Baptism so did the apostles ….To build one’s theology on the fact that the scriptures do not tell us ANY detail(s) of the thief’s life before the cross (we know almost absolutely nothing about the thief!!) it is quite foolish and willfully ignorant of what the scriptures do say about baptism…….so those who try to use the thief are in effect building their house on the sand of what scriptures do not say about a thief in spite of what the scriptures do specifically tell us about baptism!?!… “Their damnation is just” comes to mind…
    https://www.scribd.com/document/326686356/Thief-Cross-3D OR https://www.academia.edu/23846490/Thief_and_Cross_3D

    • 2QIK4U

      MOST TRUE CHRISTIAN’S GO TO HELL. …. SEE! Your own bloody words! Stop lying and enjoy Hell.

    • 2QIK4U

      Man is saved when no priest goes near him.

  • Geeper

    “we cannot Discern or Understand the Difference between what is Real and what is Fake because the Special Effects and the Visuals are so Good we do not know what to believe”

    Speak for yourself. Even with the best SFX, a little critical thinking goes a long way.

  • twodads

    Gerbil’s portal into man’s anus
    It is believed that up to 18 Gerbil’s were removed from a man’s anus whilst using the New Harry Potter’s magical 525 MHz double ended dildo whilst sharing it with gay lover. Both man were admitted to hospital and remain in a stable but critical condition with 3rd degree burns.
    The incident occurred last night whilst the two man were in a love sharing frenzy trying out the new Harry Potter’s magical 525MHz double ended 30 inch 240 volt dildo by the pool. It is believed one of the man had 22 inches of dildo driven into his anus by his lover who was chanting some mystical Harry Potter’s love spell when all of a sudden he lost his footings and fell into the pool still holding the 240 volt electricals device.
    A neighbour who was walking his dog and witnessed the incident stated “As I walked by the house, I could hear some bloke who appeared to be screaming in pleasure asking for more while his mate was yelling out Harry Potter’s name & chanting some type of spell. All of a sudden there was this almighty bang followed by an explosion then horrific screams as the lights went out, my dog yelped then bolted down the street as I took cover”.
    Another witness, an elderly 82yr old woman from next door said, “Well, Precious (my fluffy cat) and I heard what sounded like an explosion followed by a flash of light and loud screaming, so we looked over the fence & we saw one man climb out of the pool whilst the other was on his hands and knees screaming get it out. I then saw the man holding a naked flame staring into the young chaps butt hole & tug at something, nic minute it was like WWIII………a huge flame 20 meters long shoot out. The yard fence & hedges are set alight & this poor chaps running around with his head on fire, than as God is my witness the young chap stops with the flames and begins shooting out live Gerbil’s. Precious jumps the fence into the war zone and attempts to grab the little furry buggers as there flying out his butt hole but misses and cuts a major 5mm deep gash 10cm long across his butt cheeks”.
    A Police spokesperson said, “When we arrived at the scene it was utter chaos, these two man were screaming in agony. One victim had all his facial and head hair burnt completely off whilst the other suffered major burns to his butt hole. Paramedics had removed a further 18 live Gerbil’s from his anus. It is not clear how the Gerbil’s became involved however 22 charcoaled Gerbil’s have so far been removed from the yard”, investigations are continuing.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.