US Govt to Citizens: 'You Can't Leave Without Our Permission'

MAKE VIRAL TO ALL PATRIOTS! DO YOU Know what to physically do once Martial Law starts TO SAVE YOUR LIFE? This is the time for its citizens to regain full control of our gov, and this gives tactics how to stop your Fed and State gov from their illegal laws over you. If you refuse to do anything, you are telling them that their laws are great, and that you are willing to have your children live under them. But ifyou love freedom, your Ground Zero is your very own smalltown USA. You need to kick your local police from their department because they are the Fed’s and State’s #1 law enforcers, whos one and only job is to contain you with weapons pointed to your head. But if you stop them, you wil be free from the illegal laws, and your community will be free for its citizens to run it. Read what to do in your very own city for freedoms sake.

/protests-demonstrations/2015/03/2nd-revolutionary-war-time-place-revealed-100-guaranteed-victory-2455478.html

IF you ask government employees if their CONstitutions and laws automatically apply to everyone, their collective opinion is that YES, their CONstitutions and laws apply to everyone, automatically. BUT if you ask them what facts they rely on that PROVE their BELIEF that it is applicable to you “the private person”, they have no plausible answer, they’ll hang up on you, feign as though they don’t understand the question, tell you that they aren’t going to debate with you “EVEN THOUGH ALL YOU DID WAS ASK FOR FACTUAL PROOF OF THEIR ASSERTION OF JURISDICTION” They’ll even tell you to prove it doesn’t apply to you, this is an attempt to avoid answering your question!!, but they’ll continue to refuse to answer as to what facts they rely on to prove any of it applies to you,.. remember, they already told you it applies, it is their responsibility to prove it applies because they are the ones attempting to bring a charge against you, so the onus to prove it applies is theirs,.. It is not up to you to disprove anything applies!!!

Everyone has heard that the CONstitution and law automatically apply to everyone. it’s everyone’s opinion that it applies, everyone feels it applies, everyone believes it applies, everyone assumes and presumes it applies. HOWEVER; hearsay, opinions, feelings, beliefs, assumptions and presumptions aren’t proof of a damn thing.

What factual, first hand, irrefutable evidence can anyone offer that proves that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person simply because they are physically in what we commonly refer to geographically as a state.

Keeping in mind that slavery and involuntary servitude is illegal, per the governments own laws. Further, no private person is a party to their CONstitution nor is any private person a signatory to their CONstitution nor has any private person sworn an oath to be bound by or to obey their CONstitution and laws.

Do you grasp the gravity of NOT being a party to some agreement, contract, compact or CONstitution??
When one is NOT a party to some agreement, contract, compact or CONstitution, then one is NOT BOUND TO OBEY IT OR ANY PROMULGATION’S ARISING FROM SAID INSTRUMENT! “those promulgation’s in this instance would be codes, policies, statutes and laws etc”

Who precisely is a party to their federal/state CONstitutions?? The States, counties and cities are parties to the CONstitutions. NOT THE LIVING BREATHING FLESH AND BLOOD MAN/WOMAN!!

Should anyone choose to accept the challenge to show your proof/evidence that their CONstitution and laws apply to the private person. You shall adhere to the following;

The law is not evidence of itself because it’s alleged authority is derived from the CONstitution and the private person is not a party to state/fed CONstitution.
I would further point out that the alleged government has abrogated it’s duty to protect the individual, their property and alleged rights!
see Warren v. District of Columbia,.. et al.

Your proof/evidence MUST be factual and personal first hand information, your proof/evidence shall not be comprised of hearsay, your opinions, someone else’s opinions, your beliefs, someone else’s beliefs, your feelings, someone else’s feelings, assumptions, presumptions, hypotheticals, conjecture, sophistry, fraud, lies, scenarios or what if’s.

U.S. Supreme court; The Clara, 102 U.S. 200 (1880)
the maxim applies quod non apparet non est. The fact not appearing is presumed not to exist.

Good luck!