Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

To Quote President Trump, “Time to Drain the Swamp”

Wednesday, November 9, 2016 4:23
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Marriage equality reply

Yesterday the parliament of Australia voted no to the plebiscite so the Australian people don’t have there fundamental right to vote on this issue. So the parliament of Australia denied the Australian people the right to vote which is discrimination, treason,, and denial of a fundamental rights of the Australian people.

Enough is Enough. I call for the parliament of the Commonwealth to engage a Royal Commission enquiry and a special jury into corruption, dictatorship,,, slavery and white collar crime iin the parliament of Australia against the Australian people.

Catriona  reply to my post Marriage equality

Catriona
Under your logic, we should have plebiscites on all legislation. Where would you draw the line? Howard did not need a plebiscite to change the wording of the marriage Act, why do we need one to change it again. We go to war without a plebiscite and that impacts more one Australia than marriage equality will. show less

Mark reply to Catriona
Well thank you for replying,
Was Howard constitutionally lawful to change anything in the constitution without a referendum of the WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Is it not true that that the people are sovereign and no parliament is

Page 791 of the constitution 2nd last paragraph it states clearly
Neither Federal or State Parliaments are not sovereign bodies they are simply legislators with limited authority , If they attempt to past a law in excess of that authority the law is annulity and it comes under no authority and cant be enforced.

So does this mean that he never had lawful authority to send our troops to a war on lies and deception and put our son’s, daughter’s, brother’s, sisters in harms way.

Is it not true that its the parliament of the commonwealth
as in the Commonwealth Constitution Act1900-1901 preamble .
and
not parliament of Australia

Is it not true that a referendum in 1988 the 67% of WILL OF THE PEOPLE voted NO to local government and councils.

Attorney General
The Hon Robert McClelland MP
on the 08/July/ 2010

In 1988 four proposals to amend the Constitution were put to voters in accordance with section 128 of the Constitution . One of those proposals sought to give constitutional recognition to Local government but the proposal was not carried.
The Constitution dose not recognize Local Government. Any change to the Constitution to recognize Local government would need to be approved by voters at a referendum.  your sincerely

Robert McClelland
Parliament House Canberra ACT
 Telephone (02)62777300  Fax (0262734102
www.ag.gov.au

So in the last 6 years when was that referendum as the letter above is dated
8/ july/ 2010

The result of that Referendum was that over 67% of the people of Australia and States of WA, SA, VIC, TAS, NSW, and QLD voted NO, It is clear that NO “system of Local Government/ Council” may be Lawfully ” established or continued” within the commonwealth of Australia or within any of the various States.

The Constitutional decision made by the people in 1988 implied, “All Councils now operate with NO Head of Power, A Head of Power is the Authority to act. No State can Legislate to Dignify Councils with a Head of Power. NO council officer is now indemnified from Prosecution or from any private form of Litigation and NO Council LAWS or BY LAWS can be used Lawfully against any Citizen and is Criminal Contempt against the Australian People

please inform me when the referendum was to make
(Local government / councils) Lawful and any BI LAW Lawful in any state from 1988.

Is it not true that any change to anything in the constitutions federal and state has to go to a referendum of the Australian people.

Constitution – Section 128 – Mode of altering the Constitution can only be by way of referendum. Since Federation, only 8 of the 44 proposals to amend the Constitution via a referendum have passed. Over 70% of the proposed changes were rejected by the Australian people.

Please inform me when a referendum was to change the emblem of the parliament of the commonwealth to a kangaroo, sheild , emu with the star of davit over the top and the wording parliament of Australia
from
Lion ,Shield, Unicorn with crown over top which is the emblem on our commonwealth constitution Act 1900-1901 – preamble and the wording Parliament of the Commonwealth

“We The People are Guarantee” under “The Un-dissolvable Lawful contract” with the Queen Elizabeth 11 Under the great Commonwealth Constitution 1900 -1901

Australia is a Democracy …..and to deny Democracy is Treason, ie: a violation of allegiance. Without the CONSENT or Lawful Authorization of the People of Australia,  NO change to any constitution, State or federal  can be done 

As President Donald Trump said “Its time to Drain The Swamp”  and hold these people accountable for there actions

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.