Good Intentions – The Liberal Road to Hell

Good Intentions – The Liberal Road to Hell

The road to Hell is based upon Good Intentions.

In this world, laws are written by liberal emotionalist legislators for seemingly a lofty aim of “the common good.” Or for that matter, our protection, yet once the law is enacted, it seems to me the concept changes in real life. The common good then becomes the basis of common greed.

In this liberal irrationality world of good intentions liberals do the right things for the wrong reason –then, afterwards they dredge up the right reasons for justification. Liberalism will no doubt argue socialism failed here and there because it was the wrong form of socialism.

Give me a break, socialism is nothing more than a government system of dependency upon a Federal oligarchy that, in lock step, negates states’ rights. This Federal Welfare system of socialist dreamers does not and has not worked throughout the ages. Nevertheless, socialism is liberal justification for trying to do the right thing for the wrong reason.

Now do not take me the wrong way. Most people with good intentions mean well. Such idealism as, homes for the homeless and down trodden, feeding the hungry of the world and peace on earth especially at the Christmas season sound wonderful. These are however, unrealistic utopian dreams, and wonderful dreams. That is, if life were a dream. But it’s not.

Once again, these are examples of good intentions which become twisted completely around until no one recognized their original intention. It seems as though the greedy in social or political power, like a puppet on a string, turn the direction of the intention around for their, self-serving reason. Leading the puppet like populous, down the intention paved road to Hell.

A recent and, untenable situation, which clearly bolsters my position, arose whilst Bush was President then, was further exacerbated by the Obama administration. It is of course, “Fannie May and Freddie Mack.” Which, as I have indicated, sound good on the surface. Every one disserves a shot at the American dream we were told. But under the guise of what seemed to be a –good intention there lies the evil doers.

Potential home buyers who could not qualify for a home mortgage were stiffened through its fragile system nevertheless. This occurred, despite animate warnings of independent banking auditors, and, to their credit, some officials in the Bush administration. However unbeknownst to the public at large a dastardly planes were under foot. Senator Barney Franks, that is. Though few know scanty truth, these federal bureaucracies controlled by, none other than boorish Barney Franks, were enacted as havens for retired liberal politicians only. Raise an eye brow did it? It should.

The unrealistic housing bubble burst decimating the American economy. As a consequence of liberal erroneous and irrational actions the American citizens suffered. Ordinary citizens took the brunt of the worst financial loss, in their largest capital investment, their home, since the great depression. While other investments, such as 401ks plummeted too. The general public stood idly by in horror, able to do nothing.

What is the major cause of this financial disaster? Three words come to mind –liberal –liberals –and liberalism. Confused? Well you should be. These three words confused me too, as they have for many others for a long time. You see, the magnitude of their meaning has been greatly distorted. I’ll explain. But first let me first make this point clear.
The way in which we, as a civil society communicate, is the key to clarity. We need not agree on issues discussed when we speak or write, but we should be clear about what we are attempting to communicate. Or our words are not communication at-all.

Therefore, the words we chose are extremely relevant to the intention of the discussion. They are in this case as previously stated, the words –liberal –liberals –and liberalism. Each of which contain a different and unique meaning. These commonly used words, for some readers have a broad meaning, way too broad. In fact, one comes away without any clarity or understanding. So what these words –imply and to whom they –apply, is vital to their understanding.

The Liberal;
I’ll start there. A liberal as I have mentioned is a single individual who in many ways are a kind, caring, loving person. Most are religious or persons of faith, in one form or another. Jewish liberals in particular tend to be very religious supper kind persons, of whom I admire and respect. If it sounds like I am on their side, your right, I am. But, bet you knew that but was coming. These wonderful people have a slight emotional problem, and that is their emotions. Not all but a large number of liberals make decisions based upon their emotions. I call this emotionalism. Emotionalism tends to be irrational non sense, which often as not, get the individual and other with whom they are affiliated with I trouble.

With all due respect we all know someone that is, shall we say, logically challenged, sourly deficient in earthly common sense. In other words naive, gullible, and even immature, so to speak. I say this not to be disrespectful. To the contrary, these are nice people, with good intentions. Need I define nice? Once again in their defense, it is the naïve, gullible good people whom are taken advantage of by the manipulators because they are easy prey for evil doers. I’ll get to them shortly.

Liberal illogic;
Then there is the liberal who, on the one hand, is vehemently against the death penalty for convicted murders. Yet on the other hand, condones late term murder of a person called an unborn baby. A conversation with such a person may leave a logical debater, in dire need of smashing his cranium against the wall in frustration.

The liberal agnostics, stringently resist belief in a God, clamming faith is a crutch for the weak minded. Never realizing, preferring to believe in nothing or agnostic infers, the liberal can then believe in anything, including, but not limited to a frog, a cow, a sacred golden calf or even a federal govern body as their deity, and such.

Liberals in general;
The next category in natural progression is liberals. Liberals simply are a group of liberal people. This group actually nevertheless can be divided into two social classes, the rich and the poor. Though, the rich would emphatically reject such a politically incorrect implication. But be that as it may. Listen to my argument to the contrary, which is logically provable.

Rich Liberals;
Whether they admit it or not, affluent liberals are often well educated in private schools and Ivy League Universities. Nonetheless liberals have lots to say in support of a state sponsored school system yet have no need for public education. These liberals live in lavish urban homes or in gated communities which are often segregated. They prefer to live with persons of their similar financial status, only. Akin to robots, they vote for the socialistic ideology of democratic extremists, which then, enables them to retain in their Aristocratic Social Statius amongst other rich and powerful liberal socialists.

Obviously, not every student which attended Ivey League University’s, retains the political propaganda these predominant radical, professors spread. Logical thinking students reject such Marxist utopian misinformation, as the pure non sense that it is. Those of whom are, intelligent and strong minded individuals arrive at the threshold of our rational tradition contained within the Constitution manifesto.

Moreover, the rich and powerful liberals are hypocrites, here is why. They always stack the deck in their favor. Whether in business or in political offices these elitists liberals have enough financial security to hire income tax firms whose forte it is to legally evade paying taxed. These professional accounting firms know the tax code better then the IRS agents that audit their books. Trust me I know, been there, done that. By using the tax loop holes the rich and powerful manipulation investments which, for the most part is within the limits of the law. This practice is however, not beneficial to the country, only to the individual.

This practice, of course, is acceptable in their ideological justification, off one form or another. In the minds of affluent liberal elitists power is all that matters, with power, comes control, with control more power, and so on. Good intentions has become their badge of authority for evil doers’ likes of Nancy Pelosi, she paves –the road to Hell –for the trivial peasants.

Poor Liberals;
Poor liberals however, are a completely different story. Much of their demeanor is the same as -The Liberal, by this I mean, poor liberals are religious too. But this group of people is comprised mostly of black or Hispanic’s living in metropolitan ghettos under deplorable conditions. Though oddly enough, other races of poor seem to work their way out of poverty. And once out of the ghettos liberals ideals turn conservative, often realizing, for the first time, the error of their ways.

In a broad sense though, most happen to be uneducated poor who do not even know they are demarcate voting liberals. These impoverished liberals may not even know what the word liberal is, nor what it means. Still, they cling to the liberal socialist’s solution in order to assure their meager survival. You see, they have been snared in the federal dependency trap upon which welfare has subsisted for decades. Sadly, without any hope of escape, ever. So do not lecture to me about the lack of conservative compassion. My question is, where is liberals?

Liberal politicians on each side of the isle are the worst further exasperating this problem by promising entitlements for their peasants. This stupidity adds fuel to a raging out of control fire, where federal entitlement dependency becomes like a drug addiction. Once the poor are hooked on this drug addiction it is not easily broken, nor easily taken away. Dependency addicts adapt to not working for a living, verses working. Watching soap operas all day long eases the hidden pain of defeat, hopelessness and despair. Passing time waiting for their next government hand out check to arrive in the mail is not living. But it is inhumane torture; at the hands of good intention liberal do –gooders, doing what sounds like the right thing, for the wrong reasons.

Ask yourself this question;
Then why do those in political power persist with a dependency system which clearly has failed and is, in fact, bankrupting this country, why?

The answer is clear. Giving welfare to the impoverished, as previously stated, is akin to giving an addict more drugs. However, financial dependency upon liberal politicians will guarantee a vote from these dependents, for the liberal party. To the dependent entitlement addicts, any party will do, entitlement addicts see only the drugs. Whether it’s a liberal democrat or Socialist or Marxist party –who cares they say, just keep the free entitlement checks coming.

I once went on a quest to converse with a few uneducated poor whom I hired as a construction contractor. I chose those who could at least articulate their views to some degree. It quickly became abundantly clear that their concept of socialism is merely a word that starts with social. So, in their limited capacity to understand the word socialism, to them socialism is the same as social, as in Social Security entitlement. If you get the point I’m trying to make. To the welfare dependency addict the meaning makes no difference. But unfortunately, their votes do. Votes are not counted by political intellectual capability nor, social classes, all votes count the same.

Even more distressing liberal entitlement politicians view, the hard working person as an adversary. Hard working citizens that actually work two jobs in order to stay alive are not as important as the former. Working voters will undoubtedly vote conservative, one other thing, that is those too proud to take federal entitlement handouts from welfare. They however retain their dignity, self-respect, but most of all their faith.

So ask yourself, who then, is the true benefactor of welfares good intention, those who are dependent upon it, or, those of whom chose freedom from dependency? Think about it.

Radical Liberals;
There remains the altruistic liberal emotionalists who enjoy the power generated by the rebellion of agnostic radical transformation. This breed of liberals is your “occupy wall street” crowd who are supported by a radical President. Their leaders dictate absurd political theories of class warfare solely for the controversy it generates. This allows them to brandish their all mighty educational degrees, as if MBA’s were a banner of honor indicating their superiority over –all uneducated trash. In other word they have all the answers, so just sit down and shut up. Of whom am I speaking? Regrettably, these are the contemporary liberal politicians dominating the White House today and we wonder why this country is failing, well don’t!

There is another liberal toxic asset to reveal. It exists within the monarchy of an affluent social order. It is the exclusive Hollywood fellowship. Cautiously tucked away in their Beverly Hills Estates lurks these politically radical liberal elitist, who are the heart of liberalisms movement. And the proverbial head of the snake. We all know Barbara Streisand –Michael Moore –Danny Glover and the rest of their ilk who, spout illogical rhetoric while siphoning off hatred for Capitalism on the one hand. While shoveling millions from Hollywood production in their pockets with the other. Some of them are outstanding actors, who should learn to keep their politically ignorant mouths shut, lest they sound like a billowing ass. Politics is not a movie script; there are no take 2nd or 3rd or 4th takes for the politically stupidity like Sean Penn.

Liberalism;
Now we have finally arrived at the nexus of the American traditions demise, which I will explain. Though first, at this point I need to clarify this word. A word not often used in the description of an ideology or a belief in something. And that word, of course, is liberalism. Most writers and auditors use the word liberal to identify radical liberal beliefs. This practice, in particular, is both inaccurate and simply not fair to truly kind, descant loving religious liberals as previously stated. Remember all the different forms, if you will, of liberals which I have explained. They are categorizations of this vastly complex terminology which was requiring clarification. I also have endeavored to explain the differences in terminology between the words liberal –liberals and liberalism herein, with some repetition at the risk of sounding redundant.

So then, in simple terms, who are these people that sponsor liberalism? And exactly what is it that they believe in?

Liberalism is a belief, an ideology; I would venture to say even a theology. Famous political writers such as Jonah Goldberg who wrote Liberal Fascism infer the same conclusion, as do many others writers myself included. We all inadvertently agree upon one de facto point. Liberalism is a religious belief in Socialism or Marxism or in other words, a Statists. In order to clarify these commonly used terms just picture this. Liberalism is a belief in a massive federal governing body as their deity. That is, an all mighty all powerful government. If the reader finds this explanation hard to fathom, I suggest further studying the facts may lead to the same conclusion.

Let the reader understand this crucial point, as the old adage goes “with no holds barred,” liberalism is the enemy of the American people. Here is why. Liberalism is contrary too, and extremely bias towards any republic. Republics governance is the rule of the people themselves, and not politicians.

While those in political power wish to eradicate this freedom to choose from America by the use of, I venture to say, extreme prejudice. To them, the end justifies the means; therefore, the use of extreme prejudice is justified too. Using these underhanded tactics liberalism has made great strides over the last half century.

In their belief system, this nation should be governed by an all-powerful god like nationalistic state where the federal government exercises its muscle over populous through rules regulations and the law. The physical state in which we, as individuals live would have no rights or freedom to choose opting out of the nationalistic statist’s dictatorship. If you can see the crucial message I am trying to convey.

Let me reiterate but in a different way. Liberalism today rejects, with extreme prejudice, the individual’s right of freedom to choose. For example rejecting the 2011 year old concept of the Son of God is plain bigotry, further the persecution of religious faith is prejudicial, to say the least.

Harmless nativity scenes are banished from public places. Children are band from public school prayer and to top it all off –One Nation, Under God –is now stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance.

Liberalisms diabolical plan has been and is being implemented, which is, to replace God with a god of their own ideology. A nationalistic state, in other words a government, so big it then becomes god. Here is the best part, governed by liberal elitist statists, whom become like god.

Liberal elitists are cunning and devious, educated by unrealistic utopian dreamers who call themselves –professors. And what do they profess? They profess to know everything yet, know nothing of the real world in which we live. Their closed minded liberal ideology is based upon the sociological governing theories of –Marxist, Communism.

Marxism, like communism has proven one thing, it does not work. This irrationality just goes to show how illogical liberals truly are. We then, must ask why they would think a country governed by nationalistic statist’s works? The word stupidity comes to mind, but a reasonable argument for the latter is welcome.

I chuckle when I think of how irrational liberalism is. Liberals live in a fantasy world of Oz. Awaiting the return of the Wizard Carl Marx. When he departed Oz the wizard said “put Obama in charge until such day I return –“if any.” I further decree, Obama, the new Wizard of Oz Deluxe.” When I return to Oz the wizard said, “All will live happily ever after.” Isn’t that nice, such good intentions. You have the freedom to choose, go ahead; follow him down the yellow brick road to Hell –not me.

Read more at Wake Up America And Face The Dragon