The IMPEACHMENT of Barack Obama for Murder

Dear Obama clones (Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick the double dick Santorum) ,

We have always defended people in court and these bills AUMF, NDAA go on and on. What is the next bill to hit the fan? Death to all of us? Where is the line today and where is your patriotism? Where did all go? Did AIPAC write these bills to implode America?

Alex Jones should talk about the IMPEACHMENT and trial of Barack Obama for Murder but he does not.  History has always recorded one lesson. A trial and our laws is the only thing we have. To get more power the laws of this nation has to be removed and have been getting in the way. Think for yourself., various media outlets are not telling the truth. There is no greater patriotism then defending the least from those who have all the power, media control and money i.e AIPAC.

I would like you to charge Barack Obama for complicity to murder, the conspiracy to murder and depraved indifference with regard to death of Anwar Awlaki who is an American Citizen. However I would also like to grant Col. Marris Davis or Vincent T Bugliosi or any US citizen these powers to file charges in local US courts all around the nation on my behalf and challenge NDAA directly. Vincent T Bugliosi Phone: (310) 273-9013

(btw different case search google for Attorneys Carl J. Mayer and Bruce I. Afran filed a complaint Friday in the Southern U.S. District Court in New York City on my behalf as a plaintiff against Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the Authorization for Use of Military Force as embedded in the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by the president Dec. 31.)

Please take this advice: Tell your atorneys to approach the issue of standing by citing the case SINGLETON V. WULFF. In order for a party not directly afflicted by a statute to invoke standing before the courts, he must show that:

1. He will suffer some direct injury from the government act.

2. He has a unique relationship with the afflicted third parties.

3. There is a substantial obstacle which makes the third party unlikely to sue on its own behalf!!!

Judge whacks Obama in eligibility case

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist Sues Obama Over NDAA