Busted! Sandy Hook Chief ME DR W. Carver Involved in Mass Cover-Up!
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,598,750,932 |
| Stories: | 8,136,995 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
” Chief medical examiner” appears to be just another shill in this tragic ever deepening hole and all this madness just to promote the current liberal administrations antigun crusade to strip Americans of their second amendment rights. Strange, overwhelmed by the “number of bodys shot by a semiautomatic rifle” which never left the trunk of the perpetrators trunk. Something smells awful rotten here. I am confident the real American researchers will get to the bottom of this dark issue before the liberal media liars can cover their BS backsides.
Sorry man, you lost me at “wah wah wah wha wah wah…”
retry.
whoever made this video has no capacity for comprehension whatsoever.. or just plain lying. i’ll state my case for that later.. but this guy is an idiot. wayne carver opposed s.b. 1054, to start with.. and then there’s more for me to challenge here..
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/JFR/S/2011SB-01054-R00JUD-JFR.htm
this guy apparently doesn’t have a clue about what he is talking about. he is reading into documents what isn’t there, basing his own conclusions upon his own speculation, not fact.
he begins his assumptions with the belief that carver is corrupt and had foreknowledge of the sandy hook massacre/event, and presents documents and articles to support his claims.
regarding carver’s threat to quit, carver actually presents plausible reasons for his frustrations due to meddling by the administration.
http://articles.courant.com/2011-09-28/news/hc-wayne-carver-0929-20110928_1_carver-chief-medical-examiner-payroll
this video twists facts into theory in the same way that it is presenting speculation as proof. there is no way to offer carver’s desire to quit as proof of anything more than what is stated, and actually contradicts the claim that this video guy is trying to make. (if carver is corrupt and using power to manifest the then upcoming sandy hook event, as well as wielding power for control, why would he quit and lose such power?)
in the case of SB-1054 and the documented letter that is provided, this guy is completely bereft of reason, and it is no wonder he does not display the entire letter. again, he is translating this as absolutely contrary to what is actually written. it is plain to see that carver opposes the legislation, not support it, and certainly not pushing for it’s passage. i cannot see how it is possible to interpret this letter as a powerplay to get SB-1054 passed. it is without question, an appeal to dump the bill. see the link..
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/JFR/S/2011SB-01054-R00JUD-JFR.htm
as far as passing the bill.. haha… blame the judiciary committee and sen. McLachlan.. again.. carver was opposed to it.
then came the really funny part – offering up twisted minds of evil.. holy time tunnel batman! hah, referencing a video that is timestamped june 20 but includes the july 23 photo of holmes sitting in the courtroom.. hahaha, obvious predate HOAX
it seems to me the only real fact of this entire video here is that the guy makes one false claim after another, basing his “proof” on total speculation and a complete misunderstanding of what is written.. that or deliberate disinformation. i tend to think the guy is just an idiot., hardly smart enough to ever even attempt disinfo. i can say much more but.. really, i’m not here to defend carver.. i know nothing about the guy really. but, i do know pure crap when i see it, and this vid reeks.. btw .. i’m still looking into the evangelista perjury case.. his lawyer is seeking dismissal.
@warpaint, I am not buying your disinfo, Carver got the law changed, as a result he does not have to disclose the results of his pediatric autopsies to anyone. What can you not understand here.
Troll Alert!
Mark Brander.. the question is, what can YOU not understand here. the letter highlighted in the video expresses carver’s opposition to the bill and why. i have backed this up with documentation.
you claim that carver got the law changed. show us all the proof of that.. and don’t give me any conjecture. show actual proof.
RESPONSE FROM ADMINISTRATION/AGENCY:
Dr. H. Wayne Carver, Chief State Medical Examiner: Opposes this legislation. I believe that the proposed legislation is redundant of current statute, regulations and practices. The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner does not now and has never released autopsy reports to the general public, let alone autopsy reports of a pediatric homicide victim.
Autopsy reports can be made available to the general public through three mechanisms:
1 The next of kin elect to voluntarily give their copy of the report to a member of the press or some other entity which would make it broadly available.
2 If an autopsy report is entered into evidence in a trial and there is a conviction, the autopsy report along with all other records entered into evidence is available through the Clerk of the Court.
3 Under separate statutory provisions autopsy reports are available to the general public if the decedent was in the custody of the State at the time of the death.
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/JFR/S/2011SB-01054-R00JUD-JFR.htm
http://blogs.courant.com/capitol_watch/2011/02/dr-william-petit-seeks-to-prev.html
1. SB 1054. AN ACT CONCERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF AUTOPSY REPORTS.
SB 1054, in its original form, proposed direct changes to the General Statutes governing records of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (“Chief Medical Examiner”), to prohibit the Chief Medical Examiner from disclosing the autopsy report, scientific findings and records of its investigation and examination of a child whose death was caused by an apparent homicide, if nondisclosure was requested by a parent or guardian. At the Judiciary Committee hearing on this bill, the FOIC as well as the Chief Medical Examiner himself testified that this bill is unnecessary because there are already adequate safeguards built into current law to prohibit almost all disclosure of medical examiner’s reports and scientific findings. The bill came out of committee in revised form adding to the list of exemptions in the FOI Act for law enforcement records compiled in connection with an investigation to include records of a medical examiner’s investigation and examination (e.g., autopsy reports) in the apparent homicide of a person under 18 years of age. Notably, this proposal would not change the existing safeguards built into the current law.
.. and here’s more for you, Mark.
http://middletown-ct.patch.com/articles/the-publics-right-to-know-versus-a-persons-privacy-2
so.. Mark Brander.. i fully expect your reply and proof seeing that you have accused me of disinfo followed by your puerile troll alert.
since you have attempted to discredit me, make good on that. show us all your proof.
btw, here’s the article concerning the resignation withdrawal
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/State-M-E-Carver-withdraws-his-resignation-3323521.php
if you would be so kind, Mark, explain and prove how this must be due to the passing of SB-1054
i’ll even provide one more article concerning dr. william petit, SB-1054, and a statement by wayne carver..
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/northern_suburbs&id=7986639
from this article…
According to Dr. Wayne Carver, the chief medical examiner, autopsy reports are made available to the victim’s family, government agencies, public health authorities, insurance companies, parties in civil litigations and treating physicians.
Individuals can obtain them with written consent from the family or by court order.
Michelle Cruz, the state’s child advocate, said her office favors the legislation in order to prevent the autopsy reports from being released after a defendant is convicted. If autopsy reports are held by a police department – one of the handful of entities allowed to receive the documents from the medical examiner – Cruz said the reports can ultimately be sought by members of the public under the state’s Freedom of Information Act after the case has been closed.
“There is no current mechanism for the police to say, ‘These are exempt records; you can’t have a copy of them.’ There’s just no mechanism,” she said. “Once it’s transformed into a police file, it’s transformed into a police record and it’s available. And so we’re just trying to make sure that the intent of the original statute, which is to exempt these documents from review to the public, is seen all the way through the system.”
well, Mark Brander.. been over 12 hours now. shall i send out a Coward Alert?
Hey War Paint, enough posts already, I did some research and found out I was wrong and you were right!
War Paint, I know you are probably exhausted after all those posts, probably resting up with a couple of days sleep.
I tried to find this post last night after discovering I was wrong so that I could apologize for slandering your anonymous name, please forgive me! I did not pay close enough attention to what the poster was saying, but I did decide to look up the documents and discovered he did not support the change of legislation.
ok mark, thanks for the retraction. all is good.
someone in CT try to get the records. This is gettin really fishy.