Profile image
By Josey Wales (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Quo Warranto.PDF: Big Trouble For Every Federal Judge & All 9 US Supreme Court Justices (Video)

Thursday, November 13, 2014 19:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By Josey Wales

We the people have the ability to take charge of our government through the use of Quo warranto , this was given to us by our founding fathers for the purpose of removing a power holding office who we deem harmful to our country.

The Line in the Sand – Breaking News November 10, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury in every State files writ_quo_warranto.pdf in every Federal District Court, United States Supreme Court and served upon every Federal Judge and all 9 US Supreme Court Justices. Information in the nature of a quo warranto. A proceeding against the usurper of a franchise or office. Jarman v. Mason, 102 Okl. 278, 229 P. 459, 460.; An extraordinary proceeding, prerogative in nature, addressed to preventing a continued exercise of authority unlawfully asserted. Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co., N.Y., 53 S.Ct. 721, 289 U.S. 479, 77 L.Ed. 1331.

The video below walks you through the process step by step. It addresses the threat to the constitution, foreign armies on American soil and many more crimes committed against the American people.

Often times we hear people say, “I wish I knew what I could do to take our country back. This is it, this is the process to follow to take America back. Please spread this information far and wide, it’s time we take America back!

Its A legal proceeding during which an individual’s right to hold an office or governmental privilege is challenged

Quo warranto  (Medieval Latin for “by what warrant?“) is a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority they have for exercising some right or power (or “franchise”) they claim to hold.

Writ Quo Warranto

 

The prerogative writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment, which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. Here are a few writings on the subject.

Revival of the writs must be combined with reviving standing for private prosecution of public rights, subverted by the “cases and controversies” doctrine and the decision in Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), which is discussed in an article by Steve Winter, The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance.

Although some of these writings are copyrighted, we are assured that all the chapters of all the ones still copyrighted have been attached to pleadings in various cases, and thus made part of the public record, thereby putting them into the public domain.

A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.

The writ is unlike a petition or motion to show cause, because the burden of proof is on the respondant, not on the demandant.

By itself, the writ does not seek the support of the court to order the respondant to cease the exercise or vacate the office. That would be an accompanying writ of prohibito or a writ of mandamus. All such writs contemplate enforcement by the people as militia, although that could include the sheriff or constable as commander of militia. The right involved is that of the respondant to present his evidence.

These writs are called prerogative writs because they are supposed to be docketed ahead of all other cases except other prerogative writs. The demandant represents the sovereign, the people, and anyone may appear in that capacity, even without a personal stake in the decision.

A writ of habeas corpus may be regarded as a subset of quo warranto, for cases where the claimed power is to hold a prisoner, but with the addition of a requirement to produce the prisoner in court, not just appear to present evidence of authority.

The prerogative writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment, which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents.

Currently the former procedure has been replaced by an information in the nature of a quo warranto, an extraordinary remedy by which a prosecuting attorney, who represents the public at large, challenges someone whohas usurped a public office or someone who, through abuse or neglect, has forfeited an office to which she was entitled. In spite of the fact that the remedy of quo warranto is pursued by a prosecuting attorney in a majorityof jurisdictions, it is ordinarily regarded as a civil rather than criminal action. Quo warranto is often the only proper legal remedy; however, the legislature can enact legislation or provide other forms of relief.

Statutes describing quo warranto usually indicate where it is appropriate. Ordinarily it is proper to try the issue of whether a public office or authority is being abused. For example, it might be used to challenge the Unauthorized Practice of a profession, such as law or medicine. In such situations, the challenge is an assertion that the defendant is not qualified to hold the position she claims—a medical doctor, for example.

In some quo warranto proceedings, the issue is whether the defendant is entitled to hold the office he claims, or to exercise the authority he presumes to have from the government. In addition, proceedings have challengedthe right to the position of county commissioner, treasurer, school board member, district attorney, judge, or tax commissioner. In certain jurisdictions, quo warranto is a proper proceeding to challenge individuals who areacting as officers or directors of business corporations.

A prosecuting attorney ordinarily commences quo warranto proceedings; however, a statute may authorize a private person to do so without the consent of the prosecutor. Unless otherwise provided by statute, a courtpermits the filing of an information in the nature of quo warranto after an exercise of sound discretion, since quo warranto is an extraordinary exercise of power and is not to be invoked lightly. Quo warranto is not a rightavailable merely because the appropriate legal documents are filed. Valid reason must be indicated to justify governmental interference with the individual holding the challenged office, privilege, or license.

Quo warranto is a Master Stroke against the CABAL… Many more are to come…… It’s a Great beginning even though late.. better late then NEVER!

Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 27 comments
  • truthlovingsoul

    hope the ones filing are prepared to make arrests, because nobody will take this seriously. they are all above the law. scumbags.

  • Homeowner Of Record

    INTERESTING CONCEPT JOSEY

    Corrupt Judges & Attorneys are destroying this country overnight.

    Would love to apply it in my case: “The Most Corrupt Foreclosure In America!”

    http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-and-politics/2014/10/to-senator-elizabeth-warren-the-most-corrupt-foreclosure-in-america-2470436.html

  • CrowPie

    I’ll be interested in seeing how this plays out.

  • Rebel Brutal

    Do it. Do it until it works.

  • Ideas Time

    Governments Have Descended to the Level
    of
    Mere Private Corporations
    Supreme Court Building
    Clearfield Doctrine
    Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-
    371 1942
    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v.
    United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: “Governments descend to the level of a mere
    private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where
    private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is
    concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
    entities entirely separate from government.”
    What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by
    corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
    different than a mere private corporation.
    As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private
    corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific
    performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government,
    like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other
    commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific
    performance are made.
    And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial
    agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called
    statutes.
    This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED
    STATES CORPORATIOON COMPANY filed its “CERTIFICATE OF
    INCORPORATION” in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER
    the ‘corporate government’ agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the
    FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use
    today.
    References:
    (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-
    company.pdf
    (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-
    work-by-judge-dale.pdf
    [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
    are a fiction and only exist on paper.
    5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
    corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to
    conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
    bet they do!
    6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate
    or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS,
    which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of
    Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did
    you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes?
    For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued
    for violating their corporate regulations?
    [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
    enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
    SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
    actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
    (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
    http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/

  • Anonymous

    I was personally railroaded and ordered to pay fines after an illegal search and seizure. I did not pay. They may be coming for me now.

  • Anonymous

    Useless without power to back it up. Unless God is on your side, it won’t matter what ‘documents’ are filed. A corrupt judiciary isn’t going to recuse itself.

  • Jiliane

    God is not making wrongs right!
    That is the job of humans.
    Can’t wait to see how this plays out, it will require an army of people!
    A real revolution!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Finally–a way to get rid of corrupt judges and other corrupt government officials! But what is the proper procedure for initiating such an action and following through on it? And who would be the proper person to do it?

  • Dragonslayer

    If you will not make peace [treaty, contract, constitution, covenant] with the blue-coats [Dan. 3:2], you shall go [Isai 42:22] in peace.

  • Dragonslayer

    If you will not make peace [treaty, contract, constitution, covenant] with the blue-coats [Dan. 3:2], you shall go [Isai 42:22] in peace. Exod 23:33. Deut. 7:16. Judges. 2:3.

  • Theron

    So? We bury them in litigation? Have any of these actually been filed? Get back to me when one actually works.

  • fatman45

    This needs to be filed against the usurper occupying the White House, for all of the unconstitutional executive orders he has issued!

  • abnegative

    The only way arrests will ever occur is if enough of the population assemble in one direction giving the military mid command someone to back. That will be difficult but would be great.

  • Ideas Time

    Once the arrests are announced, a time and place needs to go out so armed people can attend and offer armed support to those who are making the arrests and announce to the media and sheriff’s department so it is all out in the open.

    Time for play time is over and time to get with the business of taking out the trash and lawless thugs and lairs.

  • anonymous me

    Every judge in the Union was mailed. Every county in the U.S. has now consented to have, and has voted, witnesses and notarized to be common law grand jury counties. Every single one. This was done before the mailings went to the judges. This is now known as The Common Law Grand Jury of The United States. As per Justice Scalia – in a 6-3 vote in U.S. vs Williams, Judge Scalia, speaking for the U.S. Supreme Court, the decision was made that the common law grand jury is indeed separate from the three branches of government and is indeed the fourth branch of government. Judge Scalia was also copied on the mailing that went to all judges.

    Two things need to happen now: 1) Common Law staff and jurors need space in the courthouses to work and function properly. 2) citizens are needed in each county as common law grand jurors. Each county per the U.S. Constitution will have 25 jurors and will hear each and every case brought before them. Classes on constitutional law are online as well as jury handbooks. Find all the info you need if you would like to be a jurist in your county, or just would like to learn constitutional law at nationallibertyalliance.org This is a non-partisan way citizens can learn, reach out and help take their court systems back. We The People in order to form a more perfect union seek justice….

  • Deb

    Thank you Josie for using my submitted article and adding to it so that everyone can understand it.

    • Josey Wales

      Your welcome Deb, united we stand.

  • AJjj100

    This is a joke, right? Hahaha! Well as an old gentle man told me sometime ago “The only thing that is gong to straighten this country out is gun power and led.” The people will have to rise up one day or the whole world will be lost. If you have any common sense at all you will know this to be the truth. God helps them who help them self’s when there right and just. For get God and God will forget you. Forget God to your children and God will forget your children.

  • snoop4truth

    The comment below (dated 11-14-2014, posted at 8:56) is part of the “Judge DALE Hoax”.

    “Judge DALE” is a hoax. All of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes. The people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” have already admitted it.

    The online LEGAL author who pretends to be “Judge DALE” is actually “Rodney DALE Class”, an amateur legal theorist who was NEVER a judge anywhere at anytime. (The online author of those few newer NON-LEGAL articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE”, the so-called “DINAR forgeries”, is a different fraudulent impersonator, but who was likewise NEVER a real judge either). Despite never going to college or to law school and despite never becoming a real lawyer or a real judge, Rodney DALE Class has simply made up and entire amateur belief system about the law that he presumes to “teach” to hundreds of other amateur legal theorists.

    Rodney DALE Class is an expert in the amateur belief system about the law. But, the amateur belief system about the law and the real law are two different things. Indeed, they are polar opposites. This is why Rodney DALE Class has lost every single case in which he has ever been involved. Not a single one of Rodney DALE Class’ amateur legal theories or self-glorifying “war stories” holds up under scrutiny. We have checked. They are all verifiably false. But, the falsity of “Rodney DALE Class’” claims is not our concern here. Rodney DALE Class is NOT the driving force behind the “Judge DALE Hoax”.

    The real people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” are professional hoaxers. These people do nothing but create fake documents (their specialty) that they use in support of online hoaxes. (The comment below dated 11-14-2014 posted at 8:56 AM is one example of one of these fake documents). All of the hoaxes involving these people have the following traits in common: They all involve fake documents. The contents of the fake documents are always shocking and outrageous (and always false). All of these fake documents are fraudulently attributed to the government, a government agency or a government insider with “secret inside knowledge” (like a “retired federal judge”) that has never been revealed to the public before. All of these fake documents reveal a previously unknown threat to the lives of all of the human beings on Earth or reveal a previously unknown corruption that represents a threat to the freedoms of all of the people on Earth. All of these fake documents are psychologically designed to frighten, enrage and anger the reader. The effect on the reader of these fake documents (if believed) is that the reader thinks what the people behind the hoax want them to think. They begin to actually hate other Americans, starting with those who do not believe fraudulent claims reflected by the hoax.

    In this particular case, the people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” decided to peddle “Rodney DALE Class’” amateur belief system about the law (which is shocking and false) to the American people through a series of fake documents that they themselves actually created (their specialty), but which they fraudulently told the American people were written by a “retired federal judge ” (a government insider) named, “Judge DALE” (using Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE” as an inside joke). Among the forgeries that these people fraudulently attributed to this fake “retired federal judge” (a government insider) included: “Lawfully Yours”; “The Matrix And The US Constitution” and “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America”. Almost all of the online LEGAL (not “DINAR) articles that are fraudulently attributed to this fake “Judge DALE” are actually mere re-prints of “section 5″ of “The Great American Adventure” (above) under new names (ex: “Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”; “Retired Federal Judge Turns Whistle Blower”; “Legal Advice From A Retired Federal Judge”). All of these documents are fake and all of them were actually created by the people behind the “Judge DALE Hoax”.

    The truth is that there is corruption in government. Banking, as we know it, is fraud and theft. The Federal Reserve may well be the single most evil institution in the world. But, the cop that gives you a speeding ticket is not part of the corruption and really isn’t working for the Rothschilds and the Vatican. The city government that the cop works for is really not a “private, for-profit corporation” owned by foreigners that collects money for the Rothschilds and the Vatican. The judge that presides over your traffic ticket hearing is really not part of the corruption and really isn’t working for the Rothschilds and the Vatican. The lawyer that defends you at the traffic ticket hearing is not a part of the corruption and really isn’t working for the Rothschilds and the Vatican and he/she does not get a secret kickback for intentionally losing your traffic ticket case and he/she is not “incompetent” just because he will not use Rodney DALE Class’ amateur legal theories in court (he/she would be “incompetent” if he/she did).

    Reach whatever conclusions you wish about the law and the legal system. That is your absolute right as an American. the law and the legal system is fair game for critism. But, do not base your conclusions on a pathetic hoax like the “Judge DALE Hoax”.

  • snoop4truth

    Who Is “Judge DALE”?

    “Judge DALE” is a hoax. All of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes. The people behind the hoax have already admitted it to us. This is the reason that you have never seen a photograph, video or live appearance of “Judge DALE”. He does not actually exist.

    There are actually two different people who have fraudulently impersonated “Judge DALE” online and they write about two entirely different subjects in two entirely different styles.

    “Rodney DALE Class” is the original “Judge DALE” (which uses his middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Class is actually an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who was never a judge. Class and his “editors” first began fraudulently impersonating the “Judge DALE”, a fake “retired federal judge”, in 2009 (a federal felony).

    All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of the “LAW” were written by Class and his “editors”. All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of “DINARS” were written by the late John MacHaffie, who died on January 8th, 2015.

    Here is how it came to be that there were two fake “Judge DALES”. Between 2010 and 2012, the original people who actually created the “Judge DALE Hoax” (“editors”) organized and edited Class’ amateur belief system about “the law” into the two original “Judge DALE” forgeries: “The Matrix And The US Constitution” (April 10th, 2010) and “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (sometime before May 25th, 2012). These “editors” posted these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites.

    Afterwards, these “editors” solicited other likeminded webmasters who would agree to post (or to post links to) these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites with full knowledge that these forgeries were fake. These likeminded webmasters played an important role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Indeed, two of these webmasters were so enthusiastic about their role in the hoax that they themselves actually wrote and posted additional fake articles online in which they claimed to “know Judge DALE personally” and wherein they purported to quote dialogue that they exchanged with this fictional character (who does not actually exist).

    Arguably, the most important of the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the “Judge DALE” forgeries) was the late John MacHaffie of nesaranews.com. MacHaffie posted articles on his own website on a broad range of subjects. But, he was passionate about the subject of investing in “DINARS” (a gold-backed currency used in some middle-eastern countries) and related subjects like global currency re-set/revaluation and non-disclosure agreements (which MacHaffie claimed were necessary when investing in “DINARS”) . Many people regarded MacHaffie as a genuine authority on the subject of “DINARS” and he had followers reading his “DINAR” articles all over the globe. MacHaffie did not write about the subject of the law. And, Class did not write about the subject of “DINARS”. So, Class and MacHaffie were not competitors for the same readers. Thus, Class’s material and MacHaffie’s material were compatible and Class’ material seemed to be a good fit on MacHaffie’s website, nesaranews.com.

    At first, all went well with the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries on the websites of these like-minded webmasters actually believed that “Judge DALE” was a real person and that he really was a “retired federal judge”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries believed the false and utterly delusional claims reflected therein about “the law” and the legal system. And, nobody outside of the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE” forgeries and the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the forgeries) knew that the whole thing was one giant hoax intended to dupe and defraud the American people.

    By 2012, the “Judge DALE Hoax” had become an unqualified success. The fictional online character, “Judge DALE”, had become a genuine brand-name with real value among amateur legal theorists, largely as a result of the efforts of these likeminded webmasters, like MacHaffie (who distributed the “Judge DALE forgeries” to his own readers).

    But then, in late May or very early June, 2012, the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE Hoax” stole some proprietary information from MacHaffie about “DINARS”, posted it on the websites of all of MacHaffie’s competitors and fraudulently attributed that stolen information to “Judge DALE” (who MacHaffie knew did not actually exist and who MacHaffie had actually helped make into a bona fide internet sensation).

    Needless to say, MacHaffie was livid. In retaliation, on June 4th and 5th, 2012, MacHaffie did two things. First, he posted a formal notice on his website, nesaranews.com, that read, “Judge DALE Is Removed From This Blog” and, without revealing that “Judge DALE” was a hoax, he explained his reasons for banning “Judge DALE” from his website (explained above). Second, and more importantly, MacHaffie actually stole the fake name, “Judge DALE”, for his own use in peddling his own online articles about “DINARS” and he posted his very first “DINAR” article online as the SECOND “Judge DALE”. MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, served several purposes for MacHaffie. First, it taught Class’ editors a lesson about stealing the proprietary intellectual property of others (he simply returned the favor by doing the same thing to them). MacHaffie knew that Class’ editors could not complain publically about what MacHaffie had done to them without revealing their own role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Second, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, had the effect of confusing and confounding “Judge DALE’s” original followers and thereby weakened the value of the “Judge DALE” brand among amateur legal theorists. Third, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, increased the number of readers of MacHaffie’s articles on the subject of “DINARS”. MacHaffie continued to use the stolen, fake name “Judge DALE” in connection with his own online articles on the subject of “DINARS” until his death on January 8th, 2015. MacHaffie never forgave Class’ editors for what they had done to him.

    This is why since June 4th, 2012, there have been two authors of the online forgeries that have been fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE”, not one. This is also why there are no “Judge DALE” forgeries that were ever posted online that relate to the subject of “DINARS” until after June 4th, 2012. This is why all of the “Judge DALE” forgeries that appeared online before June 4th, 2012 related exclusively to the subject of the law. This is also why, since June 4th, 2012, the “Judge DALE” forgeries posted online address two entirely unrelated subjects (the subject of the LAW and the subject of “DINARS”). This also explains why “Judge DALE”, an alleged “retired federal judge” would, on June 4th, 2012, suddenly and inexplicably start writing articles about the subject of “DINARS”, a subject about which no “retired federal judge” would have any interest, knowledge or expertise anyway. This also explains why there is such a profound difference in the quality of the writing between the two types of “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of the LAW that appear to have been written by a high school student (as edited by other high school students) were written by Class and his editors. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of “DINARS” (global currency re-set/re-valuation and NDA’s) that appear to have been written by an intelligent, articulate, educated, literate person were written by the late “John MacHaffie. This is also why no new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of “DINARS” have been posted online since MacHaffie’s death on January 8th, 2015. Finally, this is why new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of the LAW continue to be posted online despite MacHaffie’s death (Class and his “editors” remain alive to post new “Judge DALE” forgeries online about the subject of the LAW).

    Either way, there is no real “retired federal judge” who wrote any of the “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Either way, “Rodney DALE Class” was the original “Judge DALE” and was the namesake for the fictional online character, “Judge DALE” (which uses Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Either way, “Judge DALE” is a hoax. Either way, all of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes.

  • snoop4truth

    ROD CLASS & THE “DEBRA JONES HOAX”

    Rodney DALE Class (“Rod Class”) is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education. Class has LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). Despite a year long investigation, we have not yet found a single case involving Class that he (or his side) ever won. The reason that Class has a 100% failure rate in the courts is that he uses amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) in court as if they were REAL laws. Class’ amateur legal theories are an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE to the REAL laws that are actually used by the courts and the legal system. If Class’ amateur legal theories (FAKE laws) were actually valid, then he would not have LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (WELL OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING). No person with a verifiable 100% FAILURE RATE IN COURT should be masquerading as a “teacher”, “legal scholar”, “retired federal judge”, “Private Attorney General”, “Bounty Hunter” or some similar nonsense title.

    But more importantly, Class is also a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER. Class is behind the “Judge DALE Hoax” in which he writes FAKE legal articles which reveal FAKE legal information while fraudulently impersonating a FAKE “retired federal judge” named “Judge DALE” (which uses his own middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). (Impersonating a retired federal judge, is a federal felony). Class is also behind the “FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property In Other People’s Names Hoax”, the “Private Attorney General Hoax”, the “Embezzling Federal Funds Hoax”, the “CRIS Hoax” and many, many other legal hoaxes. Class uses these legal hoaxes to help him sell his amateur belief system about the law and the legal system to other amateur legal theorists. But, most importantly, for purposes of this comment, Class is also behind the “Debra Jones Hoax”.

    THE HOAX
    Class has own internet radio show on AIB radio which he uses to sell his amateur belief system about the law and the legal system––the same legal system in which he has LOST EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 65 COMPLETE, CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING).

    On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869, Class purported to bring in a “legal insider” as a guest on his radio show in order to validate, bolster and to provide support for his own amateur legal theorists about the law and the legal system. Class FRAUDULENTLY introduced this FAKE “legal insider” as “former attorney” and “former law enforcement officer”, “Debra Jones’’. As if those FRAUDULENT claims about Debra Jones were not bad enough, Debra Jones herself also FRAUDULENTLY claimed that she was once being “groomed” by the “Police Benevolent Association” to be “President of the United States” (an office that Rod Class himself once purported to run for as a “write-in candidate”). (In an apparent effort to cover all of the bases, Debra Jones has since added the titles “Dr.”, “ordained minister”, “martial artist” and “hypnotic therapist” to her resume’).

    Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, this FAKE “legal insider” mindlessly “parroted” the same “amateur legal theories” (FAKE laws) and utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. Rod Class’ radio audience was understandably shocked and horrified by the FAKE, FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims of Debra Jones who they genuinely believed was a real “legal insider” who was telling them the truth. This FRAUDULENT radio show became an internet sensation and was re-posted all over the web, much to the delight of Rod Class and Debra Jones.

    THE TRUTH
    But, before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Debra Jones was NEVER a “former real estate attorney”, NEVER a “former law enforcement officer” and that she was NEVER being “groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be “President of the United States”. The truth about Debra Jones is as follows::
    1. Debra Jones’ REAL name is “Debra Jenks Jones”;
    2. Debra Jenks Jones was born on May, 29, 1967;
    3. As of today, Debra Jenks Jones is currently 49 years old;
    4. Debra Jenks Jones’ social security number is (redacted) 531-80-XXXX;
    5. Debra Jenks Jones lives at (redacted) XXXX XXXth Street Court, Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State, 98375-6130 and has lived there since April of 1995. This is the reason that many of her “seminars” on “voodoo law” are CONVENIENTLY held in the nearby Yelp, Washington State area;
    6. Debra Jenks Jones HAS NEVER HAD a “professional license” of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE which means that she was NEVER an “ attorney”, a person who would have had a “professional license” from at least one state (at least at some point in time in the past). This is the reason why Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the law school from which she allegedly received her law degree. This is also the reason that Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name of the state or states that allegedly issued her a license to practice law. Such a law school does not exist and such a state does not exist;
    7. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER a “law enforcement officer” in any jurisdiction. This is the REAL reason why Debra Jenks Jones will not reveal the name and location of the alleged law enforcement agency (or agencies) in which she was an allegedly employed as a “law enforcement officer”. Such a law enforcement agency does not exist;
    8. Debra Jenks Jones was NEVER “being groomed by the Police Benevolent Association to be the President Of The United States”. This is the REAL reason that she will not reveal the names of the many people within that organization who were allegedly “grooming” her, the place where she was allegedly being “groomed” or the exact manner in which she was allegedly being “groomed”; 9. Debra Jenks Jones’ false claims to the effect that she grew up in Washington, D.C. and that she was a “former Congressional Aid” to a conveniently DEAD Congressman (to make verification impossible) in the “nation’s capital” was a self-glorifying fraud intended to throw investigators off of her trail as well as serving as an inside joke (because she really lives in Washington State, not in Washington, D.C.);
    10. Debra Jones’ published address on one of her three websites of “55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California, 94610” is a fraud intended to throw investigators off her trail. This FAKE address causes persons looking for her to futilely look for her in the state of California, rather than in the state of Washington State, where she actually lives and does “business” while pretending to be a “former real estate attorney” and a “former law enforcement officer” when peddling her “seminars” on “voodoo law”, “FAKE law” and “amateur legal theories”;
    11. Debra Jenks Jones’ published phone number on one of her three websites is “(360) 458-6678”. The fact that Debra Jenks Jones lives in Puyallup, Washington is the real reason that the area code for that phone number is “360”. Area code “360” is not the area code for Oakland, California (her published business address) or Washington, D.C. where she falsely claims to have grown up. Instead, area code “360” is the area code for that portion of Washington State south of Tacoma, Washington, where Puyallup, Washington is located (and where she has lived since 1995).
    12. Debra Jenks Jones operates THREE FRAUDULENT WEBSITES in order to illegally and fraudulently solicit money from her victims; KnowMore-Laws.com; TrustUSproviders.com and ProTrustAcadmey.com.
    13. As an complete OUTSIDER to the REAL law and the REAL legal system, Debra Jones has no “inside information” about the inner workings of the REAL law and the REAL system to share with you or with anyone else. She is a complete and total fraud. When you think about it, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the “Judge DALE Hoax” have much in common. In the “Debra Jones Hoax”, Debra Jones manufactured FAKE titles and FAKE credentials for herself to help her “sell” her amateur belief system in the same way that in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Rod Class manufactured a FAKE title and FAKE credentials for himself to help him “sell” his amateur belief system. Thus, Debra Jones fraudulently impersonates a FAKE “former attorney” and a FAKE “former police officer” when “selling” her amateur belief system while Rod Class fraudulently impersonates a FAKE “former federal judge” when “selling” his amateur belief system.

    NOTE: It is a federal felony to use a “means of interstate commerce” (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting and collecting money from victims for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a “former attorney” and/or a “former police officer”). It is a state crime to impersonate an ”attorney”. It is also a state crime to impersonate a “law enforcement officer). In many states, it is a state crime to impersonate a “Dr” or a clergyman, like an “ordained minister”.

    NOTE:
    Jean Haines of https://jhaines6.wordpress.com did much to re-publish and perpetrate the “Debra Jones Hoax” among her own online readers/victims. Ms. Haines wrote a glowing article in which she lavished heavy praise on “Debra Jones”. In response, dozens of Ms. Haines’ readers/victims wrote to her and specifically asked her for the very information that we have provided herein (details on Debra Jenks Jones’ REAL background and her REAL contact information). In late 2015, we attempted to answer all those questions by posting an early draft of this very document among the comments below Ms. Haines’ article. But, during the “moderation” process, Ms. Haines saw fit to block this comment from being posted on her website (or otherwise caused this comment to not be posted there). In so doing, Ms. Haines thereby prevented her own readers/victims from receiving the TRUE facts about Debra Jones contained in this post, facts that they had specifically asked her for.

    CONCLUSION:
    Everything that Rod Class has ever told you is as true as his claims to the effect that Debra Jones is a “former real estate attorney” and “former law enforcement officer”. The reality is that Rod Class will not hesitate to lie to you and to defraud you if doing so helps him “sell” his “amateur belief system” about the law and the legal system to you. Needless to say, if you paid Debra Jones hundreds or thousands of dollars to attend one or more of her seminars in the belief that she is a “former real estate attorney” and a “former police woman”, then you were defrauded and ripped-off. You should demand your money back and/or contact law enforcement authorities. Lying to the American people about their law and their legal system is an act of treason against the American people and should be treated accordingly. Rod Class and Debra Jones should be ashamed of themselves for committing this VICIOUS ATTACK on the America people. They should both immediately apologize to the American people for what they have done and they should both immediately discontinue their pattern of fraud upon the American people.

    CONTACT DEBRA JONES:
    If you are among the dozens of people on https://jhaines6.wordpress.com who still wish to reach Debra Jenks Jones, the FAKE former “attorney” and the FAKE former “ law enforcement officer” who intentionally lied to you and defrauded you on Rod Class’ AIB radio talk show, you may do so by using the following contact information:
    1. Call her at her published phone number appearing on one of her three websites of (360) 458-6678 (this number is also reportedly used by “Sleepsonic, LLC, 303 1st Street South #2 Yelm, Washington State 98597”);
    2. Look her up in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State and write her (we will not publish her full
    address online);
    3. Email her at her published email address of debra@protrustacademy.com
    4. Write her at her FAKE published business address at TrustUP (sic) Providers, 55 Santa Clara Avenue, #220B, Oakland, California 94610 (and hope that your letter gets forwarded to her REAL address in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State);
    5. Try reaching her through her three known websites, Knowmore-laws.com, TrustUSproviders.com and Protrustacademy.com.
    6. Contact Rod Class and ask him for her REAL contact information.
    7. Contact Jean Haines at her website at https://jhaines6.wordpress.com and ask for her REAL contact information.
    8. “LightInDarkness”, a senior writer with Quatloos.com. claims that Debra Jones once announced that she could be contacted at culinaryjones@gmail.com and at 323-642-8277. So, you might also try those avenues when trying to reach this FAKE “legal insider”.
    —————————————————————————————————————
    ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH

    Snoop4truth is a legal expert who opposes the New World Order, globalization, corporatism, The Federal Reserve, fractional reserve banking (which is pure fraud and theft), false flag operations, endless wars and the contamination of our air, water, food and natural resources.

    Snoop4truth opposes the main-stream-media and legal disinformation for precisely the same reason, the people behind both disseminate intentionally false and fraudulent information in order to advance their own agenda at the expense of the American people who they fraudulently claim to serve.

    Snoop4truth did not expose the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims in order to harm Rod Class or Debra Jenks Jones. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” and the falsity of Rod Class’ claim solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such PURPOSEFUL AND INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day.

    Had it not been for the Rod Class’ role in creating and perpetuating the “Judge DALE Hoax”, then Snoop4truth would not have exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the “Debra Jones Hoax” or the falsity of Rod Class’ claims about the law and the legal system.

    There is a world of difference between an amateur legal theorist making an innocent mistake about the law on one hand and a charlatan manufacturing an elaborate hoax about the law to defraud the American people on the other hand. Snoop4truth will only expose those charlatans who engage in elaborate hoaxes about the law to defraud the American people. This is why, to date, Snoop4truth has only exposed the “Judge DALE Hoax” and the “Debra Jones Hoax”. Snoop4truth has no quarrel with the amateur legal theorist who makes a simple innocent mistake about the law. Such people are mistaken, but they are not charlatans. There is a difference.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.