Profile image
By RedState (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Wisconsin Recount Could Risk Its 10 Electoral Votes

Saturday, November 26, 2016 11:37
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Jill Stein of Lexington, Mass. announces that she will seek the presidential nomination of the Green Party during a news conference outside the Statehouse in Boston Monday, Oct. 24, 2011. Stein is proposing what she's calling a Green New Deal to end unemployment in America and jump start a recovery. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

Wisconsin’s presidential recount, which will begin next week, could put the state at risk of not having its 10 electoral votes counted. A federal “safe harbor” law requires states to complete presidential recounts within 35 days of the election to ensure their electoral votes are counted. This year, that’s Dec. 13.

It will be extremely difficult for Wisconsin to meet the Dec. 13 deadline if Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand. A lawyer with Stein’s campaign has said it wants the recount done by hand. That would take longer and require a judge’s order.

According to the Journal-Sentinel, Recounts will be done by county boards of canvassers, which will likely have to work nights and weekends.

Stein and independent presidential candidate Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente separately filed recount requests late Friday, the last day they were able to do so. Stein received about 31,000 votes and De La Fuente about 1,500 out of three million cast.

Stein — who received just 1% of the vote in Wisconsin — is also planning to ask for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania, which have deadlines next week.

The push for a recount is the result of a Liberals conspiracy theory that voting machines might have been hacked. Election officials and experts say they are unaware of any problems with Wisconsin’s vote tally. No reasonable person expects the results to change after the recount. President-elect Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by some 22,000 votes in Wisconsin.

The Journal-Sentinel reminds us that Wisconsin’s last statewide recount was in 2011 for a state Supreme Court seat. The recount did not change the outcome. The recount showed Justice David Prosser defeated challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg by 7,004 votes —  slightly less than the 7,316-vote victory he had in initial returns.

What is truly troubling that recount took more than a month. This one would have to be done in a little more than two weeks to make the Dec. 13 deadline.

More important, Electors around the country must meet to cast their Electoral College votes on Dec. 19.

Edward Foley, an expert in election law at Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, told the Journal-Sentinel that if the recount isn’t complete by then, electors from Wisconsin could meet anyway and try to have their results sent to Congress by the time it counts the votes on Jan. 6. Congress has wide latitude to decide how to count the states’ electoral votes.

Could the shorthanded Supreme Court be called upon to tell Wisconsin to stop the recount to ensure the state’s 10 Electoral votes are counted?

This is just ridiculous. Stein — who received just 1% of the vote in Wisconsin and De La Fuente who received far less than that should not be able to require a recount.

The post Wisconsin Recount Could Risk Its 10 Electoral Votes appeared first on RedState.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 3 comments
  • jdpent01

    jdp…If the Clinton did not initially call for a recount then the recall by Stein should be nullified as having no standing with less than 15 PCT OF THE VOTE.

  • Debbie

    Stein has nothing to gain by a recount other than whatever money Soros and the Clinton Foundation will give her to do this…best bet is that Clinton thought the vote rigging was airtight for her win and was caught by surprise when Trump had so many votes it overwhelmed her cheating….so, recount and you can bet the ballots will now be stuffed enough dead voters for Hillary for her to win it….and Stein…who clearly has NO HONOR and will sell her country to satan for a few Shekels… surprise…Bernie did the same thing….it’s in their blood……..all that matters to them is money….

  • Everette

    Ok ! Let’s say Hillary gets Wisconsin electic votes , that still does not put her in the White House with 242 instead of 232 Votes sh had . Bye ! BYE !!! Natzi . NWO , Vatican , Edomite from Esau whom GOD said he hates in Malachi 1:1-4 . Funny thing Michigan votes were not totaled for the people . If properly counted Trump even won the popular votes , damn media lies ! I saw videos of Hillary’s clonies running with ballets while the others backs were turned and stuffing ballets into her box Telling each other not to get caught . . Remember liberal means liers , thieves , murders , cheats and perverted thinking . Do whatever is needed to win . The law abiding tax paying citizens might need to stand up and stop this bull !

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.