Profile image
By The Media Co-op
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

UN Announces Famine In South Sudan

Thursday, February 23, 2017 17:52
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
South Sudan Export Crops Curiously Unaffected
A United Nations press release on February 20, 2017 officially declared a famine in parts of South Sudan, with over 100,000 people facing immediate starvation and another 1 million people classified as being on the brink of famine. From the report:

“Famine has become a tragic reality in parts of South Sudan and our worst fears have been realised,” said Serge Tissot, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Representative in South Sudan, in a news release issued jointly with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Food Programme (WFP).

“Many families have exhausted every means they have to survive,” he stated, explaining that these people are predominantly farmers who have lost their livestock, even their farming tools.

Famine is currently affecting parts of Unity State in the northern-central part of the country. A formal famine declaration means people have already started dying of hunger.”

For people who have been following recent events in ‘the world’s newest country’, which came into existence following a long and brutal civil war that tapered off following a referendum in 2011, this isn’t new. But the acknowledgement of how bad the situation has gotten is a welcome change from the UN’s largely piecemeal response to the ongoing crisis. 
US and UN officials were heavily involved in the referendum, claiming neutrality but largely favoring separation. Former US President Jimmy Carter, American actor George Clooney, who now acts as ‘brand ambassador’ for Nestle’s brand of South Sudanese coffee, and many other ‘big names’ were involved in the campaign, while Libyan leader Gadaffi and Egyptian President Mubarek strongly favored the unity campaign. 
The resulting government has been on shaky ground ever since, reacting strongly to criticisms, even from longtime supporters concerned that the government is acting in a non-democratic manner. 
Since the separation, western business interests have aggressively manoeuvred for control over South Sudan’s resources, especially it’s most fertile agricultural areas in the centre of the country. 
Those fertile agricultural areas aren’t being affected by the problems causing the ‘famine’ in the northern parts of the country; the problem is that they are being used for export crops, including to grow coffee for the Nestle subsidiary Nespresso.
The benefits of the South Sudan agricultural ‘boom’ have been lost to the South Sudanese for the most part, even the coffee growers themselves can barely subsist because of food costs associated with imports. 
The drought is mostly in areas in the north that are largely marginal for agriculture to begin with, while there are still crops growing for export.
Smallholders grow 80 percent of South Sudan’s cereal crops, but farmers are discouraged by policies that cause high transport costs, unavailability of agricultural inputs, and no real agricultural extension services to speak of. 

Many experts say that aid would be much more effective if it involved investing resources into developing better extension services for smallholders, but instead the western advisors have pushed the government to give all the benefits to large-scale, foreign controlled industrial agricultural schemes that boost food production but mostly for export, doing little to help people in South Sudan itself. It might cost less to do those things than it does to import food into Sudan to feed the people trying to scratch bare survival from the drought effected areas. 

This is because various ‘aid’ organizations are controlled by western business interests who are pushing for more control over African farm land, expecially USAID, Citibank, the Corporate Council on Africa, and the IFC.

Many suggest that if the South Sudanese were allowed to use the best farm land to grow food for South Sudan instead of Nestle-controlled coffee production for western consumers, food security wouldn’t be a difficult issue at all.
For more detailed information on South Sudan’s history, read The Traumatic Past and Uncertain Future of South Sudan: Perspective from Social Responsibility on Local and Global issues & the relentless struggle for education, Nhial Thiwat Ruach, Nov. 2015, AuthorHouse

References (as appear in the links):

1. United Nations News Agency Press Release, February 20, 2017

2. United Nations Food And Agriculture Agency Press Release, February 20, 2017

3. BBC World News, January 30, 2011, South Sudan Referendum: 99% vote for independence.

4. Newsweek, October 10, 2014, George Clooney, South Sudan, How World’s Newest Nation Imploded.

5.Bloomberg, October 7, 2015, Nespresso, Clooney Promote Coffee In War Torn South Sudan

6. South Sudan News Agency, February 5, 2017, Whose Actually Governed In South Sudan.

7. Nestle Press Release, April 8, 2016

8. DW News Video, Coffee From South Sudan: Blessing Or Curse, Youtube, Dec. 7, 2015,

9. The World Post, June 1, 2015, Meet The South Sudanese Farmers Who Want To Feed Their War-Torn Nation


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.