Trump Cucks On Sanctuary City Defunding, Still Has Executive Order Blocked By Judge

It’s pretty much all over for Donald Trump (the piece on The Wall will be published later tonight), as we have now seen literally every single campaign promise broken and shot down during the first 100 days of this new Administration.

Actually, I guess TPP was still thrown out, but my guess is that anointed King Of The Jews Jared Kushner will eventually get around to providing a replacement – the evil Semites are so bold now that I’ll wager they’ll just use the exact same bill to mock the stupid Goyim.

But let’s start with the latest example of Judicial treason – specifically affecting the plan to bankrupt illegal sanctuary cities.

From AP:

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked any attempt by the Trump administration to withhold funding from “sanctuary cities” that do not cooperate with U.S. immigration officials, saying the president has no authority to attach new conditions to federal spending.

U.S. District Judge William Orrick issued the preliminary injunction in two lawsuits – one brought by the city of San Francisco, the other by Santa Clara County – against an executive order targeting communities that protect immigrants from deportation.

The injunction will stay in place while the lawsuits work their way through court.

The judge rejected the administration’s argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said President Donald Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress.

Even if the president could do so, those conditions would have to be clearly related to the funds at issue and not coercive, as the executive order appears to be, Orrick said.

“Federal funding that bears no meaningful relationship to immigration enforcement cannot be threatened merely because a jurisdiction chooses an immigration enforcement strategy of which the president disapproves,” the judge said.

…

The order has also led to lawsuits by Seattle; two Massachusetts cities, Lawrence and Chelsea; and a third San Francisco Bay Area government, the city of Richmond. The San Francisco and Santa Clara County lawsuits were the first to get a hearing before a judge.

On Tuesday, mayors from several cities threatened with the loss of federal grants emerged from a meeting with Sessions saying they remain confused about how to prove their police are in compliance with immigration policies.

Now, just a few weeks ago, this would have been YUGE news worthy of several articles and vicious incendiary language – maybe even a troll raid.

But after betrayal after betrayal?

Maybe we should look at what exactly Donald thinks a “sanctuary city” is?

From Politico:

Mayors emerging from a meeting with Attorney General Jeff Sessions Tuesday said the Trump administration seems to be adopting a narrow definition of “sanctuary city” that means few, if any, localities are in jeopardy of losing federal funds.

“What we were hearing both yesterday and today was a narrowing of what might be called a sanctuary city or a violative city than what a lot of us feared it might be,” Austin, Texas Mayor Steve Adler told reporters outside the Justice Department.

In case you had any questions, Adler is indeed a Jew; a fact that goes long in helping to explain why Austin is one of the most Leftist-ridden cesspits in all the South.

Whether other Texans like John Hagee worship the ground Adler walks upon is currently unknown.

Adler and other mayors said Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security officials who met with the mayors delegation in Washington this week indicated the only federal law at issue in the Trump administration’s effort to crack down on so-called sanctuary cities was one federal code section barring localities from interfering with communications with federal officials.

“Based on what we’ve heard, I don’t know of any cities that are out of compliance with that at the moment,” New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu said.

Landrieu called the meeting with Sessions on Tuesday “productive but aggressive.”

…

In addition, Trump’s heated rhetoric on the sanctuary cities issue may end up wildly at odds with his administration’s actual policies, the mayors said.

“If it turns out sanctuary city is defined as Section 1373 compliance, then….there is no sanctuary city debate,” Providence, Rhode Island Mayor Jorge Elorza said. “What’s frustrating to us is we hear very different messages from DHS, from DOJ and also from the White House….Please amongst yourselves just have one clear policy, one clear message so we know where we stand and where we don’t stand.”

I honestly can’t tell if this is an example of Jeff Sessions trying to save himself – the last truly based White man in the Administration – from termination, or if this is Trump – speaking for his (((master))) – dictating orders from up top.

And let’s not even begin to contemplate the idea that even Old Jeff could have been compromised, as that’s a black pill that I think would destroy many.

Either way, take this happening as the final straw.

There will be no wall.

No deportation force.

No peace.

No end to the demographic slide of the White Race in America.

And no end to the Jewish meddling and destruction of our nation.

Only when we realize that there will be no simple solutions to these problems can we move forward and take back what is rightfully ours.