Nevada: Bundy Trial Day 2 of Court in Nevada 07/18/17
Nevada Bundy Trial – Day 2 of Court in Nevada – Ryan Payne OMA – AParker – 07/18/17 – YouTube
Nevada Bundy Trial – More Info – Judge Gloria Navarro shows her bias – AParker Update – 07/18/17
Nevada Court Outside & Dave Ward Call Update – Jamey Landin
The Video The Feds Don’t Want You To See
Apr 13, 2015
Although no gunshots were fired, what happened at the Bundy Ranch was a shot fired across the bow using the most powerful weapon in the infowar, the camera. It captured the iconic moment of the people taking on an aggressive government tyranny, a snapshot that still reverberates one year later. We look at the lies, the spin and the reality of a federal government openly defying The Posse Comitatus Act as it threatened and brutalized citizens of the community. Although the sheriff did nothing to protect the community, neighbor stood with neighbor in true posse comitatus, the “power of the community”, to expel the federal army from the community.
Source: http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.com/2017/07/nevada-bundytrial-day-2-of-court-in.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
This trial is a joke. The female judge is obviously bias and not a honest Judge she should be disbarred. Evidently she is following orders from someone, FBI, CIA??? These Men are innocent. Kangaroo Court.
They are being tried in an unlawful kangaroo court operating under Maritime Admiralty Law. Unfortunately, they are all going to be railroaded because the judge and prosecutors are in bed together acting in collusion to subvert these brave men rights!
NOBODY WOULD WANT TO BE IN BED WITH GLORIA!
Even the BAR attorneys work for the Crown. British Accredited Regency. Only the people are on the side of the Bundys. The corporate pseudo kangaroo courts can’t even claim jurisdiction and likely none of these executive administrators masquerading as judges are even being called out. Likely the oath of office they took to ascend to the bench is not compliant with Article 6 Clause 3 of the orgainc constitution and therefore they never lawfully ascended to the bench and their offers to contract, aka judgments are Null and Void. Will anyone call them out on this?
Everyone who can comprehend this should read it. Very long and informative. To bad the Bundys do not have this information.
https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/
When the judge asks if you understand the charges against you, you say “NO!”
ANNOUNCEMENT 1
“Your Honor, the 6th Amendment to the united States Constitution grants me the right
to know the nature and cause at this action you are bringing against me, and it grants you, the
court, the duty to tell me. I do not understand the nature and cause of this action
which has been brought against me.”
QUESTION 1
“Is this going to be a CIVIL action or a CRIMINAL action?”
“Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
that this action against me, _______________ is a CRIMINAL ACTION. Now I have another
question: …”
QUESTION 2
“Your Honor, the Constitution grants this court 2 different criminal jurisdictions: One is a
criminal jurisdiction under a Common Law, and the other is a criminal action that
constitutes a condition of contract under the criminal aspects of a Colorable Admiralty
Jurisdiction. Under which of these 2 jurisdictions does court intend to try this criminal
action?”
ANNOUNCEMENT 2
“Thank you your Honor, but I don’t think that you’d be violating your Oath of
Office if you did your duty under the Constitution. You see I am not seeking legal
advice; what I want to know is your legal intent; and I have the right to represent myself
‘in my own person’ without a licensed attorney. And in order to intelligently defend myself,
I have to know the jurisdiction that this court is operating under; because the Rules of
Criminal Procedure under a Common Law jurisdiction are very different from the Rules under
an Admiralty jurisdiction. I need to know which jurisdiction you intend to try me under, in
order for me to proceed with this case. Now the 6th Amendment grants me the right to know
the jurisdiction being applied, and it grants you the duty to inform me; and I don’t think
you’d be violating your Oath of Office for doing so. So please answer the question.”
“Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
that I _______________ the accused in this criminal action against me, have asked this court to
divulge the nature and cause of the accusation, upon the authority of the 6th Amendment,
and that this court HAS FAILED in its duty to inform me of the nature and cause of the
action. Furthermore, LET THE RECORD ALSO SHOW that this court intends to
bring this criminal action against me UNDER A SECRET JURISDICTION, THAT
IS KNOWN ONLY TO LICENSED ATTORNEYS.”
Judge says “This will be a statutory jurisdiction and I hope you’re satisfied!”
“Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
that it intends to conduct a criminal action against me, _______________ , under STATUTORY
JURISDICTION. But the problem is that I have never heard of such a thing as a criminal
action under statutory jurisdiction. I would be happy to accept this, Your Honor, if you
could please tell me where I can find the published Rules of Criminal Procedure under
Statutory Jurisdiction.”
QUESTION 3
“Do you have a copy of the Rules of Criminal Procedure under
Statutory Jurisdiction in your office that I could borrow? Where does
this nature, cause, and jurisdiction information exist? Do you know of a law library
anywhere that has a copy of these rules? Since I am defending myself pro per, isn’t it your
duty to specify which Rules of Criminal Procedure will be used, so that I may conduct a fair
defense in a fair trial? You must tell me where I can access a copy of the Rules.”
“Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
that this court intends to proceed with a criminal action against me, _______________ , as a
condition of contract under the criminal aspects of a Colorable Admiralty
Jurisdiction. ”
QUESTION 4
“Your Honor, you must realize that no courts in America have Admiralty
jurisdiction without also having valid international contract in
dispute. And I’m not aware of having entered any international contract. So I deny that
any such contract exists. Now will you instruct the prosecuting attorney to
inform this court that there is a valid international contract in dispute, if there is one;
and to place this alleged international contract in evidence, if it exists; and explain how I
can be a party to it, if I am; and how I am compelled to perform under it, if I am?”
Prosecutor may get a smart (but foolish) full historical explanation of Admiralty
jurisdiction.
“Fine. LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW that this court has
declared that a criminal action against me, _______________ , is a condition of international
contract, under the criminal aspects of an Admiralty jurisdiction.”
ANNOUNCEMENT 3
Now Your Honor, according to the Law Merchant Codes, the very law that this contract
was made under, there are certain things that constitute a valid vs an invalid contract. You
must realize, that no court has the authority to enforce an invalid
contract; and I deny the validity of the contract that Roosevelt entered into with the
international bankers. He borrowed bank credit on the promise to redeem in gold coin.
Creating credit out of thin air, the bankers had no risk and no interest, because they didn’t
loan anything of value, and thus had no interest in the loan being paid: it was a ‘no interest
‘contract, and thus void by the international law of Nations. Therefore America owes no
legal debt.”
QUESTION 5
“… And now since America only owes the debt by an invalid contract, how am I as an
American Citizen, legally compelled to perform to an invalid contract under the
Admiralty jurisdiction of this court?”