Free Press Dossier on the Fourth Amendment

With the recent front and center attention on House Republicans FISA Memo that centers around an apparatus of certain individuals engaged in spy activities on United States citizens. The Free Press is also engaged in a war of its own that features political pundits, and the industry of Hollywood collusion in sync with media elites. The persuasive target is on the United States Commander in Chief President Trump. In the dire effort to achieve partisan political objectives, the media war of perception displays an unceasing abhorrence on the freedom of thought. To influence public opinion, daily; 24/7 news outlets communicate a pattern of echo-chamber messages used as war tactics against individual intellect and reasoning.

Constantly, the public is bombarded with conservative voices versus liberal voices in the game of throngs in American politics. Seemingly, Journalists are not shy to show personal gamesmanship in the art of winning the hearts and minds of the masses like sports eager to “cherry-pick” one side over the other. The messaging garbed in bias viewpoints is the jersey they sport. The problem is that this warfare of messaging is divisive and accelerates public tension. Thusly, creating a sinister environment while spinning the story for the team. In an era of the social media revolution, the Media overbearing propaganda has spun into a disservice to the public. In regards to news reporting the banner of the Free Press is accountability of objectivity; to maintain the trust of the public to uphold journalism ethics to render Journalism 101, fair and balanced, professionally, unwavering reporting effective news material.

In this bitter conflict of messaging American civil liberties fourth amendment right to privacy is the subject lost in the short web of FISA news coverage. Since Republicans released a FISA memo, Democrats are vying to share the Democratic version of a FISA Memo, the obvious targeting message is that President Trump Republican machinery is eluding Mueller’s investigation on Russia meddling in 2016 Presidential Election. Liberal media speculates Trump as the combatant of Mueller’s investigation. Popular news personalities defensively-offensively spin the FISA story shortsighted that American Bill of Rights Fourth Amendment should not be jeopardized. If there’s no watchdog to safeguard “The right to privacy alluded to in the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath. When the profession of journalism has become lukewarm to its own code of ethics; and acts of a shield to conceal and reveal is gaged upon subjectivity, a disservice to the public they serve is cheated of receiving viable information from newsmakers they trust. Every four years’ voters return to the voting polls to elect a United States President. Therefore, fair and balanced reporting on the FISA Memo is farsighted beyond the sitting president.

FISA is a shadowy entity comprised of individuals who work within the scope of autonomy secrecy. People are flawed and when hidden inside a deep state of judicial secrecy, the intent of anonymous rogue behavior is not farfetched. History has revealed rank and file officers spying on governments, bad actors and peaceful individuals’ labeled as troublemakers, like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., whom were spied on and lived under the radar of FBI agents in the J. Edgar Hoover administration. Without a doubt it’s easy to presume the Civil Rights icon, Congressman John Lewis possesses knowledge of surveillance wiretapping imposed on key leaders’ demonstration of voting rights for African-Americans in the Civil Rights Movement. When the media draw the line in the sand to win the messaging war by any means necessary, their profession echo as agents of the status quo political aligning with political parties. FISA International Dominance supersedes domestic Civil Liberties. They report to a foreign court outside of United States jurisdiction that protects Americans certain rights of privacy invasion from the government, law enforcement and corporate entities.

The Fourth Amendment Bill of Rights clause to the U.S Constitution guarantees that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, ‘spy, utilize methods of surveillance wiretapping without attaining a court warrant showing probable reasons for illegal, terrorist activities