Breaking: Obama's Origins Resurface at Intel Experts Trial; Obama DNA test

***I apologize for the condition of this blog, but the powers that be are doing everything they can to mess this up to make it impossible to read it in a good condition.  This video below that they won’t let me put up  is scathing about more than just Obama.  He throws in Ron Browns death and the bullet holes in the back of his head….etc.  Lots of information that we did not know or had not been confirmed. I gave you the link to go directly to the video since they won’t let me put up the embedding. 

Vatic Note:  We did a blog a while back, sometime during 2009, after Obama’s return from his asian trip BY NAVY FLEET, and it showed scars on his  head which had hair cut down to the nub.  It is very possible that project Blue Brain might have been  in play at the time. So, the question is, “Was Obama a created being”?  Is he a clone with an Israeli project Bluebrain, programmed brain in his head?

That is just speculation on my part and a weak one at that, but with these soul-less creatures, who knows these days.   The Kenyan birth certificate was validated recently in court, so that means he was “recorded” as born…. in Kenya.  That does not mean he was.   Its a shame we have to learn about deceit and distrust this way, but its now a fact of our lives and we are on our own.  That is probably where we should be so we know who we can trust that way and who we can count on.

After reading this, it became clear there is something to this, since a trial that was suppose to start April 2014 was postponed by the Judge, “on the day the trial was suppose to start”,  until after the US elections were done in November of 2014.  According to this article, by Dr. Corsi, The defendant intended to put on an aggressive defence, and right after submitting the derogatories to the judge, the Judge postponed the trial that was to begin that day.

Yup, something is up.  Stay tuned in November and watch that trial.   It should prove very  very interesting.  After all, if Obama’s wife is a “he”, then who knows about the mother.  It could be anything that we least expect.  I feel it only fair to say that I have my suspicions about WND.  When we tried to talk about the “facts” about Israel, they censored the comments and then barred us from posting on their site, then I found out they had a full time reporter stationed right in Israel.  So there is a definite connection between WND and Israel.

How far beyond censoring and banning, this goes, I cannot say.   Ours was a disclosure that Goldman Sachs worked for Rothschild and Goldman Sachs was proven to have more of their employees working on our government than any other institution or occupation.  Most were in top key depts, such as SEcretary of Treasury. 

Breaking:  Obama’s Origins Resurface at Intel Experts Trial; Obama DNA test
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/04/breaking-obamas-origins-resurface-at.html
Dr. Jerome Corsi, WND, April 20, 2014

This is the first of three articles  examining the criminal defense planned by British barrister Michael  Shrimpton on national security charges in a London jury trial scheduled to begin Nov. 10.

LONDON – In a nearly empty courtroom at the Southwerk Crown Court by the  historic London Bridge, a hearing took place in a criminal case that  not only has national security implications for the United Kingdom, but,  curiously, is woven into the increasingly bizarre fabric of the  controversy over Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility.

When it came his time to speak, defendant Michael Shrimpton, a  middle-aged London barrister by profession and self-proclaimed  intelligence expert, politely issued to the judge a series of  interrogatories that made clear he plans to launch a vigorous defense, representing himself before the court.

The criminal charges brought by the British government against Shrimpton  under Section 51(2) of the Criminal Law Act 1977 accuse him of falsely  notifying the British government to prepare for a terrorist nuclear  attack on the 2012 Olympics in London that the British government claims  had no basis in reality.

It’s the same Michael Shrimpton who  appears in a 2008 video that began re-circulating earlier this year on  the Internet in which he claims to have been privy to shocking  intelligence information on Obama’s origins. Shrimpton contends to this day  that the CIA collected DNA from then-Sen. Obama and a grandparent,  establishing that Stanley Ann Dunham was not Obama’s biological mother.

The video naturally has raised questions about Shrimpton’s credibility  and his qualifications to make such an extraordinary claim.

Meanwhile, Shrimpton has been indicted for having telephoned in 2012 the  secretary of state for defense in London and declaring that a nuclear  weapon stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk that sank in the Barents  Sea on Aug. 12, 2000, had been smuggled into Britain.

Shrimpton said the smugglers were agents of a top-secret German  intelligence agency that intended to detonate the weapon to cause  massive damage and murder members of the Royal family and top government  officials attending the London Olympics.

Postponed trial

On March 17, in a courtroom devoid of news media except for WND, a short-tempered Senior Circuit Judge Alistair William McCreath,  a resident judge based at Southwark Crown Court, surprised the Crown  Prosecution Service and the defense by postponing Shrimpton’s trial  until Nov. 10.

It was originally scheduled to begin that day. 

The postponement meant any issues Shrimpton wants to pursue in his  defense will not be aired in court until after the November mid-term  elections in the U.S.

Government intelligence experts on both sides of the Atlantic  marginalized Shrimpton as a loud-mouthed nuisance and gadfly who lacks  professional credentials as an intelligence expert. But McCreath,  nevertheless, dismissed a prosecution motion to order Shrimpton to  undergo a psychiatric examination, making it clear a trial on the merits  would take place.

Shrimpton was born in RAF Hospital Ely  on March 9, 1957, to an RAF officer father and a Welsh mother. He was  schooled in Wales one year then in Australia, beginning in 1964. He  earned a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Queensland in  Australia in 1976 and from the University College Cardiff at the  University of Wales in 1981. He attended the Inns of Court School of Law  in 1982 and 1983, and was called to the Bar in 1983.

His biography, while admirable in its educational achievements,  irreparably placed Shrimpton outside the British social classes from  which the most distinguished professional intelligence agents and  lawyers have traditionally been recruited. Most come from the upper  classes of British society with pedigrees and sufficient financial  resources to be educated at boarding schools such as Eton, followed by  university studies at Oxford or Cambridge.

Although Shrimpton has never held an official government job, he has published in a peer-reviewed intelligence publication,  the Journal of International Security Affairs. The editor at the time  of Shrimpton’s publication was the late U.S. Ambassador Harvey Feldman,  perhaps best known for the role he played in helping plan President  Nixon’s 1972 visit to China.

Shrimpton is the author of an upcoming book, “Spyhunter: The Secret  of German Intelligence,” which is being finalized now for publication in  the U.K. this week.

Confirming military satellite intelligence?

Shrimpton intends to defend himself in a November jury trial by  demanding to see specific intelligence information he believes will  exonerate him.

In a document shared with WND that Shrimpton submitted to the court  in his defense, he put CPS prosecutors on notice that he intends to  subpoena radar signature readings taken by U.S. military satellites.

In particular, Shrimpton wants to obtain readings from U.S.  intelligence satellites involved in the KH-13 satellite surveillance  program operated by the NRO, the highly secretive U.S. National  Reconnaissance Office headquartered in unincorporated Fairfax County,  Va., two miles south of Dulles International Airport.
 

Shrimpton believes readings from U.S. military intelligence  satellites operating in low orbit between 2200 hours GMT and 0100 on  April 20 through 21, 2011, downloaded to a ground station near Fort  Belvoir, Va., will indicate a source of weapons-grade plutonium was  adjacent to, and then on, the Blackwater River Estuary in Essex.

“This Satellite Intelligence (SATINT) is consistent with reporting of  a viable IND [Improvised Nuclear Device] being removed from the U.K. by  a German SSD [State Security Department],” Shrimpton’s brief to the  court claims. “The SATINT would have been made available to GCHQ  [British General Communications Headquarters] as a matter of course  under the UKUSA (originally BRUSA) Intelligence Treaty and on balance is  probably being withheld from the CPS, the defense, and the court.”

Nuclear weapon stolen from Kursk?

In London, WND interviewed John Large, head of Large and Associates  Consulting Engineers, a group with established nuclear expertise that  had been contracted by the Russian government for advice on how best to  salvage the Kursk submarine.

“With the salvage of the Kursk, the Russian Federation took the  standard government line of refusing to confirm or deny the presence of  nuclear weapons on board, but there were six nuclear weapons on board  when the submarine went down,” Large told WND.

“My work was to set up the procedure assuming nuclear weapons were on  board, and the Russian Federation implemented the procedures we devised  based on the malfunction of a weapon with its conventional charge being  released.”

Large said the submarine had been at the bottom of the sea for a  year, and two of the weapons silos housing the nuclear-tipped weapons  were at the front, near the site of the explosion that sank the vessel.

WND asked Large if all the nuclear weapons were on board the submarine when the salvage operations took place.

“We have no idea,” Large responded. “We assumed the nuclear weapons were on board.”

He said the submarine sank in 110 meters of water, or 360 feet, and  the Russians had a guard ship above the location from the moment the  submarine sank.

“Because of weather, the guard ship may have run for shelter three or  four times during the year when the Kursk was sunk,” he said. “It would  be difficult at that depth to do a submarine recovery given the  shallowness of the sea there, but you certainly could do a surface  recovery if you had saturation divers. But again, a surface ship would  be immediately spotted by the Russian Federation.”
Still, Large explained to WND that he and his staff were not present during Russian Federation recovery efforts.

“We worked very closely with the Russian Federation during the Kursk  salvage operations, so we assumed and we were never challenged that the  nuclear weapons were still on board,” he said.

“But if I were to testify in Michael Shrimpton’s case, I couldn’t say  if any of the nuclear weapons were missing or not missing when the  Kursk was recovered, because I wasn’t there to observe it.”

Large concluded the interview by saying he was surprised the CPS was going forward with the prosecution.

Large also had no explanation for why the judge postponed the case  until November. However, he speculated that the judge may have wanted to  give the prosecution time to consider whether or not prosecuting  Shrimpton in a public jury trial and allowing him to launch a defense  was really in the British government’s national security interest.

While he was doubtful a nuclear weapon had been stolen from the Kursk  while submerged, Large cautioned that terrorists could have obtained a  nuclear weapon in the chaos that occasioned the end of the Soviet Union.

“Iran could also have a nuclear weapon anytime Iran wants one,” Large  also said. “With Iran making rapid progress toward a nuclear weapon,  the probability of a terrorist nuclear attack is a realistic risk. Iran  could get a nuclear weapon today, if Iran wants, from North Korea or  rogue elements in Pakistan.”

Secret German intelligence group?

WND traveled to Marlborough Wiltshire west of London to meet with  distinguished retired British Intelligence officer Lt. Col. Dr. Harry  Beckhough, MBE, who Shrimpton plans to call as a defense witness via  video link from Newbury Magistrates Court. Advanced age has limited  Beckthough’s mobility.

Among Beckhough’s many career achievements are having worked as a  code-breaker at Bletchley Park during World War II and having served  with the British 8th Army in the World War II campaign in North Africa.  His duties included working on Lt. Gen. Thomas Montgomery’s intelligence  staff with the assignment to break Nazi Gen. Erwin Rommel’s military  codes.

Beckhough presented WND two books he has authored, one titled  “Germany’s Four Reichs” and the other “Germany’s Fourth Reich,” in which  he documented the rise a secret German intelligence agency. The  Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, the DVD, or German Defense Agency, he  said, was created as a post-World War II continuance of the Nazi Abwehr  military intelligence organization operated by Admiral Wilhelm Franz  Canaris.

Beckhough told WND he was willing to testify at Shrimpton’s trial  that the DVD continues to operate from its headquarters outside Dachau  as a secret German military intelligence operation.

Obama’s birth story

In the U.S., Shrimpton recently has drawn attention with the  re-circulation of a video that shows him claiming that the CIA collected  DNA from Obama and a grandparent in 2008 as Obama was running for  president.
See the Shrimpton video:

(VN: Tried putting up the video and the khazar’s cyberwarriors won’t let me…. so go directly to Utube and watch it yourself.  He fully confirms the point that Ms. Dunham was not Obama’s mother.  http://www.youtube.co/watch?v=pS18ePYGkH0 )

Shrimpton says he was informed that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya,  in about 1960, which means, he said, the information sits in British  intelligence files, because that territory was under the British Empire  at the time.

Shrimpton alleged that through DNA tests conducted during Obama’s  initial presidential campaign, the CIA established Stanley Ann Dunham  was not Obama’s biological mother.

He said Dunham was not pregnant in July 1961, yet it is claimed that she gave birth to Barack Obama Jr. on Aug. 4, 1961.

Shrimpton said it was his understanding that the DNA samples were  collected at a fundraising dinner from water glasses that were bagged  after the dinner.

However, Stanley Ann Dunham’s father, Stanley Amour Dunham, died in  1992. Her mother, Madelyn Dunham, died of cancer Nov. 2, 2008, and was  not known to have made public appearances in Obama’s campaign, though she did turn up briefly in an April 2008 Obama TV commercial.

A TV news report on the commercial by Honolulu’s KITV said Madelyn  Dunham had tried to stay out of the campaign and declined formal  interviews. When a KITV reporter reached her by phone, she said she  hadn’t seen the commercial and was surprised to learn she was in it.
See the KITV report: