Nibiru Incoming! – “Something Is Really Strange"

A twenty dollar welding helmet wouldn’t have been half the bother. Either way there’s still only one Sun.

Very true, and very true, Anne.

You know, the center of mass of our solar system is sometimes above the surface of the Sun. Jupiter is that heavy.

Nibiru is south of us. It is dark, like the small dark comets that rain down upon us every day, unseen until they arrive.

And it moves the entire solar system. And we’ve seen evidence of the jostling.

From 2009:

http://www.gpb.org/news/2009/07/27/scientists-dont-know-whats-causing-freak-tides

“Marine scientists say, they’re baffled by several weeks of unusually high tides that coastal residents have noticed from Maine to Florida.

Unusually high tides are not uncommon, but their causes are usually easily identified. Since mid-June, however, scientists have found no credible reason why tides are running a half to two-feet above normal up and down the East Coast.”

“Skidaway Institute of Oceanography professor Jack Blanton says:

‘We don’t have those kinds of winds right now…This is happening despite the winds”‘

That’s a lot of wrong in one paragraph, Mayhem.

1. The effects of the Moon and the Sun on the tides are well known. (You did know both bodies were involved, right?)

(And did you know the Earth also produces tides? The Earth and Moon orbit their common center of mass, which is inside the Earth. There is a high tide under the Moon, and there is a high tide on the opposite side of the Earth….

Thus you see how any jostling of our solar system can affect the tides….it affects the balance of forces.

2. Katabatic winds (not kabatic) flow downhill, by gravity.

A weather system that produces a 6 inch to 2 foot storm surge, from Maine to Florida, would be observed.

Especially if it lasts for 6 weeks.

3. Undersea volcanoes, “proximal” or not, do not produce weeks of tide surges.

There is a whole chain of undersea volcanoes down the middle of the North Atlantic. They don’t change the tides.

4. “Returned to normal in short order” does not describe abnormally high tides from mid-June to the end of July, when – the article said – they “appear to be diminishing.”

That’s 6 weeks or so.

5. Five years ago a force unknown to atmosphere and ocean science pushed the North Atlantic a bit to the west. For six weeks or more.

And that should have been big news.

A planet — or brown dwarf — that swings by every 10,000 years or so –is not going to be encountered every year. And the way it jostles our Sun and the planets is not going to be noticeable every year.

1. No, you are still wrong in your theory that winds caused the higher tides.

That was ruled out. By the scientists who had the weather and wind information.
Ruled out conclusively, because as I said, a weather system doing that would be observed doing that.

And the “high pressure” of katabatic winds is at the surface. Because the air is descending. Due to gravity. And piling up at the surface.

2. No, you are still wrong in your theory that volcanoes could have done it.

If anything heated the North Atlantic enough to raise the water level by TWO FEET,
it would be observed.

By which I mean, the ocean, the currents, the weather, and everything else would
be altered. Beyond recognition.

And the raised water level would be everywhere, not just along one coast.

And the source of the heat would be very very obvious.

3. No, you are wrong in your theory that the effects would be permanent, or
recurring even, if our planet’s angular momentum is altered by another planet.

But thanks for reminding me — if the ocean sloshes to one side, as it did in this case,
it should slosh back the other way…in a standing wave…

Back and forth.

And if it’s not sloshing all the way over to Europe and North Africa, then by golly
a force is stopping it from doing so.

4. The higher water levels stopped, because the force that was generating them stopped.

5. You misread what I said. The long orbital period of Nibiru means it cruises by
in a leisurely way.

If Nibiru were stationary, relative to the Sun, we would make our closest approach every year on schedule. But Nibiru is moving. And we don’t know exactly where it is.
So, we cannot know how many years will pass, between our last and our next approach.

And because we don’t know where it is exactly, we cannot predict how Nibiru will move the Sun. (As Jupiter moves the Sun.)

And what Nibiru does to the Sun, Nibiru is doing to us, indirectly.

6. Oh, YES, there are orbital anomalies, kept under wraps, and here is the proof.

http://www.space.com/3159-global-warming-pluto-puzzles-scientists.html

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=469dd8f9-802a-23ad-4459-cc5c23c24651

And here is what you need to know to understand why the increased heat means
a change in angular momentum.

http://www.halexandria.org/dward118.htm

‘A plot of total angular momentum of a planet or solar system against the total amount of internal energy being radiated into space, results in a “striking linear dependence which seems to hold across a range of luminosity and momentum totaling almost three orders of magnitude.”’

“a celestial object’s total internal luminosity seems dependent upon only one physical parameter, it’s total system angular momentum (the celestial body, plus all orbiting satellites”

7. Now that you have proof of angular momentum changes — evidenced by temperature changes, as far from the Sun as Pluto…

Now that you have proof that Earth is affected, by 6 weeks of high water levels
along the Atlantic coast of the United States…..

You can finally face reality.

Having, only, said that those possibilities needed to be considered and ruled out i don’t quite get why you’re arguing, Lifels. Did i not capitulate as to the cause of this strange anomaly?

Sun and Moon, combined, does so produce King tides. Katabatic winds can so cause water to pile up on the shore. The worlds largest volcano is under water, we only recently found it, and it’s popped during our recorded history without us noticing.

If Nibiru continues to approach why are it’s effects not seasonal, in line with the heliocentric perihelion aspect? Or even global, for that matter? ? I get that you want to claim the distance changes by approximately 200,000,000 miles over a 6 month period, explaining away the waxing and waning, so lets put that to the side.

Nibiru is supposed to be coming from the south, whatever that means with regard to planetary orbits, isn’t it? So we should be approaching our closest proximity in the next 2 weeks and while we’re waiting to notice any effects we can ponder why these tidal anomalies didn’t occur in any of the four years between then and now.

You do know that the galactic plane is two dimensional don’t you? The galaxy exists in 4 dimensions and is viewed in 3 of them. They’re not the same thing you know? I would accept above or below but i haven’t a clue how compass points come into it.

Yes, Lifels, they are plausible explanations for this anomaly and only the length of the event make any of them unlikely. Given you are clearly not reading what i write i’ll leave you to your imagination.

Till next time, be well.