War Alert ─ Update

By Patrick Wyett

The push for war intensifies, though the pace has been altered by an interesting series of events.

The quick retaliation that Obama promised against Syria isn’t going to be so quick after all. There are several reasons that come into play. The first: Russia, China and Iran; attempts to bribe, blackmail and threaten these nations hasn’t worked. Because of this resolve, US allies aren’t as keen to involve themselves in another US-led war. Such a conflict will not be like past ventures in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya (isolated nations with greatly inferior military capability).

A war in Syria risks a direct confrontation with Russia and China. That could lead to WW III.

Another reason Obama is wavering is because the media propaganda machine has failed to convince enough Americans that a strike on Syria is necessary. Even more significant, the US military itself is pushing back against the idea of attacking Syria. This backbone is long overdue.

I watched Obama and his minions in both parties go on television to amp up their lies, seeking to justify the unjustifiable to the world. Particularly striking was Obama, on Friday, saying that he had the Executive “authority” to attack another nation without the consent of Congress. 

The Constitution specifically states that Congress has the power to declare war, not the president.  Yet we’ve had every war since WW II, bypass this requirement. Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Libya, Bosnia, Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now the threat to Syria. Call it what you will, a police action, intervention or whatever word game you use. When you attack a nation, whether it’s a “limited” action or full-scale invasion, it is an act of war.

Obama claimed that he was seeking to act in our national security interests. What would those be? Syria is and was no threat to attack the US. In fact, there would be no civil war in Syria, no so-called Arab Spring without the US and Saudi Arabia planning and executing the entire thing.  As such, Obama has positioned the US as one of the leading sponsors of worldwide terrorism.

Obama never acts in US national security interests. He acts at the bidding of his international, globalist masters, to the detriment of this nation.

Obama also claimed that he was the “president of the world’s oldest constitutional democracy.”  (This coming from a self-lauded constitutional law professor.) Obama avoids the word “Republic” like a vampire avoids sunlight. A democracy is mob rule without limits. Our founders loathed the very word, “democracy.”  A Constitutional Republic, which is what we have, or at least had, provides for a specifically limited government. Under the supreme law of the land, federal governmental authority is both defined and constrained.

What we have now is the most corrupt president and Congress is our nation’s history. They are bought and paid for by banker, “New World Order” interests. 

I have to snicker when I hear traitors in both parties talk about the need to attack Syria because Obama’s, and by proxy, the United States’ credibility is at stake. I’ll let you in on the world’s worst kept secret. The bumbling, weak, amateurish Obama has no credibility. Our enemies marvel that we would not only elect such a disastrous individual to office, and reelect him as well. Unfortunately, he’s graduated from a laughing stock to an actual annoyance to those who have both the motivation and ability to destroy us.

The only coalition that Barry is building is one with our enemies.

The narcissist, Obama, has put himself in a no-win situation. If he attacks Syria, with or without congressional approval, he risks the consequences of a war we’re unprepared for. This is what his puppet-masters want. If he backs down he loses face and is exposed yet again as a clueless buffoon. 

Desperate people do stupid things. Obama is desperate. 

Why a chemical attack in Syria? Who would gain from such a thing? Not the Syrian government.  Bashar Assad’s forces, with aid from Hezbollah, Iran and Russia are routing the “Free Syrian Army” made up mostly of foreign Muslim jihadists. There’s no need to use chemical weapons against an enemy who’s losing and in retreat. Unless of course, it was a strategic move to draw the US into a trap. That is, get the US to attack Syria and in turn be annihilated by waiting and prepared Russian and Chinese forces. (More about their military capabilities in a moment.)

Unless the Syrians and their allies want the US to attack them, the only other beneficiaries of a chemical attack are the rebels, who have nothing to lose by staging a false flag attack and blaming it on the Syrian government. Obama had hoped that the rebels could do the dirty work themselves. They can’t, not without direct US involvement. A chemical attack, staged by the rebels under US direction offers the justification that Obama seeks. Or so he thought.

I’ll clarify that this is a Saudi and US-backed proxy war, pitting Sunni Islam (Saudi Arabia) against Shiite Islam (Iran). The warmongers have the gall to use the 1400 chemical attack death toll as justification to go to war. What about the 150,000 killed in the Syrian civil war that Obama and his gang, started? 

In Syria, Christians are being systematically targeted for: rape, torture and murder by the barbarians that we arm and support. Same thing happened in Egypt. Where’s the outrage against the slaughter of Christians in their own countries where they formally lived in peace?

If humanitarian reasons were enough to intervene in a sovereign nation’s affairs, why aren’t we attacking North Korea or China? You know the answer. The Russians and Chinese possess formidable weapons technology and the willingness to use them. The Chinese have an overwhelming cyber-attack capability. So too, they possess cutting edge satellite-killing orbital weapons and space-based weapons platforms. Of interest, some Chinese satellites have altered orbits recently amazing and concerning US defense experts.

continue article at Rapture Ready:

http://www.raptureready.com/soap/wyett6.html