Is Return Of Jesus Suddenly Imminent?

Sure it came from Him and so does the timing, which He makes known by signs in the heavens.
Do you dare ignore those signs for the sake of your interpretation of what was written?

I can’t believe what you’re saying, am, not knowing what I’m talking about.

am, you say much has to happen first. What if it already has without you realizing it? The coming Blood Moons are signs from above, they definitely are not man made.

Even though nearly everyone on earth is aware of what is happening now, denial, tradition and false teaching prevents most from connecting the dots.

@Pharisees.org,

Jesus said we will know false teachers by their fruits. It should be clear to anyone reading your posts or articles that your fruit is bitter and angry and you are not to be taken seriously. You lash out in anger and derisiveness. You interpret the Apostle Paul’s teachings from a fleshly perspective without an inkling of the spiritual matters Paul speaks about and then you come to your own fleshly, worldly conclusions, thinking that your juvenile arguments are proof that Paul was a false Apostle. You are the epitome of pride, arrogance, and foolishness and are deserving of pity because you are so lost that you don’t know right from wrong.

Beef Supreme proudly stated, “I’ve had my radar locked in to this cat for long enough”

General Beef, come in Sir, Over!

You are cleared to BOMB the “cat” for the prince of Peace, your “Christ”!

Fly the Drone Bomber with your “Stick of Joy”, and KILL Pharisees.org for disagreeing with you over the contents of some Ancient Plagiarized ALL-MALE-WRITTEN “BOOK OF BABBLE”!

Only YOU can do this “Sanctioned killing”, oh, General “Beef Supreme”!
For only YOU are absolved of any sin associated with this Holy Action!

My Preyer:

Christian MALES are VIOLENT LUNATICS, OH, GOD!
WHY THE HELL DID YOU “create them”, anyway!

Oh, thank you god, it is what I thought, I AM IN HELL, with your Demon MALE christian LUNATICS!

But, what did I do to deserve this HELL, oh, god?

WHAT, god, YOU SAID “NOTHING”?

B.Supreme, you claim that Pharisees.org is a liar…please provide evidence (or be guilty of bearing false witness).

How bizarre that you lump him with his opposite, the megalomaniac Martin Richling, who plasters his face/identity prominently while Pharisees.org seeks no personal recognition, money or following.

Maintaining one’s privacy is NOT equivalent to cowardice:

Merriam-Webster defines cowardice as “fear that makes you unable to do what is right”
He IS ABLE to make bold claims relying on the words of Jesus Christ and the testimony of his Apostles John and Matthew.

why would anyone but a child of Hell ignoramus heed am123 when the idiot provides nothing but his/her own thoughts rather than present what CHRIST SAID in comparison to what the Christians’ false apostle states.

the children of Hell are liars, there is no intellectual honesty in them. the scumbag am123 loves her master Pharisee who says, forget about what Christ taught in the flesh, he was just lying to Jews because God is exercising mercy on everyone by having Jews believe lies and Gentiles believe truth (romans 11:30-32). People are free to become twice the children of Hell by buying into the lies of the Christians’ apostle.

the children of Hell believe their false apostle Pharisee Rabbi Paul spoke lofty of hard to understand spiritual things

I AM LOWLY AND MEEK OF HEART, LEARN FROM ME, says Christ

the evil Christians are neither lowly or meek and so they gravitate to the one who is as they are, haughty and evil. The morons like am123 LOVE THEIR EVIL MASTER, he does evil, he don’t know how to do good, but he gots the mind of Christ and if you do bad, do something he thinks is worthy of death, the Christians’ apostle will demand death at the hand of Satan (1 Cor. 5:5). Children of Hell like am123 are hopeless, just evil through and through

ROMANS 7:19 I DO EVIL. I DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DO GOOD

suckering his Gentile moron prey like child of Hell 123am because he is what the Pharisee really thinks:

SIN WILLFULLY AFTER KNOWING THE TRUTH AND YOU ARE FOREVER CONDEMNED (Hebrews 10:26-27).

By the way, Christ did say EVERY SIN is forgivable, except blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 12:31).

The one who says I DO EVIL also claims to have the mind of Christ!

YOU WILL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS and the fruits of am123 is to tell people to follow a man of Satan, the Christians apostle Pharisee Paul. A worker of iniquity, lawlessness as her Pharisee master teaches Moses’ law was nailed to the cross (Colossians) and the Christians say YES, gone done away with, preachers of lawlessness. But the morons are put under one command of Moses by their Pharisee Rabbi master Paul who says follow Deuteronomy 25:4 because that command is allegedly for Gentiles commanding them to pay money to their church rulers.

Matthew 7:22-23 MANY shall say to me in that day, Lord Lord we did many wonderful works in your name … And I shall profess to them I NEVER KNEW YOU. Depart from me, WORKERS OF LAWLESSNESS

Don’t get any more lawless than to follow a man of Satan:

John 8:37 I know you are of the seed of Abraham

John 8:44 You are of your father, the Devil

Physically they are descendants of Abraham, but spiritually the Pharisees are children of Satan.

ACTS 23:6, ACTS 26:5 and PHILIPPIANS 3:5 THE CHRISTIANS’ APOSTLE IS A PHARISEE

Pharisee Rabbi Paul of the TRIBE OF BENJAMIN did (with fellow Pharisees) as prophesied by Jacob that in the LAST DAYS BENJAMIN IS AS A WOLF WHO CONQUERS HIS PREY AND DIVIDES THE SPOILS (Genesis 49:1, 49:27, Philippians 3:5).

whistle past your graves Christians, you will end up in Hell for being united with a man of Satan. I suggest those who do not want to end up in Hell give up believing in Pharisee Paul’s gospel, and follow Christ’s gospel as recorded by Matthew and John. To stop heeding Paul’s gospel means to cease kneeling at the church altars instituted via the doctrine of Pharisee Paul, unholy church altars that mock God’s Temple servants:

Hebrews 13:10 Gentiles have an altar that those who serve the Tabernacle have no right to eat at

Revelation 13:6 … the Beast opened his mouth to blaspheme the Tabernacle of God

why does the christians’ apostle forbid Temple servants to be at church altars? see, christians will end up in Hell for following a Pharisee, and even in Heaven the blind morons can’t believe christ but argue with him and put forth reasons why he should know them (Matthew 7:22-23).

Also for those keeping score at home:

Fair-is-seas dot org is still in the penalty box because obviously he does not play well with others

But does that stop him from spewing his venom and treading upon ground he should not be traveling unwittingly bringing himself to the precipice of eternal damnation in the fire prepared for the Devil and his angels

Nope

Time to wake up Pharisees for time is short and eternity beckons

The King of Kings and Lord of Lords is coming upon the clouds (see REV 1:7) and if you are upon the earth at that time when that happens, do you want to fry or do you want to fly

The choice is up to you—fry or fly

If we can keep this dialogue very focused on the IMMEDIATE ISSUE, I will pursue this line of thought with you. The moment it descends into bickering, or becomes too larded with extraneous subject matter, I will respectfully decline to proceed any further. Now then, one verse at a time. You quoted Ephesians 2:15. Here is an example of a translation which makes plain the deception by using extremely clear language. What follows is the verse as it appears in the Catholic Douay-Rheims translation:

MAKING VOID THE LAW OF COMMANDMENTS contained in decrees; that he might make the two in himself into one new man, making peace; (emphasis added)

But here again is the same verse as it appears in Young’s Literal Translation:

…the enmity in his flesh, the law of the commands in ordinances having done away, that the two he might create in himself into one new man, making peace,

Note well that these translations agree in principle on little to nothing. The reason for this should be obvious. Since Traditional Catholicism and Traditional Christianity have at their core a doctrine which teaches that Messiah ABOLISHED the LAW of YHWH when He died on the cross, there is clear motive for obscuring the intended meaning of the verse as written in Greek — and in the case of the Douay-Rheims version, outright ALTERATION of the original meaning.

Let us look at another literal translation of the verse, as provided by Scripture 4 All dot org:

The enmity in the flesh of Him the Law of the precepts in degrees nullifying that the two He should be creating in Himself into one new man making peace.

Again we see nothing remotely indicating that Paul has claimed a terminus for the Law of YHWH. I’ll say it again – Paul didn’t say what you’re accusing him of having said. He didn’t say it here, and he didn’t say it anywhere. The fact that several English translations are guilty of corrupting this verse DOES NOT MEAN that the Apostle Paul EVER said what the false witnesses consistently and illegally report that he said.

WHEN YOU ARE ACCUSING A MAN as you personally accuse the Apostle Paul, Ms. Jorgen, you had better make DAMN SURE that your evidence lines up perfectly with what you are reporting. My hunch is that you have NEVER taken the time to examine these verses in Greek, despite the fact that our Father in Heaven has given all of us the tools needed to glean truth from ancient languages we are not fluent in. Don’t dare point to a translation as your evidence for accusing a brother like Paul, and expect that you will not be JUDGED by the same measure with which you disperse your own accusations.

Next you have pointed to Colossians 2:14. Look at the verse in Greek. Do a thorough word study of each and every word. Spend the time with the material. YOU have taken it upon yourself to TEACH about this man. Yet YOU have been IRRESPONSIBLE and IMPRUDENT. You have not been diligent in your OWN study, and yet you presume to teach men and women alike that which you yourself do not rightly understand.

…having blotted out the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us, that was contrary to us, and he hath taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross; (Young’s Literal Translation)

“the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us”

According to YOU (not to mention that one you have taken such a shine to), this phrase should be taken to mean THE LAW OF MOSES. But the Apostle Paul has already explained his meaning. THE SIMPLE FACT that this verse DOES NOT PLAINLY SAY what you claim that it says should be enough to give you pause. NOWHERE has Paul written that “the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us” is commensurate with THE LAW OF YHWH. Nor has he even suggested it.

So it is incumbent upon YOU to search the verses of the man you dare to accuse. And you cannot claim a paucity of material as your excuse. You have accused this man of the most HEINOUS of crimes against YHWH, against MESSIAH, and against the people of THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL. YOU, therefore, are derelict in your duties if you have not SCOURED his writings and EXAMINED each and every word he ever wrote. You should be TERRIFIED to accuse this man, based solely on the POSSIBILITY that you might be wrong about him. Where is your prudence? Do you remember what YHWH said to Aaron and Miriam? And is it not written that Messiah spoke face-to-face with Paul? You are reckless, madam.

If you are wrong about this Apostle, and you are publicly teaching FALSE ACCUSATIONS against a man who is HAND-PICKED by Messiah HIMSELF, then you are in the path of a dreadful judgment. You are OUT OF THE WAY. STOP TEACHING and resort to every single tool you have been given to uncover the truth of this matter before you DARE to speak further on this subject.

If Paul is guilty of anything, he is perhaps guilty of using overly-advanced language for an audience whose capacity for comprehension he overestimated. We are consistently proven to be among the less clever of YHWH’s children; a fact which even Scripture testifies to. Perhaps Paul could have communicated more clearly. Or perhaps he did, and the confusion reared its head ONLY because of the translations. But the fact is this: YHWH has allowed things to be as we presently find them. That means HE WANTS THINGS THIS WAY. I would caution you in the strongest terms possible to consider your ways.

That’s why I’m not calling the Apostle Paul a liar.

The ‘Circumcision’ in the flesh made by hands was just as apt to err as the ‘Un-circumcision’, according to the Gospel. This fact was best illustrated in the Gospel of John when the Pharisees brought the adulteress to Messiah, to see what His ruling against her would be. Messiah said to the Pharisees (in effect): ‘The Law says she is to be judged and put to death. But are you the Judge? Consider that ALL of the Law should have been kept by you before you concern yourselves with keeping this particular part.’

The enmity which existed between the Circumcision and the Un-circumcision was not because of the Law – it was due to a misinterpretation and a misrepresentation of the Law.

The Law, once rightly applied, did away with this enmity. That is what verse 15 says:

“…the enmity in his flesh, the law of the commands in ordinances having done away, that the two he might create in himself into one new man, making peace…”

Messiah abolished the enmity between the Circumcision and the Un-circumcision by rightly applying the Law; He did not abolish the enmity by eliminating the Law.

Once again madam, you are in error. You wrote:

“Regarding precious 13th apostle Paul that [you say] I should tremble to scrutinize…”

FALSE. I specifically admonished you TO scrutinize the Apostle’s words. I furthermore admonished you against ACCUSING him unjustly. Do you see how you corrupt intended meaning, even in words which have been crafted specifically for you? You should question your ability to stick with the words as they are actually written, and your ability to refrain from deforming them into some new and different thing.

I noticed too that you have availed yourself of the concordance for a verse from Ephesians. Do the same thing with First Corinthians:

“All things are LAWFUL for me.”

You know (or maybe you don’t) that the Greek word used in reference to the Torah is NOMOS. Now I ask, is the Apostle saying that all things are LAWFUL for him, with regard to the Torah of Moses?

Move on to circumcision after that. See for yourself whether Paul wrote against the COVENANT of Circumcision. Didn’t he teach and preach that circumcision FOR THE WRONG REASONS would avail one nothing but to put one back under subjection to the Law – to the curse of the Law?

Recognize the fact that Paul’s words are difficult. Recognize the fact that even the Apostle Peter has warned us of the same. Then proceed with due caution. And remember: When you bring charges of this kind against a brother, YOU had better be right.

Consider.

Ms. Jorgen,

You are sorely in need of a lesson in basic language skills, not to mention reading comprehension. I do not say this to be snide or flippant; I am being most sincere. There is NO WAY that you will ever be able to wrest sound meaning from the Apostle Paul’s words if you keep making elementary mistakes like this…

You wrote:

“Regarding precious 13th apostle Paul that [you say] I should tremble to SCRUTINIZE…”

(Emphasis added. Note it well.)

I then responded to the above statement, which YOU wrote, by saying:

“FALSE. I specifically admonished you TO scrutinize the Apostle’s words.”

Are we paying attention, madam? The operative word in this instance would be ‘scrutinize.’ Please familiarize yourself with the definition of this word. Again, I am not being flippant. Then re-read the appropriate commentary between us.

Next, in an attempt to demonstrate that the error is mine, you posted what I had written earlier:

“You should be TERRIFIED to accuse this man, based solely on the POSSIBILITY that you might be wrong about him.”

That is a precise quote. Notice that NOWHERE in the above sentence do I say that you should not SCRUTINIZE the Apostle’s work. ONCE AGAIN, what I said was that you should be terrified to ACCUSE this man.

Yet another precise quote from me:

“So it is incumbent upon YOU to search the verses of the man you dare to accuse.”

Operative word = SEARCH

And again, I wrote:

“WHEN YOU ARE ACCUSING A MAN as you personally accuse the Apostle Paul, Ms. Jorgen, you had better make DAMN SURE that your evidence lines up perfectly with what you are reporting.”

Operative term = MAKE DAMN SURE

Now if that’s not a good definition of the word SCRUTINIZE, then I don’t know what is.

SCRUTINIZE – to SEARCH and to MAKE DAMN SURE

Perhaps the words ‘accuse’ and ‘scrutinize’ carry a similar meaning within your mind. I can assure you, however, that they do not bear similar meanings in actual fact. If this is the level at which your consternation begins, then I am woefully unprepared for offering you the kind of assistance you need. You should IN NO WAY place ANY trust in your own capacity to decipher right meaning from the Apostle’s words if you are incapable of rightly dividing meaning at a most rudimentary level of linguistic basics.

For my part, I shall let this be the conclusion of our conversation.