Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

The Endtimes Start with the destruction of Iran per Ezra's Apocalypse!

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

The Apocalypse of Ezra lists several signs that indicate the sure start of the End Times.  One of the first ones listed is the sudden destruction of Persia. This is modern day Iran.

The Apocalypse of Ezra lists the destruction of Iran as the major Sign showing the beginning of the End Times.

Probably to cover up the incoming debris from Planet X and it is being harmonized with the unrest in the Ukraine along with the NATO containment policy for Russia just as we are entering Passover and Easter Season.

This will be the Point of No Return…

 



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 145 comments
    • Theoferrum

      The Apocalypse of Ezra was the one that predicted the Bleeding Trees as one of the Sign of the End Times :

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ez7jzTo_RE&list=TLQAzNZh7nkD_uXFU1xJJxwqMzhhpmlRLD

    • Theoferrum

      Just remember – you heard it here first…

      • Omega Files

        Thank you very much, but I give all my credit to the Word made flesh – Messiah Yahushua.

        • Theoferrum

          Well, then you should be ecstatic to know that II Esdras is the only Scripture that lists Y’shua as Messiah by name.

        • am123

          “II Esdras is the only Scripture that lists Y’shua as Messiah by name.”

          Actually, there is another Scripture, in fact the only Scripture that counts, which reveals Messiah to the sheep.

          It’s the best seller of all time.

          It’s a holy book.

          Perhaps you’ve heard of it :wink: , it’s called the Bible! :lol:

        • Theoferrum

          am123 – perhaps you need to go back to Parochial School – none of the books of the Protestant Bible list the Messiah by name – i.e. Y’shua in Hebrew and Jesus is Greek.

          Get it yet, genius.

          However, II Esdras which was rejected by the Protestants (because it was never found in the Hebrew by Jerome which, then, would rule out the entire New Testament as Scripture), specifies the name of the Messiah as Y’shua – Jesus in the Greek.

          Clear it up any for ya?

        • am123

          “none of the books of the Protestant Bible list the Messiah by name”

          Are you serious :eek: :?:

          I know Messiah.

          The OT and NT are riddled with names of Messiah throughout :wink:

          :arrow: the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world

          :arrow: the Word

          :arrow: God-with-us, Immanuel

          Hallelujah :lol: :!:

          And many other names, such as:

          “And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”

          —REV 19:13

          Jesus, that’s my King, do you know Him :?:

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzqTFNfeDnE

          Knowing Jesus is the only thing that matters :wink: all else is folly:

          /spirit/2013/03/do-you-know-jesus-thats-the-only-thing-that-matters-all-else-is-folly-2476174.html

        • Truthseeker007

          Omega Files
          Do you happen to follow Michael Rood? I was just wondering because my mom calls Jesus Yahushua and she follows Michael Rood. I happen to think he is a tool for the El-lite but you might like him. It seems he shares the same beliefs you do.

        • Omega Files

          I have never heard of Michael Rood. If he is famous then he probably is a tool for the elites. That doesn’t make him wrong though

    • Theoferrum

      Tonight, of course, Netanyahu met with Obama on this very subject :

      http://news.yahoo.com/obama-netanyahu-meet-iran-mideast-peace-082627032–politics.html

    • Theoferrum

      The real reason for the upcoming war with Iran that starts the Apocalypse off is because they are one of only two countries left that have not accepted the IMF for their finances.

      The other one is Syria and the Ukraine just joined…

    • Truthseeker007

      List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

      Wow and we are still here!! Believing these predictions is just naive and gullible.

      One example from the link:

      1000 Jan 1:
      The Millennium Apocalypse at the end of the Christian Millennium. Various Christian clerics predicted the end of the world on this date, including Pope Sylvester II. Riots occurred in Europe. Pilgrims headed east to Jerusalem.

    • Truthseeker007

      Here is a prediction you can count on:

      5,000,000,000A.D.:

      The end of our Sun’s current phase of development, after which it will swell into a red giant, either swallowing the Earth or at least completely scorching it. It is widely accepted by the scientific community that the earth will be destroyed around this time. However, as the Sun grows gradually hotter (over millions of years), the Earth may become too hot for life in only a billion years’ time.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

    • Theoferrum

      am123 said :

      “Are you serious :eek: :?:

      I know Messiah.

      The OT and NT are riddled with names of Messiah throughout :wink:

      :arrow: the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world

      :arrow: the Word

      :arrow: God-with-us, Immanuel

      Hallelujah :lol: :!:

      And many other names, such as:

      “And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.”

      —REV 19:13

      Jesus, that’s my King, do you know Him :?:

      Knowing Jesus is the only thing that matters :wink: all else is folly:”

      Actually, his name is Y’shua, regardless of the various titles he was given including Immanuel which means God with us and by which he was never known while on this earth. As stated, genius, II Esdras is the only prophetic book that mentions the Messiah by his given name and that is exactly how Phillip was able to identify him when he recruited Nathanial.

      Well, then, genius, since you claim you know him and believe that is all that matters, could you expound to everyone exactly who the person was who made it into the wedding but was then cast out because he did not have a wedding garment? The wedding is the Pretribulational Rapture of the Church so in order to participate in said Rapture he must have been a believer – such as you claim to be – and had to have been watching (and praying) at the time of the Rapture and, yet, alas, he was cast out because he did not have a wedding garment.

      So, homie, since you know Y’shua and all, perhaps you can tell us who that individual is?

      • am123

        You have been deceived and you know not the Scriptures homie, for there is no pre-tribulation rapture of the Church. See:

        /alternative/2013/02/rapture-alert-millions-of-christians-have-been-deceived-2561260.html

        • Theoferrum

          “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself” – i.e. you have been deceived.

          The pretribulational rapture is clearly taught in the New Testament and has been discovered in the Ephraem Document by Grant Jeffrey and the Apostles believed it and taught it and that is because it is also a clear doctrine from right here in II Esdras.

        • Mayhem

          The pre-trib rapture, clearly taught! Oh deary me, you’d best be getting your ducks in a row, Theoferrum, you’ll need to bring your very best to sell that 3 legged pony around here. I will observe proceedings with interest.

          am123, have you been called?

        • am123

          @Theoferrum,

          A pre-trib rapture is not taught in the New Testament. In fact, a pre-trib rapture contradicts many NT scriptures. Here is but one of them:

          “Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.”

          —Matthew 12:30

          No matter how you cut it, a pre-trib rapture contradicts this scripture (among many others it contradicts).

      • Mayhem

        @Theofferum who said…

        “could you expound to everyone exactly who the person was who made it into the wedding but was then cast out because he did not have a wedding garment?”

        … we do not know who this person is beyond ‘Friend’. He was cast out for thinking his attire was better than that which was, customarily, offered. The story of the wedding feast in Matthew is symbolic and the context of the parable is salvation and entering the kingdom.

        ‘Friend’ was used 3 times in the NT and by context it appears to be used for distancing and condemnation rather like “Hey! Buddy”.

        • am123

          “rather like “Hey! Buddy””

          Or like, “Hey! Genius! :lol:

    • Theoferrum

      Truthseeker007 said ”

      “Omega Files
      Do you happen to follow Michael Rood? I was just wondering because my mom calls Jesus Yahushua and she follows Michael Rood. I happen to think he is a tool for the El-lite but you might like him. It seems he shares the same beliefs you do.”

      “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself” which, then, makes you a “tool for the elite”.

      Don’t know Mr. Rood and don’t really care. You will notice the spelling variation in the use of the name Y’shua – my version was in common use at the time of Y’shua and has been found on several ausuaries of that period whereas the various spelling variations of the type used by Mr. Rood (according to you) are basically by people who don’t know their Hebrew. And, further, you spelled Mr. Rood’s variation wrong – there should be a Shin after aleph (or is that an ayin?) and before the Het.

      Get it, genius?

    • Theoferrum

      Truthseeker007 said :

      “List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

      Wow and we are still here!! Believing these predictions is just naive and gullible.”

      Huh, well, you know, if the book of II Esdras didn’t specifically state that the Army of the East would use a Star Weapon in the End Days (which anyone with half a brain could tell is referring to a Hydrogen Bomb) and if they hadn’t developed that vary weapon about the time they also claimed to be able to field an army of a 200 Million Men (predicted by John’s Apocalypse) then, well, maybe I would listen to what you have to say.

    • Theoferrum

      Truthseeker007 said :

      “Here is a prediction you can count on:

      5,000,000,000A.D.:

      The end of our Sun’s current phase of development, after which it will swell into a red giant, either swallowing the Earth or at least completely scorching it. It is widely accepted by the scientific community that the earth will be destroyed around this time. However, as the Sun grows gradually hotter (over millions of years), the Earth may become too hot for life in only a billion years’ time.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events

      WOW – so, you’re saying that a Star CAN be used as a weapon, huh?

      Wow, you’re a genius…

    • Theoferrum

      Mayhem said :

      “The pre-trib rapture, clearly taught! Oh deary me, you’d best be getting your ducks in a row, Theoferrum, you’ll need to bring your very best to sell that 3 legged pony around here. I will observe proceedings with interest.

      @Theofferum said”

      “could you expound to everyone exactly who the person was who made it into the wedding but was then cast out because he did not have a wedding garment?”

      … we do not know who this person is beyond ‘Friend’. He was cast out for thinking his attire was better than that which was, customarily, offered. The story of the wedding feast in Matthew is symbolic and the context of the parable is salvation and entering the kingdom.”

      The Wedding Typology of Judaism makes a Pretribulational Rapture the only viable interpretation. “And you yourselves as those who wait for the Groom to return from the wedding.” The wedding occurs in Heaven and the return is at the end of the tribulation.

      The person who was cast out are those Protestants who believe in a pretribulational rapture and are even waiting for it but who do not have an Apostolic Baptism which is where the Wedding Garment comes from.

      • Mayhem

        I see that it is late in your country so i want you to be certain, Theoferrum that i will revisit this thread but in like 15-20hrs, yeah. This will not be dismissed.

        Just to clear the air i have read your alternate interpretation of the wedding feast and need to point out that we will have to disagree. All good with you, Theoferrum?

        I notice that you offer the Typology theory in support of your position and i really must say, WTF! catholic, protestant, calvanist, protestant, catholic. I’m not particularly fond of any of ya’s.

        I know your name regardless how many you are and this, my post, will have to have cleared up some stuff for ya.

        • Theoferrum

          Clear as Mudd, genius.

          We don’t expect much from Mormon cultists hired by the CIA to troll websites…

        • Omega Files

          Theoferrum,

          You belong in a circus.

          1) On what basis do you call us Mormons?
          2) On what basis do you call us cultists?
          4) On what basis do you suggest that we are employed?
          5) On what basis do you suggest that we are employed by the CIA?
          6) And if all the above were true, then on what basis do you assume that we would have any interest in trolling you?

          Get with the program Theoferrum. This is not how you prove a point.

        • Mayhem

          I really must remember this when the door knockers arrive. I’ll be able to empathise with the mislead blighters now.

    • Theoferrum

      am123 said :

      “A pre-trib rapture is not taught in the New Testament. In fact, a pre-trib rapture contradicts many NT scriptures. Here is but one of them:

      “Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.””

      —Matthew 12:30

      The Tribulation is known as the Threshing Period in the Scripture – the Wheat are those who are saved during the tribulation (whereas the Church is symbolised by the Olive Harvest – no coincidence that the last Pope was called the Glory of the Olives by the Malachi Prophesy). The Gathering into the Barn is the gathering of the saints into the Kingdom at the end of the tribulation – the tares are cast into the fires of the tribulation.

      • Theoferrum

        “It may chance of Wheat or some other seed” such as the Mustard Seed. There is no contradiction in the Parables which expounded upon the postponement and restoration of the Kingdom and a Pretribulational Rapture.

        Which explains why the Church is not mentioned in the book of Revelation after chapter 4.

        • am123

          “Which explains why the Church is not mentioned in the book of Revelation after chapter 4”

          Really? Members of the Church are mentioned in my Bible after chapter 4. Does your Bible have a chapter 11 in it? Or a chapter 12?

      • am123

        You are trying to twist things around. Let’s straighten things out shall we? The tares are gathered FIRST. See, you are saying the wheat is gathered FIRST, which CONTRADICTS what Jesus said.

        • Theoferrum

          No, that is what you are saying I am saying – both events happen at the end of the tribulation the tares are gathered and thrown into the fires of the tribulation and the wheat is gathered into the Kingdom itself at the end of the tribulation. These are the saints that endure the tribulation.

          So, as usual the same judgement you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself.

          Again, as stated, the Wedding occurs first and the return at the end of the tribulation which is proven by the Jewish Wedding Typology.

    • Omega Files

      Theoferrum,

      You’re attitude sucks.

      What are you in a rush to leave for? I would be honored to represent Messiah during the time of trouble.

      Do you honestly think that Messiah would approve of you talking down to your fellow brothers in the Faith? People with your kind of attitude never have the bearing on reality that they think they do.

      Do you have any actual evidence for your BELIEF in the pre-tribulation rapture, or are you going to continue to make these erroneous claims without providing any support?

      Evidence Theo, evidence.

      • Omega Files

        **Your** not ‘you’re…rookie mistake…

    • BEEF SUPREME

      This is the kind of thing which may make my retirement unbearable.

      Are my boxing gloves around here somewhere?

      • Omega Files

        I think Brett Favre has them.

        • BEEF SUPREME

          Somebody give that damn cheesehead a call.

      • am123

        If the Scriptures are used as the boxing gloves, fighting someone over the pre-trib rapture isn’t even a fair fight. It ends up something like this:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y77n–Af1qo

    • BEEF SUPREME

      This is interesting:

      “Theoferrum claims to have been fathered by Jesus’s sperm on the Shroud of Turin…”

      http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message888363/pg1

      A case of mistaken identities?

      …Or something other.

    • BEEF SUPREME

      Don’t ever let anyone, and I mean anyone, tell you that you’ve seen it all. And don’t ever believe it about yourself, brothers.

      The fellow you have been debating on this board could teach even Daniel John Lee a thing or two about audacity.

      Theoferrum actually places HIMSELF on the cross with Messiah in the day of His crucifixion. As numb as I am becoming to the tsunami of arrogance, pride and raging narcissism issuing forth from the body of would-be believers, this has GOT to be some kind of a new milestone in blasphemy.

      Read for yourselves:

      http://theoferrum.deviantart.com/art/The-Theoferrum-Crucibulum-55846012

      The wave has broken brothers.

      Make certain your armor is sure.

      Good speed.

      • Mayhem

        That there is no easy read: it’s easy enough to read between the lines of these comments and see that i’m not alone feeling queasy about this guy. It’s beyond reasonable and surpasses ridiculous there’s something not right with the claims this guy is making for his prophetic vision and i smell intent.

        Thanks for the link, Beef Supreme.

        • Theoferrum

          From a guy who uses Mayhem as his Screen Name I’ll consider that a compliment.

          Keep posting, homie – you’re my best PR man on this thread…

        • Theoferrum

          From a guy who uses Mayhem as a Screen name then I’ll take that as a compliament.

          That’s for the PR homie, keep up the good work…

        • Omega Files

          Theo lays claim the screenname/avatar defense. Classic putz move. What a great way to bury yourself in your a own shame a little deeper.

        • Mayhem

          Oh the shame, Theoferrum, i complimented a contributor for his effort entirely to bait such scorn from you. Beef Supreme needs no such encouragement from the likes of me; he has The Truth.

          Stamp your score card, homie, you just cracked the second level. Would you like to know how things usually transpire from here? Not telling you but many of us have seen this happen, many times.

          How’s your argument going on the pre-trip rapture, genius, has am123 got you beat there? Come at me Steel god, bring your best.

        • Mayhem

          As for your compliment, Theoferrum, thank you and i’ve been told that before. I do what i can with the smarts i was given. We approach your average hit count; lets see where it ends up.

    • Theoferrum

      Omega Files said :

      “Theoferrum,

      You’re attitude sucks.

      What are you in a rush to leave for? I would be honored to represent Messiah during the time of trouble.

      Do you honestly think that Messiah would approve of you talking down to your fellow brothers in the Faith? People with your kind of attitude never have the bearing on reality that they think they do.

      Do you have any actual evidence for your BELIEF in the pre-tribulation rapture, or are you going to continue to make these erroneous claims without providing any support?

      Evidence Theo, evidence.”

      Actually, you are the one who is not supporting any evidence for you view which, of course, proves that you are the one that sucks.

      I am not in a rush to leave, genius, I’m here for the duration. I am not part of the Bride of Christ but of the Children of the Bridechamber.

      You, genius, are not my ‘brothers’ in the faith cause you do not have an apostolic baptism – like the Protestant Evangelicals who are kicked out of the Wedding with no wedding garment

      • Omega Files

        Genius? Is this the best you got? Might I suggest that you open up your thesaurus and come up with something slightly more creative. Maybe give ‘stooge’ a shot – seems to be working pretty well for Glenn Canady.

        And what’s with all the sarcasm? Do you know something that I don’t? What’s your purpose Theo – what’s your mission – your calling? Tell me a little bit about yourself.

        Theo says: “Isaish 53:10, “When you make His soul an offering for sin He will see His own Seed” that’s what you call sperm, genius. That passage makes it clear that, not only would someone ‘join him on the cross’ in the spirit, but would also be his son and would also be seen by Him.”

        Forgive me, if I am not a genius and don’t understand this correctly, but I think that you are suggesting that you are the Messiah. Am I wrong?

        Theo says he has “500 Scripture verses in support of my claims”

        Do you think that you are unique? You’ve been at this for a while so surely you know. You are standing in a long line of false Messiah’s my friend.

        Theo says: “Clear it up any for ya.”

        I’ll be honest with you: you have and you haven’t.

        In your article you say, “Then I placed my right temple against his right temple and spoke in his ear, “Hang on, here it comes,” as I tried to shield him, as much as possible, from God’s wrath.”

        Now, I find this disturbing and it saddens me to read these words. If you cleared up anything, you cleared up the fact that you are a lunatic or a victim of mind control.

        I would like an explanation of how you came to this conclusion. How can you possibly justify elevating yourself above Y’shua?

        • Theoferrum

          “Forgive me, if I am not a genius and don’t understand this correctly, but I think that you are suggesting that you are the Messiah. Am I wrong?”

          Yes – you would be wrong. Perhaps you should be asking yourself who the “you” is of that passage who, “through the Eternal Spirit” offered up Y’shua as the Sacrifice that takes away the sins of the world. Further, since the Levitical Priesthood had been decommissioned by this time (when the High Priest ripped his Priestly Garments), then you also need to explain exactly what Priesthood this individual comes from.

          “How can you possibly justify elevating yourself above Y’shua?”

          I did not elevate myself above Y’shua, genius.

        • Omega Files

          As a matter of fact you did…genius.

          You elevated yourself above Messiah by placing yourself on the cross with Him and attempting to comfort Him as if it were you who He would find comfort in – not the Father.

          What’s with that story Theo? You are running around the topic without really providing a coherent explanation.

      • Theoferrum

        Omega Files said :

        “As a matter of fact you did…genius.

        You elevated yourself above Messiah by placing yourself on the cross with Him and attempting to comfort Him as if it were you who He would find comfort in – not the Father.

        What’s with that story Theo? You are running around the topic without really providing a coherent explanation.”

        You, obviously, don’t know your Theology and you just judged yourself of not providing a coherent explanation of your position.

        Try The Trinity and the Kingdom by Multman – in case you forgot, God the Father turned His back on His Son while on the Cross.

        • Omega Files

          “Try The Trinity and the Kingdom by Multman – in case you forgot, God the Father turned His back on His Son while on the Cross”

          TheoMimic

          You can’t just say something like this and not provide any support and expect people to take you seriously. I know my theology very well actually, so if you want to debate this issue then let’s begin. But I would prefer that you stop wasting everyone’s time by presenting these baseless claims without repeating everything your opposition has already written.

          It is not my duty to judge your intelligence, but surely you have the ability to defend your position with honor and integrity?

    • Theoferrum

      BEEF SUPREME said :

      “This is interesting:

      “Theoferrum claims to have been fathered by Jesus’s sperm on the Shroud of Turin…”

      http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message888363/pg1

      A case of mistaken identities?

      …Or something other.

      Don’t ever let anyone, and I mean anyone, tell you that you’ve seen it all. And don’t ever believe it about yourself, brothers.

      The fellow you have been debating on this board could teach even Daniel John Lee a thing or two about audacity.

      Theoferrum actually places HIMSELF on the cross with Messiah in the day of His crucifixion. As numb as I am becoming to the tsunami of arrogance, pride and raging narcissism issuing forth from the body of would-be believers, this has GOT to be some kind of a new milestone in blasphemy.

      Read for yourselves:

      http://theoferrum.deviantart.com/art/The-Theoferrum-Crucibulum-55846012

      The wave has broken brothers.

      Make certain your armor is sure.

      Good speed.”

      Actually, genius, its more then interesting – it is the fulfillment of Prophecy.

      Isaish 53:10, “When you make His soul an offering for sin He will see His own Seed” that’s what you call sperm, genius. That passage makes it clear that, not only would someone ‘join him on the cross’ in the spirit, but would also be his son and would also be seen by Him.

      Prov 30, “who has ascended up into heaven” that would be Y’shua, genius, “and who gathered the wind in his fists” and, that would be Y’shua once again, homie, “what is His name” we’ve already stated that, “AND WHAT IS HIS SON’S NAME, if you can tell?”

      Ezekiel, Hosea and Jeremiah all call him Prince David.

      Then, genius, when you are done with that, go count the geneologies in Matthew’s Gospel and you will see there is one generation missing from the third group of 14 generations and, therefore, Y’shua must have a son or the Scriptures are broken which we know can not happen.

      Clear it up any for ya.

      Then, when you are done with that, why don’t you ask the Catholic Church why they steam cleaned a 2000 year old textile.

      Finally, why don’t you check out this url with over 500 Scripture verses in support of my claims :

      http://theoferrum.activeboard.com/t55885198/the-theoferrum-crucibulum/

      • Omega Files

        Theo

        That isn’t evidence buddy. You literally said nothing. These are the mad ravings of a lunatic:

        -”I believe in my heart that I went through The Crucible”

        -”I had been with him there on the cross”

        -”I continued trying to comfort him. “Its almost over now Y’shua, its almost over now.”

        I looked at the Scripture that you used too. Most of it doesn’t even align with what you are talking about. You created this strange story and it is clear that you have simply placed whatever versus that you could find which support any and all of the most subtle aspects to your story.

        I must say, you do a decent job of disguising your lunacy. The amount of Scripture that you have sourced can be intimidating, but it doesn’t take a genius to see your manipulation of the Word.

        • Theoferrum

          “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself.”

          Thus, you are a lunatic – like most Mormon’s who believe they can become God, for instance – raving mad – obviously since you have not addressed any of the Scriptural Evidence I have already supplied – who likes to manipulate the Word which, in this case, you haven’t manifested yet because you steadfastly refurse to address the Scriptures.

        • BEEF SUPREME

          “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself.”

          Since you took the time to wrap this sentence with quotation marks, you have made it clear that you are quoting from a source. What is your source? I’m quite sure I know what it isn’t.

        • Omega Files

          Theo

          In your pathetic attempt to formulate a response to my post, you successfully repeated everything that I just said. You aren’t one for creativity are you?

          I’ve tried to talk Scripture with you Theo, but you’ve created your own cookie-cutter version of the Word. But if you want to talk Scripture, then let’s talk Scripture. Why don’t we jump back over to this quote from you which I have already questioned you about, in which you failed to provide a response:

          Theo says: “Isaish 53:10, “When you make His soul an offering for sin He will see His own Seed” that’s what you call sperm, genius. That passage makes it clear that, not only would someone ‘join him on the cross’ in the spirit, but would also be his son and would also be seen by Him.”

          How does this verse suggest that you joined Him on the cross? Stop dancing around the subject and explain this.

        • Omega Files

          Theo

          In your pathetic attempt to formulate a response to my post, you successfully repeated everything that I just said. You aren’t one for creativity are you?

          I’ve tried to talk Scripture with you Theo, but you’ve created your own cookie-cutter version of the Word. But if you want to talk Scripture, then let’s talk Scripture. Why don’t we jump back over to this quote from you which I have already questioned you about, in which you failed to provide a response:

          Theo says: “Isaish 53:10, “When you make His soul an offering for sin He will see His own Seed” that’s what you call sperm, genius. That passage makes it clear that, not only would someone ‘join him on the cross’ in the spirit, but would also be his son and would also be seen by Him.”

          How does this verse suggest that you joined Him on the cross?

        • Merkin

          “disguising your lunacy”

          Lunatics are PRO’s at it.

          I contend that many highly-functional individuals are right out of their undies “looney” and coming from middle management in a LARGE corporate environment… very few know what’s going on anywhere… Just a lot of guys dic-wagging and pretending to know like Theoferrum.

          You might just know more about your engine than the jack-arse changing the timing belt for 80 bucks an hour.

          ~ I have no idea how this world runs at all. It seems that most people I know are completely incompetent and pretending. Seriously if this whole world isn’t a Sim I can’t explain it.

    • Theoferrum

      “am123

      “Which explains why the Church is not mentioned in the book of Revelation after chapter 4”

      Really? Members of the Church are mentioned in my Bible after chapter 4. Does your Bible have a chapter 11 in it? Or a chapter 12?”

      Speaking of twisting things – show me where the word ‘church’ is used in the book of Revelation after chapter 4?

      That would be the Greek word ecclesia, genius.

      • am123

        Where the word “church” is used or not is irrelevant. You don’t have to be a genius to figure out there are other words used to describe members of the body of Christ. For example, the saints are members of the Church:

        “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them”
        —REV 13:7

        The two witnesses are members of the Church. The man child is a member of the Church. The fact that you do not equate any of these with the Church shows that you know not the Scriptures and what the glorious end time plan of God is. Daniel also spoke about the time period we are about to enter and said the Antichrist will wage war against the saints and overcome them (Daniel 7:21) until the Ancient of Days pronounces judgment in favor of the saints and then the sovereignty, power and greatness of the kingdoms under heaven will be handed over to the saints and they shall retain it forever and ever and ever! Hallelujah! Oh, but you don’t believe that these saints that Daniel speaks of are the Church! Neither do you believe that the saints John spoke of, who are overcome by the Antichrist but end up ruling and reigning with Jesus in the Millennial Reign and for all time to come, are the Church. Let it happen then as you believe genius! People are going to be “left behind” alright. Those of you who cling to this false hope of a pre-tribulation rapture will be left behind in the dust, literally, while the true Church executes the plan of God and inherits the kingdom of God.

        • Theoferrum

          The word Church is used prediminently in the first three chapters of the Revelation and then are not used after that point in time. During the Church age each and every believer (who had been properly Apostolically Baptised – unlike Judas) is indwealt in a special way which was not true of any of the Old Testament Propets, Kings or Saints (that’s why its called the New Covenant, genius) nor will any of the Saints after the Church age is over making the (prediminently) Gentile Church to be the Bride of Christ. As previously stated, those saved during the tribulation are the “Children of the Bridechamber” not the Bride.

          So, you can “cling to the false hope” that you will be part of the Church without Apostolic Baptism all you want, while the true Church executes the plan of God and inherites the Kingdom of God at the Pretribulational Rature.

        • BEEF SUPREME

          Theoferrum,

          Your above response to am123 begs two obvious questions:

          Number one – You seem to be suggesting that the efficacy of the Spirit’s ‘indwealing’ (sic) is dependent upon the type or the quality of an earthly baptism received at the hands of ‘someone’ to whom we might presently and accurately ascribe the title of ‘apostle’. What is your scriptural basis for this suggestion and how do you know Judas did not qualify for it?

          Number two – a) Who are these modern-day apostles? b) How is their legitimacy determined and how can their legitimacy be verified by those to be baptized? c) Whom is the apostle from which you received your ‘Apostolic Baptism?

        • am123

          “How is their legitimacy determined”

          They receive a diploma of certification from the home office of the Church of the Cross Sperminated Holy Ones.
          :lol:

        • am123

          “How is their legitimacy determined”

          They receive an official diploma of certification from the home office of the Church of the Holy Seed Sperm Donors.
          :lol:

        • BEEF SUPREME

          Okay am123,

          You can have another emoticon for that one.

          :lol:

        • am123

          ’tis a rare occurrence for the BEEF man to use an emoticon…..I hope you don’t get a rash this time :lol:

    • MSG Chicken

      Here’s another predilection. Another prediction doomed to fail. Remember you heard it here last.

    • Mayhem

      Tell you what did clear it all up for me, Theoferrum, finding out you’re a Nibiru-ist. Were you a Mayan-ist and Y2K-ist as well? That’s not fair, i shouldn’t presume but i’m grumpy, i had a tooth pulled today. I’m not that nice a chap to start with so if you’ll excuse me.

      Um, Theoferrum, i’m reading all of this and see the accusations from other commenters, most of whom i have debated with for a year or more, some of them have my respect. When they ask me to look anew at my arguments i’ll be sure to listen up. Be well, man of steel.

      PS this has to be the ‘n’th time i’ve seen this here rapture jobby and none of it’s stuck so far, lets see how well you do.

    • Mayhem

      Good day, Theoferrum, i hope you rested well because you will need your very best with you today. It’s on and personally i’m fascinated to see what you’ve got but do rather expect disappointment, again.

      Let us look at your work, Theoferrum and sample your fruits. I will contain myself inhouse for the time being. Your best thread received 8500 hits: “The Accidental Apocalypse”. It referenced Nibiru, the space fence, the Logic of Accidental Nuclear War, ISON and there were a few, very few, “geniuses” who commented! How did C/2012 S1 ISON work out, Theoferrum, where’s Nibiru, were you crushed when your belief failed you?

      So i have a peek through all of your work, here, and there’s a trend becoming apparent. Allow me to explain myself, if i can: You have burned your way through, idiot-tube, GLP (and who knows what else besides) yet still desperate for attention you’ve come back here after a three month hiatus. You’ve produced 30 threads and your support is obviously dismal.

      Space- 10 threads, Alternative- 12, Prophecy- 3, Conspiracy- 2 and 9/11, NWO, Sci tech- 1 thread each.

      I’ve delved into all of your ‘Space’ threads as an example, Theoferrum, and see the trend, i mentioned earlier, continuing to develop. Your ten threads have an average hit rate of 1,150 ish. Pitiful but it gets worse, much worse. Not counting your own comments i calculate an average, over these ten threads, of 0.4 comments per thread. And did you really tell a female commenter to “go get laid” in reply to her reasonable question? It’s a change from genius, i suppose.

      And now you’ve found us. Well if recent history is anything to go by you’ve hit the big time, Theoferrum, and now you’ll get all the attention you could want. And please: if you wonder at my snootiness i’ll try to leave you in no doubt as to why this is. You, Theoferrum, claim to be the son of Messiah and you have the gall to tell me you comforted Him through his great sacrifice. The rules of this forum do not allow for the adequate expression of the offense i have taken.

      • Mayhem

        Planet x, The blue winged wonder, Planet of the crossing, The 12 planet, Wormwood, Deathstar, Nibiru are all one and the same. Not to mention Marduk, Nemesis, Hercolubus, the Gods Planet, the Planet of the Empire or the Red Planet all being associated with Nibiru. And none of them could be Ison, could they? Planet-Comet, not compatible.

        You present the strawman, Theoferrum, i never said that you had claimed Ison and Nibiru were the same. If you took that as my meaning perhaps i made poor effort in my argument. How’s that clarity thing going, Theoferrum? With all due respect, how dare you, Sir!

      • Mayhem

        Theoferrum will lose this post due to his language:…

        “Well, I see that you are a very studious investigator of many subjects however, exactly where did I say anything about ISON being Nibiru and, further, where did I say Planet X was Nibiru? If that is the extent of your intelligence, Mormon Shill, then it explains why you believe the bull[dust] Smitty crammed down your throat like that you can become God – and then you accuse me of blaspheme? I guess that’s what happens when you fork over a quarter to the Tooth Fairy…”

        … yeah nah i was offered the tooth i had extracted but i’ll leave the likes of you believing in the tooth fairy if you don’t mind. You are not accused of Blasphemy but Heresy; you do know the difference, don’t you, Theoferrum?

        Mormon? That’s a new one, i’ll bet there was an amount of computer screen cleaning going on when folk saw that comment. You reformist, you.

        • Theoferrum

          Got nothing to do with reformation, homie, but with the fact that the main recruitment center for the CIA is in Salt Lake City – you know to hire shills and send them to New Zealand as missionaries and spooky little wanna be spies and all.

          What the matter, ashamed to let people know you’re a Mormon?

          • Theoferrum

            BEEF SUPREME said : “Theoferrum,

            Your above response to am123 begs two obvious questions:

            Number one – You seem to be suggesting that the efficacy of the Spirit’s ‘indwealing’ (sic) is dependent upon the type or the quality of an earthly baptism received at the hands of ‘someone’ to whom we might presently and accurately ascribe the title of ‘apostle’. What is your scriptural basis for this suggestion and how do you know Judas did not qualify for it?

            Number two – a) Who are these modern-day apostles? b) How is their legitimacy determined and how can their legitimacy be verified by those to be baptized? c) Whom is the apostle from which you received your ‘Apostolic Baptism?”

            1) Nope – one who has been Ordained by the direct laying on of hands in an unbroken lineage back to the Apostles. Their ‘Ordination’ in turn, via John’s Baptism, can be traced in another unbroken lineage via the direct laying on of hands (Priestly Ordination) all the way back to Moses and Aaron, hence the Apostles words, “they were baptized unto Moses in the Red Sea”.

            The Imputation of Authority in this manner is Scriptural and drawn from the Priestly practice which, the Scriptures make clear, imparts some of the Holy Spirit to the individual – same with the ordination of Kings by a Prophet and/or Priest. The Apostles, for this very reason, continued the practice in the Church. The entire Church for 1500 years agreed with this practice until the Protestants discarded it. Thus, when they walked away from this practice they ceased to have any Sacramental Grace in any of their ceremonies. This includes (but is not limited to) Baptism. The term “born again” that evangelicals love so much, comes from these Apostolic Churches (Catholic, Orthodox, Oriental and Anglican) and referred not just to a “public profession of faith” in Y’shua Messiah as one’s savior but to following this up with public Baptism (“he who believes and is baptised shall be saved”). This is how ones sins are washed away and it is for this very reason that a sinner, saved by grace and reborn, must have offered up Y’shua as the sacrifice that takes away the sins of the world for ours sins had to have been placed on the head of the sacrifice (“Ephraim is the strength of my head”) – even if only through the “Eternal Spirit”.

            1A) A source on the internet has compared the Gospel accounts and has proven that Simon the Leper was the father of Judas. Being a Pharasee this means Judas also was a Pharasee. The Pharasees rejected the Baptism of John (and thus Y’shua) and, therefore, it is highly likely that Judas was never ‘Apostolically’ Baptised either by John or Y’shua.

            2) The legitimacy for Apostolic Succession can be shown in two ways. One is that each one of these Priests can tell you their ‘Apostolic Pedegree’ all the way back to the Apostles in an unbroken lineage. For instance, the Coptic Church can show you on paper an unbroken lineage of ordinations all the way back to John Mark who founded the Church of Alexandria Egypt.

            2A) Technically my infant Baptism in an Episcopal Church would have been Sacramental in nature because the Episcopal Church still believes in, and has maintained their, Apostolic Succession. However, before I realized all this I was Baptized in a Coptic Church by a Bishop who, as stated, traces his Apostolic Succession back to John Mark.

            2B) The second way one can verify Priestly Apostolic Succession is via the Incorruptibles which I never heard anything about from any of the Protestants however, if the Holy Spirit indwells the Church, bringing with Him the Spirit of Christ, then there should be miracles occurring in the Church to this day. There exists Saints who have not seen corruption upon death. Y’shua was the only one specifically stated to be Incorruptible and, therefore, if some of the saints are manifesting this upon death it proves that they have been “partakers of the Divine nature” via the Eucharist. Some of these are simply fortuitous in that they may have been buried in soil with high lime content and thus preserved but these are ruled out by these churches and only those which are truly miraculous are considered to be truly incorruptible. All four Apostolic Churches mentioned above have manifested this miracle.

            None of the Protestants have because their communions service is just a symbol.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              Theoferrum,

              First of all I would thank you for providing in-depth answers to my questions. The fact that you have taken the time to answer at all is opposite of my expectations and it demonstrates that at least you have pondered the depths and are willing to be questioned. The substance of the answers as provided by you is another matter entirely. Without meaning to, I have walked us into another entire field of debate; namely the legitimacy or the illegitimacy of the Church of Rome. As a man who makes it his sole purpose in life to ‘suss out the is and the ain’t’ of all these things, you will manage to gain no traction with me by attempting to argue for the authenticity of the Roman Rite. I am more than adequately satisfied that all of Rome’s claims to legitimacy are founded in fallaciousness and fabrications, and that Rome’s foundations are deeply-dug only by virtue of the fact that they rest upon the very stalactites of Hell itself. The Church of Rome is old – older even, by far, than it is purports itself to be. As an organization which claims monarchical hierarchy as its structure, it can also legitimately claim Nimrod himself as its first king. So I will brook no argument whatsoever which at its core posits the legitimacy of the Roman Rite.

              You wrote:

              “There exists Saints who have not seen corruption upon death. Y’shua was the only one specifically stated to be Incorruptible and, therefore, if some of the saints are manifesting this upon death it proves that they have been “partakers of the Divine nature” via the Eucharist.”

              By this logic, Vladimir Lennon is a saint. Limited visible decomposition of a corpse is actually not that rare. There have been numerous reported instances of bodies being exhumed in the course of various police investigations which exhibited remarkably little evidence of decomposition. This alone explodes the validity of your last point, your assurances of the ‘church’ ruling out natural causes for this phenomenon notwithstanding.

            • Theoferrum

              Well, that is because you were the first to actually ask an intelligent question.

              Lenin was embalmed.

              You did not read what I said very carefully. It is not a “Catholic Rite” but includes the Orthodox, Oriental and Anglican Churches which makes up anywhere from 70-90 percent of Christianity. They all have their Apostolic Succession and have manifested this miracle.

              Your belief that the Catholic Church can be traced back to Nimrod is founded on one book only and that is Alexander Hislop’s Book the Two Babylons and his work has not been verified by any other sources.

              For instance, his statement about the Rosaries being used before the Catholic’s started the practice.

              The Cardinal Doctrines that are held dear by every Mainstream Protestant Church on the Planet, all came to you from Rome.

              What Protestants don’t realize is that when they undermine the Catholic Churches foundations, they are undermining their own.

              Non Christians see this disparity very clearly but Protestants don’t.

              You said : “There have been numerous reported instances of bodies being exhumed in the course of various police investigations which exhibited remarkably little evidence of decomposition.”

              One would counter this very easily.

              Prove that none of these bodies had never received communion from one of these Churches…

            • Theoferrum

              And, perhaps now we can get back to the topic of this thread which is the coming destruction of Iran as a sign of the start of the endtimes…

            • BEEF SUPREME

              Theoferrum wrote:

              “And, perhaps now we can get back to the topic of this thread which is the coming destruction of Iran as a sign of the start of the endtimes…”

              We can do that if you like.

              ‘The Apocalypse of Ezra’ is a portion of ‘2 Esdras’, which is sometimes referred to as ‘4 Ezra’. In the Catholic Canon, ‘2 Ezdras’ is identical with the ‘Book of Nehemiah’ from the Protestant Canon. The two books bearing the name ‘2 Esdras’ are not the same, despite the confusing coincidence.

              The ‘2 Esdras’ in question for the purposes of this article was probably written in the late first century (according to the J.H. Charlesworth edition of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha), but the first two chapters of the work were almost certainly composed and added much later by Christian authors. Therefore, it is only chapters 3 through 16 (inclusive) of this version of ‘2 Esdras’ which is referred to as ‘The Apocalypse of Ezra’; not to be confused with the ‘Greek Apocalypse of Ezra’, yet another text.

              Theoferrum has highlighted chapter 5 verse 3 of The Apocalypse of Ezra in an effort to argue that the verse makes reference to the United States. But here is an alternate translation of the same verse, along with two accompanying footnotes which call attention to potential problems for Theoferrum’s theory. First the alternate translation of the verse:

              “And the land which you now see ruling shall be waste and untrodden, and men shall see it desolate.”

              And one accompanying footnote from the above referenced edition of the pseudepigrapha states:

              ‘The Land’ i.e. The Roman Empire.

              The second footnote states, of the second portion of the verse where the words ‘and men shall see it desolate’ are written:

              Syriac; the Latin is corrupt.

              Therefore, the oldest and best manuscript available includes a lacuna or some other obscuring corruption of the text.

              It is also peculiar that the J.H. Charlesworth edition would include the suggestion that the Roman Empire is the power intended by the speaker in the verse. Ezra was being addressed by the Angel Uriel during the Babylonian Captivity, considerably earlier than the advent of the Roman Empire. The tense used in the verse should also make it clear that the words “which you now see ruling” should not necessarily be taken to be in reference to the end times. “…which you now see ruling…” was spoken to the man Ezra at the time, and it was not during the course of a prophetic vision.

              Therefore, the suggestion that this verse contains a reference to the United States is just as tenuous as the suggestion that it refers to the Roman Empire. “The land which you now see ruling” should be understood as a reference to the then present Babylonian Empire. That, then, would be the land laid desolate, according to the verse.

              I do believe in the prophetic and spiritual connection between the historical Babylonian Empire and the end-times Daughter of Babylon; and I believe that the United States is (at the very least) a significant component of the Daughter of Babylon, but I do not believe the Angel Uriel was making reference to that end-times entity in chapter 5 verse 3.

            • Mayhem

              Considerable effort and i always appreciate your input. Well put, interesting, clear and concise but Theoferrum is bound to get no further than… “Actually I did”… seeing as how he’s not fond of the truth and all.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              There is no point in continuing this conversation.

              Any fool can look at the timeline and see which power was the captor at the time in question.

              You are not unique at all, Theoferrum. You are a carbon-copy of every self-deluded, self-important simpleton who has been carried away by his own vain imaginations.

              You can’t even get the basics straight. Your predicament is entirely of your own doing.

              Good day to you.

            • Theoferrum

              “Any fool can look at the timeline and see which power was the captor at the time in question.”

              Have you ever read II Esdras, genius.

              He starts it with saying he was coming up from Babylon in the reign of Artaxeres.

              Cotemporary with Nehemiah.

              Boy, you sure ain’t doing your cause a lot of good, genius – I can see why you ended the confirsation.

              So, anyways, here’s another headline hot off the Press :

              U.S. pushing Israel to stop assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists

              http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-pushing-israel-to-stop-assassinating-iranian-nuclear-scientists/

            • Theoferrum

              “It is also peculiar that the J.H. Charlesworth edition would include the suggestion that the Roman Empire is the power intended by the speaker in the verse. Ezra was being addressed by the Angel Uriel during the Babylonian Captivity, considerably earlier than the advent of the Roman Empire.”

              Nope – the Babylonian Captivity was over by this time. The reason the redactors suggest it refers to Rome is because they do not believe Prophecy exists. I did not say it refers to the United States – I see you are very, very carefull in your reading – but to Persia who was ruling when Ezra received the Vision.

              Modern day Iran.

              The belief that America is Babylon came from – surprise surprise – the Mormon Church. The retard Smitty thought he was the Stone Kingdom destined to destroy the Babylonian Statue.

              Your Mormon Slip is showing, little shill…

            • Theoferrum

              But, of course, that was obvious from your Screen name…

            • Theoferrum

              Strange Screen Name for someone who claims to be a follower of Y’shua…

            • Mayhem

              Let it go, already!

            • Theoferrum

              Go to hell, Mayphem – right where you belong…

            • Omega Files

              … thussss ssssayeth Theoferrum…

            • Theoferrum

              By the way, genius, who accused me of “elevating myself above Y’shua” why did you chose one of His names for your screen name?

              You can join your buddy Mayphem – right where you belong…

            • Theoferrum

              Stick to the Topic :

              Iran Terrorist of the Malyasian Flight? :

              http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-HR370-definitely-a-false-flag-and-now-we-know-why

            • Mayhem

              So you agree with us: The, of ferrum? Strange name nothing more certain. Steel god. Caps with care.

            • Mayhem

              … and… er… thank you :?: i think :razz:

            • Mayhem

              @Theoferrum, with all due respect, you say…

              “The belief that America is Babylon came from”

              … i underlined “is”. Whereas Beef Supreme say’s…

              “I believe that the United States is (at the very least) a significant component of the Daughter of Babylon”

              … not nearly the same thing. I expect any genius to grasp the basic concepts. Better to shut your mouth and be thought a fool than to open it only to remove all doubt. Beef Supreme is towing you around by the nose hairs, thus sayeth Mayhem.

            • BEEF SUPREME

              Theoferrum wrote:

              “You did not read what I said very carefully.”

              Actually I did. I just failed to communicate my response adequately enough. I shall try to do better.

              “It is not a “Catholic Rite” but includes the Orthodox, Oriental and Anglican Churches which makes up anywhere from 70-90 percent of Christianity.”

              This gives me the very opportunity I need for clarity: I understand and recognize the distinction you are highlighting between the Churches. But the fact remains that before any of the schisms began to fracture what was once a cohesive institution, that institution was the Universal Church of Rome.

              “They all have their Apostolic Succession and have manifested this miracle.”

              It is unfortunate that you so freely place your trust in a chain-of-custody which could very easily have been fabricated by wicked fraudulence. It is again unfortunate that you place your trust in a miracle (so-called) which brazenly and nakedly contradicts the Scriptures. Even King David saw corruption of his mortal remains. The suggestion that any once human entity has died and their carcass has suffered nothing of natural decomposition should be laughed out of court even before it is given the dignity of a second glance. The very suggestion is nothing more than a mouthful of spit fired directly into the face of the written Word, were such a thing actually possible.

              “Your belief that the Catholic Church can be traced back to Nimrod is founded on one book only and that is Alexander Hislop’s Book the Two Babylons and his work has not been verified by any other sources.”

              This is a preposterous supposition. I base my beliefs on evidence and facts. For example: I have examined the symbols with which the Roman Rite ostentatiously (and in flagrant violation of the Second Commandment) decorates itself. None of these myriad symbols are without meaning. There is an entire language of symbols which is spoken in plain view of the people of this world. We become fluent in this language when we search out the origins and the meanings of the symbols themselves, which the Occultists and the Luciferians (among and above whom the Roman Rite takes its rightful place) are only too happy to teach us if we know the correct questions to ask and the correct leads to pursue.

              Everything the Roman Rite does it does for very specific reasons. Every piece of costumery the Roman Rite dons is pregnant with meaning – from the colors of the robes and the stoles, to the patterns of the laces and the fringe, to the shape of the collars and the head-coverings – all of it is overflowing with important and revealing information that can expose to us many edifying leads. The leads uncovered, if faithfully and effectively pursued, will teach us the true character of the Roman Rite and will lay bare to us both that entity’s origins as well as its true human and non-human leadership.

              Alexander Hislop doesn’t even get a seat at this table. We don’t win valuable knowledge in pursuits such as these by basing our theories or our beliefs upon the work of other men. Rather, we examine and study the same source material writers like Hislop have availed themselves of throughout the course of their investigations. Their research is theirs alone. Ours is ours alone. This way, any errors made along the way do not become contagious. We would be found in gross violation of the rules of decorum for this pursuit if we based either our theories or our conclusions on as flimsy a source for evidence as that which you have suggested.

              “The Cardinal Doctrines that are held dear by every Mainstream Protestant Church on the Planet, all came to you from Rome.”

              You don’t imagine yourself to be engaged in a conversation with a Protestant, do you? You aren’t even addressing a Christian when you address me. There are no ‘Cardinal Doctrines’ to which I am beholden; nor is there any ‘Church’ of any kind which has a rightful claim to my fealty. There is only The Way of Messiah Yehoshua. There is The Way and there are The Roads: All roads lead to Rome. There is The Way of Messiah Yehoshua and there is The Labyrinth of The Adversary.

              “What Protestants don’t realize is that when they undermine the Catholic Churches foundations, they are undermining their own.”

              If you can’t see me, how do you expect to meet me on the field of debate? Take off your shades and look at me. The only church here is the one you represent.

              “Prove that none of these bodies had never received communion from one of these Churches.”

              A demand for proof can be an effective counter in a meaningful debate, but not when you have failed to rightly divide the word of Truth. You have failed to recognize Truth and to hear His voice. How then can you ever hope to know what ‘proof’ is and what it isn’t. Proof to you is a document sealed with the imprimatur of the Roman Rite. Why would you give your trust to such an elaborate counterfeit when your Father has specifically warned you against doing so? When you ignore our Father’s explicit instructions, the consequences tend to be far-reaching, long-lasting, and inconceivably dire.

              You should throw away everything you have learned and begin again In The Beginning. And I know the way my spirit would recoil in disgust if anyone were to say those words to me. But if you even tried to salvage a small portion of your ‘knowledge’, it would contaminate any hope you might have of future progress in your pursuit of Truth. Of a mortal certainty, your progress has been arrested and you have become helplessly stuck in the mire along the Wayside. No doubt you are turbo-charged and in the fast lane, blazing along on the Super Highway to Rome. But if your aim is to pursue the Way, the Truth and the Life, then your vessel is wheels up in the ditch, belching smoke and fumes. You need a tow back to the starting line, a new set of tires, a replacement engine and a fresh tank of uncontaminated fuel. And you should probably scrape the fungus off from the windshield to help you see a little more clearly.

          • Mayhem

            You have to be kidding, Theoferrum, i’m an apologist i’ve studied mormonism it lacks Truth as do most “ism’s”.

            Perhaps you could learn to think a little better…

            /metaphysics/2014/03/cold-shock-and-the-modality-of-gradualism-2443786.html

            … is this what you call coming at me, Theoferrum? You mention shame, we shall see about that.

      • Mayhem

        Er :roll: well he should lose that post. Perhaps Webby is a little distracted today. What is with this site at the moment? Hope it’s sorted soon and settles down again, i’m all for change but only on it’s merit, yes?

        • Mayhem

          There we go. Ain’t it funny how these know it all’s like Theo think they can boss people around yet haven’t even figured out the basic principles of nesting the comments here?

          • am123

            Everyone in this thread, except for Theo, figured out how to use the Reply button. But then again, Theo has called all of us geniuses. :lol:

    • Theoferrum

      Now that all the Shills have exposed themselves, we can get back to the discussion of this thread and that is that the Apocalypse of Ezra states that the End Times begins with the destruction of Iran.

      • Omega Files

        Theo, you haven’t exposed anybody for anything.

        When people read this, they will see a cowardly wolf backed into a corner barking demeaning slurs that are swatted away with absolutely no effect what-so-ever.

        And unfortunately for you, this article is no longer advertised on the home page. So that means you are stuck with us.

        • Theoferrum

          You exposed yourself, homie.

          Its pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain when people, such as yourself, don’t add anything of importance to any given discussion, only malign the person posting the information which is typical behavior of shills.

        • Omega Files

          Theo,

          We’ve all been sitting here, waiting patiently for you to provide something of importance to the discussion. You have only been successful in demonstrating your incompetence. You can keep calling us “Mormon cultist CIA shills” or you can defend the areas of your position that have been called in to question.

          The choice is up to you Theo, genius.

      • Omega Files

        Theo, you haven’t exposed anybody for anything.

        When people read this, they will see a cowardly wolf who has been backed into a corner – barking abject slurs that have been swatted away with absolutely no effect on your opposition.

        Unfortunately for you, this article is no longer advertised on the homepage. That means, for the most part, you are stuck with us. We are your audience.

        Entertain us or be gone.

      • Omega Files

        Sorry for the multiple postings Theo.

        Computer issues…

        • am123

          I had the same problem Omega. I wonder if it’s a problem with their new site.

        • Mayhem

          You won’t know, am123, but we were warned by one of these, brethren, that stiffer competition would arise to challenge the word. Myself and another contributor, just yesterday, scoffed and i asked where this more worthy foe could be found. “Can’t be found”, came the reply, and “bring it” if i recall correctly. Immediately after the exchange i found this thread and now look where we are.

          Did you want to know how to change your avatar or name the other day? [email protected]

        • Merkin

          ” I wonder if it’s a problem with their new site”

          It might be an anti-trolling mechanism afflicting anyone who debates with a “contributor” and leaves them lying in a pool of their own urine ( as it appears Theoferrum has been left to do )

        • am123

          @Mayhem,

          I don’t know who the stiffer competition might be, but if they try coming against the Word, their foundation is sinking sand. And no, I don’t care to change my avatar, but I know how anyway, thanks.

          @Merkin,

          It’s not only urine he’s lying in :lol:

      • Mayhem

        And don’t feel overly pressured, Theoferrum, we’re a patient lot us shills. You have several questions to address which will require considerable effort on your part given that you are boxed into the corner. Don’t pout, this is what you wanted, here we are, lets be having it. Come at me Bro.

        • Mayhem

          Check your Yeehaa mail, Theoferrum, i sent you my IP. Can you say New Zealand?

      • Truthseeker

        theoferrum,

        the end times (the 5th Seal) begins after America is defeated in World War Three.
        The 4th Seal is W W 3.

        25% of the earth is involved and 100′s of millions are to die.

        The 5th Seal – The Great Tribulation begins the Time of Jacob’s Trouble.

        • Theoferrum

          America is the Eagle from the Sea of II Esdras and they will be judged very possibly starting this year however the tribulation does not start until Nisan 1, 2033 AD with each seal being one of the seven years of the tribulation with the Return in 2020 AD around Nisan 14th.

        • Omega Files

          Theo,

          Excuse me if I am being a dummy, but how does the tribulation begin in 2033 and end in 2020?

        • am123

          Omega,

          You know you’re setting yourself up to be called a genius again, don’t you? :lol:

        • am123

          NOTE TO BIN ADMINISTRATORS:

          Commenting on the new site is much more difficult. I guess you guys didn’t QA it before going live?

        • Mayhem

          Embrace the change, the “Top 50″ is the new recent comments.

        • Mayhem

          er i mean it’s the new “most popular thread” a list of most recent comments have surely gone. We’ll have to save links in a folder on the bookmarks bar to follow a debate. I’m thinking it will be a good change once we adjust. Should reduce trolling as folk will have to be interested in the subject and not just the tone of the debate.

        • am123

          What I am referring to Mayhem is when I post a comment, it takes forever to accept it. The little spinner thing keeps going around and round, when she stops, no one knows. It has resulted in posting comments twice as you can see here and there. Before this change, comments were accepted right away.

        • Omega Files

          am123,

          it is quite the nuisance. It’ll spin for up to an hour before it finally posts.

        • am123

          Yep Omega. I sure hope they address this problem.

        • Mayhem

          I hear that but find a refresh will often sort it quicker. But you’ve still got to give it a while. In one thread i ended up double posting after an hours wait. Sheesh.

      • Merkin

        “Now that all the Shills have exposed themselves”

        Hardly…

        There are MANY more “Shills” on here who are looking to separate the wheat from the chaff with due haste.

        In that vein can someone here confirm the following confusions for me?

        1. Theoferrum believes his seed was planted from the line of Jesus.. not just the line.. but from Jesus himself or an artifact attributed to him?

        2. Theoferrum thinks he knows what it is like to be crucified? Ahem ( can you smell disdain? )

        3. How is an aspiring man of the WORD supposed to take this cat seriously?

        Theoferrum Name denotes “Iron of GOD”

        Merkin: as the lone remaining “MERovingian KINg” in the wilderness I call shenanigans on your self appointed title unless the “theo” relates to the god of this earthly realm “Saturnus”

        • Mayhem

          Whew! I was about to steal your line and say…

          Theoferrum puts the ‘count’ in “country”

          … glad i didn’t. Um?

        • Merkin

          You are welcome to use that any time Brother Mayhem. It’s not so thinly veiled but it will pass any language filter with ease.

          “count theo” the goat

          I’d rather be friends with the “other” goat Judas if point 1 and 2 are accurate.

        • Mayhem

          Do you see, Merkin, how Theo was all blather when he thought he had am123 alone? Never doubt my friend but that the enemy is very familiar with The Inspired Word. You well know that the best lies contain much of the truth. Having said that, am123, could do with a hefty revision of hell and eternal torment, all the same. Maybe iconography as well but what would i know.

          I gulped down a decent slug of apprehension, myself, when i stepped into this. Witness the strength of His shield, Merkin, for without Him i am dust, almost nothing.

          I’m loathe to boast but we are being noticed by both sides and we have to be racking up some sort of record for truth holding forth. Nah, that first bit is a fib. Jiggy, jiggy, yee, haa! Thankyou Yahweh Elohim, in the name of our Savior, Yehoshua, for teaching me real strength and giving me courage. Forgive my sin and reveal my transgressions that i might learn, i listen for your command, my King.

        • Merkin

          “the best lies contain much of the truth.”

          They sure do. Sometimes the lie is in the truth itself. Telling you a lesser story to avoid the bigger reality or offering a bigger fabrication to misdirect entirely.

          “we are being noticed by both sides”

          My wife has been worried about my “lack of common sense” when asking questions and looking for answers. Call it a character flaw if you want. She’s been waiting for the “knock on the door” for years. Even more so since I’ve starting kicking embers back into the face of ‘it’.
          Maybe I was made for this.. you too Brother.

          What she is starting to “feel” is a real foundation and future in my eyes.. not matter what comes. She hears me laughing with tears watching some of “these” debates on here. She see’s me playing with my kids. I notice the song birds that have always been there.

          I’ll follow this windy trail even if it leads me back to my Father’s arms.
          ( If I step on a few rabid dogs on the way home so be it )

        • Omega Files

          Brother Mayhem, Brother Merkin,

          I wish everybody could read those words. Those last two comments may have been the most powerful expression of Faith that I have ever seen.

          There might not be much to boast about in regards to our ‘work’ on BIN, but it’s moments like this where you realize that maybe we are on the right track. Where else can you observe a conversation so genuine and pure but in a comment thread on a B-grade conspiracy website?

          If nobody but those who are currently visiting this thread sees this, then I would just like to butt in here and say thank you and God bless – truly uplifting.

          …as you were.

        • Mayhem

          Then i count you among Yeshua’s brothers, Merkin; hold on tight to your marbles the power rush can be heady. Excuse the conceit but one thing i try to show is the absolute power in humbleness. Omega provides a good example with this…

          “abject slurs that have been swatted away with absolutely no effect”

          … i have a fair idea how little gets by you, Mr President, and you see this from us all the time. On my part; Aikido, brother Merkin, and it’s principles teach much. Absorb, Amplify and Return so that the barbs of the enemy are of none effect. Anonymity really helps in this regard and i understand where the catholics get their confessional from but i expect, should i be found, to be naked and alone. Conscience replete.

        • Omega Files

          Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting. ~ Psalm 139:23-24

        • Mayhem

          I forgot a couple of words: after the word “show” please insert….

          , from the lofty heights of arrogance,

          … the arrogance never gets anywhere, and often draws the focus, and the humility doesn’t need all caps to shout.

        • Merkin

          Never has a more worthless soul picked up the mantel than the small ‘i” behind this keyboard.

          The disdain I’ve demonstrated on here ( at times still ) is shameful ( from the wrong father ) and (an ongoing pattern) does a disservice to the real men who show measure in their words and defend with logic, honor, and grace. I hope others read this and ask if you aren’t controlling yourself… who is ?

          I know “without a shadow of a doubt” language written and spoken is more powerful than most even suspect. Intention in language should match your spirit and often will without your direct input.

          “Aikido, brother Merkin, and it’s principles teach much”

          That is an excellent idea Brother. I believe you know me well to suggest such a thing. As far as my marbles go… they are completely scrambled… undiagnosed but clearly so. Want to hear something funny? My uncontrollable verbal “ticks” plaguing me for years have almost completely gone since taking this new path…

          ( Peace Brothers All )

        • Mayhem

          With regards to anger and it’s management lets consider that we have been told everything: Not once, but twice.

          Here’s one you will enjoy reading, Proverbs 12:16. I am certain you know this already, that’s actually my point. Long before either of us knew of it, it was written. That we have clear, unequivocal instruction for heading in a [G]ood [O]rderly [D]irection. An agnostic friend taught me that acronym.

          On the other hand you’ll also be interested in what Mark had to say, Mark 3:5. You’ll see for yourself that anger is not without it’s place but read from the start of the chapter to gain context for what Messiah was doing and saying. Makes my bluff about having a pair pale by comparison, i don’t mind saying.

          Meek does not mean whipped by a she cats bits, nor door mat. Just as turn the other cheek only applies to our brothers and sisters.

          http://www.openbible.info/topics/anger_management

          I use this site, and there are many like it, i’ll type anything into the search engine and if it’s contained anywhere in Canon Scripture you’ll have it before your eyes. It’s how i found those two verses i offer.

          http://biblehub.com/summary/

          This site, again one of many, is where i look to the original languages. It has Strong’s concordance, Greek Interlinear and cross references many different translations. I find the summaries fantastic for conceptualising, getting the timeline square and working out who is speaking and to whom.

          It goes all etymological, not to mention transubstantiational, at the click of a mouse and really does have the whole shebang in a nut shell. Er did i just make up a word?

          Excuse me if i’m preaching to the choir, brother Mr President, but it’s not for you alone that i write. There is nothing in Faith that offends the reasoned mind.

    • Pix

      Apocalypse is a Greek word that means ‘to uncover’, ‘to reveal’, hence the book is titled REVELATION.

      DER.

      :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

      • Mayhem

        You’re definitely preaching to the choir, Pix. What on God’s earth could make you think any of us, here, would claim otherwise? No one said the world will end with the destruction of Persia only that the end will start then (underline ‘start’). They may be right, who knows?

      • Theoferrum

        And that is how it is used in the title of this thread, genius.

        And its, DUH, not DER – get it right…

    • Theoferrum

      BEEF SUPREME said :

      ‘The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself.’

      “Since you took the time to wrap this sentence with quotation marks, you have made it clear that you are quoting from a source. What is your source? I’m quite sure I know what it isn’t.”

      Boy, you sure are clueless arn’t ya?

      Try Romans 2:1

      • BEEF SUPREME

        Theoferrum wrote:

        “Boy, you sure are clueless arn’t ya? Try Romans 2:1”

        You suffer as equal a perplexity with reading comprehension as you do with English language writing and composition. No matter; we’re here to help. Let’s first try it thusly:

        Here we have your original quote:

        “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself.”

        Again I will admit to being clueless as to the source of your quotation. I did not fail to note, however, that you now begin to see the problem you have in this case – when at first you posted the above quote, you wrapped it with DOUBLE quotation marks, and now you have changed to SINGLE quotation marks. Had you used single marks originally, the concept of paraphrasing would have been implied in your posting, as we are both aware. So are you reading from Scripture or are you paraphrasing?

        And here we have Romans 2:1, which you suggest corresponds with, or otherwise agrees with, the quotation you have provided:

        “Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.”

        It sounds like you might even have a fair argument, right up until two verses later, that is:

        “And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?”

        Therefore, the verse you cite includes the concept of ‘hypocrisy’ – but you have not allowed any provision for the concept of hypocrisy in your paraphrase. Your paraphrase is exclusive of the concept of hypocrisy. RIGHT RULING is another concept which is expounded upon at length from Genesis to the Maps. Therefore RIGHT RULING cannot contradict the concept of JUDGMENT. The concept of RIGHT RULING as taught by Scripture makes it clear that there is a CORRECT way for us to judge. One of the INCORRECT ways for us to judge is highlighted by Paul in Romans chapter 2. And YOU have just highlighted the main failing of paraphrasing verses of Scripture: Not only does the original meaning become lost yet further in the fog of translation when we paraphrase, but the context of the original verse or verses is often completely eliminated from consideration.

        With each subsequent posting, you further betray an inadequate knowledge of all things. Your writing is substandard and borderline incoherent and your ability to comprehend what you read in Scripture is dubious at best.

        Reel it in man.

        Hide yourself in a hole and just study the Word until He comes. You’ll be much better off if you do. Everything you think you know is wrong.

        • Mayhem

          Is this “Jeopardy”? Can anyone answer?

          What does the word “and” mean in Romans 2:3?

    • NIBIRU

      Good….

    • Theoferrum

      “This gives me the very opportunity I need for clarity: I understand and recognize the distinction you are highlighting between the Churches. But the fact remains that before any of the schisms began to fracture what was once a cohesive institution, that institution was the Universal Church of Rome”

      Wrong – you need to look at your church history a little closer. You will see that, up until Chalcedon in 451 AD the Pope of the Catholic Church was the Bishop of Alexandria (he was called Pope before the Bishop of Rome) and it was this Bishop which settled all major Doctrinal Issues for those first 400 Years. The Niacene Creed was written by Athanasius of Alexandria and is still used by all those churches to this day. At the time of Chalcedon there was a power struggle between Rome and Alexandria and the Pope in Rome accused the Pope of Alexandria of heresy and excommunicated them.

      The Orthodox church recently came out with a statement to the effect that these Oriental Churches (Coptic, Ethiopean, Armenian, Indian etc) were never guilty of heresy. But, effectively, the Pope of Rome now had the Scepter. This is actually portrayed by the letter to Ephesus who lost their candlestick at this time for it was the Pope of Alexandria by the name of Augustine (following Origen) who convinced the entire Catholic (Universal) Church to discard the Premillenial Faith (and, though most evangelicals don’t know it, it is the Catholic Church which revived the Premillenial Faith – Monk by the name of Lacunza).

    • Theoferrum

      ” It is again unfortunate that you place your trust in a miracle (so-called) which brazenly and nakedly contradicts the Scriptures.”

      We have been made, “partakers of the Divine Nature” – those of us who are saved and receiving the Real Presence in the Eucharist.

      By the way, you are aware of the fact that both Luther and Calvin continued to believe in Apostolic Succession and the Real Presence in the Eucharist aren’t you?

      And, of course, you must be aware of the fact that Wycliffe, a very outspoken critic of both of those Sacraments continued to receive communion and it killed him – he died of a stroke while attending Divine Liturgy in fullfillment of Paul’s words that those who receive communion unworthily drink damnation unto themselves, “not recognizing the Body of Christ.”

    • Theoferrum

      “You have failed to recognize Truth and to hear His voice.”

      “The same judgment you judge others with, you are guilty of yourself” homie.

    • Theoferrum

      U.S. pushing Israel to stop assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists

      http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-pushing-israel-to-stop-assassinating-iranian-nuclear-scientists/

    • Theoferrum
    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.