Mirabolin:

Here’s fifty dollars–$50–to translate your replies into anything commensurable with the vernacular.

My guess, and it is nothing more than a guess, is that you think that the Treatise On the Resurrection is a treatise of metaphysical philosophy.

It’s not.

It is a description in the vernacular of the receiving of a specific Revelation: the Revelation of “the resurrection”.

The “spiritual” resurrection is not a metaphysical theory; it is a term for the Revelation of the Memory of Creation and of the non-dualistic consciousness of man at the moment of Creation. It is based upon an actual experience of that kind of consciousness, rather than being something concocted by a ‘thinker’ with time on its hands.

And the repetition of your comment about ‘kicker in the faces’ completely missed its intended target, leaving me puzzled at what you are even referring to and whether I am supposed to be amused or offended.

Similar for your statement about “Godhood too Flea Lord”.

And “transcendentalism of Paul’s Christianity”????

You mean the same Paul that said that a man can be ‘God’?

The same Paul whose doctrine resulted in Naziism?

THAT Paul?

I do not consider that transcendentalism at all but “wallowing in the mire-ism” of the consciousness of the “self”‘s need to preserve itself with metaphysical philosophy.

I have no love for metaphysical philosophy, which is what you appear to swim in.

Michael

I don’t know where to begin. (and, still, this “lord of the fleas” nonsense; whatever THAT is supposed to mean. I don’t have a CLUE.)

Seriously.

You make several assumptions about what I “believe” without any evidence whatsoever from my statements that that is the case. But, as Nietzsche said: “…it is not my job to shoo flies.”

Anyway, no ‘decision is made’. A person either directly receives the memories of previous lives or the revelation of the memories of previous lives or he doesn’t. Going to a past-life regression hypnotist is nothing I would ever do; nor would I consult any lama or swami.

The memories I have had have emerged immediately out of the circumstances of my life; the people I have met, and the similarity or correspondences between this life and other lives in which I have met them. Had I never received those memories, it would not even have occurred to me that there was any way that I could know for certain that I had lived previous lives. It would have been nothing more than a theory.

And don’t be so cynical.

The observation of the emergence of different selves requires a ‘grounding’ consciousness beyond the consciousness of the “self” for such an ‘observation’. That is simply common sense.

Michael

And “transcendentalism of Paul’s Christianity”????
You mean the same Paul that said that a man can be ‘God’?

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The transcendentalism of man is in his ability to not circle endless wordly lives defined by other psychopaths alone. God is not bound by transcendentalism.

The transcendentalism that says the no amount of talking banana plants and turbulent skies is ever going to cut it. That if God can interact in this world – and he might not be able to do so – then he is going to interact as someone who had lived the profane life of a man if they are ever going to transcend their daily lives when needed. Christianity is not the profane laws of a small group of people descended from some desert nomad. Paul never left the profanity of his jewishness while he lived but I guess that he thought that when he was interacting with non-jews he was transcending it in Christ’s name. As he would have to. If he hadn’t then his own profane existence as a Jew would have itself have to trespass into the world of the sacred sacrifice and that would be one in which the whole world became Jewish (while staying themselves too) and the Jews would have given up their group body for the world as some type of sacred sacrifice instead (something that only Americans are brain dead enough to do). Even Jesus only took up that role when after he was crucified.

“I don’t know where to begin. (and, still, this “lord of the fleas” nonsense; whatever THAT is supposed to mean. I don’t have a CLUE.”

- – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - -

I have explained clearly what it means. Your Christianity incorporating Hinduism / Buddhism considers openly or deep down that people are the reincarnation of other lives and that the value of these previous lives determines the rebirthed peoples future lives. And, literally or figuratively, people can become fleas and people can be the reincarnation of fleas – those at the bottom of society obviously. You worship and would have people worship the Lord of the Flies or Fleas, the Devil – these aforementioned people.

=============================

“You make several assumptions about what I “believe” without any evidence whatsoever from my statements that that is the case.”

- – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - -

You hope! But at least now you are stumbling towards openly admitting what your sneaky guilt tripping post are like for most people to read are like: that no one could POSSIBLY know what you believe based on what you post. That THAT is not possible!

For most people no. But as you still demonstrate you can only respond by insulting others that you think are offending you by interrupting the obscenity of the insults and filt that you are throwing at them.

And what you are still NOT doing is exposing the malignancy of what you actually BELIEVE to the light.

==========================
“A person either directly receives the memories of previous lives or the revelation of the memories of previous lives or he doesn’t.”

- – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - -

So the present ‘pretend’ basis for your religion of ShiteTan is schizophrenia.

=====================================

n almost all cases, I have been able to determine whether or not someone else agrees or disagrees with me on the basis of what they say; and, very clearly, what precisely it is that they agree with or object to.

- – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - -

If you are unsure about whether or not my describing your ‘Kicking evil handicapped ‘re-born flea’ children in the face for your religion of ShiteTan, the Lord of the Flies’ is agreement with you or not then Michael … you really do have borderline schizophrenia.

============================
>My guess, and it is nothing more than a guess, is that you think that the Treatise On the Resurrection is a treatise of metaphysical philosophy.
It’s not.
It is a description in the vernacular of the receiving of a specific Revelation: the Revelation of “the resurrection”.
The “spiritual” resurrection is not a metaphysical theory; it is a term for the Revelation of the Memory of Creation and of the non-dualistic consciousness of man at the moment of Creation. It is based upon an actual experience of that kind of consciousness, rather than being something concocted by a ‘thinker’ with time on its hands.

- – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - — – - – - -
And if you cannot expose yourself then simply cite a modern source that comments on your beliefs.

I have given you a source that states that the Christian gnostic Doctrine of the Resurrection that you use to show what Christianity should be rather than dualistic (even though Christianity is trinitarian) IS a dualistic doctrine.

http://www.theologywebsite.com/etext/naghammadi/resurrection.shtml

“Most of what I write does not come under the category of belief at all; rather, it originates in two principal Revelations: the Vision of the “Son of man” and the Revelation of “the resurrection”. (These are the two fundamental Revelations which underlie the Torah, the Prophets, the Gospels and the Quran. And that is not any thought of a ‘thinker’. That is a statement based upon recognition; that recognition based upon the receiving of those Revelations.) That Knowledge originates beyond fear and desire (and guilt, wherever you got that idea), pleasure and pain.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

That is NOT a source. I said a wanted a modern source that agreed with you.

And as for fear etc this is just your, again, starting to rant at the evil reborn fleas that you wish to worship the Lord of the Flies. Your need for people, and for people of the Christian faith to let you speak on their behalf rquires that you dismiss their thoughts as innately maggot like.

+++And my words are not pleasurable to you; which is the only thing of importance to the consciousness of a worm (“their worm dieth not and their fire is not quenched”, as Jesus said in Chapter 9, verse 48 of the Gospel of Mark).+++

===================

That Knowledge originates beyond fear and desire (and guilt, wherever you got that idea), pleasure and pain.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

Well understanding that knowledge and emotions are different things isn’t adding much to anybody elses understanding of things.

==================================

“these words will remain secret and sealed until the time of the End”, which would seem to exclude the possibility that what I say has already been said by metaphysical philosopher-theologians.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

So you know that they will be sealed to you unless you have the books with you and have opened their seals.

======================

And, in order for any of them to accept what I have said as being Revealed Truth, their consciousness of the ‘thinker’ would have to come to an end—which, of course, is the meaning of the phrase “until the time of the End”; that is, when the words of Truth are no longer ‘secret and unsealed’.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

And if a persons ‘consciousness was appropriately destroyed first’ you would get them to believe any number of things.

So so modern or ancient sources. Not a single recorded source to back you up as having the authority that you say you have over all things?

===============================

“I do not believe in any “Christian gnostic doctrine of Resurrection”, whatever that means.”

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

The Christian gnostic doctrine of Resurrection was the doctrine espoused in the Doctrine of Revelation. I knew that you were not even in agreement with it as well as St Paul and that is what I poiinted out to you

===========================

You are well within your rights to deny that I have received Revelations at all. But that is merely the structure and reflex (“fire”) of the consciousness of the “self” in its turning away from the Light and into the cesspool of duality…
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – - – - – - – — – - – - – - – -

And you going nowhere shattered (Krishna?) consciousness is left without a theory of mind – either your own or others.