Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Jeffery Pritchett
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Magic of Solomon: Vatican Removed 14 Books From the Bible in 1684? (Video)

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


In the year 1611 the Holy Bible was translated from Latin to English; and at that time the Bible contained a total of 80 books. The last 14 books that made up the end of the Old Testament were as follows:

  •  1 Esdras
  •  2 Esdras
  •  Tobit
  •  Judith
  •  The rest of Esther
  •  The Wisdom of Solomon
  •  Ecclesiasticus
  •  Baruch with the epistle Jeremiah
  •  The Songs of the 3 Holy children
  •  The history of Susana
  •  bel and the dragon
  •  The prayer for Manasses
  •  1 Maccabees
  •  2 Maccabees

In the year 1684 these 14 books were removed from all versions of the Holy Bible except the 1611 edition; in this edition you will also find that Jesus name  is not the same, in fact it is spelled IESUS and pronounced Yahashua.  Why then do we continue to call our savior Jesus? Did you know that these books even existed? I hope that the Questions that I am presenting are Encouraging you to research further into this subject and praying that it gets you reading your bible! Then and only then will you begin to see what they have hidden from us in Plain Sight!
While my studying the Word in the Apocrypha I came across a book called the Wisdom of Solomon; this intrigued me so that I continued to read this book called the Wisdom of Solomon…… What I read sent Chills through my body and I just had to share it with you…..

Wisdom of Solomon 2:5-24

5  For our time is very shadow that passeth away; and after our end there is no returning: for it is fast sealed, so that no man cometh again.

6  Come on there for let us enjoy the good things that are present: and let us speedily use the creatures like as in youth.

7  Let us fill ourselves with costly wine and ointments: and let no flower of the Spring pass by us.

8  Let us crown ourselves with rosebuds, before they be withered:

9  Let non of us go without his part of our voluptuousness: let us leave tokens of our joyfulness in every place: for this is our portion and our lot is this.

10 Let us oppress the poor righteous man, let us not spare the widow, nor reverence the ancient gray hairs of the aged.

11  Let our strength be  the law of justice: for that which is feeble is found to be nothing worth.

12  Therefore let us lie in wait for the righteous; because HE is not of our turn, and HE is clean contrary to our doings. He upbraideth  us with our offending of the law, and ojecteth to our infamy the transgression of our education.

13  HE professeth to have the knowledge of the MOST HIGH, and calleth HIS self the child of the LORD.

14  HE was made to reprove our thoughts

15  HE is grievous unto us even to behold, for HIS life is not like other men’s, HIS ways are of another fashion.

16  We are esteemed of HIM as counterfeits: HE abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness: HE pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed, and maketh HIS boast that GOD is HIS father.

17  Let us see if HIS words be true: and let us prove what shall happen in the end of HIM.

18  For if the just man be the Son of THE MOST HIGH, HE will help HIM and deliver HIM from the hands of HIS enemies.

19  Let us examine HIM with despitefulness and torture, that we may know HIS meekness and prove HIS patience.

20  Let us condemn HIM with a shameful death: for by HIS own mouth HE shall be respected…..

Now this left me with some serious questions like:

  • What righteous man was Solomon speaking of killing with a shameful death?
  • Why did the Vatican vote to have these 14 books removed from our Bible?
  • Why did Solomon sound so evil in this book?
  • Did you know that Solomon wrote a number of books that were not included in the Bible?

I can go on and on but the question is just WHY did they remove these books?

Well I have a few possible answers to the questions that I have asked:

In my opinion Solomon is speaking of our Savior…. Who else could he be speaking of plus the similarities in the crucifixion are just to similar to ignore…..

  • They killed the SON with a shameful death
  • The SON’s actions or fashions were different from everyone else’s
  • HE claims to be and IS the child of The MOST HIGH
  • Righteous poor man
  • HE professeth to have knowledge of The MOST HIGH

Then listen to what Solomon has to say:

  • HE was made to reprove our thoughts
  • We are esteemed of HIM as counterfeits: HE abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness: HE pronounceth the end of the just to be blessed, and maketh HIS boast that GOD is HIS father
  • For if the just man be the Son of THE MOST HIGH, HE will help HIM and deliver HIM from the hands of HIS enemies. ( This is what was said directly before HIS crucifixion)

If there is no truth to this How did Solomon know Exactly the How, What, Where, When and  even the words used while the savior was on the cross? I have always admired Solomon as a wise ruler….. but something is off here!

I am a believer that the folks in power are just Big Fat Liars, including the pope! I know that they removed these books in order to keep us Ignorant of the Truth! Yet they hid it in Plain Sight!

Source

 
Check out more contributions by Jeffery Pritchett ranging from UFO to Bigfoot to Paranormal to Prophecy

~~~~~

Most people who use social media have figured out that Facebook and Google are in cahoots with the government. For those who are well aware of the issues, it’s high time you switched over to Seen.life. It is a website that is similar to Facebook but without all the censorship.

 

Firearm friendly, you may buy sell or trade anything allowed by site TOS rules.



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 64 comments
    • Jango

      I am confident that God made sure that everything we need to know is in our current Bibles. There are minor differences between translations, but not enough to change the story. If all you ever understand from the Bible is that Jesus died for your sins, and if you repent and ask him to forgive your sins, then that will be enough to get you eternal life. More at ItsHisStory.com

      • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

        You might want to do a bit more studying.
        Christ doesn’t forgive, our Heavenly Father does.
        And if you are not aware of WHOM shows up first… you might have a problem. :wink:

      • sed

        maybe, but I like to see that for myself.

      • Zabwe`

        The Homo Christos have devoured the knowledge that broke Homo-Sapiens…..

      • maxwell

        …So true Jango…
        …So many can’t imagine that Christ is God…That what Christ does IS, the Father’s actions. I know this IS true, and has always been the ‘main point’ of Christianity. Christ IS the physical manifestation of God, the Father. There IS no other.
        ..Mankind has been created, to allow each and every one of us to make a choice…between SPIRTUALITY, and earthly “POWER”. Humble humans, have no problem, believing in the “Son of God”. Powerful, arrogant humans, on the other hand, have a hard time crediting (thanking) God for what they have acquired in earthly life. They feel they have “earned” it. The New testament teaches us that ALL we have is Christ’s.

    • PaulTarsuss

      Read God’s Word and compare to the apopcyphal books. What was removed, was deemed “uninspired of God” and, as you can see, much of it detracts from understanding. The book of Enoch, does add some understanding, but is clearly written much later and is mixed with confusion.

      Some of these books adds confusion and could be cause for stumbling of innocent ones. Solomon is recorded in God’s Word as having fallen away from God, and gave himself over to false teachings of his many wives, following false gods, instead of our True Creator.

      Look at what we have today because of his rebellion to the Truth….and those like him….

      /economics-and-politics/2016/09/malwart-and-the-mark-of-the-beast-the-mark-is-not-hidden-its-everywhere-2487951.html

      There are MANY distinct prophecies foretold about Yeshua, Jesus Christ, even thousands of years before His birth that were fulfilled to the letter by Yahweh through Christ Yeshua, alone!

      http://www.100prophecies.org/page4.htm

      Good Journeys

    • Anonymous

      They weren’t biblical books. Jesus never quoted from the them. They weren’t accepted as scripture by the early church. Just another series of lies by those who hate the truth.

      • Room With a View

        Jesus never quoted from Paul either!!!!!!

        • Uncle_Scam

          No he didn’t- just sang a little Peter, Paul & Mary.

    • LegalNameFraud

      Truth just is

      Isaiah 25:7 (KJV)
      And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the veil that is spread over all nations.

      Legal System busted ( The BC Cross #BCCRSS)

      It’s illegal to use a legal name. (Lawful and Legal fact)

      The Holy Grail (found)

      The Riddle of The Sphinx (solved)

      The All Seeing Eye back on the Great PyramI.D.

      God is here in the flesh (verified)

      https://mineyebook.wordpress.com/2016/12/16/truth-just-is/ (picture essay)

      #AKEHENATON #ARCHEOLOGY #BCCRSS #BIRTHCERTIFICATE #DEATHCULT #DECODED #DUCKTAPES #EGYPT #HISTORICAL #HOROSCOPE #ITSILLEGALTOUSEALEGALNAME #KATE #KATEOFGAIA #ROSELINE #KATESWRITINGS #LEGALNAMEFRAUD #LEGALNAMEFRAUDRADIO #SATANWORSHIP #THERIDDLEOFTHESPHINX #TRUTH #NIBIRU #NEMESIS

      http://kateofgaia.net/en/writings/kates-writings/audio-essays/

      Deuteronomy 5……..The TEN Commandments……..law, not the legal lies of Satan’s owe-cult, they’re for the lawless ones and fallen
      1And M/O-se’s (the modus opera-un-die of life) called all Israel, and said unto them, Hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your ears this day, that ye may learn them, and keep, and do them.
      2The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.
      3The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us,even us, who are all of us here alive this day.
      4The LORD talked with you face to face in the mount out of the midst of the fire,
      5(I stood between the LORD and you at that time, to shew you the word of the LORD: for ye were afraid by reason of the fire, and went not up into the mount;) saying,
      6I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
      7Thou shalt have none other gods before me.
      8Thou shalt not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or thatis in the waters beneath the earth:
      9Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me,
      10And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me and keep my commandments.
      11Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain: for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
      12Keep the sabbath day to sanctify it, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee.
      13Six days thou shalt labour, and do all thy work:
      14But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, nor thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thine ox, nor thine ass, nor any of thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; that thy manservant and thy maidservant may rest as well as thou.
      15And remember that thou wast a servant in the land of Egypt, andthat the LORD thy God brought thee out thence through a mighty hand and by a stretched out arm: therefore the LORD thy God commanded thee to keep the sabbath day.
      16Honour thy father and thy mother, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee; that thy days may be prolonged, and that it may go well with thee, in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
      17Thou shalt not kill.
      18Neither shalt thou commit adultery.
      19Neither shalt thou steal.
      20Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour.
      21Neither shalt thou desire thy neighbour’s wife, neither shalt thou covet thy neighbour’s house, his field, or his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is thy neighbour’s.

      D Duck Tapes: Revelations & Proof There Are NO Coincidences! Everything Decoded!
      pdf here: https://mineyebook.wordpress.com/2016/05/27/d-duck-tapes-rr/
      .
      ‪#‎disney‬ ‪#‎donaldduck‬ ‪#‎disneyland‬ ‪#‎cartoons‬ ‪#‎comics‬ ‪#‎decoded‬ ‪#‎monalisa‬ ‪#‎davincicode‬ ‪#‎templebar‬ ‪#‎matrix‬ ‪#‎proof‬ ‪#‎biblecode‬ ‪#‎ancient‬ ‪#‎geometry‬ ‪#‎codex‬ ‪#‎revelation‬ ‪#‎christ‬ ‪#‎consciousness‬ ‪#‎legalnamefraud‬ ‪#‎thetruth‬ ‪#‎itsillegaltousealegalname‬ ‪#‎astrology‬ ‪#‎art‬ ‪#‎history‬ ‪#‎monarchy‬ ‪#‎legality‬ ‪#‎conspiracy‬ ‪#‎money‬ ‪#‎government‬ ‪#‎world‬

      • maxwell

        …Boy you have a lot to say…too bad, so very little of it, makes any sense at all…you made most of this up yourself, didn’t you?
        …You really should find a real Christian scholar to translate your beliefs for you. You are deceived. Deeply.
        …Salvation is actually very simple…despite hat you religionists think.

    • Zabwe`

      Hadron Collider extracts silver seed from core…….Engineering – Not Majik……….

    • FatherAaronA

      Some books were removed from the Bible as you mentioned, but not by the Vatican. Prior to the Protestant Reformation all Bibles printed included all the books you mentioned. This is confirmed by Guttenberg who printed the first bibles. The bibles he printed contained all the books you mentioned. None were left out. While not coming out and making a dogmatic statement concerning the canon of what books were to be included in the Bible the Universal Christian Church, both East and West, up until the Protestant Reformation had tacidly settled on all the books of the bible, OT and NT. This understanding contained all the books you mentioned, as this is confirmed by Guttenberg when he printed the first bibles. Since all these books were accepted as part of the Bible that Guttenberg printed, why then were they removed in later printings in languages other than Latin. Why were they deemed unworthy of being included with the other books of the bible. The answer is that Martin Luther didn’t like them. He deemed them apocrapha, or second class, because they contained information that didn’t fit into his theology. He justified this by appealing to the Jewish texts that he said, didn’t include these books. Shortly after Martin Luther’s time all bibles, approved by the the leaders of the Protestant Reformation, and translated into languages other than Latin dropped these books from their canon. The “Catholic” bible which existed before the Protestant Reformation, had all the books in it that you mention. They have always been in the “Catholic” bible. If you were to go into a bookstore today and request a “Catholic” Bible you would find all of the books you mentioned in it, as the Vatican never had them removed. Books were removed from the bible, but this was done by the Protestant Reformation, because the Reformation Leaders objected to content these books contained. They didn’t fit into their reformed theology. Many tacitly accepted the Protestant bible with its 14 less books, and for a variety of reasons. But the reason that Martin Luther used to justify their removal was that the Jewish canon didn’t contain these books. What he didn’t tell his followers and those who used his reasoning to print the Protestant” bible was that there were two schools of Jewish Canon. One school didn’t have these 14 books, because they were written in Greek, and a large segment of the Pharisees objected to anything Greek, because of problems that arose in Israel after the death of Alexander the Great. The Other school of thought had no problem with the Greek books, and considered them validly part of the inspired books of the Bible (OT). Martin Luther did not mention this latter school, even though it was from this Jewish school that the Universal Church drew its canon, a canon that was long before Martin Luther, and confirmed by Guttenburg in the first bible. Martin Luther wanted to eliminate books in the NT as well, because they didn’t fit into his theology of “justification by faith alone”, like the book of James. But Martin Luther wasn’t able to do so, because their existed nothing for the NT like the OT Anti-Greek School of Jewish thought that he could appeal to. So books were removed from the bible due to the Protestant Reformation. These books were inspired by the Holy Spirit, no less that those found the current “Protestant” bibles. So the question arises. Are you going to accept that the bible printed by Guttenberg and accepted by the Universal Christian Church contained all the inspired books of the bible, or are you going to believe that Martin Luther had the ability to determine what books were or were not inspired by the Holy Spirit. If you accept these 14 books, and you are a protestant, then many of the theological premises upon which you base your faith, will be challenged. If you do not want your “Protestant” faith challenged, then accept Martin Luther’s ability to tell the universal Christian Church that he alone has the ability to discern what is of the Holy Spirit and what is not, and then skip these books. The choice is yours.

      • Cintus Supremus

        “Prior to the Protestant Reformation all Bibles printed included all the books you mentioned.”

        Not true. All 49 surviving copies of the Guttenberg Bible contain the same Books as today’s Catholic Bibles – that is, there are an additional SEVEN books (recognized as apocryphal by the Protestants) as compared with the 66 Book Protestant Canon. Seven of the books listed above were never considered a part of Scripture Canon by Guttenberg or by Rome.

        “…why then were they removed in later printings in languages other than Latin.”

        The seven apocryphal books in question were removed because they were found to be in conflict with the written Word, and therefore not inspired Scripture. There are many tests which inspired documents must pass in order to prove their authenticity and none of the apocryphal works pass all the tests.

        “The answer is that Martin Luther didn’t like them.”

        A gross oversimplification.

        “He deemed them apocrapha, or second class, because they contained information that didn’t fit into his theology.”

        Leaving Luther out of the equation, is it a rather simple task so show that the apocryphal books are not inspired. In a similar vein, it is quite easy to show that all gnostic gospels are spurious for the same reasons.

        “…appealing to the Jewish texts that he said, didn’t include these books.”

        At no time did the Ancient Israelites consider any of the apocryphal books to be scripture. This fact should admit of no dispute.

        “Shortly after Martin Luther’s time all bibles, approved by the the leaders of the Protestant Reformation, and translated into languages other than Latin dropped these books from their canon.”

        All of the early versions of the King James Bible included the apocryphal books – albeit between the Old and New Testaments as being somewhat ‘separate’ from the other Scriptures.

        “The “Catholic” bible which existed before the Protestant Reformation, had all the books in it that you mention.”

        Your version of the facts leaves somewhat to be desired.

        “The Other school of thought had no problem with the Greek books, and considered them validly part of the inspired books of the Bible…”

        I would love to see this assertion supported with citation or example. I contend the assertion is untrue.

        “Martin Luther wanted to eliminate books in the NT as well, because they didn’t fit into his theology of “justification by faith alone”, like the book of James.”

        A careful reading of the Book of James does nothing to dissuade a reader from that apostle’s belief in justification through faith alone. There is nothing ever said by James in his Book which conflicts with or contradicts anything ever written by Paul on the subject. All James says is that he can show his faith by his works and that faith without works is dead. That is not, in the least, denying the doctrine of justification by faith alone. Martin Luther misunderstood the Book of James, just as you apparently have done, because he didn’t read it very carefully. Luther also took a dim view of the Book of Revelation because he didn’t understand it – which is something he can be forgiven for on account of Revelation being deep and very difficult to rightly understand.

        “These books (the apocrypha – in addition to seven other books listed above) were inspired by the Holy Spirit, no less that those found the current “Protestant” bibles.”

        This statement is demonstrably false, as I will be happy to show right here if you but indicate your wish for me to do so.

        “If you do not want your “Protestant” faith challenged, then accept Martin Luther’s ability to tell the universal Christian Church that he alone has the ability to discern what is of the Holy Spirit and what is not, and then skip these books. The choice is yours.”

        Pretend Martin Luther never existed. Forget about him altogether and you have done nothing to eliminate the fact that none of the apocryphal works are God-breathed.

        • maxwell

          …Gracias beefo…beautiful.

        • Morgana Le Fay

          “The seven apocryphal books in question were removed because they were found to be in conflict with the written Word, and therefore not inspired Scripture.”

          In case you haven’t noticed, the bible as it is now contradicts itself in myriad places, and is one of the most morally inconsistent books on the planet.

          • Morgana Le Fay

            They are far too numerous to list here, but here’s a laundry list of the many self-contradictions contained in your book of lies:

            http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/cv/scb/scb02.htm

            • Morgana Le Fay

              So there you have it. The entire tome is riddled with self-contradiction and contains a chaotic symphony of moral inconsistencies. No wonder most of its followers are such HYPOCRITES.

            • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

              Not a single contradiction in the Bible.
              One simply needs a TEACHER, not a preacher.

            • Cintus Supremus

              Here chickie…

              I have addressed all of the so-called contradictions in the so-called book of lies.

              There are NO unresolvable contradictions in the Bible. Not. A. One. There are plenty of apparent contradictions; the lion’s share of which fall to dust when one takes the simple step of looking at the segments in question in the original languages. Is that a bit too much effort for you? I understand — you would much rather have your thinking done for you when heavy lifting may be what’s on the menu.

              If you were even a moderately serious investigator of these things, you would not limit your shallow delvings to only websites which hate the Word. You would round out your inquiries by looking at ALL sides of any given argument. But as usual, your agenda precedes you and everything YOU have to say on the matter can be, and has been, proven false.

              That which you seek to accuse is four-square beyond reproach.

              And you are without excuse, Morgana.

            • Cintus Supremus

              If you’re interested — but I doubt you’re possessed of even this much zeal for meaningful thought on the subject — please head on over to your linked-to website and bring me FIVE of the most compelling (sounding) contradictions. I will show you right here that they are, in fact, no contradictions at all. I’m not interested in addressing the entire list again, as I’ve done it all many times before. Tedious, it is.

              So please, you or anyone else who might like to see the truth of the Word…

              …five examples, right here. Any five.

            • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

              “crickets”

            • Cintus Supremus

              Crickets it is then.

      • Josie

        I am Protestant and it’s makes me angry that books were left out of the Bible. I want the truth good or bad. No one has the right to pick and choose what they think we should have access to. I have no respect for the Catholic church because I know they hide things that everyone has a right to know. The pope is not the father, there is only one father, that’s God Almighty. I believe the Cathlic is the church of Satin. I already started reading the Hebrew bible to see if the scripture is any different. I don’t trust the KJV. I know I sound a little nuts, but I just want the truth from the most important book in history and the world..

        • Zabwe`

          Maybe they will lead you into a more divisive and confused state than what you are in today…..Its like eating more alphabetti spaghetti and pizza when you haven’t fully digested the first lot of processed shite thats been cooked into it….

          • Cintus Supremus

            If you’re the one who downvoted Josie, Zabwe…

            …you’re more confused by far than you think she is. If honest and sincere interest in the pursuit of truth is offensive to you, then you have some very serious problems.

            • Zabwe`

              Sick jokes sick books sick people…..I do not down vote…….Try another angle……

            • Zabwe`

              Paper trails…….I do not waste my time chasing the ramblings and histories of stack overflows within the un-evolved mind…..Orang-utans bear greater knowledge than lumberjacks…..
              Be like the ant and see her ways and learn, for there is no harvest for her,.

            • Zabwe`

              Can fish I fish in your pool of ignorance……..I have already had a couple of bytes…..lol…

            • Zabwe`

              Heres a meaningless up vote to add to your confusion….👍……..I will not pray and hold out much hope for the knowledge you have gathered from the shallows and shoals of binary Piscean tiddler’s………Happy XXXmas……..

            • Cintus Supremus

              Is that what understanding looks like where you come from?

              May God bless you, friend — so that one day you should become a normal person.

    • CTrent33

      1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, 1 Machabees, & 2 Machabees are in the “Catholic bible,” which proves you have no idea what you are talking about. The rest are not holy Scripture. The Vatican, of old, did not remove anything. Martin Luther, on the other hand, ripped out 7 books.

      http://www.drbo.org

      • Cintus Supremus

        Why is the emphasis placed on ripping out rather than inserting?

        Why isn’t it considered — from the Catholic perspective — that the Ancient Israelites did not, at any time, consider the seven books in question (as you correctly indicate) to be inspired Scripture?

        • Damien

          Cintus

          Because Israel was destroyed in the 700s BC

        • Zabwe`

          Sssh…….. collections of Chinese whispers that run through the Christos….I do not get off in exposing your shallowness within the matter……

        • Zabwe`

          If you’re the one who down voted Zabwe…

          …you’re more confused by far than you think she is. If honest and sincere interest in the pursuit of truth is offensive to you, then you have some very serious problems.

    • YellowRoseTx51

      I have to wonder how much deeper their lies can get.
      They are ‘selling’ you a myth.
      They are re-writing our history, in this way.

      The “3 Ptolemy’s” were “Elizabeth, George, & Alexander”
      It is the 3 Ptolemy’s that created the Vatican. This is now removed from our books, but was in them, circa 1917.
      “The Covens of Azazel are legally defined as “The Papal, The Royal, & The Federal”. This is what is removed, now.

      It is the Coven Age of SET whom common man called “Satan”, that created the Coven age, which became renamed “Religions” in 1917. When they did that, they ‘codified’ the Canon Law, and Common Law and placed things under “occult” which they claim is ‘private’. They own the system, because it is the Slave system of Ur. “Religion, Corp.Gov., Money/Banking”. These were the overseers left in charge, of the p.o.w. “Earth”. And why it is a system world wide. The Vatican is legally the “Legislative Branch”.

    • Vein Arde

      What is strange is, I have a catholic bible WITH those books that were taken out! On of them I liked and felt IS beneficial to man is, Ecclesiasticus!

      • Zabwe`

        Hells freezing over – Its a dead give away……

    • King of Shambhala

      Shills c

      • King of Shambhala

        TYPO sorry:
        Shills caught infiltrating BIN
        Google it
        Operatives Breaching BeforeItsNews Rules To Infiltrate And Plant Fake News. Shill-Swamp Works For Antichrist (Video)

        • Zabwe`

          Obama sinks Israel……..You owe your President an apology…….

    • Apollo is the A/C

      Yes, God hid some things until the end – see the Book of Daniel as a reference, however, seriously? The books of Enoch & Jasher REFERRED TO IN SCRIPTURE are not even n your list and we are supposed to take you seriously? Go pound rocks!!!!!! :roll:

      • TRUTHY1

        Everyone should read anything they can get their hands on and not worry about who or why the books were deleted/hidden from the congregations. Use your own discernment to take the good and leave the rest. All of the Scriptures have endured editing,errors and mistranslations to this day, some of them deliberate ! The truth is often hidden between two lies and these “extra-canonical” books still have much valuable information that compliments the included books.
        Proverbs 25:2King James Version (KJV)

        2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

        • Zabwe`

          5 Types Of Brain Waves Frequencies: Gamma, Beta, Alpha, Theta, Delta………
          You should learn to divine the knowledge from the new light that is now shinning through old windows……..

    • Zabwe`

      Core what a cheek…….Nuclear hole cutters go with a bang………shakes and quakes…….Don’t bite the apple…….

    • Abiezer

      The apocrypha wasn’t included in the Bible because they couldn’t be found in the original language so were probably later forgeries or gnostic fake books.

      • Zabwe`

        Is makes sense…….Kinda like hyper threading your slip on shoes with encrypted shoelaces…….

        • Zabwe`

          I.s Incomprehensible Scripture……

    • Manfred

      Those “excluded” books were never considered part of the Jewish canon of Scripture and were not included AS Scripture even when printed as part of the Bible. They were included as important but not inspired documents. Hence they were left out of printed Bibles as printing dropped in price.

    • jdpent01

      jdp…NO God is in control and we have what he wants to have to believe in his Son Jesus. Jesus said many will come in my name to deceive don’t believe them. SOLOMON corrupted his wisdom and married outside the Jewish people that was for bidden. God also told some they would not have a book because they did evil. So we don’t need every single book but those books that were cited by Jesus we should read Enoch and book of Jasher cited by Joshua

    • allendaves

      The thief-baptism-grace& the name-Lord

      “whosoever shall call on THE NAME OF THE LORD shall be saved”.…….So WHAT “NAME” did you “CALL UPON”?……
      Ps 138:2. praise THY NAME … for thou hast magnified THY WORD ABOVE ALL THY NAME
      Rev 19:13. .. and HIS NAME IS called THE WORD OF GOD
      Isaiah 52:1. . 6. Therefore MY PEOPLE SHALL KNOW MY NAME: ..What NAME do you “KNOW”.?
      1Jn 2:3. And HEREBY WE DO KNOW that we KNOW HIM, if we KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS./
      Titus 1: 16. They profess that THEY KNOW God; but IN WORKS THEY DENY him…
      Rev 3:8 kept MY WORD, and hast not DENIED MY NAME; …
      .Jn 17:6. I have MANIFESTED THY NAME .& they have KEPT THY WORD.;
      THE WORD is THE NAME above every name that saves us 1Pt 3:21

      - If God placed His “THE WORD” ABOVE all of God’s various NAMEs – and Jesus NAME IS called “THE WORD” no other name saves Then it must follow that the MOST important name we should KNOW and CALL UPON is “THE WORD”; . Not the letters that spell the word but the sayings/ doctrine/commands. It does NOT say “thy word is given a name above other names because here THY WORD is identified as the name that is placed above all other names. “AT the name OF JESUS”…..Jesus has a name that belongs to Jesus…just like the name OF GOD means a name that belongs to GOD but it is ridiculous to suggest that the letters G-O-D is that name…likewise it is just as ridiculous to suggest that the name OF JESUS is the letters J-E-S-U-S. Why would anyone think that you could pronounce THE HIGHEST NAME OF GOD letter by letter…. (ie Judges 13:18; 2Cor 12:4 but God’s name is not as great and or “unspeakable )

      Download the full doc
      https://www.academia.edu/23846490/Thief_and_Cross_3D
      https://www.scribd.com/document/326686356/Thief-Cross-3D

      https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/thief-baptism-grace-name-lord-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      Also there is this…..I’m not Roman Catholic by any stretch but give credit where credit is due, this guy did do his homework on this issue and his presentation is kinda slow at first but very methodical and sound ..Basically it is an examination of the Reformed theologies (John MacArthur, James White, John Piper, R.C. Sproul, Michael Kruger, Steven Anderson, Charles Stanley et al) uses of Justification (and Forensic Justification) (Regeneration v Justification)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L14UNjaZJm8

    • Everette

      If you desire to know what books are truly GOD inspired then the books like John ( only gospel containing it ) that contains the Bible code . Not all the books of the Bible contain the Bible code . GOD told the prophets when coping HIS words everything must be correct . Reason being if just 1 letter was off or misspelled the entire book would be corrupted as far as GODs Bible code goes . This code takes a computer to open up its full potential . It tells the past , present and future of individuals . It is written so man can not use it to make great gain or money gain from discovering it . But let a incident happen like JFK’s death and it contains a lot of hidden facts that we now know but did not know then . Once the statement is stated as fact it will become apparent around the individuals life actions with the bible code . It’s just a way of GOD letting us know HE already knew what was going to happen . Some of these books were written when Moses walked the earth but contains today’s historical facts . So it is proof GOD had to have given the words to the prophets in order for today’s and tomorrow’s history to be in the books of the Bible code . In all the world of books there is only 2 other books that contain HIS code . So these 2 must be approved of by GOD . It took our modern computer to be able to open its doors . Like Daniel was told , seal up the book until the time of the end . Then when knowledge has increased the book shall be opened . There is codes in Daniel that has yet to be opened . When it has been totally opened then we will know exactly what needs to be done durning the end time events . But not knowing these Bible codes does not stop you from becoming one of GODs children . The Bible says those HE fore knew , HE predestine to be conformed to be HIS children . Those that are HIS are HIS and will come to the saving knowledge of HIM . HE says all that are MINE will come to ME and I will in no wise loose nothing ! We couldn’t save ourselves , what makes us think that we have to be the one to get the job done and keep ourselves in order for us to enter HIS Kingdom ? GOD says there is none righteous and there is none that seeks HIM . It is HE that draws us ! Our mouth only confesses what HE has brought to light in our minds and the actions HE does within our hearts . We would like to think we chose GOD . But the Bible says HE chose us ! So our making some kind of New Years resolution will not get us into GODs Kingdom . If HIS Spirit does not draw us then we are none of HIS children . Why do you think so many are headed to the path of destruction . The Bible says many are called but few are chosen . We are to tell everyone of GODs calling on their lives , but GOD already knows those HE has chosen . So why tell them then ? So the wicked can’t say you never told me about GODs salvation plan . Even being told they will never except it anyway ! Broad is the way that leads to destruction and many that go that way , but narrow is the way that leads to life everlasting and few there be that find it . So if GOD does not illuminate the path for the chosen they would never find their way . It is GOD that justifies and not we ourselves . It is GOD that paid for our sins and not we ourselves . It is GOD that chose us and not we ourselves . John chapter 1 say Jesus was GOD !

    • Man

      good luck figuring out

      Roman Catholic finds these apocrypha

      Tobit
      Judith
      Rest of Esther (Vulgate Esther 10:4-16:24)
      1 Maccabees
      2 Maccabees
      Wisdom
      Ecclesiasticus (also known as Sirach)
      Baruch 1
      Letter of Jeremiah
      The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children (Vulgate Daniel 3:24-90)
      Susanna (Book of Daniel) (Vulgate Daniel 13)
      Bel and the Dragon (Vulgate Daniel 14)

      Eastern Orthodox finds these apocrypha

      3 Maccabees
      4 Maccabees (Georgian church only)
      1 Esdras
      2 Esdras (Georgian church only)
      Odes
      Psalm 151
      Psalm 152-155 (Syriac Peshitta only)
      Baruch 2 (Syriac Peshitta only)
      Prayer of Manasseh

      Ethiopian Orthodox finds these apocrypha

      Book of Enoch
      Book of Jubilees
      Rest of the Words of Baruch (aka Paralipomena of Baruch)
      1 Meqabyan
      2 Meqabyan
      3 Meqabyan

      and most people choose and select what they believe anyway. Otherwise we don’t have those infinite bible quote wars on BIN

    • Zabwe`

      Full house – Hand of the almighty Gods…..Majik…………

    • allendaves

      123’s of true Christianity (simply because you “confess” it does not mean you actually are, the devil has deceived many of his own children to believe they are Christians 2Tim 3:5)

      #1 “ONE” not triune: No the son & father are the same person not like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?! https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy

      “WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh! https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-6-anti-christ-where-everywhere-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      THE ANTI CHRIST….WHERE? WHERE?….EVERYWHERE!!! …..IT”S YOU O TRINITARIAN!

      The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural).Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-1-echadechadmy-godgod-echad-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      NOTE: don’t be that one in prov 26:12 over my use of the word “fool” here prov 18:13 (https://www.scribd.com/presentation/322007258/Fools ) “But but, the gospel of John…the Gospel of John …look look…” which is quite ironic since the gospel of John does not leave ANY room for multiple different persons of Jesus and father. However the gospel of John does leave a few verses that facilitate God’s promise in 2 Thess 2:11/ Isaiah 66:4 (take note of “HAND” in verse 2,14..You just can’t make this stuff up…God is surely laughing at these fools; Ps 2:1&4)

      ……Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is…..
      JESUS IS GOD AND IS THE FULLFILMENT OF ALL THE LAW AND PROPHETS SO IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON SIN IS MOOT

      TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…No, Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

      https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-2-pgs-91-101-chapter-eight-lets-talk-us-allen-daves?trk=mp-reader-card

      - Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5;

      - A Favorite tool for pathological liars is to use incongruent definitions or create oxymorons out of synonyms such as “a person” and “a being” so as to claim that your god is THREE DIFFERENT PERSONS but ONLY ONE BEING: Which is (1) no different then trying to claim that “THREE DIFFERENT CARS” is “THE ONE VEHICLE” (2) blatant demonstration of the dishonesty & sorcery these children of hell will employ with “a strait face” (which is in part what it means to be a pathological liar)
      ……but, ah i remember how this game is played… “God is three in one” (or 1in 3 or 3in one et al) should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions and vain imaginations have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into your image!

      You can download the complete FREE book from
      https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
      OR
      https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY

      http://www.scribd.com/user/249756770/Allen-Daves

      independent.academia.edu/AllenDaves

      https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/0_0wXAPxHFpV6o3_6erj3ZFe?trk=prof-sm

      #2 SECOND COMING Thou Fool! “I come quickly” so “Hold fast
      till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 yrs I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And
      they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES.
      2Thess 2: 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12. That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

      DOWNLOAD FREE THE ENTIRE 480PG BOOK AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS
      https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom

      or

      https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM

      #3 There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups :

      (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

      (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

      (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
      will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

      Predestination….its true..its all true…download here

      https://www.scribd.com/doc/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell

      https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

    • El

      It wasn’t that Martin Luther didn’t like them, it was that by his time the bible mythology items were in question by both Priests and Preachers. They were coming out of a very dark time in the middle ages where superstition and hysteria ruled more than facts. Some of the books removed were deleted because there was no real proof of authorship or that they had been part of the early teachings of the church, during and right after the time of Christ. Some were deemed simply more historical, with very little spiritual insight, and were reprinted eventually as such. Some were deemed to have parts that contradicted scripture, or were simply someone else writing things as if Solomon had done so. They kept the books that could be associated with the ancient Hebrew Torah, and with New Testament authorship unchallenged. Scholars before Martin Luther had questioned the authenticity of some of those books and a panel of learned men looked very carefully into things like, did the style of speaking or writing line up with the known writings of Solomon and for his time period, for instance. They did not, and therefore the Wisdom of Solomon was removed was removed. Most of the other books were very much considered historical, but not God inspired. Facts actually matter to intelligent Christians. The oldest know writings of both the Torah and new Testament scripture which of course started out as letters to the churches, have been translated by the scholars of today and their studies have shown that the bible we read today is accurate. No one says you can’t read the others, but I wouldn’t stake my life on them.
      I might also add a note to the guy with the artichoke in his identity, Jesus died on the cross and shed His blood for the remission and forgiveness for our sins. In fact when Jesus healed someone once, He actually said, your sins are forgiven, and the Jewish leaders were angry that he said it. It is Christmas Eve and I’m too tired to hunt for the exact scripture, so I would suggest when you have some time, you need to read the bible again. Remember the songs line, God in three persons blessed trinity. And the line I and my father are one, kind of rip your theory to shreds. Merry Christmas.

    • apache5

      like ALWAYS, someoone THINKS they KNOW MORE and so the PUBLIC must NOT be allowed to see this!! what a crock of CRAP!! since the time of OLD, there are always groups or siingle men who think THEY can control the population and so the HISTORY IS ALWAYS been controled and twisted to meet THER views, IF you have NOT read it your self then it is meaningless, DON”T let others try to tell you what it means IF god or his people wrote it THEN it is written where YOU will know its meaning!! tiime to remove the world leaders that try to control us!! we don’t need controlling what we need is FREEDOM and PEACE to live a healthy life without the fear of war and religious persecution!!

    • Jarheadusmc

      What a bunch of illiterate garbage – it never ceases to amaze me how little people know of the bible and its history.

    • zero

      Definition of apocryphal

      1: of doubtful authenticity : spurious

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apocryphal

    • jdpent01

      jdp..It was not the Vatican initially it was 70 scholars who decided to to keep and what to drop.

    • Zabwe`

      Fantastic Post Jeffery Pritchett……..Its a set of rules the vile criminal cabal use to justify their persecution of the righteous man……Any fool upon a hill can see that……Happy XXXmas Jeff……XXX

    • Anonymous

      READ! Colossians page 1309 NKJ bible it will get anyone to start to read, but if you dont understand what your reading how is that to change this ungodly world we live in. It talks about “christ” Jesus, the real Jesus, you know there were three jesus’s in the bible jesus, jesus christ and christ jesus or justus pauls friend but the hidden jesus… enjoy peace lisa nichols ur ceer

    • Pink Slime

      The OVERACTING turned me off. :mad:

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.