Profile image
By Jeffery Pritchett
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Muslim Sikh NJ Mayor Just Abolished Christmas ‘to Respect Other Religions’ (Video)

Friday, November 10, 2017 4:19
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

You won’t see businesses in Hoboken, New Jersey, decking the halls anytime soon thanks to the city’s new Mayor, Ravi Bhalla.

Bhalla was elected just yesterday but he has wasted no time implementing his new regime. While he could appreciate the freedom that allowed him to get elected, Bhalla decided to instead spend his early days taking it away from others.

Bhalla will officially take office on November 29, just in time for Christmas. But the wreaths will not be hung nor will the carolers be singing with joy because Bhalla has canceled all “government involvement in the Christian holiday Christmas” out of respect for “other religions.”

“There are many who do not celebrate Christmas,” the turban-wearing Muslim mayor told the Hoboken Star. “Muslims do not celebrate Christmas. Jews do not celebrate Christmas. Atheists do not celebrate Christmas. The list goes on.”

Bhalla says that instead of the annual Christmas celebration that has been held every year Hoboken has existed, the city will be having an “All holiday matter” celebration that will incorporate “elements of all major religions’ holiday celebrations.”

When Bhalla was elected, he promised to “glorify Allah in every decision.” This must be part of that.

Already, more than 3,500 residents have called the office of current outgoing mayor Shelly Hoberstein to complain.


Update: Apparently there is great debate if Sikh is considered Muslim. Many say they are similar and the same and many also say they are not. So will let the reader decide. Either way the news is shared and this is just information sharing from the source quoted above. I did some further research and found this..via Guardian

“They say the average American does not know the difference between a Sikh and Muslim. They tell me the average American associates a turban and a beard with ISIS, Taliban, or Bin Laden,” said Mr Singh.

“We are not the victims of mistaken identity; we are in fact doing exactly what our identity was supposed to do. It was supposed to absorb hate and ignorance so others would not have to.”

Mr Singh goes on to describe the principles of Sikhism in the post, which has received more than 1,800 likes.


I host the Church of Mabus radio show and it is going on 8 years. I’ve been in the paranormal community for 20 years. I provide content from a network of sources and guests and allies. Ranging from Politics to the Paranormal and the Spiritual. You can check out my other articles here at my BIOGRAPHY at BIN and you can check out my free radio show at this link HERE. Thanks for showing your support and stopping by.

We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 42 comments
  • DK

    You are going to have to delete this article since the Gentleman concerned is a Sikh the blue turban is a dead giveaway, they are Buddhists following a guru called Nanak(This might help It is a bit hard for an American to tell the difference between one turban wearer and another, the key thing is the majority of Arabs stopped wearing them 100 years ago, Sikhs have to as an article of faith since it is forbidden to cut their hair hand have to bind the turban in a specific way, it is called the Dastar ( you can tell he is wearing one by the way it is folded which is unique to that faith. It is obvious to me since I am English, have met them and my Grandfather Harry served with them in the 8 th Army so I got a decent but second hand account of their faith and practices since he was with them about 5 years of his ten year service. They key thing is you as a non believer are forbidden from watching them put on the Dastar. Other than that great people treated badly and since most of them practiced their own martial arts as an act of faith so you really should not be doing that.

    • Jeffery Pritchett

      I don’t delete articles. I added an update to express your concern and also a video to break down the difference between Muslim and Sikh. I honestly am not an expert on over seas religions. So hopefully by adding what I added it helps to shed light on the difference. Right wing news is calling him Muslim. I belong to no political party so if they are wrong we will use this to bring light to the subject. Thanks for your feedback. PS either way he seems to be offing Christmas. But I’m sure that could be debated as well.

      • Hayduke

        Nice. :grin:

    • King of Shambhala

      DK, I think Huffington Post is even muddying the waters further or else it’s a spoof. The guy may have a very pro-Islam political line but that’s just because he’s catering to his Muslim people.
      Why not just clear the air and go look at Wikipedia for “Sikhism”?
      Sikh people say they’re HINDUS (and that’s not Buddhists for Christ’s sake!)
      Sikhism was influenced by Bhakti movement,[60][61][62] but it was not simply an extension of the Bhakti movement
      The movement has traditionally been considered as an influential social reformation in Hinduism

      • DK

        True but we classified them as Buddhist, to be honest there are so many different flavors of the Hindu brand the distinction is pointless unless you go to a BJP meeting. I expect it is more to do with not worshiping Krishna since he represents darkness and it was probably a term of abuse we got to label them with since Buddhist were exiled from the continent.

        • King of Shambhala

          I respect you as a feloow reporters DK and we at BeforeItsNews have a rule of no fighting but respectfully I tell you, you don’t know much.
          Hindus and Buddhists are not the same religion, I know seeing I’m a Buddhist religious since 45 years.
          You say “we have classified them as Buddhist.”
          That’s not your call.
          Buddhists don’t depend on you to define who they are.

          Who is “we”?

          Some Bible Belt church out in the plains of Texas??

          Tibetan Tantric Buddhism is the highest form of culture in the world.

          It’s defining features that makes it different from Hinduism and puts Buddhism at loggerheads with Hindusim are the following:
          Hindus rejected Buddha and his Buddhist religion because he committed grave faults towards Hinduism which was he rejected the Caste system.

          In the Hindu sacred caste-system, the lowest caste of “Untouchables” are outcastes that cannot be frequented by anyone in society.

          Buddha rejected that as being hateful and said that system would lead Hindus to hell.

          The Caste system is not a simple thing of no importance, it’s a dicatatorial system and Hindus really believe in it. It’s mind-boggling.

          Anyone mixing among the castes will be rejected from society and no longer considered on par with others but he will be rejected and ordered that no oen speak or see him anymore.

          He’ll be rejected like in a ghetto and never again spoken to.

          Buddha went begging like a holy man and accepted the food given to him by any houselhold along his path. Hindu holy beggars won’yt accept food from the lowest caste of “Untoucahables” but Buddha accepted food to eat from all and any household – be they Untouchable or of the highest castes.

          Buddha forbid for holy beggars to choose the household they were to beg from so as to only receive food from the highest castes.

          As for the differences between the evil Christian religion and Buddhism, Buddhism is infinitely purer, better and higher than evil Christianity.
          Islam is te worst thing existing in the world. Hindusim and Buddhism never carried out war like Christainity did so on a scale of good and evil religions Buddhism is highest, Hinduism is second (i.e. “it never carried out evil war such as Christinaity did”) and Islam is evilest thing on earth, aka “the pits”.

          Judaism also carried out war and has a caste system where only the chosen ones go to heaven. In Hinduism likewise only the highest caste of Brahmans go to heaven (from what Hindiuism teaches).

          Those two are both unadulterated evil.

          Buddhism doesn’t define if you go to heaven or not by depending on what caste you belong to or what race and faith you belong to, like Jews do. Buddha taught that anyone can get to heaven if he practises the faith correctly, no matter who he is or what background he comes from. It teaches a path that is faultless with no obstacles like war or hatred like the other faiths have.

          DK, I don’t know if you’re part of some country-boy church out of the sticks but you guys should at least read Wikipedia to figure out the difference between the religions of the world.

          I studied Tibetan langauage and cultur at Paris University in France for five years. I know everything you need to know about Tibet and I speak the language.


            “Tibetan Tantric Buddhism is the highest form of culture in the world.”

            That’s the one where Buddhist boys dress up like girls and poke each other in their root chakras. Right?

            And you brag about this?

          • King of Shambhala

            I’m not bragging about Tibetan Tantric Buddhism being the highest form of culture in the world.
            The other forms of culture are so bad that it’s easy to be higher than everybody.
            Islam is the worst thing existing in the world.

      • DK

        King my thinking is pretty early 20th century being brought up by grandparents, so I have my faults which are many, but I am old enough and wise enough not to claim superiority, my language and its use come from that background, now I read through some mantras through books largely, have seen the entire Mahabharata as a play and India has had a very important effect on all Britons, the culture flowed both ways, that means so did some of the prejudices.

        • King of Shambhala

          Sorry to criticise DK.
          Mahabharata again = is Not Buddhist.

          My family back in the old days were Theosophy followers (my ancestor was Russian writer Leon Tolstoy) and that was the first time Buddhism penetrated into the West in an openly accepted form.

  • Truth

    As DK points out above, this bloke is a Sikh not a Mossie. What’s more confusing is the title of this post given by the author yet he includes a video stating that he is a Sikh.

    As for the Christmas thing, it’s nothing more than a pagan holiday and anyone that’s read the bible would know that.


      “…this bloke is a Sikh…”

      Isn’t that what Darth Vader was? A Sikh Lord?


      • Jeffery Pritchett

        Vinnie! How you doing!? What you doing up so early? Gotta make some biscuits and gabba ghoul? You are a smart man. Is Sikh a Muslim? Or is he really a Sith Lord who works for Vader trying to off Christmas? Badda Bing Badda Bang. I updated the article to include a debate on this situation of Sikh / Muslim.

        • Hayduke

          You are DA MAN!!! Keep these coming!!! Plus, we need more Bigfeets in these stories, please? :eek: :shock: :cool: :smile: :grin: :lol:


          GABBA GOUL!!!

          Now I gotta go make me a sanguich.

  • raburgeson

    Take him to court, they are testing the waters, flip over the boat. The government cannot tell you what you can have. That includes pot, get your people out of jail. The entire government is manipulating and controlling and needs a reboot. You can have Christmas and give them the finger when you have it.

  • Jay

    The Government is what the people make it. If Hoboken wanted this low life then enjoy .

  • barebones

    Why must I suffer his perpetual display of his alien beliefs by wearing of a turban, and a dagger! Should I expect that when visiting mindless, heathen populations that they attenuate their “religious” rituals out of respect for my presence?

    When the RESET comes, I predict a resurgence in Christianity crushing this engineered, irrational behavior foisted on European settled populations. When white largess and tolerance disappears, this piece of intellectual waste and his ilk may well find themselves returning to their trivial status.


  • unidentified

    xmas is a fairytale for kids like easter and today is only for buying stuff for other people they can also ban xmas music :wink:

  • Anonymous

    “When Bhalla was elected, he promised to “glorify Allah in every decision.””

    If he glorifies Allah then he’s Muslim, no if and’s or but’s. He must be just ashamed to admit it…..

  • King of Shambhala

    Targeted by racist fliers, Ravi Bhalla becomes the first turbaned Sikh mayor in New Jersey
    By Julie Zauzmer November 8

    Three candidates in New Jersey were targetted by racist ads leading up to election day. All three were declared winners on Nov. 8. (Thomas Johnson/The Washington Post)
    An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Ravi Bhalla was the first Sikh mayor of a major U.S. city. This version has been corrected.

    Days before the New Jersey elections, someone distributed anonymous fliers around Hoboken. “Don’t let TERRORISM take over our town,” the fliers said, while featuring a photo of Ravinder Bhalla, wearing the turban that he always wears as a hallmark of his faith.

    On Tuesday night, Bhalla was beaming in that turban, waving his arm in the air to celebrate his election as one of the first Sikh mayors of a U.S. city.

    Bhalla, a Democrat who has served two terms on the Hoboken City Council, inspired enthusiasm not just in Hoboken but in the nationwide Sikh community of about 200,000 people, which has suffered frequent racist slurs and acts of violence since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. People tend to mix up Sikhs — members of a 500-year-old monotheistic Indian religion that is not related to either Islam or Hinduism — with Muslims.

    The community celebrated Bhalla’s election on Tuesday night.

    Simran Jeet Singh ✔@SikhProf
    I can’t tell you how much it means that my daughter will have civic heroes who look like her father. I’m crying right now.
    4:57 AM – Nov 8, 2017 · Manhattan, NY

    Ravi Bhalla wins Hoboken mayoral election days after flyers label him terrorist
    HOBOKEN, NJ — Ravinder Bhalla will become Hoboken’s first ever Sikh mayor. He won Tuesday night’s election just days after being targeted by flyers labeling him a terrorist. Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer…
    101 101 Replies 1,246 1,246 Retweets 6,500 6,500 likes
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    “Given how much we’ve endured in this country, and frankly the fact that we have been here for more than a century now in the U.S. and have felt largely ignored and neglected as a minority community, this is for us a signal shift, where we feel like we’re getting on the map. This is a major development for us,” Simran Jeet Singh, a religion fellow at the Sikh Coalition, said. “And it comes in a context where, like many minority groups, we’re facing xenophobia.”

    Singh said his parents, who immigrated to the United States, could scarcely have imagined someone who looked like them winning elected office, and he’s thrilled that his 18-month-old daughter will grow up seeing a turbaned Sikh as the city’s leader.

    Gurwin Ahuja, executive director of the National Sikh Campaign, said Bhalla is one of the first Sikh people to become mayor of a U.S. city. Satyendra Huja served as mayor of the city of Charlottesville, and some small towns have had Sikh mayors.

    In Hoboken, a city of more than 50,000 people across the Hudson River from Manhattan, Bhalla ran against five other candidates. He tweeted Saturday that the fliers about terrorism were “troubling, but we won’t let hate win.” CBS News reported that the fliers did not name the group that paid for them, a violation of state election law.

    Ahuja said that whoever made the fliers implying that “turban” meant “terrorist” interpreted the turban completely wrong. “Sikhs are instructed to be actively involved in their communities…. In fact, the reason why Sikhs wear a turban is because it represents our value of equality and to stand up against injustice wherever we see it,” he said. “The turban represents our commitment to those values of equality — gender equality, racial equality and religious tolerance — and our duty to stand up for those rights. In India, back in the day, when people would see a Sikh, they knew that was someone they could go to for safety.”

    The Sikh faith’s historic emphasis on equality, borne out of resistance to India’s caste system, lends itself to participating in American democracy, Ahuja said. “When I see him up there, I see someone that has committed himself to those values. It makes us more proud when we see that,” he said. “The turban actually represents the ethos of American values.”

  • allendaves

    123′s of the most popular & damnable heresies

    “ONE” not triune: Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is….. IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON LOVE & SIN IS MOOT….. (NOTE: And yes, the specific Greek and Hebrew words used also and only define one person contrary to the ridiculous obfuscation attempts of some!?!)
    PART 4 & 5 HOW MANY GODS ARE THERE FOR THE ONE GOD TO TALK TO?? Who was Jesus praying to??!?…. The real question should be … How does having multiple different persons keep this one God/being/entity from praying to himself?! (The trinitarian “schizophrenic” “god-head”) The Trinitarians want to have their cake and eat it too as the saying goes. On the one hand they need to say they only worship one indivisible God being/ entity but on the other hand they feel the need for some reason to keep Jesus or God from praying and talking to himself by dividing him up into different persons!?! It never occurs to them that that since there is only one indivisible God to pray too and Jesus is that indivisible God come in the flesh that he would need to talk to himself as to show us how to live, suffer, pray and die for our/ flesh) benefit not his!?!….. So while Trinitarians are quick to complain that God was not talking to himself at Christ baptism or in Gen “let us” they ignore the logical demands of their own theology! If Jesus is the ONE GOD in flesh and the Father is the SAME ONE GOD in heaven then Trinitarianism demands THE ONE GOD is talking to HIMSELF! Claiming that God is multiple different persons as the reason for why God is not talking to himself (because God is three different “selfs”) only demonstrates that what they really worship is in fact not a ONE GOD who talks to himself but three different god “selfs”/ and they all talk to each other! When they speak about who God was talking and praying to, they are quick to say “the other person, NOT HIMSELF!” But if you ask them how many gods do they pray to then they will say “ONLY ONE”!?! They expect you to believe that those three different persons are THE ONE GOD-BEING” which is like calling three different cars “THE ONE VEHICLE” (text book examples of prov 26:12)

    PART 6: THE ANTI CHRIST….WHERE? WHERE?….EVERYWHERE!!! …..IT”S YOU O TRINITARIAN! “WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh! Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

    JOHN 14: 8-20 ….[Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father] ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!
    Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

    The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural) Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense

    Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5; TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…

    This should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……Today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into the image of your vain imaginations!
    You can download the complete FREE book from

    If you ask most people what the Good news or Gospel is they will probably tell you about the virgin birth or Christ death burial and resurrection. This would be rather humorous if it was not so sad considering that for the three and half years of Christ ministry he does not mention hardly ever. However, Christ does spend a lot of time preaching out of the OT scriptures. Now imagine given a report or manual to read and understand, that makes reference to and even quotes other source material and then ignoring that source material when it comes to defining the context and meanings of words in the report or manual you are trying to make sense of. If that seems dysfunctional that is because it is. This is, however, what most people are doing when it comes to understanding sound NT doctrine and or even what the Gospel message of Jesus was. The mystery of the gospel was not the death, burial and resurrection although it is part of it. In fact, death, burial and resurrection was the sign, the only sign, that Jesus gave to validate that the gospel message he was preaching all that time was true……and yet most deny it!?!?!
    The “2nd coming”… “I come quickly” so “Hold fast till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 years I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 (in their lifetime) are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the Lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES. The “idea”/ doctrine that Jesus has not yet returned but “soon any day now soon” does not just make God out a liar; it is not just ridiculous but makes Christianity a mockery, A pathetic “ship of fools”!?!
    The following example excerpt from Bertrand Russell: sometimes quoted by atheist et al and from his published work “Why I Am Not A Christian”

    Defects in Christ’s Teaching

    Having granted the excellence of these maxims, I come to certain points in which I do not believe that one can grant either the superlative wisdom or the superlative goodness of Christ as depicted in the Gospels; …. I am concerned with Christ as He appears in the Gospels, taking the Gospel narrative as it stands, and there one does find some things that do not seem to be very wise. For one thing, he certainly thought that His second coming would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that. He says, for instance, “Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come.” Then he says, “There are some standing here which shall not taste death till the Son of Man comes into His kingdom”; and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that His second coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living. That was the belief of His earlier followers, and it was the basis of a good deal of His moral teaching. When He said, “Take no thought for the morrow,” and things of that sort, it was very largely because He thought that the second coming was going to be very soon, and that all ordinary mundane affairs did not count. I have, as a matter of fact, known some Christians who did believe that the second coming was imminent. I knew a parson who frightened his congregation terribly by telling them that the second coming was very imminent indeed, but they were much consoled when they found that he was planting trees in his garden. The early Christians did really believe it, and they did abstain from such things as planting trees in their gardens, because they did accept from Christ the belief that the second coming was imminent. In that respect, clearly He was not so wise as some other people have been, and He was certainly not superlatively wise.
    Amazon/Barns & Nobel et al
    978-1-4907-0590-3 (SC ISBN)

    #3 GOD LOVES EVERYONE; Jesus Died for “you”…… Just “come as you are”
    Does God love you?….”Probably” NOT!….and NO Jesus did not die for everyone!?!……There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups : A. The predestined damned B. the “many” called C. The “Few” Chosen
    Predestination….its true..its all true… God does NOT love everyone:
    Prov 8: 17. I LOVE THEM THAT LOVE ME …………
    1John 5:3. For THIS IS THE LOVE OF GOD, that we keep his commandments:
    (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD
    (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,
    (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
    will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”
    PS: “The world” that God so loved was not the Roman world nor the world of the Maya nor the world you imagined in your head that God specifically told them NOT TO LOVE!?!

    Col 2:12 “……though the operation(work) of God” CAN ANY MAN BE SAVED WITHOUT WORK?

    The thief-baptism-grace& the name-Lord & LT

    “whosoever shall call on THE NAME OF THE LORD shall be saved”
    ………So WHAT “NAME” did you “CALL UPON”?……
    Rev 19:13. .. and HIS NAME IS called THE WORD OF GOD
    Ps 138:2. praise THY NAME … for thou hast magnified THY WORD ABOVE ALL THY NAME -
    NOTE: God placed His “THE WORD” ABOVE all of God’s various NAMEs – and Jesus NAME IS called “THE WORD” no other name saves. The MOST important name we should KNOW and CALL UPON is “THE WORD”; Not letters that spell “word” but the sayings/ doctrine/commands. It does NOT say “thy word is given a name above other names because here THY WORD is identified as the name that is placed above all other names.
    Isaiah 52:1. . 6. Therefore MY PEOPLE SHALL KNOW MY NAME: ..What NAME do you “KNOW”.?
    1Jn 2:3. And HEREBY WE DO KNOW that we KNOW HIM, if we KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS./ Titus 1: 16. They profess that THEY KNOW God; but IN WORKS THEY DENY him…
    “AT the name OF JESUS”…..Jesus has a name that belongs to Jesus…just like the name OF GOD means a name that belongs to GOD but it is ridiculous to suggest that the letters G-O-D is that name…likewise the name OF JESUS is NOT the letters J-E-S-U-S. Why would anyone think that you could pronounce THE HIGHEST NAME OF GOD letter by letter…. (ie Judges 13:18; 2Cor 12:4 but God’s name is not as great and or “unspeakable )
    Rev 3:8 kept MY WORD, and hast not DENIED MY NAME; …
    .Jn 17:6. I have MANIFESTED THY NAME And they have KEPT THY WORD.;
    THE WORD is THE NAME above every name that saves us 1Pt 3:21 The ONE baptism(Eph 4:5) is into THE WORD ( which is also baptism in the Holy spirit Jn 6:63the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit ) ..ALL the sayings doctrines and commands….what did THE WORD that became flesh command? (Mat 28:19)…..what did THE WORD exemplify? (Mat 3:15/ Jn 4:1)………among other things…..YES .water baptism is just as essential and necessary for much a part of salvation (1Pt 3:21) as is keeping one self away from works of the flesh (Gal 5:21)….In fact obedience to the command of water baptism is specifically identified as the act of calling on the name of the Lord (Col 2:12 “……though the operation[work] of God” CAN ANY MAN BE SAVED WITHOUT GOD WORKING ON HIM?) …..THE WORD OF GOD is the name of God that men call upon OR…OR ..they DENY with their disobedience
    The scriptures tell us almost nothing about the thief’s life. However, the scriptures tell us a great deal about Christ life……Jesus had been around for 3.5 years before the cross and was Baptizing (Jn 4:1-2 in fact He instructed his disciples to do so and did many more then John the Baptist ever did) …..Those who try to appeal to the thief on the cross assume the thief had never heard of Jesus preaching and had never ever been baptized….The burden of Proof is on those who say baptism is not essential! ………..You can’t claim a logically valid “non-essentiality” doctrinal argument on ANYTHING based on what the scriptures do not say and in spite of the things it clearly does state to the opposite effect!…That is like looking at the constitutional law and then basing a argument against a constitutional principle in law based on the fact that history did not record for us what some unknown cattle thief did or did not do a 150 years ago?!?! What??..Who cares?? We know what the constitution did say 150 years ago. I don’t know of any Law school that bases its teaching on constitutional law based on what history does not tell us about unknown cattle thieves!?! ..Jesus command, preached & practiced Baptism so did the apostles ….To build one’s theology on the fact that the scriptures do not tell us ANY detail(s) of the thief’s life before the cross (we know almost absolutely nothing about the thief!!) it is quite foolish and willfully ignorant of what the scriptures do say about baptism…….so those who try to use the thief are in effect building their house on the sand of what scriptures do not say about a thief in spite of what the scriptures do specifically tell us about baptism!?!… “Their damnation is just” comes to mind… OR

    ………………..For the love of God if you truly have any love for God
    Assertions and descriptions no matter how vivid and or emphatically employed demonstrate nothing.

  • harry

    Being offensive to other religions is not the point! Celebrating Christmas has been done for 300 plus years and now you are not allowed to put up Christmas decorations? Erasing history and traditions are your first steps to an oligarchy, and you have taken that first step.

  • Canderson

    Why doesn’t he just go home to India or Pakistan or where ever the hell this devil comes from. A sign of that Cultural-Marxism is winning, I hate it.

  • Canderson

    If you are this the big melting pot, then you got what you deserve.
    If you are not then things must change rapidly.

    “Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.” – JFK

    The same force only played their other card, Open borders.

    This is what counts.
    Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it.

    Eli Harman
    Why are you worried about becoming a minority?

    Eli Harman
    White Genocide?

  • Man

    a sikh isn’t a muslim. it is a sikh

  • Big dog.../small fish...


    • Mayhem

      Gillespie also thought Bannon was disgusting and look where that got him.

  • Anonymous

    Yo’ broken, Hoboken. :neutral:

  • dennis48309

    It surely wasn’t Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, and Atheists that settled this continent.


      Right. It was the dirt worshippers.

      Then white boy came along and kicked them dirt worshippin injuns in the yam bags and took all their land.

      And it ain’t white boy’s fault the injuns never invented cannons and muskets and biological warfare.

      White boy stole North America fair and square. And he was even nice enough to take us niggas out of Africa, to teach the injuns how to distill spirits and to give the Mexicans and South Americans a few actual languages!!!

  • Canderson

    They fake it all by a machine. (everything is corrupt until you take a stand.) Kick them bastards out of your country!

  • Canderson

    The US is not about Sikhs, they supposedly is about to integrate and be an asset to the Country.
    Well they are not.

    • Canderson

      And you are not pissed? This is not US at all.

  • Pink Slime

    Christmass is a PAGAN holyday perpetuated by that other PAGAN religion called Catholics who RIPPED off the truth from Christians and called it their own.

    They then began to SLAUGHTER the true followers of Christianity. Yeah, that man in the white hat? God blood all over his hands. :twisted:

    • Mayhem

      And that explains why Xmas is the point of the attack, Pink Slime, because Bible taught “christians” don’t support this pagan holy day.

    • DK

      Christmas misses the Pagan holidays Saturnas and Beltaine, in England and possibly Scotland/Ireland/Wales it was a holiday season of 12 days beginning on the 24th of December with Mass at midnight which went through the calendar year covering both Christmas days by both Catholic Churches. St Nicholas of Anatolia was added because of the legends surrounding him and his Saints day was 6th of December, Saint Stephen on the 26th, St John the Apostle 27th the Catholic church put in St Thomas Becket on the 29th a couple of feast days Jan 1st is Mary Mother of God, Jan 2nd St Basil, 3rd Most holy name of Jesus. Pretty crowded. Britain had both Gregorian and Julian Calendars for a while with 2 churches, that of Iona and the Catholic one and existed through the schism between Eastern Orthodox and the Roman Catholic churches who held their Nativity on different dates with different calendars which is the last day of Christmas(6th January). The date coincided with the 25th which was mitras birthday and only in the Gregorian calendar by chance, and is the religion merged with the Catholic church whose practices i.e. trinity dogmas and the uniforms were used as religion over what was the way because the roman state required it. We also used to have 8 day weeks.

  • Babouche

    Then you should abolish all religious events, from all religions. Dot.

  • The Watcher


  • Grim

    This foreigner is literally a *rag head*, yet the idiot citizens elected him…..They deserve whatever they get.

Top Stories
Recent Stories


Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.