I think I read EG’s article on ZeroHedge. Both of you have valid concerns and suspicions, but I disagree with both of you. Controlled opposition? For what? Hillary would have won, and the criminal elite would have had carte blanche to do anything they want. I was initially concerned that Trump may have been wittingly or unwittingly used to foment civil division for two main purposes. The first purpose would be to raise up and identify all the patriots so that they could be conveniently incarcerated in Hillary fun camps or summarily executed. The second reason would be to raise such hatred against patriots that the Hillary supporters would support their internment and executions. Raising a straw resistance movement is far too much risk for the elite in that the straw resistance may turn to steel.

I have questioned why it took so long for hidden patriots in the mil-intel sector to form publicly visible resistance. Perhaps the diabolical endgame was fast approaching, and Trump in partnership with them offers the last stand. This war has the ability to create widespread suffering, economic collapse, extreme civil unrest, and an opportunity for international enemies to exploit a weakness. Those are motives enough to avoid all out war with the criminal deep state until absolutely necessary.

In war, you have to choose your battles wisely. Trying to fight everyone at once usually fails. If Trump has had dealings with Rothschild or allowed certain elites to certain appointments, that may be a strategic way of keeping the enemy from consolidating; it’s a possible sign he will not war with that faction while they remain on the sidelines.

You cannot prove Trump and his mil-intel backers are stooges for the elite, but even if they are, the fate is no different than if they never existed. This last stand that Trump represents and makes possible is a last stand I don’t think any patriot expected. It’s all we have so do not waste it or assume it’s false. Attacking this last stand is either ignorance or siding with the enemy.