Exposing The Lucifer Lie

Isaiah 14:12 Exposing The Lucifer Lie and With It The Luciferian Myth(s) – Part 1

Introduction

So who or what is Lucifer? I ask this question because this word, believe it or not only appears once in the King James Version of the Holy Scriptures – only once, and not at all in the New Testament. So what’s going on? Corrupting additions is what is going on and would you believe by the very same two villains that added the blasphemous trinity to the Holy Scriptures. Does this prove that leopards never change their spots? You bet.

What is Isaiah chapter 14 all about, for we need to understand that taking Isaiah 14:12on its own as a stand alone verse and attempting to interpret it is only going to lead to gross errors and false teachings galore? What time periods or ages was Isaiah alluding to? Is Isaiah 14 prophetic symbolism? Is it really about Satan the Devil? Who is this Son of the Dawn or Son of the Morning? Is it about a king of Babylon, as mentioned in verse 4, or is the intended subject matter something or someone entirely different? Who or what is Lucifer? Does Lucifer exist? Is the name Lucifer a construct and/or a Roman Catholic invention and yet another of their devious shell game conjuring tricks i.e. a corruption of The Holy Scriptures? Can the alleged name ‘Lucifer’ only be found once in the KJV Old Testament Holy Scriptures and not at all in the KJV New Testament Holy Scriptures? Is Lucifer another name for Satan the Devil?

Now, if it turns out that Lucifer does not exist, this must beggar the knock on question, can there be, in Truth, any Luciferian Conspiracy? Again, how can there be a Luciferian Conspiracy if it happens that Lucifer doesn’t exist and never existed? Just do a web search on the word ‘Luciferian’ and see what comes up, for there you will find all manner of weird and even weirder web page titles like:

Washington DC – A Luciferian Plot?; The Luciferian Path – a Witches Sabbat; Luciferian Sorcery; The Luciferian Legacy; The Lucis Trust, and so it goes, on and on and on with never ending web sites all obsessing about Luciferian conspiracies, plots and mysteries. I could even mockingly add: “Lucifer goes to Toy Town to conspire with Noddy and Big Ears,” such is the ludicrous nature of some of these silly ill informed web page offerings and all built upon an idea that has never been thoroughly researched, studied or proven by the authors of these web pages.

OK, so back to reality and let’s look at this Lucifer thing another way, because this issue is much the same, in its foundation, as in other age old mysteries such as the mystery of the Arthurian Legend, otherwise known as the legend of King Arthur with his Knights (Templar) of the Round Table or even Robin Hood with his Merry Men in Sherwood Forest until, that is, it comes to the numbers of people who will swiftly rush forward to tell us King Arthur and Robin Hood never existed – they were both make believe fictions. In reality, though, the jury is still out on them, for these stories (legends) have neither been wholly proved, nor totally disproved. Always remember, too, that legends do contain some Truths. Myths, as in Luciferian Conspiracies, do not.  

Moreover this Lucifer myth is slightly different, for here we have a global phenomenon not dissimilar to the worldwide fame of Manchester United FC, a football club. This is a football club that is otherwise known as The Red Devils, (how appropriate is that for this discussion!!??) with a global fan base of millions, irrespective of race, language, colour, religion or creed, it’s also a multi-million £ worldwide commercial brand to boot – a global phenomenon no less. Now, if we were to quiz a similar size worldwide audience with the question: “Who is Lucifer?” how many of them would parrot the mantra: “He’s Satan the Devil.” Nearly all of them I would wager!! On the other hand, how many of them would come forward and say: “Don’t be silly, Lucifer doesn’t exist”? Not many, if any, that’s for sure, and that’s how complete this strange deception is. This deception is so complete The Devil, via the drug LSD, even got Lennon and McCartney to write a song about him i.e. “Lucy(fer) In The Sky With Diamonds” so brazen with his deceptions is he in these last days. Always remember folks, wherever you find an all encompassing lie such as the nonsense about Lucifer you know the Father of Lies will be in there somewhere promoting it through his willing servants.

Right, that’s enough of the negative preamble, so let’s get down to business, and here is that solitary verse with its infamous corruption in the KJV of Isaiah 14. After it, I will copy the Hebrew Transliteral Version of the same verse along with the Concordant Literal Version, Young’s Literal Translation and The Amplified Bible Translation:

Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

Isaiah 14:12 (HEBREW TRANSLITERAL) How you-fell from heavens howl you son of dawn you-were-hacked-down to the earth one defeating over nations.

Isaiah 14:12 (CLV) How you have fallen from the heavens! Howl, son of the dawn! You are hacked down to the earth, defeater of all nations!

Isaiah 14:12 (YLT) How hast thou fallen from the heavens, O shining one, son of the dawn! Thou hast been cut down to earth, O weakener of nations.

Isaiah 14:12 (TAB) How have you fallen from heaven, O light-bringer and daystar, son of the morning! How you have been cut down to the ground, you who weakened and laid low the nations [O blasphemous, satanic king of Babylon!]

Now here I have listed five translations with only one translation, the KJV, using the Latin derived noun or name ‘Lucifer’, a word which originates from the Latin term lucem ferre, and means ‘light bringer’ or ‘bearer of light’. This means it’s referring to a thing or a being. In Ancient Roman astrology and/or astronomy ‘Lucifer’ was the name given to the morning star i.e. the planet Venus, but is this relevant to the original Hebrew meaning of this verse? no not at all.

Notice, too, that I say noun, because The Hebrew word that ‘Lucifer’ is translated from is a verb. Now in order for it to be a name, a noun would have to be present in the Hebrew text, but it isn’t, there is no noun, nor any word that could be translated as a name or a being from the Hebrew text, so what gives? The Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religious agenda is what gives and I will return to this dimension later.

So how has a verb become a noun when the Hebrew word involved is this: halal; hawlal’; heylel or hay-lale’? Now some scholars say it means ‘to howl’ or ‘howl you’ i.e. a shout or an exclamation. Others say it means ‘to shine’ or ‘shine forth’ or to ‘flash forth light’. If we combine the two meanings we could have ‘to shine’ and ‘to shout out boastfully’ as if we are dealing with someone who thinks he is some kind of big shot. All these descriptions though are verb based, not noun based, and from Strong’s Concordance we get these definitions:

H1966 from H1984 (in the sense of brightness); the morning star: - lucifer.

If we now look at H1984 we get some more information from Strongs:

H1984 halal or hawlal’  ”A primitive root; to be clear (originally of sound, but usually of colour); to shine; hence to make a show; to boast; and thus to be (clamourously) foolish; to rave; causatively to celebrate; also to stultify: – (make) boast (self), celebrate, commend, (deal, make), fool (-ish, -ly), glory, give [light], be (make, feign self) mad (against), give in marriage, [sing, be worthy of] praise, rage, renowned, shine.”

So from this we can see that either translation could be correct or perhaps both could be used i.e. ‘howl you’ or ‘shine you’ or ‘boast you’ or ‘rave you’ son of the dawn or son of the morning. It’s my view that both meanings are relevant here and we are dealing with someone who had a very high opinion of himself and let everyone know it. Notice, though, how the translators of the Young’s translation and the Amplified Bible have fallen for the noun trap by interpreting it as “O shining one” and “O light bringer and day star”. This means both these translations have erred along the same lines as the KJV by including noun based translations. They have just replaced ‘Lucifer’ with Venus.    

Now notice how Strong, almost begrudgingly gives his H1966 definition and then tacks old Lucifer’s name on right at the end without a capital ‘L’. Why did he do that and why did such an eminent and brilliant Bible scholar allow a verb to be translated as a noun – a proper noun no less? Easy, because he already knew it was a Roman Catholic corruption, and at the same time he knew what the deluded consensus of opinion was throughout Christendom or, better, the satanic opinion of the worldwide Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, and how that overwhelming erroneous opinion had been carried down through the ages from the third century AD, and had to be adhered to, or else? Some might call it peer pressure!!

So who were the heretical villains that introduced this corrupting Latin garbage into The Holy Scriptures? Well, we won’t be surprised to hear these two names mentioned again will we? i.e. Tertullian the trinity blasphemer circa 200 AD and later Jerome 390 AD the Latin Vulgate author and Papist religious mongrel dog. Between them, these two blaspheming illegitimates introduced a nonsensical deceptive myth that many say originated from the Canaanite Jewish, 2nd Book of Enoch written between 200 and 100 BC. So, as we can see, the plot is thickening quite nicely and it’s all beginning to look very magical, very magical indeed.

To sum up this preliminary stage of this series of articles we now know that the name Lucifer is a corruption and fiction added to The Holy Scriptures by those with another agenda. This was and is a deceptive agenda to get us to believe that Satan the Devil was, at one point in time, a bright and shining star otherwise known as The Morning Star or The Son of The Dawn or The Day Star who was hacked down to the earth from the heavenly realm and who also weakened and/or defeated the nations. Again, is any of this True and can any of it fit as an accurate description of Satan the Devil? No, and to prove it:

Rev 2:26-28 (KJV) And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: 27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. 28 And I will give him the morning star.

Here is this short passage of Holy Scripture we have reference of The Lord Himself offering the morning star to saints who overcome so what is this all about when we cross reference it with Isaiah 14:12? Well, quite simply it is telling us that the morning star is more to do with The Lord than the Devil or with a supposed king of Babylon. This gift of the morning star is telling us that those believers who are or were a part of the Church at Thyatira will in the resurrection shine like the morning star.

Now if we then add in this Holy Scripture:

Rev 22:16 (KJV) I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

Here, as we can see, The Lord is now the bright and morning star so what does this mean? It means we have moved completely away from this perverted idea that Lucifer as Satan the Devil was or is the morning star or the son of the dawn as written in the King James Version of Isaiah 14:12.

OK then, so if it’s not a king of Babylon and it’s not Lucifer as Satan the Devil then who is this son of the dawn or son of the morning?

All will be revealed in part two.

http://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/