Popes Who Fell Into Heresy; An Examination of History
TradCatKnight: POPES WHO ARGUABLY FELL INTO MATERIAL (PERSONAL) HERESY
Bookmark & check in daily (over 150k do) to TradCatKnight for the latest endtime news as we head closer to the great chastisements foretold at Fatima!
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/
Most Catholics even non-Catholics do not have the
proper un derstanding of Papal infallibility. A POPE
IS ONLY INFALLIBLE WHEN HE SPEAKS EXCATHEDRA OR WHEN
WHAT HE TEACHES FALLS IN LINE WITH TRADITION/ THE
INFALLIBLE EXTRAORDINARY OR ORDINARY MAGESTERIUM. WHEN
HE FAILS TO DO SO YOU MUST REJECT, ANY NOVELTY OR
HERESY, AND MAINTAIN TRADITION/ANTIQUITY.
POPE ST. MARCELLINUS (296-304)
Marcellinus, during the persecutions of the Emperor
Diocletian in 303-304, offered incense to the idols of
the pagan gods. Therefore, he apostatized, left the
Catholic Faith, and left the Church. Catholic theology
teaches that it is possible for this to happen with a
pope as with any other man, as a pope is a man and has
freewill to accept or reject the Catholic Faith.
The Catholic faithful were so scandalized by the pope's
apostasy that they accosted him and reproached him
severely. Under pressure from the Catholic faith,
Marcellinus publicly recanted his error and deposed
himself. He declared himself unworthy of Christian
burial and excommunicated all who might presume to bury
him. His body lay above ground for 35 days
decomposing.
POPE LIBERIUS (352-355)
By his own admission (Letter "Studens Paci"),
Liberius signed an heretical semi-Arian profession of
faith at Sirmium in 357, during the period of the
Arian heresy in the Church. He also excommunicated
St. Athanasius, who was courageously defending the
orthodox Catholic faith.
Liberius also signed, in December 359, when he was
under pressure at the hands of the Emperor, who was
holding him prisoner at Byzantium, a semi-Arian formula
that had already been accepted by all the (heretic)
Eastern bishops, 160 in number, meeting at Seleucia,
and by 400 (heretic) Western bishops, at Rimini -- by
all of them except St. Hilary, St. Athanasius, and a
tiny handful of others, whom Liberius went so far as
to condemn and excommunicate.
These facts are attested to by St. Athanasius
(History of the Arians, sec. 41; Apologia against
the Arians, sec. 89), St. Hilary of Potiers
(Historical Fragments, Ad Constantium), and St. Jerome
(Chronicle), who wrote: "Liberius, conquered by the
tedium of exile, WITH HERETICAL PERVERSITY, signed
[the profession of semi-Arian faith] and entered into
Rome as a conqueror."
Neither St. Athanasius nor St. Hilary had any problem
resisting the heretical politics of Pope Liberius.
POPE ZOSIMUS (417-418)
Pope Zosimus, in the presence of the Roman clergy,
recognized as orthodox the heretical statements of
Pelagius, which had been condemned by Pope Innocent I
and the two Councils of Carthage.
Pelagianism, which denied the doctrine of Original Sin
and man's need for grace, was a virulent heresy of the
time, against which St. Augustine wrote numerous tracts
(The Remission of Sins and the Baptism of Children,
The Spirit and the Letter, Letter to Hilary, Nature
and Grace, Perfect Justice, The Acts of Pelagius, The
Grace of Christ, and Original Sin).
The pope condemned those who held the orthodox Catholic
faith as calumniators (Letter "Postquam nobis,"
November 21, 417; Letter "Magnum pondus") and demanded
a formal retraction from the orthodox African bishops,
St. Augustine of Hippo and St. Aurelius of Carthage.
In response, St. Augustine and St. Aurelian took a
solemn oath with God as witness (obtestatio), affirming
that the prior Catholic doctrine prevailed over the
judgment of the pope, which was upheld by a plenary
council of all Africa assembled. Confronted with
resistance to his part in perpetuating heresy, Pope
Zosimus finally recanted and renewed the
excommunication of the heretic Pelagius.
It was around this time that St. Augustine uttered the
famous words (or something close to them):
Roma locuta est; causa finita est, in a Sermon CXXXI
of September 417. Pope Zosimus was waffling on his
precedessor's, Pope St. Innocent I's, anathema against
the heretic Pelagius. St. Augustine meant by his
statement since Rome had already spoken on the matter
(a reference to Pope St. Innocent I's anathema against
Pelagius), the case ought not to be reopened, even by
Pope Zosimus, who ought to give his assent to the
solemn judgment of his predecessor.
St. Augustine made his statement, then, at a time when
a pope was in the process of lending aid and comfort
to heretics, when he should have been holding fast to
what his predecessor had decreed. The great Saint was
not saying that every decision of Rome must be blindly
obeyed; otherwise, he would have supported the reigning
pope. He was warning people, the Pope included, that
Rome had already spoken on this matter and that it
would be gravely wrong for anyone (even, presumably,
a pope) to attempt to reverse a solid and sound
judgment on a matter of Catholic doctrine.
POPE ANASTASIUS (496-498)
This pope appears held in Hell in Dante Alighieri's
Inferno (Canto XI, lines 8-9):
...Anastasio papa guardo, lo qual trasse Fotin dela
via dritta.
[...I hold Pope Anastasius,whom Photinus drew from the
straight path.]
In mediaeval tradition, this pope was held to have been
persuaded by Photinus, a deacon of Thessalonica, to
deny the divine birth of Christ. Although later
scholarship has cast doubt on the correctness of this
tradition, the point is that it was a widely held
opinion of the Church that a pope was a heretic, so
widely held, in fact, that this pope appears as a
heretic in one of the most read and influential texts
of the Middle Ages, written by a Franciscan Tertiary
and praised by several subsequent popes as showing
consonance with the Apostolic Tradition.
POPE VIGILIUS (537-555)
Vigilius became to all appearances a supporter of
heresy when, in 553, he refused to uphold firmly the
Church's teaching that Christ had two Wills, against
"Monothelism." He did not condemn either this or the
older Monophysite heresy. The Roman deacon Pelagius
attacked Vigilius on this account and charged him with
heresy, for which he was excommunicated by Vigilius.
It was Pelagius, however, who succeeded him as pope,
only to fall into similar habits of temporizing and
diplomatic duplicity as his predecessor!
The Emperor Justianian had called a kangaroo council
to rescind the condemnation of the heresy of
monophysitism, a heresy that denied the two natures,
human and divine, of Christ. Pope Vigilius, who
wished to return to Rome from exile, in a decree, or
Iudicatum, recanted his former orthodox Catholic
position, condemned the orthodox decree of the Council
of Chalcedon (451), and excommunicated the
bishop-authors of that decree (the so-called Three
Chapters of Theodoret).
As a result of this action, he was excommunicated for
heresy by an African Council and forced to annul the
Iudicatum, although he continued to support it
privately in correspondence with the emperor.
The Fifth Oecumenical Council at Constantinople (553)
excommunicated Pope Vigilius, and the next year he
recanted again, saying that he had been deceived by
the devil.
Having thus succumbed to public and personal heresy,
Pope Virgilus died before he reached Rome. His heresy
had a great repercussion on the Church of the time. In
the West, it even caused a schism in northern Italy.
POPE BONIFACE IV (608-615)
Pope Boniface manifested strong tendencies toward the
Nestorian heresy, which denied the correct doctrine of
the two natures of Christ and denied that the Blessed
Virgin Mary was the Mother of God. This heresy was
condemned by the Councils of Ephesus (431) and
Chalcedon (451) and persists in parts of the East to
this day.
St. Columbanus wrote to the pope vehemently
reprimanding him for his heretical tendencies
(Epistula V), called upon the pope to prove his
orthodoxy and to call a council to clarify the
doctrinal confusions that the pope had created.
POPE HONORIUS I (625-638)
Honorius is, among all the popes in any way guilty
of heresy, both the best known and the most culpable.
The phrase he used when justifying his compromise with
the heretics has a surprisingly up-to-date ring about
it, for all that it was spoken in 634: "We must be
careful not to rekindle ancient quarrels." On the
strength of this argument, he allowed error to spread
freely, with the result that truth and orthodoxy were
effectively banished. Pope Honorius wrote a letter
approving the heresy of the Patriarch Sergius of
Constantinople, monothelitism, which held against the
doctrine of the human and divine natures of Christ
that there was only a single will in Christ.
This heresy was strongly opposed by St. Sophronius,
later Patriarch of Jerusalem, St. Maximus the
Confessor, and various popes. St. Sophronius called
a council to combat the heresy, at which the constant
teaching of the Church on the two natures, human and
divine, in Christ was demonstrated. Pope Honorius in
reply reproved the orthodox Catholic patriarch and
enlisted the help of the heretical emperor Heralitus.
The heresy of monothelitism, to which Pope Honorius
personally held, was condemned by Pope Severinus
(640-640), Pope John IV (640-642) in 642, Pope Theodore
I (642-649), who excommunicated the Patriarch of
Constantinople for defending the error, Pope St. Martin
I 9649-655), who died a martyr for defending the
orthodox Catholic doctrine, and Pope Eugenius I
(654-657).
Finally, the Third Oecumenical Council of
Constantinople (680-681) condemned the heresy of
monothelitism and condemned and excommunicated Pope
Honorius (after his death) as a heretic, as did
Pope St. Leo II, who followed the Council, in these
words: "Having found that [Honorius's letters] are in
complete disagreement with the Apostolic dogmata and
the definitions of the Holy Councils, and of all the
approved Fathers; and that, on the contrary, they
lead to the false doctrines of the heretics, we
absolutely reject and condemn them as being poisonous
to souls.
"We also state that Honorius, formerly pope of the
elder Rome, had been also rejected from God's Holy
Catholic Church and is being anathematized, on account
of the writings that he sent to Sergius,where he
adopted his ideas in everything, and reaffirmed his
impious principles. He is shown to be incapable of
enlightening this Apostolic Church by the doctrine of
Apostolic Tradition, in that he allowed its immaculate
faith to be blemished by a sacrilegious betrayal."
All the great Oecumenical Councils since then have
endorsed this verdict. Even while proclaiming the
dogma of Papal Infallibility, the Church upheld the
anathema cast many centuries ago upon one of her
Pontiffs on account of heresy.
Moreover, Pope Honorius admonished the bishops of
Spain to be benevolent toward the errors of the
Jewish religion, which had been condemned by the
Council of Toledo (633), presided over by St. Isidore
of Seville. St. Braulio of Saragossa publicly
reproved the pope, charging that he could not believe
that "the astuteness of the serpent had been able to
leave traces of his passing over the stone of the
Apostolic See."
THE CHURCH WAS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT POPE HONORIUS WAS
CONDEMNED AND EXCOMMUNICATED BY THE CHURCH AS A
HERETIC, WHO WROTE HERESY IN HIS OFFICIAL PAPAL
LETTERS.
#1. Honorius was condemned by the Third Oecumenical
Council of Constantinople specifically as a heretic
who had taught heresy, not just because he was just
negligent and failed to teach the true Faith when it
was in danger of subversion. The Council's findings
were as follows: We find that these documents
[including those of Honorius] are quite foreign to the
Apostolic dogmata, to the declarations of the Holy
Councils, and to all the accepted Fathers, and that
they follow the false teachings of the heretics.
We expel and anathematize from the Holy Church of God
Honorius, who was some time pope of Old Rome, because
of what we found written by him to Sergius, that in all
respects he followed his view and confirmed his
impious doctrines....
To Honorius, the heretic, anathema!... [The devil]
has actively employed them [including Honorius]...
We slew them [including Honorius] with anathema, as
lapsed from the faith and as sinners, in the morning
outside the camp of the tabernacle of God.
#2. Pope Leo confirmed the documents of this Council
with a sentence that actually confirms that Honorius
Moreover, [we anathematize] also Honorius, who ruled
this Apostolic Church, not by the doctrine of
Apostolic Tradition; rather, he tried by profane
treason to overthrow the immaculate Faith of the
Roman Church. Necnon et Honorium (anathematizamus),
qui hanc Apostolicam ecclesiam, non Apostolicæ
Traditionis doctrina lustravit, sed profana proditione
immaculatam fidem subvertere conatus est.”
(Mansi, Tomus XI. p. 731]
#3. The Council of Trullo was held just a few years
after Constantinople III. It stated that Honorius had
been condemned specifically because he taught heresy:
This council taught that we should openly profess our
faith that in the incarnation of Jesus Christ, our
true God, there are two natural wills, or volitions,
and two natural operations; and condemned by a just
sentence those who adulterated the true doctrine and
taught the people that in the one Lord Jesus Christ
there is but one will and one operation: to wit,
Theodore of Pharan, Cyrus of Alexandria, Honorius of
Rome, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, and Peter.
The Oecumenical Council II Nicea also recorded that
Honorius held the heresy along with the other heretics:
We have also anathematised the idle tales of Origen,
Didymus, and Evagrius; and the doctrine of one will
held by Sergius, Honorius, Cyrus, and Pyrrhus, or
rather, we have anathematized their own evil will.
POPE FORMOSUS (891-896)
Pope Stephen VI (VII) (896-897) had the body of Pope
Formosus (891-896), his second-to-last predecessor,
although not charged with heresy, exhumed, vested in
papal vestments, seated on a throne, formally placed
on trial before the Roman Synod (sometimes called the
Cadaver Synod) for having invalidly usurped the papal
throne. When he was found guilty, Formosus was then
stripped of his papal vestments, and the three fingers
of his right hand -- the fingers with which he
conferred blessings -- were cut off and cast away
contemptuously. Formosus' body was then thrown into
the Tiber River. Stephen deposed the dead pope,
annulled all his decrees, and pronounced all the
ordinations conferred by him invalid. Although several
of Stephen's successors rehabilitated Formosus, Pope
Sergius III (904-911) upheld Stephen's actions.
Boniface VI (896), Stephen's immediate predecessor,
was an excommunicated priest. Formosus had himself
been excommunicated in 872.
POPE BENEDICT IX (1032-1044; 1045; 1047-8)
in 1049 Pope Benedict IX was excommunicated not for
heresy, but for simony by a Lateran synod.
He reportedly renounced the papal throne in exchange
for the income of the annual St. Peter's Pence
collection.
POPE PASCHAL II (1099-1118)
In 1111 Pope Paschal II succumbed to the secular
power and demanded that all bishops and abbots resign
so that the secular power could make its own
appointments (lay investiture). To a man, including
St. Bruno of Segni, the bishops and abbots refused to
obey the pope.
Paschal was declared suspect of heresy. In 1112 Guido
of Burgundy, Archbishop of Vienne and the future Pope
Callistus II, with St. Hugh of Grenoble and St.
Godfrey of Amiens, also acted against the pope at a
provincial synod.
In 1116, like St. Peter, the pope in public repented
bitterly of the error that he had made in undermining
the authority of the Church and acting against the
common good of the Church.
POPE JOHN XXII (1316-1334)
In three sermons from 1331 until 1333 preached and
wrote against the common opinion of theologians,
preaching instead that the souls of the just do not
enjoy the Beatific Vision immediately after death,
nor are the wicked at once eternally damned, but that
all await the final judgment of God at the Last Day.
The pope was denounced as a heretic and demanded to be
brought before a council for trial and condemnation.
Yet he persisted in teaching this error, even throwing
into the papal dungeon one who accused him of heresy.
Eventually, however, the pope appointed a commission
of theologians to examine the question, which easily
showed him that his teaching was contrary to the
almost universal opinion of theologians. On the day
before his death, December 3, 1334, he issued the Bull
Ne Super His in the presence of the College of
Cardinals, formally and solemnly revoking his opinion.
On January 29, 1936, his successor, Pope Benedict XII,
published this document, along with his own
Constitution, Benedictus Deus, which declared
authoritatively and perpetually concerning the matter.
John XXII, upon his deathbed, solemnly recanted every
opinion, every teaching contrary to the Catholic Faith,
alluding to his heretical sermon given on the Feast of
All Saints in 1331, "determinationi Ecclesiae ac
successorum nostrorum" [submitting all that he may have
said or written on the subject to the judgement of the
Church and of his successors].
Such instances do not leave any room for doubt but
that it is possible for a Pope to be guilty of heresy,
except in the exercise of the Extraordinary
Magisterium, which, alone, is intrinsically infallible.
"Papal teaching authority was not thought of as being
independent of the other teaching authorities in the
Church. Scholastic theologians like St. Thomas Aquinas
recognized that the Pope could introduce new formulas
of faith, but Thomas thought of this in the context of
papal councils like the Lateran councils, and saw
papal authority to determine the faith as being
exercised as the head of such a council, not in
opposition to it or independence from it.
Related: http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/05/resistance-missing-mass-spiritual.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/05/resistance-is-there-conciliar-church.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/05/suarez-on-what-to-do-if-pope-falls-into.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/02/john-of-st-thomas-on-deposition-of.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/tradcatknight-radio-manifest-heresy.html
TradCatKnight is the most viewed & followed traditional catholic page worldwide.
This is the HOME of the New crusade keeping you up to date on the latest Endtime News stories worldwide as we head closer to the GREAT CHASTISEMENTS foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima.
Don’t forget to signup to my other social media outlets:
google.com/+EricGajewski
youtube.com/user/tradcatknights
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
Cardinal Newman admits in his book that; the “The use of temples, and these dedicated to particular saints, and ornamented on occasions with branches of trees; incense, lamps, and candles; votive offerings on recovery from illness; holy water; asylums; holydays and seasons, use of calendars, processions, blessings on the fields; sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure, the ring in marriage, turning to the East, images at a later date, …the ecclesiastical chant, and the Kyrie Eleison, are all of pagan origin, and sanctified by their adoption into the Church. {374}” -An Essay on the The Development of the Christian Doctrine John Henry “Cardinal Newman” p.359 (Also see According to Dr. E. D. Clarke, Travels, vol. i. p. 352.)
Antichrist must be a “Christian” church that embraces the teachings of BABYLON
Revelation 17:5, “And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”
In the Scriptures we find a prophetic explanation of the church of Antichrist. We learned earlier that a woman in prophecy equals a church. A mother is most definitely a woman, is she not? Therefore this mother in Revelation 17:5 is a church. Problem is, this mother is a whore, in fact she is a mother of many whores the prophecy says. This means that MANY churches the world over will spawn out from this church doing as she has taught. Looking through history one will find upwards of 3000 denominations that have been spawned from Roman Catholicism. Prophecy defines this woman as a whore. This means she will be an apostate mother or church to all those that do as she suggests.
All throughout the Word of God we see an apostate church being likened unto a harlot. In, Jeremiah 3:6, “The LORD said also unto me in the days of Josiah the king, Hast thou seen that which backsliding Israel hath done? she is gone up upon every high mountain and under every green tree, and there hath played the harlot.”
Israel is the bride of Christ. But the Word shows that she seeks another husbandman. Doing so means she “cheated on her husband” to put it plainly. She “played the harlot.” Sad fact is, she is still doing so to this day.
The Pagan’s of Babylon would perform worship to idols under green trees. This practice found it’s way into the lives of God’s chosen people. Soon Israel itself was embracing Pagan rituals as well. We all know the name “Israel” is in fact the loving name the Father has given to His church. This is not just for the Jewish believers that accept the Lord Jesus as Christ. This name Israel is also for the Gentile believer, for it is well known our Father is not a respector of persons, and it is also penned in…
Romans 9:6-8, “Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.”
There is one more defining feature of this church that I would like to bring to your attention. We already understand it to be a whore, but what type of whoredom does she commit? The Prophecy states this will be a church that embraces the teachings of BABYLON. Could it be? The church that claims Christ Jesus Lord is also a church that embraces Babylonian, or Pagan worship? The Lord God who is a God of divine order gives us many identifiable facts that point to this very church. So many that it makes it overwhelmingly easy for the child of God THAT TRUSTS their Heavenly Father and His Word to see plainly. Please understand this is a major KEY in identifying the church of Antichrist! For if you do not trust your Creator or His Word, then it may be you this passage describes as one who embraces the flesh over and above the Spirit. For it is written well in…
1 Corinthians 2:14, “…the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”
http://www.remnantofgod.org/666-CHAR.htm#pagan