Part 3...Even God Himself Specifically Uses Modalism to Describe the Son/Father, so When Did it Become Heresy Again?!?

PART 3

EVEN GOD USES MODALISM by definition SO WHEN DID IT BECOME HERESY AGAIN?!?

-God used it to describe himself and who would be coming in the flesh …That part of the spirit of God that God considers to be his own right arm comes occupies and is “fussed” with human flesh in a way that the rest of God is not. The distinction is in that fact and the “additional sensations/existence” that human flesh/spirit fusion create, not a distinction in person. …….When someone goes to put a needle in my arm IT REACTS to pull back but my head tells it no stay there it is for the best….but only a fool would try to conclude that my right arm is a different person, even though it has “a will of its own” (see Ch7 also the flesh lust against the spirit and visa versa) ..?!??!. This Trinitarian attempt to deny what God plainly states about his own nature and “PERSON” based on the trinitarians “rational” arguments but build your whole God on the incomprehensible concept of three different person who are each God with different “god” powers and knowledge as only ONE GOD rather then what that really is which is three different Gods……So [for trinitarians et al] what God has clearly stated and described (God in the spiritual universe will send that part of himself that he considers to be his own right arm will be born into the physical world of human flesh) is just a figure of speech or metaphor but what God specifically denounces (God specifically denounces that he is multiple different persons) must be the “truth” that all men must accept according to these Trinitarian heretics. What God describes is just a figure of speech not to be taken too literally while the ideas that plainly contradict God must be accepted as “truth”.

- Everyday experience can explain the nature of God using the modalistic descriptions and allegories found in scripture with everyday experience. However, trinitarianism cannot be seen or understood in everyday experience and is in fact as admitted to in their own “confessions of faith” (and by virtue of their “God is so great we cant put God in a box, we  just can’t understand it arguments/excuses) is admittedly “INCOMPREHSIBLE”.

- Since man is made in the image of God you would think that folks would want to start with that concept to apply first, rather then invoking the number three or the word Trinity entirely unnecessarily, into a God that is quite clear about the fact that He is only one person..…My right hand IS me and is WITH me (Jn 1:1).….WOW, imagine that!?!? Distinctions are not multiple different persons. The fact that God has distinctions between father son and holy spirit is not any more incomprehensible then a man with a head and right arm and a sprit that animates them all. One might be tempted to think that God actually intended for us to understand his nature by using the very creation (even in the language and terminology) that was made in that image……………………… Man is made in the image of God and God uses these exact terms to describe and define his nature. You right arm is distinct from your head…It is with you and it is you….Your head is greater then your right arm (the father is greater then I)…..your right arm can only know, do and communicate what your head tells it to, (Jn 8:28) unless it feels pain and then it lets the head know…”I do not like this”…so the hand wants to pull away from the needle but your head tells it no stay there it if for the best. (not my will but thy will be done) Jesus is nothing more then that part of God that God considers to be his right arm come in the flesh. How curious that everyone seems to have never read or heard (certainly never meet the metric of “know and understand”) that God states he is going to send his right arm and in that day they would know “I am he”. Take note, the speaker who is going to SEND his right arm states that it is HIMSELF that is coming; in another passage the speaker who is going to SEND a servant states that it is HIMSELF. The person who sends the servant is the servant that comes. Your right arm does the bidding of your head and by your right arm all things that you make are created also. When I sit down my right hand (an object) is “at my right hand” (a location). Take a look at the diagrams in Chapter six which conceptualizes the whole idea of “where God is”. There are many other things we shall continue to explore in this study and once you see it you should realize just how simple it all really is. Then your next question will be “how come then so few or almost no one ever saw all this before”; to which i suggest (A) a few have (B) 2 Thess 2:10-11……………………

-How “Ironic” (hypocritical) that Trinitarians will try to deny the scriptures use of God literally sending His right arm (even ridiculing that) because of its Anthropomorphic implications and yet that is the exact bases for all Trinitarian arguments. It is the anthropomorphic descriptors that the Trinitarian hypocrites try to use as reasons for arguing a demand for multiple/three different persons of God (ie. had to be multiple persons so that God was not praying to himself et al). The Question must be asked, “How many other Gods is there for the one God to pray [or swear] to?!?! God could swear by no greater then Himself, nor could their be any higher authority to hold God to his own oath…!?! God is one person who only sent a part of himself called his right arm via a physical birth ergo called his son to teach us how to live pray, suffer and die to HIMSELF!?!….well, he certainly did not come to teach us how to pray and die to some other god????.

- Christ is part of the omnipresent Spirit of God (that God considers to be His own right arm) attached to flesh but not limited to the confines of that flesh; connected in a way that the rest of God is not.. ….He (Jesus) is however, that part of God that God himself considers to be his own right arm that came in the flesh. ……..and the terms that God uses are the very ones that man who is made in his image are not just modalist but staunchly anti-trinitarian! His son is his right arm… …. before you scoff with Jesus was just a hand puppet of God (Gods right arm in human flesh) then consider you likewise are just as much a puppet of the soul/spirit that is in your flesh the only difference is that you are a different person (then God) who’s spirit is limited to the confines of your human flesh while Christ is part of the omnipresent Spirit of God (that God considers to be His own right arm) attached to flesh but not limited to the confines of that flesh; connected in a way that the rest of God is not. A simple thought exercise with a hand puppet animated by you (the unseen behind the curtain spirit using your right hand) explains all the “difficulty” understanding with such passages as Jn 10:29-31; 12:49 et al

- Your spirit animates your body just as a puppet is animated by a hand in a puppet glove. (the spirit is the life what gives animation to the flesh) You can put your right hand into a glove or puppet and animate it. Your spirit is animating your physical flesh. The physical flesh is nothing more then a more complex puppet of your spirit. Jesus is nothing but that part of the spirit of God that came and occupied the same physical flesh as you and me and animated it in the same way that we are animated by our spirits. The difference is that our spirits were created by Jesus himself who is the father and God of all spirits. If you find the concept of Jesus as a puppet disturbing then just look in the mirror because that is what you are! ….

-Some argue: Lk 22:42 .  Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. 43.  And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him. ……………They attempt to say that since there are two different wills here so must be two different persons right? But the answer is far more simple then requiring a multiple personal headed god!?!

That part of the spirit of God that is connected to flesh is distinct from the rest of the spirit of God that is not connected to that flesh thus the distinction between them as well as how the spirit of God was against the flesh of GOD ..Example:

Gal 5:17.  For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other:

Mat 26:41:   the SPIRIT indeed is willing, but the FLESH is weak.

The Fact that God can do more then you image is not a valid argument for why God did everything you suggest in spite of what he clearly

Rom 8:1 walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit…… 5.  For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

But What fool would suggest that since my flesh and my spirit inside of me can be contrary to each other and want different things must mean that I am multiple different persons!?!? When someone goes to put a needle in my arm IT REACTS to pull back but my head tells it no stay there it is for the best….but only a fool would try to conclude that my right arm is a different person, even though it has “a will of its own” (see also the flesh lust agains the spirit and visa versa).. A distinction between the desires or “will” of the spirit and the desires “will” of the flesh or what the spirit wants and what the flesh wants does not make for different persons of myself!?!   

-The only coherent and consistent way to apply all the scriptures is in and with the allusion to head and right arm the head that scriptures make just as your right arm is you and you are the head of your right arm it is with you and is you.  The issue is not what God could do or what “great things” you can image that God could do, but rather what did God say about his self, His nature and how did God describe it.

You can download the complete book FREE from
https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY
http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920799