Formal Complaint re Collusion, Fraud, FALSE INSTRUMENT and NO due process via Trial by Jury for Laurence McGeough: -

Thursday, 7 February 2013MAKE WHAT YOU WILL OF THIS…i know what i make of it… 7 FEB 13

Formal Complaint re Collusion, Fraud, FALSE INSTRUMENT and NO due process via Trial by Jury for Laurence McGeough: -

——————————————————————————– 

 
John Hemming

This may interest you:
http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Player.aspx?meetingId=12519&st=17:59:20

 
—- Original Message —–
From:Tim Fleming
To: Patrick Cullinane
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Formal Complaint re Collusion, Fraud, FALSE INSTRUMENT and NO due process via Trial by Jury for Laurence McGeough: -

Dear Patrick,

RE; Laurence McGeough

You are brave and honourable man, I am sickened to witness such rough justice being dished out daily at these Kangaroo Courts, THIS MUST STOP, Surely as a European Citizen this case can be escalated to the highest level of the Legal System and EXPOSE THESE GANGESTERS What are our MP’s doing ? Did you see Dispatches Programme last week on the Andrew Mitchell incident & ( recorded on CCTV at the very gates of the House of Commons ) we should all be very concerned about the Collusion/Corruption surrounding us in the UK ENOUGH IS ENOUGH , united we stand, we will not take it any more TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY & TRIAL BY JUDGE IS TYRANNY Keep up your excellent work, you have a lot of support out there, Good Luck. Regards Tim Fleming On 06/02/2013 18:24, Patrick Cullinane wrote:

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
Working Against all the Odds!!
<>>>>>>>><>————————————————————————-

6th February 2013
FAO: Patti Nephews, Court Manager
Uxbridge County Court
501 Uxbridge Road
Hayes
Middlesex, UB4 8HL
Tel: 020 8756 3520
Patti Nephews:

Laurence McGeough -v- United Kingdom Member State
Laurence McGeough, 83 Windmill Lane, Greenford, Middlesex, UB6 9DR

Formal Complaint: Under European Union Laws& the Common Laws in the UK
At Uxbridge County on 20 December 2012 Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG served District Judge Wood with the attached submission on behalf of his client Laurence McGeough.
Judge Wood called Court Security saying, “Mr Cullinane had NO right to represent Laurence McGeough in court and demanded that he represent himself against a Barrister and two Solicitors when he had no knowledge of the law whatsoever. The man was SICK.
Mr Cullinane told Judge Wood that she had “no jurisdiction to oppose him and was operating a Kangaroo Court”
When the Court Security, Mr Zeeshan Khan arrived, he ordered Mr Cullinane to leave the court. Mr Cullinane refused and told Mr Khan that he had no authority to demand that he leave the court, as he had broken no law. Mr Cullinane told Mr Khan not to be harassing him and that he was protecting the scene of a crime and was calling the Police to confiscate the Court Tape and arrest District Judge Wood as she was operating a Kangaroo Court.
When the Police arrived, PC Strong XH 515 and PC Gibson XH 158. The two Police Officers would not listen to Mr Cullinane and PC Gibson told him that he would arrest him if he did not leave the court immediately. Mr Cullinane handed PC Gibson a copy of the submission that he served on Judge Wood, but he flatly refused to take it, as he was in a very threatening and aggressive mode. PC Gibson was COLLUDING with Judge Wood.
When everyone had left the court building without any hearing whatsoever, Judge Wood made up the following order: -

This is aFALSE INSTRUMENT for the purpose of FRAUD, as District Judge Wood never heard the “Defendant in Person”, as Laurence McGeough had left the court building with his legal representative Mr Cullinane: -
Judge Wood advised Mr Cullinane that the proceedings were being recorded; therefore, it is imperative that a copy of the Court Tapes are made available to Laurence McGeough and Patrick Cullinane, as they are both victims of serious crimes and inhuman and degrading treatment, which will be on the Court Tapes.
The following letter from Stephen Pound MP is a typical example of howshyster MPs leave their constituents to the mercy of the Kangaroo Courts in the UK, to be PERSECUTED and ROBBED by COLLUDING Law—yers, Police, Bailiffs and Judges without due process of the law: -
Mr Cullinane was informed by Laurence and Peter McGeough that when they visited Stephen Pound’s surgery on 4th January 2013 for EFFECTIVE representation, he kept quizzing them about Mr Cullinane’s qualifications. What is this FRAUD getting taxpayers money for, when he is leaving Patrick Cullinane doHIS work, while he is shoring up the ENTRENCHED CORRUPTION in our Courts? This FRAUDSTER, like numerous other MPs should resign immediately, as they are COLLUDING with the CRIMINALS to ROB their constituents.
<!–[if !supportLists]–>1. <!–[endif]–>With a fobbing off letter like this, what do the likes of Stephen Pound MP know about his constituents GUARANTEED rights in Common Law to due process via Trial by Jury? Stephen Pound MP is abusing public office; while having the barefaced cheek to question his constituents about Patrick Cullinane’s qualifications. And what is Mr Pound NOW going to do about Uxbridge County Court manufacturing a FALSE INSTRUMENT to ROB his constituent Laurence McGeough and destroy this immigrant Irish family? – And does Mr Pound know anything about the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as the FALSE INSTRUMENT was handed to him in his surgery on 4th January 2013 by Laurence and his father Peter. And now ALL you upholders of the Rule of Law in the UK know exactly what Mr Pound he did with it.
You will see that there is nothing whatsoever on here that Mr Heck knows anything about due process and the Common Law Trial by Jury: -

Dirk van Heck Barristers
Following a pupillage at Maitland Chambers, Dirk worked for two independent think tanks, where he gained knowledge of international, European and human rights law, before commencing practice at the Bar.
Following a pupillage at Maitland Chambers, Dirk worked for two independent think tanks, where he gained knowledge of international, European and human rights law, before commencing practice at the Bar.
Between 2009 and early 2012, he was employed in the Litigation & Insolvency Department of leading offshore law firm Maples and Calder, in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”), where he acted as both barrister and solicitor. This period of employment included a large amount of Commercial Court work, involving Dirk advocating alone against QCs (some based in the BVI and others in London), as well as a secondment to Maples and Calder’s Cayman Islands office.
Dirktakes instructions directly from members of the public under the Direct Public Access scheme.
http://www.1ec.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132&Itemid=120
What is Dirk van Heck demanding money for when he has shown himself to be a complete FOOL about Common Law, which is the law of the LAND? Mr Heck is also blinded to the conflict of interest of representing a firm of Solicitors one day and a member of the public the next. – “Commercial Court work”… supported by MPs and enforced by Police an Bailiffs. –It is so outrageous, that you could not make it up: -

Due process: is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from harm. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process
Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads: “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”
{Article 39} reads: “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”
{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”
http://www.iamm.com/magnaarticles.htm
No Act of Parliament can take away We the Peoples’ Common Law rights, to due-process via the Trial by Jury.
Our legal future had already been shaped in 1215; peruse the following very important article and, ALL the 8 comments to it, very carefully:-

Shaping our legal future – 17 February 2012

Trial by jury: the importance of “ordinary”jurors
http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/trial-by-jury-the-importance-of-ordinary-jurors/#comment-14641
CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Chapter VI – JUSTICE

——————————————————————————–

Article 47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.
Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time byanindependent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented. Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.
http://infoportal.fra.europa.eu/InfoPortal/infobaseShowContent.do?btnCat_253&btnCountryBread_169
International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State
ITCCS Communique 23 July 2012: Brussels, London, Ottawa
Published on Jul 23, 2012 by ITCCSInternational
The Case against the Crown, the Vatican and other Agents of Genocide: Common Law Courts, Indictments and Juries to be Established by September 15, 2012 – A Call for Citizen Participation
http://2012indyinfo.com/2012/07/25/itccs-communique-23-july-2012-brussels-london-ottawa/
District Judge Wood has committed TREASON.
The above was also witnessed by Timothy Fleming an observer and Peter McGeough, who is Laurence’s father.
“The entire­administration is engaged in a criminal act”: – Which usVICTIMS have been screaming about for decades: -

guardian.co.uk: By George Monbiot on Monday 1 February 2010
Mock this campaign if you like, but how else can Blair be held to account?
With the limits of power in Britain so ill-defined, the only way a reckoning for Iraq will ever come is via a citizen’s arrest
Comments (410)
What else can you do? When the entire­administration is engaged in a criminal act, when there isno clear separation of powers between the government and the judiciary, when those appointed to hold the government to account are as scary as a litter of kittens, where do you turn? Do you appeal to the attorney general’s office to prosecute itself?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/01/blair-arrest-crime-national-memory
The Times: By Heather Brooke – 28 July 2010
The courts are open but justice is a closed book
We are denied even the barest details of what goes on in supposedly public legal proceedings
http://heatherbrooke.org/2010/article-co urt-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-5067
Pair jailed without due process of the law of the LAND = Trial by Jury: -

Halifax Courier – Published Date: 07 September 2007 Pair jailed for recording court hearing TWO men have been sent to prison for recording court proceedings. http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Pair-jailed-for-recording-court.3185526.jp
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 17 January 2012
Bashing trial by jury is pathetically predictable
Michael Mansfield
Comments (96)
Governments needing a facelift often attempt to curtail jury trial. Quick-fix supermarket justice must be resisted
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/17/trial-by-jury-bashing-predictable?newsfeed=true
We the People in the UK have a legitimate excuse, and duty, to tape-record proceedings in Her Majesty’s Courts in the UK Member State, as they are Corporate / CommercialKangaroo Courts perverting the course of justice to raise revenue and oppress the people.
The usual Barrister SCAM: Just prior to entering the court, in the hallway, the Barrister Dirk Van Heck handed Mr Cullinane a document, which was headed “CLAIMANT’S CHRONOLOGY” and dated 19 December 2012. Mr Cullinane asked the Barrister what he was doing here as there was FRAUD in the case? Which the Barrister replied as he walked away, “It is too late now to claim FRAUD”. Mr Cullinane shouted after him that, “FRAUD was always claimed in the case”. What law exactly did Mr Heck and Judge Wood learn at Law School?
Patrick Cullinane also petitioned the Queen on numerous occasions, and this also failed: -

PUBLISHED: By Claire Ellicott on5 February 2013

Palace knifeman ‘wanted Queen to help him get back £170,000 stolen in property deal’
The businessman Tasered outside Buckingham Palace wanted to appeal directly to the Queen after claiming no one would help him when nearly £170,000 was stolen from him, his family said.
Yesterday, the grandfather’s family told the Mail that he was in a ‘desperate situation’ after losing his business and savings and had been driven to despair after police refused to help him. They claim a solicitor, who has since been disqualified from practising for a year, stole £168,000 from him in a property deal.
Rehman, from Harrow, North-West London, lost his business and savings as a result and is desperate for justice, but had been told by police that he should pursue a civil case…
Rehman’s family said he had spent £30,000 on legal fees trying to recover his money. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2273506/Palace-knifeman-wanted-Queen-help-170-000-stolen-property-deal.html#axzz2K4IaEaoh
Note how the COLLABORATORS call in the Psychiatrists’ when you start to expose their CORRUPTION and start to look for JUSTICE:-

Patrick Cullinane’s address in the House of Commons on 23 April 2009
“This is a short video of the corruption at the Inland Revenue; who conspired with High Court ‘Judges’ and the Police to pervert the course of Justice. Trial by Jury is the ONLYanswer to this Government’s Tyranny.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFakScc9Z80
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:
This man was right all along
Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/may/10/tax.scamsandfraud
The following is what Summary Justice did to me. I was on PAYE on an Emergency Tax Code, where HMRC owed me thousands of £s in tax rebates. And they still do to this day, 6th February 2013: –
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/10/harry-redknapp-taxman-hmrc?commentpage=2#start-of-comments
Thirteen High Court Judges COLLUDED with HMRC, the Insolvency Service, KPMG my Trustee in Bankruptcy, my MPs, the Bailiffs, the Police and Psychiatrists to ROB Mr Cullinane of his home, and his worldly possessions: -

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008
Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/aug/25/tax.taxandspending1
The Judges in Mr Cullinane’s case are: -

Mr Registrar Pimm
Mr Registrar Simmonds
Mr Registrar Baister
Mr Justice Jacobs
Mr Justice Neuberger – Promoted for Crime: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jul/12/lord-neuberger-appointed-supreme-court-president
Lord Justice Stewart-Smith – Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster. See below: -
Mr Jonathan Parker
Mr Justice Hart
Master Leslie
Mrs Justice Ebsworth
Mr Justice Ferris
Mr Justice Pumfrey
Mr Justice Mann.
All the above High Court Judges have proved themselves to be corrupt to the core, as theevidence demonstrates. They conspired with each other and the Inland Revenue and Police to ROB me of my home and possessions:

BBC NEWS on 19 December 2012
Hillsborough disaster and its aftermath
Lord Justice Stuart-Smith’s conclusion was that the fresh evidence did not add anything significant to the understanding of the disaster, and that while statements should not have been edited, this was simply an “error of judgement”.
Jack Straw accepted the findings and ruled out a new inquiry, but in August 1998 the Hillsborough Family Support Group brought charges of manslaughter against David Duckenfield and his deputy, Supt Bernard Murray, in a private prosecution.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19545126
Jack Straw also COLLUDED in Patrick Cullinane’s case and ignored ALL his correspondence for HELP: -

Videos from the House of Lords on 9 March 2010: -
Here are recordings of “victims turned starfighters” introducing themselves on 9th March 2010:
[Please listen to what Brian Hudson has to say about the conman Jack Straw at number two introduction]
http://edm1297.info/2010/03/11/tackling-the-serious-oppression-of-hm-subjects/
Don’t forget: KPMG as my Trustee in Bankruptcy conspired with the Inland Revenue and the High Court to ROB me of my home and possessions:

The Guardian: By Rob Evans and Polly Curtis on Thursday 17 June 2010

Tax boss most wined and dined mandarin –study
HMRC head David Hartnett attended 107 events in three years, with accountancy firms among those extending largesse
Hartnett sat down with representatives of the “big four” accountancy firms 27 times. He ate with KPMG 10 times … • Datablog: see the full list of civil servants entertained details
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jun/17/hmrc-head-tax-corporate-entertainment
As the Police in the UK are totally corrupted by 50 years of Rupert Murdoch and his gutter press reporters attacking Whistle Blowers for their own ends: -

Tony Farrell – Institutional Denial and the Police Service (WeAreChange Manchester)
Tony Farrell, the Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing the Whistle On False Flag Terror speaking to WeAreChange Manchester
After stating that the threat from internal tyranny “far exceeded” that posed by Islamic terrorism, Farrell’s Director of Intelligence responded by saying, “Tony, you and I will never get them to tell the truth….we are mere foot-soldiers of the government.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45ggImuqyUc
The Police in the UK are so CORRUPT now that they treat blatant FRAUD against We the People as a CIVIL (sic) matter: -

The police have told me on VIDEO that the robbery of my home and possessions is a civil matter: -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg
Mr Cullinane’s MPs told him that it WAS a police matter, but failed to contact the Police on Mr Cullinane’s behalf. Which demonstrates the COLLUSION. Just like Stephen Pound MP did to his constituents Patricia Miller-Foulds and Laurence McGeough: -
Stephen Pound MP has left this old English lady on the Streets; ROBBEB of her own HOME and EVERYTHING. Mr Cullinane also contacted Mr Pound about this old English lady’s plight. His office staff contacted Patricia Miller-Folulds and said, Mr Cullinane was abusive to them. This is the EVIL scam these SHYSTERS are pulling every day on old and vulnerable people like Patricia Miller-Foulds. She is still on the Streets: -

Forums > WE ARE ANGRY – The executive MUST RECOGNISE OUR CONSTITUTION > STASI-LIKE BEHAVIOUR REPORTS
BAILIFFs SOLICITORS, POLICE, COURTS – CASE of PATRICIA MILLE-FOULDS By Elizabeth Watson ONE VOICE ACTION GROUP.
http://weareangry.co.uk/Discussion/tabid/822/aft/225/afpg/2/language/en-GB/Default.aspx
Fraud Act 2006
1 Fraud
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed in
subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).
(2) The sections are—
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).
(3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable—
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12
months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
10 years or to a fine (or to both).
Theft Act 1968
1 Basic definition of theft.E+W
(1) A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently
depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.
“Property”.E+W
(1)“Property” includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property.
Such is the state of justice in the UK today, we have the rule of Law–yersand Judges, who have hijacked the Rule of Law for their own COMMERCIAL gain. Which has nothing whatsoever to do with natural justice: -
A report by Aidan Radnedge in the METRO newspaper on 23 January 2013, which was headed, “Male suicide at 10-year high as recession bites”…
“Some 4,552 men killed themselves in 2011″ – in the UK
There is NO Rule of Law or protection in our courts, only ROBBERY, and no accountability whatsoever. It is GENOCIDE.

The Leveson Inquiry – Forgetful Editors
Tell your friends because the newspapers won’t.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hkpE4jle4VE
We have massive problems in the UK with getting the Local and National Media to publish anything to do with Judges operating Kangaroo Courts and Members of Parliament COLLUDING with Judges and Law–yers by fobbing off their PERSECUTED and ROBBED constituents. – The following will explain why: -

The Real News – Published on 28 Jan 2013
Spies and the Media
Anaie Machon: Intelligence agencies infiltrate and actively work to influence mainstream media
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcPGitZHE0U&feature=youtube_gdata_player
On 20 December 2012, having been evicted from the court by the police, Mr Cullinane visited Trinity Mirror Southern in Uxbridge with Laurence McGeough, Timothy Fleming and Peter McGeough and they spoke to the News Editor Alan Hayes and gave him a copy of the attach document that was served on District Judge Wood.
God help We the People in the UK, as we do NOT have the protection of the law, and the Media and Politicians are involved.
Official Notice –We the Peopledemand: As Sovereign flesh and blood human beings, we accept and acknowledge your oath of office, as you entered into office to protect and uphold our God given rights, Treaty rights and Common Law rights in these MALICIOUS abuse of process matters.
As this is a very serious case; we look forward to a positive response at your earliest convenience, as our client is getting pains in his chest, and his work and family life is being affected badly. DO NOT MURDER THIS IMMIGRANT IRISHMAN. Laurence McGeough is owed hundreds of thousands of pounds in compensation for the HELL he has been put through by the (COMMERCIAL) Justice system in the UK, which is run by Law—yers andJudges.
Please advise: As to which person or persons’ in the UK have the legal expertise in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION to investigate this CRIMINAL abuse of process case properly. Notwithstanding, that the UK is a Common Law Jurisdiction. But not many Judges, Law—yers or MPs are aware of this FACT, as you will see from this correspondence. The likes ofStephen Pound MP needs to read this correspondence, very, very carefully!
For ALL the above reasons We the People have lost ALL faith and confidence in the Complaints Systems’ in the UK.
We await your reply, as Judge Wood has shown herself to be a serious danger to members of the public that enter HER court.
Please acknowledge the safe receipt of this correspondence by return of email.
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane
Common Law: Legal Adviser, McKenzie Friend, Caseworker for the IBRG and Victim of HM COLLUDING Partnerships.
<><><><><><><>
PS. The British Army is the ONLY remedy now for this ENTRENCHED CORRUPTION in the UK. Justice will have to come from the barrel of a GUN. Otherwise, who is going to restore the RULE OF LAW in our Courts ??? Amen.