ROBERT GREEN [HOLLIE GREIG CASE] SHOULD NOT BE IN COURT TOMORROW - EDINBURGH, 1 MAY 2013

 

Angiolini, along with MacKaskill and Salmond  - should be behind bars!!

 

From Robert Green’s blog:

 

TOO HOT TO HANDLE?

The next hearing over Angiolini`s action against me is set to take place again at the Court of Session, Parliament Square, Edinburgh at 10.00 hrs on Wednesday 1st May. If anyone is able to come along to support me, I would be most grateful.

On this occasion, I am forced to represent myself as no Legal Aid is likely to be provided for me to be professionally represented. It seems that now Angiolini has amended her citation to include defamation, it appears that defence is more difficult, on the basis that someone as eminent as Elish Angiolini is simply too important to be criticised, unless you can actually prove your allegations.

That this state of affairs actually exists in Britain may come as a complete surprise to anyone who does not live under a totalitarian regime. In the rest of the UK, ex-Prime Ministers such as Tony Blair and Baroness Thatcher have been condemned in the most vitriolic way many times over the years, but as far as I know, no one has actually been jailed for these verbal attacks, however severe or unfair. I suppose one has to concede that Elish Angiolini is far more important that either of them. One only has to be thought to have claimed that she is unsuitable for a specific job to find oneself snatched from home and thrown into prison. As far as Scotland is concerned, the famous East German film “The Lives Of Others” is now “The Lives of Us”!

The timidity of the Scottish media has always baffled those who live outside the country. Now I think we know why. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression no longer exist there. The all-powerful Scottish magic circle holds both media and people in its iron grip. So Scottish children and the disabled get raped – who dares to say or do anything about it?

Not the media, with some honourable exceptions and certainly not the police. The latter seem to largely exist to ensure magic circle criminals are never arrested. That is not to say that Scottish police are not competent when dealing, for example, with drunks fighting in a Glasgow bar, but when it comes to vulnerable Scots being sexually abused, the police are more likely to support the perpetrators.

It is a shocking state of affairs and I do not think that what I have said is too much of an exaggeration.

Going back to my case, of course, I shall be hopelessly disadvantaged by having to represent myself in a civil case in a foreign land, in legal terms, where I not only have no knowledge of Scottish Civil Law, but also as a non-Scot and non-resident have absolutely no legal obligation to know it. On the other hand, my opponent is a QC and former head of the justice system, using two of Scotland`s most expensive law firms, Balfour & Manson and Levy & McRae. One is clearly not enough for someone as eminent as Angiolini. Nonetheless, last week I asked the current Lord Advocate, Frank Mulholland , to provide the court with an assurance that no public funds are being utilised for Angiolini`s private action, following press reports that a secret “slush fund” is thought to exist to enable senior Crown Office officials, past as well as present, to access public money for personal financial gain. The current head of the justice system has so far failed to provide this assurance for the court.

Also, certain items have been discovered this week within the bundle presented by Balfour & Manson. These are private and confidential emails between me and colleagues that could only realistically have been obtained unlawfully. Appropriate action is already under way to discover how these items could have possibly got into Angiolini`s lawyer`s hands. They have some explaining to do.

Of course, Angiolini is saying that I have made all kinds of inaccurate allegations to defame her. It is most outrageous that she now intends to sue me, as I provided her with every opportunity to address these concerns she claims to have by citing her as a witness at my trial. There, she would have been given every chance to defend herself, on oath , during cross-examination. If her sworn testimony held that I had been mistaken in any way, I would have made a public retraction and apology. She failed to allow me that opportunity by refusing to be questioned in a court of law. Why she refused to attend must be a matter for speculation, but it is hard to escape the conclusion that she did not wish to be faced with a situation where she had to choose between the truth and perjury. What kind of person with nothing to hide would avoid the chance to put the record straight in a public court?

I do not pretend to imagine whether someone with the apparent status of a high priestess would actually deign to attend the hearing on Wednesday. Nobody seems to know.

Posted by Robert Green at 20:14 2 comments:

 

Fri 26 April – Much more at:

http://robertgreensblog-holliegreigcampaign.blogspot.co.uk/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00Z&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00Z&max-results=19

——————————————–

THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qjg3ob

 

ROBERT GREEN EXPOSES SATANIC RITUAL CHILD ABUSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaRI-h9jVxM&feature=uploademail

HOLLIE GREIG – ROBERT GREENS older BLOG

http://holliedemandsjustice-robertgreensblog.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.html

ROBERT GREEN INTERVIEW- EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11 =

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF35AAC01128C697D

Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhfju-nNlgY

HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL – TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw

ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG – P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBA1F5B143DC56468

HOLLIE GREIG OFFICIAL SITE =

http://www.holliedemandsjustice.org/