Lord Janner will not face child sex abuse charges, CPS says – 16 April 2015

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-32329924

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

 Petitioning Crown prosecution services

 Review the decision not to prosecute greville janner

 please sign + share   https://www.change.org/p/crown-prosecution-services-review-the-decision-not-to-prosecute-greville-janner

 Darren Knights Woodbridge, United Kingdom
2,185 supporters

We the public believe it is in the interests of the public to have this man in court and tried for his crimes against children, there is overwhelming evidence in the public domain against this man let alone the evidence the police and intel agency’s must be sitting on.

Letter to
Crown prosecution services
Review there decision not to prosecute greville janner
Updates
please sign:  https://www.change.org/p/crown-prosecution-services-review-the-decision-not-to-prosecute-greville-janner
   

“WHY HASNT GREVILLE JANNER BEEN ARRESTED YET?” + DPP STATEMENT: “THE DECISION NOT TO PROSECUTE LORD JENNER”

Why the hell hasn’t Greville Janner been arrested yet?
 By thecolemanexperience April 13, 2015

janner and cherie Absoulute filth

In September 2104, we wrote a post about child-raping filth Greville Janner.
Quite unbelievably , despite witness statements from many boys, the CPS are still fucking dithering about whether or not to arrest him.
Hoping he’ll ‘die‘ like his pal Leon Brittan are they?
Or catch a plane back to his homeland in Israel?
Israeli PassportJanner and GellerLeon Brittan Old
Pull your fingers out you complicit scum.
Here’s the post in question
” Jewish peer, Greville Janner, is one of the most repulsive, twisted, slimy, pieces of paedophilic filth, walking the earth today.
As chairman of Britain’s Holocaust Educational Trust, Janner has spent a lifetime ‘hunting down’ Nazis, allegedly accused of war crimes during WWII, and has often vowed to target them even if they’re elderly, frail or suffering from serious illness.
Janner filthJanner and CameronChristian Dave 5
So when the tables are turned on child-raping Janner, we should be just as resilient in ensuring that he doesn’t escape justice either and we should indeed hunt him down too, despite the hilarious claims that he is himself now frail and suffering from paedophilia-induced ‘amnesia’ ( what an absolute pile of cack).
Of course, Janner is no ordinary, run-of-the-mill politician.
Due to his links to Israel and Mossad, he could be described as one of filthy Britain’s ‘untouchables’ and has been allowed to travel the land raping young boys at will, knowing full well that he would be protected by his friends in high places.
In fact a Leicestershire police officer has come forward with shocking claims that he was ordered to limit any abuse probe into Janner when he was first investigated over the rape of a vulnerable care-home boy who he buggered for over two years solid.
Janner University Leicester
According to the Mail:
” Police chiefs blocked a paedophile probe into a top politician 25 years ago, one of the country’s most senior officers said yesterday.

Derbyshire Chief Constable Mick Creedon was serving as a detective sergeant in Leicestershire when allegations surfaced against Labour MP Greville Janner in 1989.

Mr Creedon said he was ordered to limit his inquiries into the MP, now Lord Janner of Braunstone.

He was forbidden from arresting the politician or searching his home, despite ‘credible evidence’ that warranted further investigation.

The chief constable said the message was passed on by a superintendent, but he believes it came from higher up. ‘The decision was clear, he will be interviewed by appointment and there won’t be a search of his home, his constituency office or his office in the Commons,’ he said, adding: ‘It was a decision made by people more senior than me.’

His comments are likely to fuel widespread dissatisfaction with the way allegations against Lord Janner were originally handled.

The claims surfaced during an investigation into Frank Beck, the manager of Leicester children’s homes, who died in jail after being convicted of abusing boys in his care.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770235/Police-told-limit-abuse-probe-MP.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

In 2013, we published the following post about Janner and the mysterious death of Frank Beck:

” In 1994, Frank Beck died in Whitemoor prison whilst serving a staggering 5 life sentences for alleged child abuse.

Frank Beck
Frank Beck had been implicated in the abuse of boys in Leicestershire care homes.
Frank Beck had always maintained his innocence and claimed he was imprisoned because he’d exposed alleged abuse by a high-profile politician.
Frank Beck was appealing against his conviction and sentence.
Leave to appeal and legal aid were granted in January 1993 and Anthony Scrivener QC, one of Britain’s most eminent lawyers and former chairman of the Bar, agreed to take the case.
Frank Beck’s solicitor said at the time of his death
‘He was very impatient for the appeal to go ahead. His death came out of the blue. Normally the case would lapse and die with him but his family and close friends are discussing the possibility of carrying on with the appeal. This would not be unprecedented.’
Beck was convinced there was enough new evidence and material that was not put before the original court due to non-disclosure by the prosecution which would have made the original conviction unsafe and proved his innocence.’
In 2011 the following anonymous comments were left on a blog which was discussing his death:
“ In 1991, after accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period.
At his trial Beck stated that: – “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“.
Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester.
Whereupon, the following statement was issued:
“We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”.
Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail.
The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later.
Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning.
The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife.
In court, Paul Winston, who was, at the time of Beck’s trial, a married man with children, stood up for him, as did several other witnesses, paying credit to his achievements and behaviour and confirming his anti-Janner testimony.
He said Beck had counselled him over his relationship with the MP, and had brought the affair to an end.
He also stated that he had had a beneficial effect on his life. According to Winston’s evidence, he was invited to Janner’s home near Golders Green, whilst Janner‘s wife was away, and this led to his sharing Janner’s bed where they “cuddled and fondled each other”.
Thereafter Winston testified that, over the next two years, he was regularly sodomised by Janner.
Beck discovered what had been going on after Winston was put into his care, at which point, he informed his superiors at Leicester Social Services.
At one point, Janner visited the care home with a new bicycle for Paul but Beck denied him entry and would not allow the gift to be passed on. This was confirmed by another witness at the trial.
Nevertheless, Beck was found guilty and sentenced to twenty-four years in prison, with five life sentences to run concurrently for his “crimes”.
Janner was never brought to court, nor was he ever called upon to testify.
Frank Beck died suddenly of a “heart attack”, shortly before his appeal was due to begin.
He was, by all accounts, a fit man at the time of his death.
He never stopped protesting his innocence and Janner’s guilt.
His two main solicitors, who admitted to being sceptical in the first instance, believed him at the time that he was found guilty.
One of these solicitors has since been killed in a road accident, and the other has been subjected to police harassment on a major scale.
Frank Beck was a resident of Braunstone in Leicester when the events described above were taking place.
When Janner was ennobled in 1997, he took the title, Lord Janner of Braunstone.
The man responsible for ennobling Greville Janner was Tony Blair.
The following very interesting comments were left :
” I was in the courtroom when beck gave his evidence in full :his death by food poisoning in custody was very convenient for all those he said he had supplied the boys to in the local area .”
” Blair had a macabre sense of humour as Braunstone is the area Frank Beck used to live in. Beck was guilty. But he almost nailed Greville Janner.”
Freinds ReunitedMagic CircleTony Blair Lord Levy
It has since emerged that the disappearance of Maddie McCann may be connected in some way to the VIP abuse ring operating in this country.
The McCann’s have also received extra-special treatment from the authorities and coincidentally live in Leicestershire, where Gerry is thought to be a high-ranking Freemason.
Clarence Mitchell and McCanns
Intel agent, Clarence Mitchell was sent as their spokesman, and strangely was also one of the first people at the scene of the murder of Jill Dando.
Jill knew all about the VIP paedo-ring and was silenced by Mossad and Blair because she about to blow the lid.
Jill Dando Daily Star Headline
One of Greville Janner’s close friends is Margaret Oppenheimer-Hodge, who was responsible for the Islington children’s home abuse ring cover-up which culminated in the death of Jason Swift.
She also deliberately made sure children were sent to Jersey to be abused and murdered at the Haut de la Gaurenne care home by VIP filth.
Jason SwiftHodge filthy cowJersey Satanic Horrors
Quite unbelievably, her nephew Philip Edmond, was holidaying at the same resort as the McCanns’ when their daughter went missing, and he flew back to England just before the news broke of her disappearance.
Mandelson and HodgeNaughty Peter MandelsonChildren Born For Sacrifice
The Mark Warner resort in Portugal is also close to the home of Cliff Richard.
Cliff was forced to befriend Jill and find out how much she knew about paedophile politicians and royals.
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/barry-george-jill-dando-jimmy-savile-bbc-paedophiles-cliff-richard-alan-farthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/
Cliff and Tone
On his 51st birthday, Paul Boateng, another Labour Peer, was serenaded in the House of Commons by Michael Jackson, who was on a visit to the UK, organised by Uri Geller and Greville Janner.
In the 80’s a child-abuse scandal swept the London Borough of Lambeth, where thousands of children were subjected to horrific abuse in council-run care homes. The abuse was carried out with the full complicity of Lambeth social services and the police.
Charles an Paul BoatengLambeth abuse enquiryBlair Cover Up
By strange coincidence, the head of social services throughout this period was none other than Janet Boateng, the wife of Paul Boateng.
Quite why she has never been investigated for any wrongdoing is a complete and utter mystery.
It’s a little know fact that Cliff Richard is close pals with the Blairs:
” It’s comforting to find that beloved Christian singer Cliff Richard has friends in high places.
He kindly lent his villa in Barbados to close chum Tony Blair. Cliff was so concerned that Tony was looking ‘haggard’ after starting the Iraq war that he took it upon himself to do a good deed.
Tony’s wife Cherie Blair QC is also close to Cliff. She loves nothing better than to attend award ceremonies with Cliff and let the world know what a great guy he is.
They’ve even been joined by another pal, TV personality Melvyn Bragg. Some voices have alleged that Cliff and Melvyn share a rather repulsive hobby that the average person would find sickening.
Other voices have alleged that Cliff is linked to notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House and used the pseudonym, Kitty.
Yet others claim that Cliff is a person of interest to Operation Fernbridge officers and may be linked to the murder of Jill Dando, who knew all about the paedophile ring at the BBC.
Some have questioned why Cliff recently renounced his British citizenship and is now a fully-fledged Barbadian.”
Cliff once went on a fact-finding mission with child-rapist Jimmy Savile and Lord Longford:
” One of Myra Hindley’s most famous supporters was Lord Longford, who spent years lobbying for her release. Lord Longford went on a fact-finding mission in the ’70′s to investigate pornography. He took along Jimmy Savile and Cliff Richard.
Harriet Harman’s Uncle Lord LongfordCliff and SavileHodge and HarmanMonster Pie
Jill Dando knew all about the BBC paedo-ring run by Savile and told her close chum Cliff. She was soon shot dead on her doorstep as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut.
Longford was the uncle of Harriet Harman MP, who has recently been embroiled in the recent PIE paedophile scandal.
Harman is in turn a cousin of Prime Minister David Cameron, who is in turn a cousin of the Queen.
cameron and his blackmailerQueenies gone battyQueenie Wanted
Another high-profile Hindley campaigner was wealthy journo, David Astor who spent 20 years corresponding with her and was close to Longford:
” Longford and Astor had known each other since Oxford. Their paths had often crossed in the beaten ways of liberal postwar Britain, and they shared an interest in prison reform. Astor was agnostic, verging on atheist, Longford  a devout Roman Catholic. Both were fascinated by the idea of redemption.”
By a strange coincidence, David Astor was the step-uncle of Samantha Cameron.”
Times editor, Danny Finkelstein, is a huge fan of Janner.
You see, the real Danny Finkelstein is what one might call a ‘great pretender’.
He’s merely pretending to be who he says he is, when in fact he’s one of a small group of ‘behind the scenes’ players who despise Britain and are pushing a sickening agenda that seeks to destroy this once great nation.
jc5874 x10845NerYisroelPannel
Danny ‘the fink’, runs the hugely powerful and influential, Policy Exchange organisation.
Policy Exchange claims to merely discuss political policy-making, but in fact writes the policies that Cameron, Gove, Osbourne and IDS have so disastrously adopted.
http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/people/trustees
The current education minister, Michael Gove, is extremely close to Finkelstein.
He used to run Policy Exchange.
They both adore child-raping Labour Peer, Greville Janner.
Some might call Gove, Finkelstein’s whipping boy.
Currie, Janner and Gove
Gove has recently been in the headlines because he mysteriously dismissed calls for the mandatory reporting of sex-abuse claims by pupils in schools.
He claimed that the idea would swamp ” child protection” officials.
http://www.exaronews.com/articles/4999/michael-gove-blocks-move-to-force-schools-to-report-sex-abuse
In light of the many recent scandals in private boys schools this pathetic excuse seem incredulous.
Did Finkelstein have a hand in Gove’s bizarre decision not to allow abuse to be reported?
The brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been pivotal in reporting on the huge numbers of children taken into care by social workers when their parents have done nothing wrong.
http://chrisspivey.org/
These children are often then abused in care homes by VIP filth.
In a recent article, Spivey exposed the links between the government’s faked austerity measures and the rise in the number of children being taken into care because their parents have been sanctioned by the DWP and they are left penniless and sometime homeless.
Danny Finkelstein commissioned a report into benefit sanctions and appeared to have invented a fairer approach, but it’s actually more callous than ever.
Fake-football ‘lover’ Danny wants to introduce a sinister yellow card warning system which promises much stricter punishments for anyone who deviates.
http://socialwelfare.bl.uk/subject-areas/services-activity/poverty-benefits/policyexchange/160124smartersanctions.pdf
This begs the question, why, oh why, would Danny Finkelstein want parents to lose their benefits and have their children taken into care?
We published the following claims about Finkelstein which he didn’t take too kindly too and accused us (and our readers) of being ‘nutters’ and needing our heads examining:
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/
Between 1981 and 1990 Finkelstein was a member of the SDP and in 1987 was defeated in the Brent East by-election.
It’s highly likely he came across child-raping filth, Cyril Smith MP.
Finkelstein switched political allegiance and  joined the Tories, where he became political advisor to bald oddity, William Hague.
Hague himself is up to his neck in filth of the highest order and may have lots to tell the authorities about his links to the notorious Dolphin Square boy-brothel and the North Wales care-home scandal.
He was also the toy-boy of Margaret Thatcher, who spent a staggering amount of time with close chum, Jimmy Savile.
We now know that Jill Dando was shot in the head because she was about to blow the lid on the BBC paedophile-ring, linked to Savile, Parliament and the Royals.
Nick Ross Jill Dando
Her high-profile death was a warning to others to keep their mouth shut too.
The Crimestoppers helpline, run by Nick Ross, conveniently stopped working when an appeal was made for information about Jill’s murder.
Nick Ross BBC
Ross, who recently said he’d watch child-porn given half the chance, is married to the cousin of Esther Rantzen.
Rantzen runs the Childline charity and has been accused of ignoring the victims of Savile at the BBC.
Some voices claim that both organisations are used to gather and suppress reports of VIP child-abuse.
According to the Spectator:
” Lord Finkelstein is closer by far to George Osborne. One senior Times writer told me three years ago that he spoke ‘six or seven times a day. probably more’ to the Chancellor. Mr Osborne once reportedly remarked that he spoke to Mr Finkelstein more often then he did to his wife. But when Mr Osborne appeared in front of Lord Justice Leveson, the following exchange occurred:
Q. ‘Does he [Finkelstein] act for you as a sort of unpaid adviser and/or speech writer?’
A. ‘No, he’s just a very good friend.’
Osbourne has been embroiled in his own scandals after details emerged of his cocaine-habit and love of brothels.
In 2005, the BBC held a debate in response to the 7/7 bombings:
” To the Everyman Cinema last night with Tom Brent for a public meeting on current affairs. BBC presenter Emily Maitlis chaired a brisk discussion in which Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, outshone distinguished panelists Sir Leon Brittan, Simon Hughes, and Daniel Finkelstein.”
Brittan and Hughes have both been linked to sordid allegations of abuse against boys.
Was Finkelstein aware of these allegations?
For many years, Daniel Finkelstein ran a company called ‘The Generation of Change Ltd’ with Neil Sherlock.
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/02499621/THE-GENERATION-OF-CHANGE-LIMITED/directors-shareholders
Sherlock became Nick Clegg’s special adviser in his private office and his wife, Kathryn Parminter, used to work as a parliamentary research assistant for Simon Hughes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Parminter,_Baroness_Parminter
Nick Clegg has been accused of covering-up what he knew about Cyril Smith and his child-raping ways.
In 2012, for some unknown reason, Finkelstein wrote an article for the Times, entitled, ‘The dead can’t enter a plea of guilty’.
The article appeared to cast doubt on the abuse claims made against Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile:
” Cyril Smith may have been a monster. But until we have reliable evidence we must not rush to judgment . Can I ask you a question? How do you know, really know, that Jimmy Savile is guilty of child abuse? The truth, let’s face it, is that you don’t.  You are like me. You’ve perhaps heard one or two TV interviews with victims. You’ve read the odd article including some fairly damning quotes. You’ve gathered that there is a police investigation and that, as a result, a number of famous people have been arrested, although oddly always in connection with allegations that have nothing to do with Savile.
And, most of all, you’ve heard people say that he always looked a little fishy and that come to think of it it was a dead giveaway that he always waltzed around in one of those gold lamé tracksuits that paedos love to wear. And that hair. And “now then, now then”. He definitely did it.”
The following anonymous comments were left on a blog, detailing the case of Labour Peer, Greville Janner:
Greville Janner
” After accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, care worker, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period. At his trial Beck stated that: –
“One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“.
Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester.
Whereupon, the following statement was issued: “We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”. Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail.
The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later. Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning. The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife.”
Daniel Finkelstein must have been aware of the accusations against Janner but, for some unknown reason, posted the following tweet:
” Watching Greville Janner in 1970 election prog. Attractive, incisive, intelligent, moderate. How did he not end up one of Lab’s leaders?”
The two were also listed together in the JC as being highly influential in their respective fields:
http://www.thejc.com/jc-power-100/the-jc-power-100-numbers-11-20
” The highest judge in the land is Lord David Neuberger.
Neuberger
He used to work at N.M Rothschild and Sons and is married to Angela Holdsworth.
He was responsible for evicting the Parliament Square peace campaign.
In May 2011, while commenting on super injunctions, he said that social media sites like Twitter were “totally out of control” and society should consider ways to bring such websites under control.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury
By a very strange twist, his wife Angela, was a BBC executive for many years and must have known about Jimmy Savile’s child-raping activities.
She also worked with Nick Ross and Esther Rantzen on the controversial BBC show, Man Alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Alive_(BBC_TV_series)
Savile and RantzenSavile SatanRIP innocent child
Angela Holdsworth then became the editor of another well-known programme.
That programme was none-other than Crimewatch.
http://www.angelaholdsworth.com/
The phone-hacking judge, Brian Levenson was involved in the trial of Barry George.
Some claim the hacking scandal was a deliberate set-up to clamp down on the media.
Following the death of Jill Dando, a new research centre in her name was formed:
” The UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science is the first Institute in the world devoted to Crime Science. Research is concentrated on new ways to cut crime and increase security ” .
By a strange twist, the Board of the Institute is run by none other than Nick Ross and Professor Anthony Finkelstein.
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdi/people/tabbed-box/board
Anthony Finkelstein is Daniel Finkelstein’s brother.”
We then made a shocking discovery.
Max Clifford Filth
Jailed pervert, Max Clifford, uses the following shady business address:
11-15 Acre House
 William Road
 London
 United Kingdom
 NW1 3ER
In February 2013, we were given a tip-off that Acre House is linked to less-than-kosher Conservative monetary shenanigans:
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/acre-house-11-15-william-road-london/
By a strange coincidence, Finkelstein’s Policy Exchange uses the same address.
So does Tory child-pimp, Derek Laud.
So does crooked Gerald Ronson.
So does Leon Brittan.
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/
Quite why they all share this debauched address is a complete and utter mystery.
But this shit just gets deeper and deeper.
What many people aren’t aware of is that Greville Janner and his sons are all high-ranking barristers and are well aware of how easy it is for someone to avoid justice by claiming they have dementia or Alzheimer’s and would be unable to recall key facts.
Well that’s not going to f*****g cut it in this case.
Janner should surely be proud of our persistence in hunting him down to the bitter end.
He did it to the ‘ Nazis’ so we’re merely returning the favour.
Don’t worry Grev, we won’t let you down.
You’ll get what’s coming to you.
It’s only a matter of time…
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2015/04/09/the-weird-world-of-danny-finkelstein/
https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/greville-janner-tony-blair-madeline-mccann-margaret-hodge-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/
( Notes:
According to scholars:
” The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition):
“My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”
Indeed, the Talmud is the very law that Jewish followers must follow:
” The Talmud “
” The Talmud is the comprehensive written version of the Jewish oral law and the subsequent commentaries on it. It originates from the 2nd century CE. The word Talmud is derived from the Hebrew verb ‘to teach’, which can also be expressed as the verb ‘to learn’.
The Talmud is the source from which the code of Jewish Halakhah (law) is derived. It is made up of the Mishnah and the Gemara. The Mishnah is the original written version of the oral law and the Gemara is the record of the rabbinic discussions following this writing down. It includes their differences of view.
The Talmud can also be known by the name Shas. This is a Hebrew abbreviation for the expression Shishah Sedarim or the six orders of the Mishnah.”
Does the Talmud hold the secret to the murderous child-abuse ring that has been operating in this country for decades and has seen thousands upon thousands of innocent British children raped and killed?
We haven’t got a clue.
But what we do know is that some of the Talmudic texts below give an indication that in Judaism, non-Jewish children are absolute filth, not even human, and can be treated like animals ( apparently sanctioned by God):
– When a man commits sodomy with a boy under nine years of age, it “is not deemed as pederasty” (Sanhedrin, 54b,55a).
– Sexual intercourse with a boy under the age of eight is lawful since it isn’t fornication (Sanhedrin, 69b).
1) ” Sanhedrin 54b.:   A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.“
2) Kethuboth 11b. :  When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.
3) Yebamoth 98a. :  All Gentile (Non-Jewish) children are animals.
4) Baba Mezia 114a-114b. :  Only Jews are human.
Schene luchoth haberuth, p 250b. : Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew as a monkey to a human.
Baba Mezia, 114b (page referrals). :  The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.
5)  Baba Kamma 113a.:  Jews may use lies (subterfuges) to circumvent a Gentile (Non-Jew).
6) Sanhedrin 57a. :  A Jew need not pay a Gentile (Non-Jew) the wages owed him for work.
7)  Sepher Ikkarim III c 25. : It is permited to take the body and life of a Gentile (Non-Jew).
8) Bammidber raba c 21 & jalkut 772.:   Every Jew who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.
9) It is lawful for a girl three years old to have sexual intercourse (Abodah Zarah, 37a; Kethuboth, 11b,39a; Sanhedrin, 55b,69a,b; Yebamoth, 12a,57b,58a,60b)
10) Since all Gentiles are only animals, all Gentile children are bastards (Yebamoth, 98a). )
http://www.rense.com/general79/talmud.htm ”

For pics +
source:  https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/why-the-hell-hasnt-greville-janner-been-arrested-yet/

————————————————============————————————————

The decision not to prosecute Lord Janner – statement from the DPP

16/04/2015

1. The CPS has concluded that Lord Greville Janner should not be prosecuted because of the severity of his dementia which means he is not fit to take part in any proceedings, there is no treatment for his condition, and there is no current or future risk of offending.

The reasons for making a public statement in this case

2. The CPS has carefully considered whether it is appropriate to make a public statement in relation to this case, explaining the reasons for this decision and has decided that it is appropriate to do so. There has been considerable public interest, and media coverage, of the fact of the investigations including identifying Lord Janner as the subject of them. Indeed, concern has been expressed publicly of a ‘cover up’. The allegations that have been made against Lord Janner are extremely serious. Those who have made them are, entirely understandably, vociferous in urging the taking of action against Lord Janner. The reasons for the decision not to do so require explanation in some detail in order to be properly understood and to avoid the inevitable speculation that would follow were no explanation to be given. As appears below, this is not a straightforward case in which the conclusion is simply that the evidence does not warrant taking further action. Moreover, the CPS considers that some of the decisions made by both itself and by the police in relation to past investigations relating to Lord Janner were wrong. This statement is also necessary in order for it to be made clear what the role of the CPS is in making this decision – including in particular to emphasise that the CPS is in no sense deciding or implying that the allegations that have been made are established or that Lord Janner is guilty of any offence. For all of those reasons, it is right in this case that there should be a public explanation of the conclusions reached by the CPS.

The most recent and past investigations in relation to Lord Janner

3. Operation Enamel was initiated in January 2013. It was a thorough and comprehensive investigation by Leicestershire Police into allegations against Lord Greville Janner of non-recent sexual abuse. It included, as part of the investigation, a review by police of complaints against Lord Janner from three previous police investigations between 1991 and 2007. As part of those investigations Lord Janner was interviewed by police in 1991.
4. In relation to Operation Enamel, more than a dozen individuals made allegations to police relating to Lord Janner. Most of them were residents in Leicestershire children’s homes between 1970 and the mid to late 1980s. The children and young people in this case were vulnerable and in a situation where they should have been looked after and protected. The allegations in this case are thus extremely serious, with a number of alleged victims and allegations of multiple offending over a lengthy period of time. The core allegation was that Lord Janner, in a position of authority and trust as the local MP for Leicester West at the time, befriended the manager of a children’s care home to allow him access to children in order to allow him to perpetrate serious sexual offences on children.
5. Evidence relating to ten individuals was developed by the police and CPS to the fullest extent possible. The investigation included a search of Lord Janner’s home in December 2013, and the recovery of material from Lord Janner’s Millbank offices in March 2014. It also included an invitation for interview – but medical concerns were raised and an independent police neuropsychiatrist’s report meant that no interview took place. Material was still being passed to the CPS shortly before Easter 2015.
6. In relation to the three previous police investigations, the complaints and the decision making by police and the CPS at the time were as follows:
•A complaint of sexual assaults by one individual who featured in the trial of Frank Beck in 1991. The allegation, in essence, was one of grooming and sexual abuse of the alleged male victim between the ages of 13 and 15. The advice given at the time by the CPS was that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.
•Complaints by one individual during Operation Magnolia in 2002. Although Lord Janner was the subject of allegations during this Operation, which was an investigation into a relevant children’s home, it does not appear that specific allegations relating to him were referred to the CPS. It is apparent that the police decided that no further action should be taken against Lord Janner. The CPS decided at the time that no further action should be taken against any other individual.
•In Operation Dauntless in 2006, an individual made allegations of serious sexual offending around 1981 by three individuals including Lord Janner. The CPS decision in 2007 was again that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.

The CPS’s functions in making the decisions it has

7. Before setting out the main conclusions that the CPS have reached on the available evidence, it is important to emphasise and to be clear about the CPS’s functions and the nature of this part of its decision making.
8. The CPS considers cases on the basis of the evidence available at the time the charging decision is to be taken. It applies the well-known two stage test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors: the evidential test and the public interest test.
9. The evidential test involves an assessment, on the then state of the evidence, by the CPS as to whether that evidence provides a realistic prospect of conviction. The CPS’s function is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for the criminal court to consider. The CPS assessment of any case is thus not in any sense a finding of, or implication of, any guilt or criminal conduct. It is not a finding of fact, which can only be made by a court, but rather an assessment of what it might be possible to prove to a court, in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors, a copy of which is provided here: www.cps.gov.uk/publications/code_for_crown_prosecutors/index.html

10. This assessment is based on the evidence available arising out of the police investigation and not on the evidence that is likely to be gathered by the defence, and likely to be used to test the prosecution evidence. The CPS charging decision is therefore necessarily an assessment on the basis of the evidence that is available to the CPS at the time the decision is made. CPS prosecutors must also keep every case under review, so that they take account of any change in circumstances that occurs as the case develops, including what becomes known of the defence case. If appropriate, the CPS may change the charges or stop a case.
11. The public interest test is considered if the evidential test is passed. All matters relevant to whether it is in the public interest to prosecute are considered.

The evidential test: the CPS’s main conclusions in relation to Operation Enamel and the past investigations

12. With that explanation of functions in mind, the CPS has reached the following conclusions in relation to the evidential test, as a result of the investigations and reviews undertaken in this case.
•In relation to the allegations investigated in Operation Enamel, the CPS considers that the evidential test was passed on the basis that the evidence is sufficient to have warranted charging and prosecuting LordJanner in relation to the particular charges listed below; these relate to nine individuals:  ◦14 indecent assaults on a male under 16 between 1969 and 1988
◦2 indecent assaults between 1984 and 1988
◦4 counts of buggery of a male under 16 between 1972 and 1987
◦2 counts of buggery between 1977 and 1988.

•In relation to the other three previous investigations, the CPS also now considers that the evidential test was passed. It follows that the CPS judges that mistakes were made in the decision making at the time by both the Leicestershire police in 2002 and the CPS in 1991 and 2007. Lord Janner should have been prosecuted in relation to those complaints.
13. It is a matter of deep regret that the decisions in relation to the previous investigations were as they were. Had the previous decisions been to prosecute, as they should have been, Lord Janner would have had the opportunity to challenge the evidence and defend himself through the trial process, with a jury ultimately deciding on his guilt or innocence some years ago. Victims of the alleged offences have been denied the opportunity of criminal proceedings in relation to the offences of which they have complained. It is of obvious and particular concern that such proceedings did not take place as a result of what the CPS now consider to be wrong decisions. In order to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice and to seek to learn appropriate lessons, the CPS has asked retired High Court Judge, Sir Richard Henriques, to conduct a thorough and independent review into the CPS decision making and handling of all past matters relating to this case; and to make whatever recommendations he considers appropriate. He has agreed to undertake this task.

The public interest test and Lord Janner’s medical condition

14. The question that remains is whether there should be a prosecution of Lord Janner now. The second stage of the test already referred to is the public interest test. The CPS’s conclusion, for the reasons that follow, is that it would not be in the public interest to launch criminal proceedings now.
15. At the outset, it is emphasised that but for medical considerations, it would undoubtedly have been in the public interest to prosecute. Public interest factors in favour of a prosecution include that the allegations are of very serious offending; the complainants were young, vulnerable children and the allegations involve the alleged abuse of power and position. The CPS equally has no doubt that, if the correct decisions had been taken about the evidential test in relation to the previous investigations, the public interest test would have been passed and prosecution should have followed.
16. However, the public interest test now has to be considered in the light of current facts. The key facts for that purpose relate to Lord Janner’s present medical condition. They are as follows.
17. In 2009, Lord Janner was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, which is the most common cause of dementia. Alzheimer’s disease is a physical disease affecting the brain. Alzheimer’s is a progressive disease, which means that gradually, over time, more parts of the brain are damaged. As this happens, the symptoms become more severe. There is no treatment or cure.
18. Four medical experts, all experienced and highly qualified, have examined Lord Janner – two instructed by his own legal team, two by the police and prosecutors. The most recent medical report is dated 31 March 2015. The key findings are as follows:
•Lord Janner is suffering from a degenerative dementia which is rapidly becoming more severe. He requires continuous care both day and night.
•His evidence could not be relied upon in court and he could not have any meaningful engagement with the court process, and the court would find it impossible to proceed.
•On the Mini Mental State examination all four doctors were in general agreement as to the level of cognitive ability.
•The condition will only deteriorate, there is no prospect of recovery.
•Manipulation (“putting it on”) is “out of the question”
•There is no risk of future offending.
19. The CPS considers that in the light of the medical evidence Lord Janner would inevitably be found not fit to plead, not fit to instruct his legal team and not fit to challenge or give evidence in a trial. That means that a criminal trial, to determine whether or not he was guilty of any offence, could not now properly take place.
20. The CPS has considered with particular care whether it would nevertheless be appropriate to launch a fitness to plead process. In such a process, there is no determination of the criminal charge, no criminal verdict and no question of conviction or punishment. The powers of the court are “restricted to measures designed to treat, rehabilitate and support while, in the most serious cases, providing protection for the public” (Wells, Masud, Hone and Kail and R [2015] EWCA Crim 2.)
21. There are thus some cases in which such a process may be appropriate in order for example to protect the public either by a hospital order or by a supervision order. However, in this case, the CPS judges that the outcome of such proceedings would not only be without conviction, but would also result in an absolute discharge. The medical evidence establishes both that there is no current risk of re-offending identified and that there is no likelihood of the defendant recovering from his medical condition (and thus that there is no future risk of reoffending either). Balancing these factors with those in favour of prosecution, the balance is that there is not a public interest in commencing criminal proceedings in this case.
22. Lord Janner’s medical condition has been explained to all those individuals whose allegations have sufficient evidence to be tried in the criminal courts. Each of them has made it clear that they wish to tell their stories publicly. I sincerely hope that this can be achieved through the victims giving evidence before the Independent Inquiry into child sexual abuse. I have referred this to the Inquiry team which has confirmed that this case would be covered by the scope of the Inquiry and that those who have made allegations in this case would be able to give evidence to the Inquiry. They have offered to speak to the complainants to explain this.
23. The lack of a prosecution will be extremely disappointing to complainants. I have written to each of them, explaining the reasons for the decision, inviting them to a meeting with me so that Ican explain any matters to them further, should they wish.
Ends

Notes to Editors

1.For media enquiries call the CPS Press Office on 020 3357 0906; Out of Hours Pager 07699 781 926
2.The CPS consists of 13 Areas in total, each headed by a Chief Crown Prosecutor (CCP). In addition, there are three national casework divisions: Specialist Fraud (formerly Central Fraud and Welfare, Rural & Health Divisions), Special Crime & Counter Terrorism and Organised Crime. CPS Direct is a ‘virtual’ 14th Area which provides charging decisions to all police forces and other investigators across England and Wales – it operates twenty-four hours, seven days a week, 365 days a year.
3.At 31 March 2014 we employed a workforce of approximately 6237 staff (full time equivalent), including around 2226 prosecutors and 3629 caseworkers and administrators. Further information can be found on our website: www.cps.gov.uk.
4.The CPS, together with ACPO and media representatives, has developed a Protocol for the release of prosecution material to the media. This sets out the type of prosecution material that will normally be released, or considered for release, together with the factors we will take into account when considering requests. Read the Protocol for the release of prosecution material to the media
5.

6.Links
[1 ] CPS http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/lord_janner/

source: https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/cps-decision-not-to-prosecute-janner/