Towards Effective Spaceflight - some notes and references.
Sunday, December 11, 2011 4:44
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Note: Some sources are reproduced here in full, with links to the originals. I hope that the BeforeItsNews management will recognize this as a legitimate academic use, given that the articles contain scientific results which are in the commons. It also is advantageous for archival purposes, since I have no control over the websites where the articles are sourced, hence the original copies may well be removed at some point.
—
This is a copy of an email I sent to my brother today, a summary of my progress in monitoring and collating scientific results favourable to the development of interstellar spacecraft. I have done this in collaboration with a friend who shares this interest, who has approached the same problem from a mathematical and theoretical point of view – something I am unqualified to do myself! (The email is anonymized to protect his privacy; he is referred to by the initial ‘B’ in the text.)
B also did a theoretical summary for my brother; I will post this later if he agrees.
This is the product of 15 years of research by both of us. The article might seem a little short for all the time spent on it, but there have been many dead ends, and many reports of small, difficult to reproduce effects which we were unable to interpret in a general way at the time.
This article is concerned mainly with the production of gravitational effects. There is another aspect to it, not covered here, the production of ‘kinetic charges’ – unpaired action/reactions for the purpose of propulsion, where over the years there have also been many reports of progress, which we have also collated.
I rather hope that this information is correct enough for those with the means to do so to begin engineering development to harness the phenomenon*.
Good Luck!
* There appears to be only one – I believe all of the results here are examples of the same underlying physical principle, realized by different means.
—text of message—
Well, of course we are – but as I discovered, to know the secrets of the universe, one has to know the secrets of mankind, since the latter are a subset of the former!
Have a look at this: http://www.esa.int/esaMI/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html (also copied below, in case of goonic intervention!)
(I’ve highlighted the (really) interesting bits).
I wrote a comment a few days ago (site URL included) on this subject. I believe that the Tajmar superconductor experiment below is only one of a class of experiments which will demonstrate gravitational anomalies, specifically, all those experiments which involve the production of accelerated magnetic fields. So far, I know of three ways to produce such a thing:
* The Tajmar superconductor experiment, with a rotating superconductor undergoing angular acceleration: A rotating superconductor will produce a magnetic field (the ‘London Moment’). If the rate of rotation is increasing or decreasing therefore, the requirement for an accelerated magnetic field is met (Tajmar calls it the ‘Gravitomagnetic London Moment);
* Experiments involving the production of rapid magnetic disconnection and reconnection events, such as the (admittedly fringe) duralumin disk experiment: See the Chris Eccles ‘Mystified by Results’ articles on Usenet News (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics.electromag/znr1xeUaYKQ and his followup posts https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics.electromag/YLQ1vB8uQpQ, also copied below. The second post (of three) actually discusses an idea of the physics that may underpin the phenomenon he describes; my approach is more pragmatic – i.e. what do we need to do generally to make this sort of effect happen? Eccles of course was writing in 1998, and the Tajmar result was not found until 2006, precluding Eccles from guessing a general principle for the effect. The magnetic reconnection event approach I see as similar to the crude system of uncontrolled broadband electromagnetic noise pulses used in the early wireless telegraphy system, produced by making and breaking a high-voltage contact with an undebounced switch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spark-gap_transmitter). The magnetic reconnection event device then I suspect also produces broadband noise, albeit ‘magnetogravitic’ rather than electromagnetic.
* Experiments involving accelerated charged plasmas. Even if one does not believe suggestions that the silent triangular UFO craft use plasma devices that satisfy this condition (or indeed that the things actually exist!^), there is now a mainstream result that could be interpreted as (possibly) satisfying the accelerated magnetic field requirement, which appears to correlate with periodic variations in the rates of decay of well-known radioactive materials that had previously been considered to be constant. The result, reported in the Stanford Report journal of Stanford University, August 23 2010 (copied below), found that the decay rates of the radioactive materials examined exhibited seasonal variation, and also appeared to respond to a solar flare event. Large-scale magnetic reconnection events are known to occur in solar plasma (they are sometimes related to coronal mass ejections and other plasma emissions), and one can deduce that accelerated magnetic fields will also occur in the plasma. The Stanford people believe that a ‘new particle’ is responsible for the radioactive decay effect, but do not appear to have examined the wider natural environment for similar effects arising from other phenomena – as I hope I have here.
Just as the rate of chemical reactions is responsive to the thermal temperature of a material, I suspect we shall find that there is a subatomic equivalent to this – let’s call it the ‘quark temperature’ – which will prove to control the rate of nuclear reactions in matter (Laithwaite talks of quark spin, rather than temperature as perhaps being coupled to gravity in one of his articles - http://gyroscopes.org/papers/Roll%20Isaac,%20roll.pdf, bottom of fifth page, middle column). An ability to change the rate of nuclear processes within atoms may prove to be indistinguishable to a person whose body is under such influence from a change in the rate at which time passes, relative to the external observer. It would certainly affect an atomic clock! I suspect that the rate of progression of internal nuclear processes will be found to correlate with, or even be logically equivalent to – gravitational field strength. There seems to be an indirect indication of this in the experimental results I’ve copied here: Duralumin disk experimenter Chris Eccles reported an apparent alteration in ‘grav mass’ – weight – of his apparatus, which, as I’ve identified, produces magnetic reconnection events, and by implication, accelerated magnetic fields. Solar plasmas surely also produce accelerated magnetic fields, so one would expect a ‘grav-mass’ interaction due to these also, as well as (or measured by) the radioactive decay rate changes the Stanford people report.
That’s pretty much what I have at the moment. B has done a great deal of the more fundamental (rather than ‘journalistic’) work to develop a theoretical framework that fits in with existing theory within the common limits, but which also covers and predicts physical phenomena beyond those limits – including the ones noted in the reports here. B I think can update you on the limits to the present theoretical understanding (which you may not have been taught!), as well as his own developments.
For myself, I think we’ve cracked it, but I’m not sure B’s so certain yet!
Phil.
—
^ There is a picture of the famous Belgian UFO at http://caelestia.be/article05ad.html. Interestingly, this site claims that the thing was hoaxed by the photographer. It says that the photographer, identified as ‘Patrick M.’, confessed that he’d hoaxed the photograph. The site does acknowledge though that he did not keep any other pictures he took of his ‘UFO’ whilst preparing the hoax. In other words, there is as little evidence that the thing was a hoax as there is that it wasn’t!
I must say I remain unconvinced it is a hoaxed photo, given that the apparent ‘shock fronts’ around the corners lights of the triangle do not appear to drag in the same direction, as one would expect if they were due to motion blur only. The site shows an attempted duplication of the photo, a mock-up, but frankly it looks like a hoax, with a bit of post-processing for the shock front artefacts – post processing which would have been rather more difficult back in 1990, with a film camera.
If intense pulses of gravitational distortion were being produced, I would say this is the sort of effect – bending of light, or gravitational lensing – that one would expect to see.
Here is the photo:
—
Tajmar superconductor experiment (ESA):
Towards a new test of general relativity? 23 March 2006
Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6 500 times a minute. Superconductors are special materials that lose all electrical resistance at a certain temperature. Spinning superconductors produce a weak magnetic field, the so-called London moment. The new experiment tests a conjecture that explains the difference between high-precision mass measurements of Cooper-pairs (the current carriers in superconductors) and their prediction via quantum theory. They have discovered that this anomaly could be explained by the appearance of a gravitomagnetic field in the spinning superconductor (This effect has been named the Gravitomagnetic London Moment by analogy with its magnetic counterpart).
Small acceleration sensors placed at different locations close to the spinning superconductor, which has to be accelerated for the effect to be noticeable, recorded an acceleration field outside the superconductor that appears to be produced by gravitomagnetism. “This experiment is the gravitational analogue of Faraday’s electromagnetic induction experiment in 1831.
It demonstrates that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil. Depending on further confirmation, this effect could form the basis for a new technological domain, which would have numerous applications in space and other high-tech sectors” says ESA study manager Clovis de Matos. Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts. Initially, the researchers were reluctant to believe their own results.
Gravitomagnetic induction of gravitational fields
In parallel to the experimental evaluation of their conjecture, Tajmar and team also looked for a more refined theoretical model of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment. They took their inspiration from superconductivity. The electromagnetic properties of superconductors are explained in quantum theory by assuming that force-carrying particles, known as photons, gain mass. By allowing force-carrying gravitational particles, known as the gravitons, to become heavier, they found that the unexpectedly large gravitomagnetic force could be modelled.
“If confirmed, this would be a major breakthrough,” says Tajmar, “it opens up a new means of investigating general relativity and it consequences in the quantum world.”
The results, obtained in the framework of an ESA contract, were presented at a one-day conference at ESA’s European Space and Technology Research Centre (ESTEC), in the Netherlands, 21 March 2006. Two papers detailing the work are now being considered for publication. The papers can be accessed on-line at the Los Alamos pre-print server using the references: gr-qc/0603033 and gr-qc/0603032.
For more detailed information, please contact:
Dipl-Ing Dr Martin Tajmar
Head of Business Field Space Propulsion ARC Seibersdorf research GmbH A-2444 Seibersdorf Austria Phone: +43 (0)5 05 50 31 42 Fax: +43 (0)5 05 50 33 66 Email: martin.tajmar @ arcs.ac.at Web: http://ilfb.tuwien.ac.at/~tajmar
Mr Clovis J. de Matos
General Studies Officer European Space Agency ESA-HQ Advanced Concepts and Studies Office – EUI-AC 8-10 Rue Mario Nikis 75738 Paris Cedex 15 France Tel: +33 (0)1 53 69 74 98 Fax: +33 (0)1 53 69 76 51 Email: clovis.de.matos @ esa.int |
—
(Stanford report result:)
Stanford Report, August 23, 2010
The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements
When researchers found an unusual linkage between solar flares and the inner life of radioactive elements on Earth, it touched off a scientific detective investigation that could end up protecting the lives of space-walking astronauts and maybe rewriting some of the assumptions of physics.
BY DAN STOBER
It’s a mystery that presented itself unexpectedly: The radioactive decay of some elements sitting quietly in laboratories on Earth seemed to be influenced by activities inside the sun, 93 million miles away.
Is this possible?
Researchers from Stanford and Purdue University believe it is. But their explanation of how it happens opens the door to yet another mystery.
There is even an outside chance that this unexpected effect is brought about by a previously unknown particle emitted by the sun. “That would be truly remarkable,” said Peter Sturrock, Stanford professor emeritus of applied physics and an expert on the inner workings of the sun.
The story begins, in a sense, in classrooms around the world, where students are taught that the rate of decay of a specific radioactive material is a constant. This concept is relied upon, for example, when anthropologists use carbon-14 to date ancient artifacts and when doctors determine the proper dose of radioactivity to treat a cancer patient.
Random numbers
But that assumption was challenged in an unexpected way by a group of researchers from Purdue University who at the time were more interested in random numbers than nuclear decay. (Scientists use long strings of random numbers for a variety of calculations, but they are difficult to produce, since the process used to produce the numbers has an influence on the outcome.)
Ephraim Fischbach, a physics professor at Purdue, was looking into the rate of radioactive decay of several isotopes as a possible source of random numbers generated without any human input. (A lump of radioactive cesium-137, for example, may decay at a steady rate overall, but individual atoms within the lump will decay in an unpredictable, random pattern. Thus the timing of the random ticks of a Geiger counter placed near the cesium might be used to generate random numbers.)
As the researchers pored through published data on specific isotopes, they found disagreement in the measured decay rates – odd for supposed physical constants.
Checking data collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island and the Federal Physical and Technical Institute in Germany, they came across something even more surprising: long-term observation of the decay rate of silicon-32 and radium-226 seemed to show a small seasonal variation. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in summer.
Was this fluctuation real, or was it merely a glitch in the equipment used to measure the decay, induced by the change of seasons, with the accompanying changes in temperature and humidity?
“Everyone thought it must be due to experimental mistakes, because we’re all brought up to believe that decay rates are constant,” Sturrock said.
The sun speaks
On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.
If this apparent relationship between flares and decay rates proves true, it could lead to a method of predicting solar flares prior to their occurrence, which could help prevent damage to satellites and electric grids, as well as save the lives of astronauts in space.
The decay-rate aberrations that Jenkins noticed occurred during the middle of the night in Indiana – meaning that something produced by the sun had traveled all the way through the Earth to reach Jenkins’ detectors. What could the flare send forth that could have such an effect?
Jenkins and Fischbach guessed that the culprits in this bit of decay-rate mischief were probably solar neutrinos, the almost weightless particles famous for flying at almost the speed of light through the physical world – humans, rocks, oceans or planets – with virtually no interaction with anything.
Then, in a series of papers published in Astroparticle Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research and Space Science Reviews, Jenkins, Fischbach and their colleagues showed that the observed variations in decay rates were highly unlikely to have come from environmental influences on the detection systems.
Reason for suspicion
Their findings strengthened the argument that the strange swings in decay rates were caused by neutrinos from the sun. The swings seemed to be in synch with the Earth’s elliptical orbit, with the decay rates oscillating as the Earth came closer to the sun (where it would be exposed to more neutrinos) and then moving away.
So there was good reason to suspect the sun, but could it be proved?
Enter Peter Sturrock, Stanford professor emeritus of applied physics and an expert on the inner workings of the sun. While on a visit to the National Solar Observatory in Arizona, Sturrock was handed copies of the scientific journal articles written by the Purdue researchers.
Sturrock knew from long experience that the intensity of the barrage of neutrinos the sun continuously sends racing toward Earth varies on a regular basis as the sun itself revolves and shows a different face, like a slower version of the revolving light on a police car. His advice to Purdue: Look for evidence that the changes in radioactive decay on Earth vary with the rotation of the sun. “That’s what I suggested. And that’s what we have done.”
A surprise
Going back to take another look at the decay data from the Brookhaven lab, the researchers found a recurring pattern of 33 days. It was a bit of a surprise, given that most solar observations show a pattern of about 28 days – the rotation rate of the surface of the sun.
The explanation? The core of the sun – where nuclear reactions produce neutrinos – apparently spins more slowly than the surface we see. “It may seem counter-intuitive, but it looks as if the core rotates more slowly than the rest of the sun,” Sturrock said.
All of the evidence points toward a conclusion that the sun is “communicating” with radioactive isotopes on Earth, said Fischbach.
But there’s one rather large question left unanswered. No one knows how neutrinos could interact with radioactive materials to change their rate of decay.
“It doesn’t make sense according to conventional ideas,” Fischbach said. Jenkins whimsically added, “What we’re suggesting is that something that doesn’t really interact with anything is changing something that can’t be changed.”
“It’s an effect that no one yet understands,” agreed Sturrock. “Theorists are starting to say, ‘What’s going on?’ But that’s what the evidence points to. It’s a challenge for the physicists and a challenge for the solar people too.”
If the mystery particle is not a neutrino, “It would have to be something we don’t know about, an unknown particle that is also emitted by the sun and has this effect, and that would be even more remarkable,” Sturrock said.
Chantal Jolagh, a science-writing intern at the Stanford News Service, contributed to this story.
—
Chris Eccles duralumin disk experiment:
Chris Eccles
Post reply
05/10/1998
I don’t often post to news but, this time, I feel that someone out there
might offer me an answer to a wierd outcome of an experiment.
Chris
might offer me an answer to a wierd outcome of an experiment.
I have spent my entire career in mainstream physics research and have
always been amused (often annoyed) by the “crankies” who believe in
teleportation, spoon-bending, etc etc etc, and have consistently held
the view that these fringe things belong firmly outside what I call
physics.
always been amused (often annoyed) by the “crankies” who believe in
teleportation, spoon-bending, etc etc etc, and have consistently held
the view that these fringe things belong firmly outside what I call
physics.
A few weeks back, my lab assistant got some stuff off the net about a
“magneto-gravity” device, accompanied by some notes by Tom Bearden.
This swatch of paper was lying about in the lab office and I happened to
read it. Out of nothing but bemused interest, I said to my team, “Lets
build this crap and see what happens….”
“magneto-gravity” device, accompanied by some notes by Tom Bearden.
This swatch of paper was lying about in the lab office and I happened to
read it. Out of nothing but bemused interest, I said to my team, “Lets
build this crap and see what happens….”
We constructed a variant of the device shown in the drawings which
accompanied the data. This consisted of a Duralumin disc (350mm dia)
which could be spun on a motor shaft, using a Picador bearing which we
had lying about. The disc was made to spin 1.5mm eccentric and was
fitted with twelve button magnets around its periphery, with all their N
poles facing outwards, by fixing the magnets to 90-degree offcuts of
alloy angle. The whole thing was then mechanically balanced by adding
extra thin strips of copper busbar (!) to compensate for the
eccenticity. When tested, the disc displayed some imbalance but this
was easily corrected until we had it running smoothly at 2850 rpm from a
mains-powered 750W motor. So far so good.
accompanied the data. This consisted of a Duralumin disc (350mm dia)
which could be spun on a motor shaft, using a Picador bearing which we
had lying about. The disc was made to spin 1.5mm eccentric and was
fitted with twelve button magnets around its periphery, with all their N
poles facing outwards, by fixing the magnets to 90-degree offcuts of
alloy angle. The whole thing was then mechanically balanced by adding
extra thin strips of copper busbar (!) to compensate for the
eccenticity. When tested, the disc displayed some imbalance but this
was easily corrected until we had it running smoothly at 2850 rpm from a
mains-powered 750W motor. So far so good.
We then rigged an enclosing fence of alloy strip around the disc, on
which we mounted twelve more button magnets with their S poles facing
inwards. The clearance between the disc-mounted magnets and the
peripheral ones varied by ±0.75mm as the disc turned.
which we mounted twelve more button magnets with their S poles facing
inwards. The clearance between the disc-mounted magnets and the
peripheral ones varied by ±0.75mm as the disc turned.
The whole shazam was mounted on an acrylic baseplate and weighed. It
was 14.26 kg. When we switched the motor in, the weird shit happened.
The balance showed a loss of grav mass of the assembly of some 550 grams
(3.85%) and every computer terminal and fluorescent lamp in the lab went
ape !
was 14.26 kg. When we switched the motor in, the weird shit happened.
The balance showed a loss of grav mass of the assembly of some 550 grams
(3.85%) and every computer terminal and fluorescent lamp in the lab went
ape !
Is this real, or should I take a holiday ?
Can anyone offer an explanation ?
Chris
—
Chris Eccles
Post reply
17/10/1998
Since the first test of the device, we have not done a great deal
but the interest shown by subscribers to this group (reflected in the
pile of email I have received) has made me reserve some more lab time
for further investigations.
Chris
but the interest shown by subscribers to this group (reflected in the
pile of email I have received) has made me reserve some more lab time
for further investigations.
To the many who wrote to me (rightly sceptical) I have to say
unequivocally that this is NOT some kind of hoax. It’s nowhere near
April 1st and I am 50 years old, a serious researcher with a healthy
career in mainstream electronic physics, and not given to the kind of
tom-foolery that belongs in the student common-room during rag-week.
unequivocally that this is NOT some kind of hoax. It’s nowhere near
April 1st and I am 50 years old, a serious researcher with a healthy
career in mainstream electronic physics, and not given to the kind of
tom-foolery that belongs in the student common-room during rag-week.
What we are talking about here is the possibility of some kind of
hitherto-unknown relationship between dynamically-changing tensor
fields. Magnetism, particularly intrinsic, remanent magnetism, is one
of the few phenomena that remain relatively badly delineated by
current quantum theory and I, for one, am prepared to admit that there
are huge holes in my own fundamental understanding of it. If a simple,
but rarely-occuring-in-nature, juxtaposition of non-scalar fields is
capable of either creating (or destroying) spin-2, zero mass mediating
particles, then there is the real possibility of manipulating and
engineering the gravitational field. It becomes an exciting prospect
but not one which should lead any of us into assuming that the Sinclaire
device actually manifests such an effect.
hitherto-unknown relationship between dynamically-changing tensor
fields. Magnetism, particularly intrinsic, remanent magnetism, is one
of the few phenomena that remain relatively badly delineated by
current quantum theory and I, for one, am prepared to admit that there
are huge holes in my own fundamental understanding of it. If a simple,
but rarely-occuring-in-nature, juxtaposition of non-scalar fields is
capable of either creating (or destroying) spin-2, zero mass mediating
particles, then there is the real possibility of manipulating and
engineering the gravitational field. It becomes an exciting prospect
but not one which should lead any of us into assuming that the Sinclaire
device actually manifests such an effect.
The secondary EM effects are quite interesting. Has anyone else built
anything which comes close to displaying the same anomalies ?
anything which comes close to displaying the same anomalies ?
Please feel free to email me direct and suggest guidelines for a
concerted research pathway on this. There is too much indiscipline and
disorganisation in “fringe” physics for anyone to feel secure about such
work. Lack of published matter in mainstream journals (for obvious and
valid reasons) gives rise to the feeling that one is trying to “swim
through treacle” even commencing such a programme of research.
concerted research pathway on this. There is too much indiscipline and
disorganisation in “fringe” physics for anyone to feel secure about such
work. Lack of published matter in mainstream journals (for obvious and
valid reasons) gives rise to the feeling that one is trying to “swim
through treacle” even commencing such a programme of research.
It is, I think, fundamentally important to distinguish between a
mass-shielding effect (where a device purports to alter the measured
strength of the Earth’s [or any] grav field “above” the device), and an
effect which indicates that an entire, physically-linked, chunk of
equipment can be made to behave as though it has shed grav mass. The
one case illustrates that a tensor field can be manipulated vectorally
(and few would find fault with the math of this); the other possibly is
suggesting that a property of matter which we have all believed to be
sacrosanct and writ-in-stone for several centuries is, in fact, a deal
more woolly than we believed it to be.
mass-shielding effect (where a device purports to alter the measured
strength of the Earth’s [or any] grav field “above” the device), and an
effect which indicates that an entire, physically-linked, chunk of
equipment can be made to behave as though it has shed grav mass. The
one case illustrates that a tensor field can be manipulated vectorally
(and few would find fault with the math of this); the other possibly is
suggesting that a property of matter which we have all believed to be
sacrosanct and writ-in-stone for several centuries is, in fact, a deal
more woolly than we believed it to be.
I remain very puzzled.
Chris
—
(Later post by Chris Eccles, In the same thread:)
Chris Eccles
Post reply
18/10/1998
I have just been told by someone in the lab that what we actually have
built is nearly a replica of something called the Searl Levi-Disk. It
is exceedingly difficult to get any sound and reliable information from
anyone on this device !
More news when we have it.
built is nearly a replica of something called the Searl Levi-Disk. It
is exceedingly difficult to get any sound and reliable information from
anyone on this device !
I appreciate the email from Mr Sterniman; it seems well-reasoned and I
am replying soon when I have attempted to set the math of it straight in
my own terms.
am replying soon when I have attempted to set the math of it straight in
my own terms.
I am unused to newsgroups and their etiquette, and I hope regular
readers will forgive the inevitable confusion of a novitiate ?
readers will forgive the inevitable confusion of a novitiate ?
It seems that we can summarise as follows:
—————————— ———–
—————————— ———–
When the flux of an N-pole cuts the flux of an S-pole such that the
tensor fields experience the maximum tendency to repel (pi/2), we create
an electric field in whatever gap exists between the sources of the
flux. We will also, a priori, because of the fact that the disk does
not rotate its magnets in concentricity with those on the outer wall, be
setting up a variation of transfer of angular momentum of the
electromagnetic field associated with the electric field cutting flux
all the time the disk is turning. This eccentricity has an interesting
locus and traces out a cylindrical path of wall-thickness equal to twice
the original eccentricity of the magnet ring on the disk (when
stationary).
tensor fields experience the maximum tendency to repel (pi/2), we create
an electric field in whatever gap exists between the sources of the
flux. We will also, a priori, because of the fact that the disk does
not rotate its magnets in concentricity with those on the outer wall, be
setting up a variation of transfer of angular momentum of the
electromagnetic field associated with the electric field cutting flux
all the time the disk is turning. This eccentricity has an interesting
locus and traces out a cylindrical path of wall-thickness equal to twice
the original eccentricity of the magnet ring on the disk (when
stationary).
We are going to run the device again soon, using a remote spring balance
to ascertain the apparent mass loss so that there is no chance of an
interaction between the pan balance and the device. Also, in answer to
many queries, “No, it’s not electromagnetic interference from the motor
which caused the strange effects.” Running the motor free is fine. It
came from a vacuum pump which had been running in the lab for ages !
Anyway, after thirty years in physics, I’ve yet to encounter a 50Hz
mains induction motor that could dim-out flu-tubes and blow up LCD’s.
to ascertain the apparent mass loss so that there is no chance of an
interaction between the pan balance and the device. Also, in answer to
many queries, “No, it’s not electromagnetic interference from the motor
which caused the strange effects.” Running the motor free is fine. It
came from a vacuum pump which had been running in the lab for ages !
Anyway, after thirty years in physics, I’ve yet to encounter a 50Hz
mains induction motor that could dim-out flu-tubes and blow up LCD’s.
More news when we have it.
Please keep ideas flowing in – this device threatens to prevent me from
building the HV/HF switches which we are supposed to be producing !!!!!
building the HV/HF switches which we are supposed to be producing !!!!!
Chris
—
(Finally, my recent comment on ‘beforeitsnews.com’:)
Magnetronics: Radioactive decay variability apparently due to solar influence will probably turn out to be an unforeseen result of accelerating magnetic fields produced during the magnetic reconnection events that often occur in ionized solar plasma.
Motional and accelerated magnetic fields are *not* used in commonly available technologies, including electric motors and transformers. These devices produce static magnetic fields with periodic variations in intensity, to produce electromagnetic induction, but the fields do not physically move (See Laithwaite’s technical book describing his Linear Motor for confirmation of this).
There is a European Space Agency experiment by Tajmar et al using rotating superconductors which also supports this hypothesis. They find a gravitational interaction during periods when the superconductor is undergoing angular *acceleration*, and the effect is described to be millions of millions of times greater than predicted by GR.
The hypothesis is (I think) supported by the fact that rotating superconductors produce a magnetic field, therefore, if the superconductor’s rotation is also accelerated, the condition of an accelerated magnetic field is demonstrated, correlated with the production of a gravitational anomaly.
Gravitational anomalies may be expected to affect the rate at which nuclear reactions progress within them, relative to those not near to the anomaly, since they affect the rate at which time passes generally from the perspective of distant observers.
I expect some variation of this theory will explain this phenomenon.
(/story/1452/028/Shocked_Scientists_Ask:_Is_The_Sun_Is_Dying.html?currentSplittedPage=2)
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
MOST RECENT
HELP KEEP NEWS FREE
DONATE
HERE
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,599,176,594 |
| Stories: | 8,138,299 |
Wanted: Citizen Reporters,
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
"Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the Lord of hosts." Zechariah 4:6
Today's Top Stories
Featured
Top Global
Top Alternative
Looks like my story has been sandboxed and censored, as the single view (by me) would seem to attest.
I am a targeted individual of some 13 years now, and I have routinely found my articles and comment (even the anonymous ones) buried and hidden, irrespective of their content. Each time I have attempted to publish, I have been punished, first with gangstalking and community harassment techniques, and latterly with increasingly vicious directed energy weapon attacks.
As the internet becomes increasingly compartmentalized and anonymity is lost, it will become nothing more than an arm of the propaganda industry – and all the more effective because people will take some time to realize this has happened, if they ever realize it (if the realization does not become tainted as another ‘conspiracy theory’ and thereby discredited in the eyes of those who read but do not enquire).
At this point it can be easily reasoned that it is now technically possible to create a bespoke ‘sandbox’ for every internet user. By correlating the (now mandatory) mobile phone user registrations, call data and links between each mobile phone and internet accounts, it must now be possible to create a graph of almost every individual active on the internet in NATO surveillance societies and their associates.
Software can then be used to present each person and their known associates with each others’ user-generated comments and other content (rather like Facebook does), alongside well-crafted propaganda comments from authorized sources that will give the impression that each individual’s content is available to everyone, based on the fallacious reasoning: “If I can see these comments from people I don’t know, everyone must be able to see mine!”, whilst inculcating the beliefs that the super-elites want them to have.
Do not suffer spies to remain hidden within your communities: MI5, MI6, 21 SAS (secret army), gang stalkers, vigilantes, soldiers – spies of any kind. It may be superficially exciting to know such people, but they are extremely destructive to the public interest – and that includes yours.
Links corrupted censorship: nice
Why not just do a one page summary of your discovery in simple language for people like me who are not scientifically minded and who want to know what you are saying without need of complex academic proof. The proof can be provided elsewhere for the academically minded. Sometimes news sites don’t want such complex science just simple info for us sheep to read quickly and notch hits on the site to get advert revenue. A catchy heading helps too. There may be spies but there is also paranoia and mostly there are selfish financial considerations to posts.