Stop Electronic Weapons / Gangstalking, "the Torture Report" Dr. Les Dove Jan. 2012

STOPEG = STOP ELECTRONIC WEAPONS STOP GANG STALKING

Hope u can see this facebook page:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stopeg/106302809426481

===================================

“THE TORTURE REPORT”

( c ) By Dr Les Dove C.P.H. Updated Mexico. January 2012. ( c ) First published in United Kingdom. 1995

 Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy … censorship. When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, “This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,” the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives … Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hood-winked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a freeman, a whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything – you can’t conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert A Heinlein Aims and objectives of the report The main objectives of this report are to explore the basic elements of psychological torture in order to try and reach conclusions as to why psychological torture is now being used so widely and to examine why it is being used in many countries that purport to be free democracies. This will build upon the writers own research in various countries, plus his own wide personal experience of psychological torture, which leaves no doubt that such methods are being used far more often than many people would suspect. In turn, this leads to the following specific aims: (a) To explore the question why, by whom, and with what authority psychological and other methods of torture is being carried out. (b) To identify relevant information and evidence concerning psychological torture. (c) To examine reasons for the lack of public information on the subject. Background to the report There are references in various books concerning the activities of internal security forces who employ torture in one form or another, (Even in some so-called ‘democracies’) yet psychological torture and its use in the West seems not to have been probed to any great depth at all. Indeed, people in the West have become used to hearing about ‘torture in other countries”, but what of their own standards? Are those people living in the West really so blameless as they would have others believe? Is it always “others” who torture and never themselves?

Experience in investigating this subject leads to the realization that a number of ‘charitable organizations’ in the United Kingdom, supposedly set up to investigate breaches of human rights (including torture), appear to be more concerned in keeping the ‘national image’ rather than exposing torture within their own country. In other words, it appears that some human rights organizations are avoiding their real responsibilities in some areas, simply because they feel that they may incur the wrath of their own state security service, namely MI5 (Military Intelligence) and the police Special Branch (Secret Police), if they probe into areas the British establishment does not wish them to. Indeed, according to the National Council for Civil Liberties (UK), now simply called Liberty, their organization was targeted by the British security services. They suffered much harassment as a result. This kind of harassment, plus the certain loss of government funding, is intended to keep British human rights organizations ‘in line’ and the British public ignorant of what is happening within their own country. When the real implications of psychological torture are examined, it can be appreciated why some British human rights groups are reluctant to become involved in exposing repression and torture in their country.

That is not to suggest that anyone working for the Liberty organization has been tortured by MI5, although some people working in other British human rights organizations certainly have been. Early ‘pressure’ from MI-5 does indeed appear to act as a ‘deterrent’ should some organizations decide to probe into the area of psychological torture. Whatever, there are some human rights organizations who do doubt the legitimacy of their government. But if a government does indeed have a true and proper democratic constitution then there should be no reason for it to deny any investigation into its activities by anyone. Indeed, it could be argued that such inquiries should be made welcome by any legitimate government. However, many governments quite apparently do have much to hide, in spite of their claims of being free democracies. Writers daring to probe into the internal affairs of some governments are particularly at risk, as governments inevitably let their security forces loose in attempts to prevent the exposure of any information they feel may be embarrassing or damaging to them. Rarely are writers accused of breaking any law. For in most cases they do not. They are simply conducting legitimate research. However, what does happen in many instances is that these researchers find themselves being targeted, persecuted, tortured and even murdered for simply daring to ask questions that officials of any true democracy would be proud to answer. For instance; the information department of the UK newspaper ‘The Independent’ reported that on average at least forty writers are killed somewhere in the world every year. Furthermore, according to the details presented in the British television program ‘Africa Express’, in 1983 twenty-eight writer/researchers were murdered in Africa alone. In 1994, one hundred and fifteen writers were killed throughout the world.

From 1995, the figure’s are; Iraq – 97 dead, Philippines – 60 dead, Russia – 13 dead, China – 31 in jail, Zimbabwe – 61 exiled, Turkey – 15 prosecuted. According to an international press freedom watchdog a record number of 70 journalists were killed in 2009 with at least 136 other writers, editors and photojournalists being harassed and imprisoned. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), 887 journalists have been killed since 1992. At least 40 journalists have killed this year alone, 2011. By now, these figures may well be very much higher. Due to the strict censorship in place, British and U.S. writers and researchers that have, or are being persecuted, exiled and / or killed there are not available but their numbers are expected to be considerable. Trying to report the truth is a very dangerous occupation. It should be made clear that such writers are not necessarily probing into any apparent so-called state secrets in these searches after truth. Their efforts may simply be to probe into the everyday workings of governments. Yet such seems to be the paranoia of some governments, such as that of the United Kingdom for instance, that it so very often treats such inquiry’s as a form of direct attack against its authority. This inevitably leads to ‘an action’ against the writer by the British security services, Namely MI5 and the police Special Branch. At least such actions are being taken against researchers in the name of government.

Whether such actions are indeed instigated by government, or simply ordered by their security services without proper legal authority, should that be needed by them, is open to question? That these actions do take place is in no doubt. According to the available literature, far too many political activists in countries around the world, including Britain and the United States, have suffered greatly in one way or another for that to be reasonably disputed by anyone. The real problem for some governments today is that such actions cannot be so easily hidden as they might have been before the ‘electronic age and the Internet.’ With that realization, some governments now seek to hide the action itself rather than the victim. That is why psychological torture, rather than obvious physical torture, now seems to have become almost mandatory with numerous security forces all over the world. The reasons for the latter statement are quite apparent. Foremost there is the ‘deny-ability’ factor that has become associated with psychological torture. (No obvious marks or wounds, as with physical torture.) In fact, by using modern methods of repression the torture action itself can be carried out without ant real physical contact with the victim at all. Many writers are presently describing this, as ‘no touch torture’. For that reason alone psychological torture has become an attractive accessory to the usual forms of government repression. Psychological torture makes it far easier for a government to rule by force rather than consent. The growing use of torture, in particular psychological torture, as reported by Ackroyd, also raises the question of whether or not there is a ‘third force’ or influence involved in its use. Namely big business, in the form of multinational corporations.’ For example; it is no longer a matter of speculation that some multinational companies were involved in the overthrow of some South American governments that had been legally elected with large majorities. For instance in 1970 a board member of a multinational company (I.T.T.), suggested a joint Central Intelligence Agency ITT/US telecommunications operation to ensure the election of a candidate it wanted in Chile.

These kinds of shady ‘deals’ involving multinationals have taken place not only in South America but also in many other countries. These illegal actions were, more often than not, ‘justified’ by untruthful and exaggerated claims of ‘communist infiltration’. Indeed, former CIA Director Richard Helms was fined and given a suspended prison sentence for lying to the United States Congress about the CIA’s involvement in overthrowing at least one South American government.

(1) ‘The Shock Doctrine’ – Full Length Film

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS6391Sdf7s

Those ‘lies and deceptions’ resulted in CIA and NSA backed death squads being set up. Over the coming years, these death squads tortured and murdered tens of thousands, indeed millions of people worldwide. The goodwill that had previously been directed towards the United States by some nations then quickly evaporated. A bitter lasting hatred of all things American, particularly their government, then replaced it. Unfortunately, a large section of the American public ….contd. at the site: http://lesdove.blogspot.com/2009/02/torture-report.html

. …nanaste…b.

.,..b.