Boeing's Bird Of Prey, Netherlands UFO Picture--Generations Of UFO Spotters Confusing Terrestrial High Tech Craft With UFOs

by Monica Davis

As cagey as the military has been over the last 50 years about UFOs, we don’t know what is a real UFO, and what is a high tech American plane.  Many believe that a lot of what average people think are UFOs are actually high tech American craft.

We humans are impressive inventors and UFOs have sparked imaginations for many years. It is a logical assumption, therefore, that many different people have constructed many different working models of flying circular winged or lenticular aircraft. Search Google for man made UFOs.

Below is an example of a man-made jet-engine-powered flying saucer from fifty years ago ( 1955 ) by a French aerospace designer. This preliminary wood (if you say so, looks like metal) 3/5th scale jet powered prototype in the Couzinet factory at Levallois-Perret supposedly never lifted off the ground. Really? The photos show Couzinet’s “Multiple wing aircraft” RC-360 with the wings rotating. MOREHERE

Countless critics and wanna be whistleblowers have outed secret crafts, and even naming US UFO bases–Area 51 and a large space under the Denver Airport, for instance. Ships such as Boeing’s Bird of Prey confused a lot of UFO affectionadoes. 

As soon as the aircraft was introduced to the press in October 2002, some stated that UFOs are now explained.

But this is an aircraft that is:

Serious ufologists know since the beginning of the research on the phenomenon that people can confuse aircraft and UFOs. They know that perhaps 80 to 95 percent of UFO reports, particularly those by unqualified witnesses, correspond to a vast collection of commonplace explanations, some including unusual or little known aircraft. 

• subsonic, flying at the unimpressive speed of 260 knots. Impressive UFO reports include object that flew at a much more extraordinary speed, is not silent. Using a quite conventional turbofan jet engine, he does not adapt to UFO sightings were absolute silence was reported, of where the reported noise was not similar at all the a jet engine’s noises, even if the location of the engine on the top of the structure of the Bird of Prey reduces its noise volume, is not a production aircraft. It did only test and demonstration flights under heavy scrutiny in protected test area. Unlike UFOs it did not fly above all countries in the world in full public’s view, exists only since 1996. A huge number of UFO reports exist well before 1996,is used to test discrete flight technologies. If these technologies are efficient, if this aircraft is designed to be seen of heard, then it will not spur sighting reports. If the aircraft is not as unnoticeable as hoped, then most observers will easily recognize that it is an aircraft, looks like an aircraft. True, it has unusual inverted V wings, but there are many aircraft that have an even more unusual configuration. If not witnesses, ufologists can discriminate and explain UFO reports that are possibly misinterpreted sightings of aircraft from UFO reports that are of other objects (saucer shaped etc.), is used to test low and even zero radar detection responsiveness technologies. But it is precisely UFO reports that are not only visual reports, but that are also undoubtedly confirmed by radar detection and measurements that are truly puzzling. If this aircraft is undetectable by radar, then it will not increase the number of serious good radar / visual UFO cases, can hover, cannot take off and land vertically. Other aircraft, or balloon, would make better candidates to explain observations with these characteristics, cannot disappear, nor bank or change flight path instantly, neither perform any of the manoeuvers that today’s aeronautic physics considers “impossible.” It is precisely the observation of such “impossible” behavior that makes a truly puzzling UFO case.

The Netherlands UFO photo was also reviewed on Elyktra Photoart. They ruled out the object being an insect or a bird, but could not conclusively identify the object. They also mentioned that there were no aircraft or contrails present and that there was no sound either.

Previously the Netherlands UFO photo was covered here, “Netherlands UFO: Photos appear to be real.” Ben Hansen, of the SyFy Channel’s “Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files,” determined that the raw files were not altered in any way. He thought the Netherlands UFO was actually a flying insect, but did notice another spot above the 728-year-old-castle in one of the photos. The “disk-shaped object” can only make us wonder.

Netherlands UFO photo real with explanation