Higg’s particle will never raise from belief to knowledge

Higg’s particle-ism, ie, the idea in particle physics that there is a particle that traverses the boundary between class and object (or between abstraction and reality) is, like cladistics, ie, the idea in biological systematics that there is a single “true tree of life”, fundamentallyy a manifestation of the ancient fundamental approach called “realism” (and “subjectivity”), resting on the axiom that classes are real, as opposed to “nominalism” (also called “objectivity”), resting on the axiom that objects are real. Conceptualization does namely include objects and classes, whereof not both can’t be correct at the same time, since there can’t be a one-to-one correspondance between them. The only difference between Higg’s particle-ism and cladistics is that the latter concerns overall classification, ie, is macro-realism, whereas the former concerns classes as single entities, ie, is micro-realism. However, whereas cladistics is doomed to an eternal wandering between contradictory solutions, Higg’s particle-ism does indeed have a single solution: contradiction itself, meaning that Higg’s particle-ism is a worse enemy to nominalism than Cladistics is.

The logical end of realism was first untangled around 2,500 BC by the ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides (see “Wisdom of the West” by Bertrand Russell),who  concluded that “reality (coined as “what-is”) is one, change is impossible, and existence is timeless, uniform, necessary, and unchanging” (a citation of Parmenides from Wikipedia). However, about 2,400 years later (in 1901) Bertrand Russell demonstrated that this end (ie, conclusion) is actually just a conceptual paradox due to that classification itself ends in paradox. Just a few years later, Albert Einstein moreover falsified this end (ie, conclusion, that is, realism itself) by demonstrating that time must be relative (first in special relativity 1905 and then in the final general relativity 1916), since existence can’t be “timeless” if time is relative. Existence must be either still or changing, it can’t be both at the same time, and Einstein proved that it’s changing. It means that both Higg’s particle-ism and cladistics already are falsified on a fundamental level, that is, on the level of the axiom for their approach, ie, as being realistic approaches.

So, what is the problem with “Higg’s particle”, except that it is obviously contradictory between particle and field? Well, the problem is that its contradiction makes it a practical impossibility. It is indeed the perfect theoretical solution of the contradictions in science, but the fact that it is contradictory means that it lacks a practical (ie, real) counterpart. This “particle” thus simply can’t be found.

Higg’s particle-ists at Cern now claim that they have almost found Higg’s particle, but this “almost” will actually remain forever, because Higg’s particle is like God – it simply can’t be found, because it can’t raise from belief to knowledge. It is indeed the perfect theoreticsl solution, but can’t, unfortunately, materialize. So, we ought not shout Halleluja before Higg’s particle-ism has risen from belief to knowledge, (like the Nobel committee did), which it, unfortunately, never will.

The Nobel committee has thus embarrassed itself by making a naive mistake.

Another contribution to understanding of conceptualization http://menvall.wordpress.com/