Has particle physics really invalidated facts?

When we humans began classifying the particles of the reality we perceive, we were surprised of that however we did, we always ended up with a pile containing “the rest”. There didn’t appear to be any classification that could break even. The reason for this phenomenon was revealed by Bertrand Russell when he in 1901 demonstrated that classification ultimately leads to paradox, called Russell’s paradox.

When particle physicists built their particle collider in Cern, they soon began finding so-called “elementary particles”, or rather classes of so-called “elementary particles”, but lacked a class of elementary particle (or rather boson, or rather field, or rather mechanism) that could complete their “standard model”, which they called “Higgs particle”. The reason for this “Higgs particle” was, however, revealed by Bertrand Russell already in 1901 when he demonstrated that classification ultimately leads to paradox, called Russell’s paradox.

The only difference between classification and particle physics is that particle physics “finds” classes of “elementary particles” instead of classify “elementary particles”, and that particle physics thus “finds” Russell’s paradox (ie, “Higgs particle”) instead of ends up with a pile containing “the rest” of “elementary particles”. We can actually also get rid of traditional piles containing “the rest” by constructing a paradoxical class. The problem with this solution of the problem with Russell’s paradox is, however, that it conflates what we classify (ie, particles) with classes (of particles) by implying that there is one class of particles (ie, Russell’s paradox) that is a particle. The problem with this conflation is not, however, the idea that paradoxes are real in itself (although it appears totally stupid to the rest of us), but that it also conflates pattern with process, which, in turn, conflates space with time, which is contradicted by the fact that time is relative with speed in space. The problem is thus that it is contradicted by facts.

It means that if the conflation is correct (ie, if particle physics actually has found “Higgs particle”), then facts are contradictory: the fact that time is relative with speed in space contradicts the fact that Higgs particle is real, and vice versa. If this is correct, then every statement about reality is just as true as any other statement about reality is, because facts themselves are contradictory. There simply isn’t any difference between true and false.

I bet, however, that facts are not contradictory, but that particle physics’ claim is wrong. Particle physics has actually not found “Higgs particle” and will never do, although it has already been awarded the Nobel Prize for this finding. The Nobel Prize Committée has simply made a huge mistake. For those that don’t understand the problem, future will show whether I’m right or wrong.