Hasn’t particle physics’ empirical finding of Higgs particle liquidated itself?

Particle physics lives in the illusion that it discusses particles when it actually discusses kinds of particles (like fermions, leptones, bosons and all other kinds of elementary particles). It means that particle physics ends in one kind of Russell’s paradox, which it calls “Higgs particle” and ”Higgs boson”. This particle/boson is thus both a particle and a process (which particle physics calls a “mechanism”), as is expected from a kind of Russell’s paradox.

However, recently particle physicists moreover announced that they indeed had found this kind of Russell’s paradox empirically, ie, actually observed it, for which they immediately was awarded the Nobel Prize, which (if it is correct) means that paradoxes are real instead of particles. This leads to the question: has particle physics thereby liquidated itself? How can it possibly continue from this point? It has verified empirically that reality is paradoxical, full stop.

No, particle physics of course has to retreat from this announcement sooner or later, which the Nobel Committee ought to have realized. Dreamers do of course feel nice when they think they have realized their dream, but as soon as they realize that it also means that they are stuck in a paradoxically contradictory dream, they do all they can to retreat from this dream, because they realize that the dream does not promote their personal career. The dream has fulfilled its positive kick for their careers in the moment it was announced to be real, and is thereafter just a burden. It will thus be interesting to follow how this retreat implodes practically.

The fundamental problem is not that reality is paradoxical, but that reality is ambiguous between our different interpretations of it. This problem may be screwed into that reality is paradoxical by assuming that kinds are real as an axiom (as particle physics and cladistics do), but it doesn’t mean that reality IS paradoxical, only that it can be screwed into appearing paradoxical by assuming as an erroneous axiom that kinds are real. The fundamental problem (that reality is ambiguous between our different interpretations of it) can only be dealt with consistently using the objective approach called nominalism, which also is the fundament for traditional empirical science. This approach does indeed also have shortcomings, but is the best alternative we have. Life is not a matter of realizing dreams, but of choosing between the alternatives we have.

A single consistent and unambiguous description of reality is an impossibility per definition, since a description can’t fuse with the described. Particle physics has with its announcement of its empirical verification thus not reached this impossible goal, but just erroneously claims it has. Particle physics is thus a disgrace to science, actually just a paradoxically contradictory belief among all other paradoxically contradictory beliefs (which thus also recently has liquidated itself).