An Appeal to Nibiru Theorists to Consider Concave Earth Theory

Today, I added a comment on a youtube post of Nick Thomas.  He is a good person, well-intentioned, as are we all.  But I am afraid all of his hard work is sending every intelligent person towards a false fear: Nibiru.

The imagery that Nick shows most often that I have seen is nothing more than light refraction and here are my comments made to him verbatim:

Nick,

I would strongly recommend you pay a visit to http://www.wildheretic.com aka Wild Heretic.

There, visit http://www.wildheretic.com/there-is-glass-in-the-sky/

What you and millions of others are experiencing is birefringence.

The Sun is ‘behind’ a glass sky of the celestial sphere at the center of our Hollow Earth wherein we live on its ‘concave surface’.

That is the ‘scam’ which has been perpetrated on humanity for hundreds of years.

We do not live in a Copernican Heliocentric Universe.

Max Planck Institute sent up their own satellite to collect cosmic background microwave radiation, and compiled a summary report which concludes we do not live in a Copernican World.  This conclusion has been kept out of mainstream media news.

Max Planck Institute in the same report concludes ‘New Science’ must be constructed around their observations.

That ‘New Science’ is emergent and Concave Earth Theory aligns with science more so than the NASA, Theory of Relativity, Black Holes, Copernican Heliocentrism ‘hoagie sub’ ever will.  The hoagie sandwich to which I refer, is an ongoing ‘lie’ wherein new layers or ‘shims’ keep being added to adjust current (unproven) theory.

This is the face of ‘The Theoretical Science Establishment’ who are keeping the secret hidden that in fact there is indeed a glass sky and that the Earth is stationary and a myriad of other untold facts that are in the realm of Concave Earth.

I hope you take my post as an earnest effort to ‘reach out’ and appeal to your good senses and intellect and as my good faith attempt to sway you to consider an alternate path to truth you may not have considered.

Kindest Regards,
Dietrich T. Schmitz