Five hundred million year old footprints suggest prehistoric civilizations
Statistics shows man becoming more and more dumb in contradiction to the Theory Of Evolution.
Many research studies show that average IQ score of man has been dropping alot in recent decades. Despite a more ”advanced” education and endless hours spent in school man gets more and more dumb. This is of course in complete contradiction to the Evolution Theory. As we saw in our first article Charles Darwin was a proven liar on multiple occasions and lived like a king on a huge estate after presenting his Theory of Evolution. Is his theory of Evolution yet another marxist scam? We will try to show the basic faults of the Evolution Theory in this article.
Part One Of This Article: Charles Darwin – An Honest Scientist?
”To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.” – Charles Darwin
It is clear that not even Darwin himself had full faith in the Theory Of Evolution. He couldn´t imagine how the eye could have been evolved naturally. In fact, since the Theory Of Evolution has never been observed by any human being it must be considerred a religion and not science.
”I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.” (A. Einstein)
According to Physics, man will devolve and not evolve over time since all systems tend toward more and more chaos and disorder. We see the same thing happen in modern society with more and more technology, medicines, vaccines, conflicts, desires etc creating lazier, weaker and dumber human beings who have falling IQ scores despite more schooling than ever. Einstein in his days already predicted that man would become a fool as man relied on technology for survival.
”We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories… Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.” (Protocols 2:2-3)
Since 1897 when the Protocols of The Elders Of Zion were published they have claimed that the whole idea of Darwinism is a conspiracy against mankind. Considerring that almost all parts of the protocols have become true today we should have an open mind to the possibility of Evolution being yet another marxist scam.
After studying the Theory Of Evolution I know that one cannot discredit, in a few paragraphs, an idea which the elite have spent billions to indoctrinate society with. But let’s look at it with a free mind without any notions from religion or materialism. We will try to use our common sense to look at it at a level that ordinary people can understand.
We will discuss some objections to Evolution Theory from a scientific standpoint. We will go through some of the most important question marks and compare with today´s society to see whether they seem right or not.
First of all, the Theory of Evolution is a theory which states that life evolved from simple life forms into more complex life forms on earth. It supposedly took billions of years and ended in the human being as the most advanced life form.
Evolution Theory: A flash of lightning may have created the first life according to scientists. Do we really believe that?
The main objection to the Theory Of Evolution is how the first life, ie a single cell, was created. Life comes from life as everyone knows. Has anyone ever seen chemicals giving birth to life? Furthermore a single cell is extremely complicated at the microscale. Current suggestions include chemical processes causing human life to occur but so far nobody has never been able to reproduce life by mixing chemical substances. You could say that the main issue of the evolution theory is the issue of whether life has a soul or not. Can anything live without a soul? So far the scientists couldn´t create life and I expect it to never happen since a single cell is infinitely complicated at a micro level.
Banana flies can change color but they can´t become a new species.
Secondly no experiments could create a new species from an existing species. It is easy enough to alter some characteristics of a species but so far nobody could make a bird out of a banana fly. And there have been many banana flies breeded, many more than there were ever monkeys on earth.
Human footprints from Utah about 500 million years old with a trilobite fossil at the arrow. According to biologists it is accidental and no footprint.
In addition we can´t explain the stunning traces of prehistoric civilizations. How could they build such gigantic structures tens of thousands of years ago and how could their art be so advanced with depictions of dinosaurs, flying saucers etc? How could they produce iron with a purity far beyond what modern man could produce? These questions can never be addressed properly by the Theory of Evolution. In part 3 we will take a look at the multitude of evidence for prehistoric civilizations far more advanced than our current civilization.
Rabbits and foxes show a typical sinusoid population curve.
Furthermore, there are no linear processes in nature over long periods of time while the evolution theory suggests that man evolved from simple life forms to advanced life forms during billions of years. Usually species go extinct over time with DNA mutation and environmental causes.
Transitional fossils are missing causing evolutionists to claim that evolution took place in ”spurts”. Well, that supports the theory of multiple civilizations, each one created at the outset.
In addition to that we are missing transitional fossils. For example, how could a fish walk up on land without lungs? Did he suddenly grow a lung and crawl up on land?
Dr Patterson had written a book for the British Museum simply called Evolution.2Creationist Luther Sunderland wrote to Dr Patterson inquiring why he had not shown one single photograph of a transitional fossil in his book. Patterson then wrote back with the following amazing confession which was reproduced, in its entirety, in Sunderland’s bookDarwin’s Enigma:
‘I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualise such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic licence, would that not mislead the reader?’
He went on to say:
‘Yet Gould [Stephen J. Gould—the now deceased professor of paleontology from Harvard University] and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils. … You say that I should at least “show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was derived.” I will lay it on the line—there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.’3[Emphasis added].
Please visit http://expandourmind.com/2016/10/30/evolution-theory-objections-part-2/ for the full version of this article.