Moon Landing Hoax Proof!! Stanley Kubrick who Filmed Fake Moon Footag
THIS SHOULD CONVINCE YOU THAT IT WAS KUBRICK AND NOT DISNEY: IT IS A STUNNING AND SCAREY ANALYSIS OF “THE SHINING”
Although it is an Old Theory, is it true? How can we the trust mainstream media?
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,598,866,082 |
| Stories: | 8,137,453 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
This theory has been around for years. Very interesting but not new.
yes, but why do many people believe the lies that were told before many decades ago.
Not ‘theory’. The moon landings were not filmed for the public as there is too much there that public must not know about. Pretty films were made in a controlled environment to feign “accountability” of public funds. End of story.
Ok, except…
1> General Walters was NOT in “perfect shape.” He was a morbidly obese 85 year old man. He wasn’t long for this world no matter what.
2> Why not kill everyone involved if they were willing to kill anyone? Why wait and give anyone the chance to reveal it?
3> And finally, we have photographed the lunar lander sites from orbit. We can see the tracks made by the astronauts, the rovers and the leftover equipment.
Sorry. This particular theory has outlived its “Sell By” date.
-Ken
http://www.LaserGuidedLoogie.com
The documentary is completely “Factual”
“And finally, we have photographed the lunar lander sites from orbit. We can see the tracks made by the astronauts, the rovers and the leftover equipment.”
I would love to see something concrete on this, as it would completely put the matter to rest. Do you have anything to point to by way of evidence in support of this claim?
I’d love to see this left over stuff and landing sites too. Tracks would be awesome evidence and I agree very compelling. Why can’t I find any information pertaining to your assertions with my own research? A nudge in the right direction would be appreciated.
Thanks.
When I see a picture of the moon landing from someone who isn’t being controlled by the government I’ll believe the moon landing. We may have went there, but the pictures and video on the official nasa site are a joke at best. Anyone who’s worked with environment lighting will tell you it’s a stage.
they got to the moon but not on those machines. the radiation would kill anybody.. it doesnt matter how fast you travel through it.
Interesting, never heard this before…I also think the moon landing was a hoax but that dosent mean they didnt go. Just covered up what they discovered possibly? I don’t know just a thought.
If you watch “A funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon”, you will see NASA footage of Apollo falsifying video to deceive the viewers into believing that they were 130,000 miles from earth. This video footage is worthy of court evidence.
Laser Guided Loogie is a plant!
The astro-nots are the big give-away. They got very hostile when asked to swear on the Bible that they’d been. Armstrong wouldn’t do it, even when he was offered money to give to a charity of his choice if he would. He told a group of students at a White House function that there were many things they had left undone, and in a very downbeat and depressed sort of way…not definitive evidence of a cover-up; but an odd way of inspiring people. Aldrin actually hit the interviewer. Put yourself in their position. You know you’ve been, but some idiot suggests you haven’t. The last thing you do is to think you can prove it with a punch. My theory is that they were mind-modified to visualize going, but underneath it all, they knew they never really did. Cognitive dissonance sets in, which is known to produce rage and anxiety if the underlying programming is challenged. We know they do this sort of thing. By the way, anyone who has looked at the LEM knows that it is inconceivable that such a heap of junk could have gone anyhere, let alone to the moon. It is completely unsealed, and looks like some kid made it out of left-over Meccano. Plus, altho’ it is tiny, we are asked to believe that two spacemen could have changed into spacesuits whilst inside it. One of its dials is painted onto the metal, and a pointer painted in too. I think it says “Warp Speed 9″.
Don’t think they have changed. There is no rover on Mars either. The whole NASA thing is an elaborate scam to fleece you. The US has been a corporation since 1871, and the bottom line of such organizations is always the bottom line.
“The whole NASA thing is an elaborate scam to fleece you.”
There is much, much more behind this agency than the theft of funds.
I see you HereAmi you seem wise.
“The US has been a corporation since 1871, and the bottom line of such organizations is always the bottom line.”
Boo Yah!
Let’s see…there are plenty of people who would like to be rid of the United States once and for all. What better way than to convince the world that one of their most inspiring achievements, several moon landings, never happened?
But how indeed, do the people who insist it never happened, explain the descent stages, reflectors, and other experiments still on the moon at the published landing sites, along with physical tracks, photographed by those who are not part of NASA?
With so many people needing to be “in” on the “hoax” who is the intended audience?
I think the US needs no help its destroying and Bankrupting itself all by itself
Why was Nixon not present when Appollo 11 was launched? Because he knew because of the Van Allen Belts there was no way in hell they were going to the moon. So they staged it and America bught it.
They went to the moon, but they couldn’t show the real footage because of what they found…ruined cities and artifacts…so they created videos and pictures to add to what little footage they could show.
Yet I can see incredible detail of the moon’s surface with a surprisingly cheap telescope from my back yard. I ask you? I accept there’s no way I could see left behind debris or Rovers let alone tracks. But whole cities and artifacts. Seriously?
I could see plenty of man assembled stuff from the space station by naked eye and things like the great wall with a US $50 pair of binoculars.
Think big. Try to find out how grunty some of our telescopes are. Especially the ones that float around outside of the filtering effects of our atmosphere. And you still think there’s a cover up going on?
I find it amazing that so many people can believe that the US Government, an organization so incompetent they could f*** up a wet dream, could pull off such an elaborate hoax for all of these years. The myth of a hyper-competent government is just that, a myth.
It just goes to show that not all maxim hold true “If more than two people know something it is almost impossible to keep it secret”. Pretty good trick the powers that be pulled here. Manned Moon landings? Snigger Puh-lease!
Of course it does help in the grand scam if many of the bit players believe in the role they are playing. Does it not? Some of these characters have great intellect and virtuous minds no less.
Believe nothing you hear and so little of what you see and please define ‘Science’ before any assault so that I know I am not wasting my time.
I believe the first landing or landings were faked but they’ve been there since to cover they’re tracks. As for the people saying they’ve seen the pictures taken from orbit of the module and the vehicle tracks, those pictures could have been faked too. After all, who do you think took them. That’s right the same idiots that helped fake the first moon landings.
One day china or Russia will get to the moon and uncover the truth. They’ll tell the world too because they ain’t exactly friends of America are they.
I don’t think WE are allowed to go to the moon.
Just saying.
So which is it? The landing was a hoax? Or, the landing was real and they found ancient moon bases? It can’t be both.
I think the landing was hoax
This is a classic example of just how idiotic and dim-witted the BIN posters and commenters are.
Vernon Walters was only a Deputy Director at the CIA, and that was from 1972-76, after Apollo 11. Yes, he did indeed participate in a French MOCKUMENTARY of the moon landing just before he died.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon_(documentary)
This took me all of two minutes.
you raise a good point here, and there is more. people should note that within this vid, the voice overs and interview clips are all out of context and cleverly placed. in all of these interview rips, there is no direct reference to the moonlanding itself although this is constructed to appear as though they are.. also – “… the director of “Dark Side of the Moon”, William Karel, lifted interview footage from another of his own documentary films called “The World According to Bush” and placed that footage out of context in “Dark Side of the Moon”.
uh.. the good point i refer to is not one of calling others idiotic and dimwitted.
in other words.. this vid is a complete hoax. ironic..
Salutations Rainingmind.
Thank you for reminding me that there is always an agenda independent of my own.
People! listen for we are being schooled by one wise in the art of discernment.
I ask, if I may, that we look critically at the contributors who seem to never lose an argument. Look how provocative and controversial they can be. Look how bold their assumptions are. Look at how they can claim their knowledge without fear of attack. Ask yourself “What guides them?”
I believe it is because they know how to find truth for themselves and know the difference between an opinion and a fact. This is where the “Nothing you hear and little of what you see” maxim comes from.
Books are not for everyone and truth can easily be hidden but this fool typing on this tool can learn till his mind is full. There are generations with us who get their entire knowledge from a TV screen. If you think you are one of those then STOP IT NOW!
The ‘Cliff’s Notes’ version of what rainingmind and Mayhem have said here goes like this:
Look for the word “PROOF”.
Anywhere you see that word, you will know you have a fabrication on your hands.
ah! hehe.. no doubt.. and always glad to run into another of my favorite commenters.. hope you’re doing well, Beef… been reading a lot of your work, damn you’re good.
oh, not to forget you, Mayhem.. always a trip. wishing you well, too. ok, enough, heh.. love to stay on topic but what else is there to say?
Yes Mr Supreme.
‘CliffsNotes’ is an eye opener a good place to start.
I thought the purpose of school was to teach me stuff. Imagine my surprise that all it was good for was providing me the skills to learn. I left school just when I had turned 16 and served a trade for 3 yrs. I weld Steels and Alloys. I am a grunt.
That’s all the system did for me. A mediocre but sufficient education. Everything else I know I learned because I wanted to and it wasn’t even difficult. I can spell ‘search engine’ you see.
Nice day Sir.
ps to any who might be thinking I write well here is my secret. With respect to you all I check my spelling, take the time to try to make sense and research the answers I get to my questions. I learned why we need to know the difference between Past and Passed when they mean the same thing. Between allude and elude which don’t mean anything like the same thing.
Most importantly I learn because I am commanded by Him and it is His skill given to me that makes me who I am. Peace.
I could work on my grammar all the same. That read better inside my head. Yet again.
But mostly I just like……. Nah.
Mayhem,
Did you see what rainingmind said about me?
Ha ha ha. (I can hear my “atheist” friends in the first three rows growling at you rainingmind) Thank you, my good man.
And the education system used to be good for that. At least. Now, it serves mostly as a conduit for propaganda and the doctrine of the social engineers. I always give thanks for the fact that I was born at a time which allowed me to see the United States and the rest of the world as a more-or-less sane and functioning environment. Look at what it’s become. Public education in the Western World has become a nightmare. Us ‘older folk’ at least reaped the benefit of learning how to self-educate. It’s an acquired taste – an observation I see you make often. It’s also a dying art.
Sanity, Beef, what is this you speak of?
In my national news paper today. Bring screen wipes. You have been warned.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10853493
To you lot still stuck in the dark ages, yesterday, a Dairy is exactly like a suburban convenience store. For milk, smokes, fizzy cola, lollies etc.
I kid you not and please it will take 2 min’s.
“For milk, smokes, fizzy cola, lollies etc.”
And for Crack.
If I was the author of that article, I would have sprung for the fee to get the stuff analyzed. No list of ingredients? That crap would never fly Stateside. We here in the States demand that our crack be certified organic.
Something I’ve never been able to find is that the Conspiracy Theorists claim the moon landing(singular) was a hoax but nothing is ever mentioned about the other moon landings. Do they mean the first moon landing, the second one or all of them? Was the first one staged then the footage from that one was just shown over and over again for each moon landing, possibly from different camera angles? The Conspiracy Theorists haven’t answered any questions in fact they have presented more and will a whole new batch of Conspiracy Theorists claim the people that claim there was only one moon landing faked and the same footage shown over and over again is in fact a Conspriacy and not true? That there was a new staged fake moon landing for every Apollo mission? Food for thought.
What other landings?, I say not any, Oh we may well have crashed some petty unmanned rubbish at the moon but I’m not counting chucking the garbage out. Sheesh.
If I may paraphrase one of the anonymous posters below.
You can not take terrestrial POV shots, ie taken from the ground watching the capsule thingy leave, with a Haselblad 500 camera because the film gets left behind. Get it? There was no beaming that stuff back. It was thought we the sheeple would be too distracted to notice or too dumb to mention it. How stupid are we? Onion anybody?
Now! Learn these truths, there are many, and tell everyone you know. We are on the cusp of a great up-welling of Truth and the powers that be are very afraid. These powers that be will try to crush this Truth and it probably won’t be pretty but Good will Triumph over Evil.
This I know. Peace.
hey there Mayhem.. a lot to consider, eh? been wondering about this vid all evening, more accurately, wondering about the intent.. a hoax designed to discredit a hoax? hah,, getting more confused by this the more i think.. if you can give a fresh perspective on this, let me know.
The double fake blind scam? I will try, Rainingmind.
It is where the 2nd hoax is so woefully inept that it lends credence to the original hoax. It is blind because the 2nd hoax is completely independent of the 1st you see.
The 2nd hoax is trying to debunk the 1st hoax but is so obviously fake/misleading that ergo the moon landings must have happened.
You say…” a hoax designed to discredit a hoax”. I say a hoax designed not to discredit a hoax by failing in it’s attempt to do so.
It does help that I’m part con-man but not that I’m part nutjob.
ah, hehe.. perhaps the intent actually is to thoroughly confuse everyone… “daisy chains and laughs, Got to keep the loonies on the path…”
If anyone gets the chance watch a movie called Capricorn 1, it’s excellent. I believe it was made in the early 80′s. It’s about the Moon Landings being staged and NASA trying to get rid of the astronauts. I won’t say anything else. You will enjoy it.
point of interest, heh, if only to myself.. although this vid is most definitely, unquestioningly a hoax, it does not mean that the moonlanding itself was not also a hoax, (not necessarily my own view).. in an era of psy-ops, this is a good example? i ask this because an effective psy-op functions in at least two ways in presenting a big lie, both of which serve to confuse people and create perpetual doubt.
1) create a falsehood or fiction that mimics and discredits a possible reality (such as this vid).. as in this case, a hoax that dupes people into doubting the veracity of an actual moonlanding, thereby causing people to believe a big lie rather than the truth.
2)create a hoax or fiction that mirrors an actual event. suppose that the moonlanding was actually faked. along with creating supporting “evidence” to lend credence to the notion that it is actually real, (such as televised real time news reports, film and video footage, all also faked) one can also create a hoax that is then easily debunked, (such as this vid – a hoax substituted for a hoax) leading people to again believe that the moonlanding was an actual real event where in fact, it was the real hoax.. again causing people to believe a big lie rather than the truth.
we live in a time where perpetual confusion and dumbing down of the people is paramount to the success of the “agenda”… and i just thoroughly confused myself. heh..
Wead a book Silly.
I understand I think.
This de-bunker video is so bad an desperate that it lends credence to the official story?
Close?
If so this would then be called a double fake blind scam.
heh.. i should stick to something more my speed, maybe a rereading of through the looking glass. nothing confusing about that. yeah..
you know me, mayhem, just putting it out there on the curb, kind of like the trash? hehe..
You do well as you are, Rain, observe away my friend. Ain’t it a trip?
ps I repeat if I may.
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson is a mind blower.
Don’t read the chapter on extinctions if you don’t want to cry your eyeballs out. Oh the in-humanity!
This book has been rated by much better than me as a must have Science primer for our Schools. This book rates so high on all the buyers guides satisfaction scales it’s almost scary. Bill Bryson! Keep asking ‘but why?’ for me if you would be so kind.
I think the Truth might be getting out but I must work hard on the Way.
ps Bill Bryson is a Comic the book tries to be a delight and often succeeds as it de-mystifies all that Science gobble-de-gook. Define Science for me please?
Mayhem.. heh, a mind blower you say? good enough for me, coming from you.. dealing with a mind bender at the moment………….. yikes, man. not a good one.
I challenge anyone to broadcast footage from a haselblad 500 (the camera used on the moon fantasy) with out the aid of a television / film studio
To get the footage of the pod blasting off from the lunar surface ..you would have to beam those images (from a film camera) back to earth or as is most often the case these days ..do a set up shot step 1 blast off ..film it
step 2 nip back down to collect the camera and then blast off agaiin
of course this would be ridiculous so can someone explain to me how they got the footage of the module blasting off from the surface of the moon and get the footage back to earth from a haselblad 500 film camera..
anyone ??
You have seen the orange my friend.
now that’s incredibly interesting, anon. i hope you can pursue this side of things and flesh it out a bit more. your angle seems to provide the evidence (or lack of?) needed to put this one to rest. thanks for that insight.
I was hoping someone could explain it to me , as i obviously know very little about film and cameras and the like. but how can you broadcast images directly from a film camera…
They have made many movies where the film has to be rushed back to the lstudio to be made ready for broadcasting via formatting or whatever magic it is they do to film to make broadcastable images
So with out going back down to collect the camera how can you broadcast from a “basically modified haselblad 500″?????
The reason for the project was to convince the world – and the American public- that America’s leaders were the best in the world, and that the American system was the best in the world.
Faked landings served that purpose even BETTER than real ones would have, because there was absolutely ZERO RISK of FAILURE.
There are many reasons to believe the photos and the videos are fake.
There is no reason to believe the US secretly had moon-flight capable flying saucers or any such thing. None at all.
I used to belive it, but then I visited a Space Museum and seen the suits and the capsul. You could’nt survive in that thing at the South Pole! Not enough insulation! I could go on and on with facts against it, but answer this one, It’s reported to be something like 280 below zero in the shade and around 300 degrees in the sun on the surface of the Moon! With no atmosphere you freeze to the suit one the cold side and cook on the warm side! The problem now is once you start a lie that big and it gets in the history books and taught in school, you have to keep it alive! So now they have to place stuff up there to authenticate it! When they shot a rocket into the moon just a while back, the whole world was watching! including me, with my rather large scope! There she went. And then she was just gone! The moons a big dust ball! We never went! No-one has! If we had, we’d been setting up bases up there when the Space Shuttle was going! Now thier talking about putting robots up there. Construction style robots. Maybe to build a landing strip! Then I might belive it! They did prove that idea would work because lighter gravity, the craft would’nt weigh so much and with the technology we have now, we could go….Yes it was all a big lie!
anon.. i would love to see more of the facts you mentioned.. this entire issue has become incredibly intriguing and it would be fantastic if each commenter provided more info covering their particular angle of this. in return i’ll dig up more info/(conjecture?) on the vid and film issues, if anyone else is interested. a nice little puzzle here.
We never went to the moon. I belived it for years, until I went to a space museum and seen that capsul! You could’nt survive a cold night in that thing in Northern Canada!
if you’re interested in analysis and speculation concerning Kubrick and William Karel, (the director of “dark side of the moon”) along with possible motivations and intent a place to start could be here: http://www.collativelearning.com/2001%20chapter%2012.html
sorry i have trouble providing a direct link but look for “Kubrick: and beyond the cinema frame” an in depth analysis of 2001: a space odyssey, chapter 12, 2001: a fake odyssey?
if you scroll down you see speculation on both directors concerning the moon landing.. it presents questions to consider and raises the possibility that they suspected a hoax was in the works.
What a bunch of idiots. Those of us who were alive during the 1969 moon landing knew it was real. It took a bunch of ignorant people 30 years before they decided it was fake. It would’ve taken a conspiracy of silence involving thousands of people.
actually, people have a lot of legitimate questions and observations concerning the Apollo 11 moon landing and i’m curious about your “30 year” remark, suggesting that it was not until 1999 that people began to question the veracity of the mission. the fact is, the issue of a hoax being instigated began well before the mission even took place. as far as a conspiracy of silence involving thousands.. that too is not necessarily true in that many directly involved may have been unaware of what was actually taking place. it isn’t really a question of the Apollo 11 mission having occurred, it is one of whether or not men actually stepped onto the moon.
given your “supporting” argument of a conspiracy of silence, i have to wonder what your thoughts are concerning 9/11, OKC, the Kennedy shootings, etc..
Anonymous, I was alive in 1969. What we knew is what we were told, and what we thought we saw on television – and in the news magazines.
Large numbers of Americans AT THE TIME doubted the Gemini space walks and the moon landings, based on what they saw. I remember Walter Schirra insisting during the CBS coverage that the video we were looking at “could not be faked,” because the dust from the astronauts footsteps settled slowly.
(Wally, it was taped at 60 frames per second and broadcast at 30. It was plain old slow-motion.)
“‘I saw it with my own eyes.’ If people didn’t have eyes to be sure with, it wouldn’t be so easy to fool them.” — a magician in an episode of “Moonlighting.”