Explosion On The Moon As Twin GRAIL Craft Crash, Recorded By Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

“We were informed by the GRAIL team about three weeks prior to the impact exactly where the impact site would be,” said LRO Project Scientist John Keller of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “The GRAIL team’s focus was on obtaining the highest resolution gravity measurements possible from the last few orbits of the GRAIL spacecraft, which led to uncertainty in the ultimate impact site until relatively late.” 

LRO is in a low orbit, only about 100 miles from the lunar surface at the time of the impact, and variations in gravity from massive features like lunar mountains tug on the spacecraft, altering its orbit. “We had planned a station-keeping maneuver – a periodic adjustment to the orbit to prevent the spacecraft from hitting the lunar surface — a few days before the GRAIL impact,” Keller said. “I asked the Flight Dynamics folks here at Goddard if they could combine the station-keeping maneuver with a phasing maneuver – firing the engines to slightly speed up or slow down the spacecraft so it is in the right place at the right time to see the impact. They said it didn’t really work; we’d have to do another station-keeping maneuver to compensate. Based on this, we were leaning against observing this impact because we were going to observe another lunar impact to end the European Space Agency’s successful Herschel mission. That impact would have created a much larger plume because the Herschel spacecraft is more massive than GRAIL. However, ESA decided against the collision, so we went with the impact we had.” 

“By this time, we had lost about a week, and any time we fire the engines on LRO, mission safety requires us to schedule communications coverage from NASA’s Deep Space Network,” said Keller. Since so many spacecraft rely on the DSN, it’s not easy to schedule with little notice. 

“However, we had already planned the station-keeping maneuver, so we had already scheduled the DSN coverage,” said Keller. “We postponed the station keeping until April 29, and the Flight Dynamics team turned on a dime, making the station-keeping maneuver into a phasing maneuver so we could observe the impact.” 

LRO LROC before-and-after view of GRAIL-A (Ebb) impact.

Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University › Before impact  › After impact

The site was in shadow at the time of the impact, so the LRO team had to wait until the plumes rose high enough to be in sunlight before making the observation. The Lyman Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP), an ultraviolet imaging spectrograph on board the spacecraft, saw mercury and enhancements of atomic hydrogen in the plume. 

“The mercury observation is consistent with what the LRO team saw from the LCROSS impact in October 2009,” said Keller. “LCROSS (Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite) saw significant amounts of mercury, but the LCROSS site was at the bottom of the moon’s Cabeus crater which hasn’t seen sunlight for more than a billion years and is therefore extremely cold.” 

Mercury is a volatile, or easily vaporized, substance. Scientists propose that it could accumulate in cold, permanently shadowed craters like the one targeted for the LCROSS impact, but it was a surprise to see that it was also in an area that gets regular sunlight. “The issue for the GRAIL impact was not so much that mercury was found – you would expect it to be present as an element from the moon’s formation, just like it is found on Earth,” said Keller. “Rather, it is still reasonably concentrated near the surface instead of being driven off in an area where, for a very long time, the surface has been completely exposed to the space environment, including heat from the Sun, impacts from microscopic meteorites, and radiation.” 

LRO LROC before-and-after view of GRAIL-B (Flow) impact.

Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University › Before impact  › After impact

“These new results help us continue to understand the nature of volatiles near the lunar poles,” says Kurt Retherford, LAMP principal investigator at Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas. “In the last four years we have begun to understand that the amount of water ice near the polar regions is higher than previously thought. In addition to direct measurements of water from the LCROSS impact plume there were several other volatile species detected in the Cabeus crater cold-trapping region, including mercury atoms and hydrogen (H2) molecules detected with the LAMP instrument. While our results are still very new, our thinking is that the mercury detected by LAMP from the GRAIL site might be related to an enhancement at the poles caused by mercury atoms generally hopping across the surface and eventually migrating toward the colder polar regions. The detection of hydrogen atoms from the GRAIL impact plumes compared with H2 molecules in the LCROSS impact plume might tell us more about hydrogen and/or water near the poles, but this is a work in progress.” 

“This gives insight into how volatile material is transported around the moon,” adds Keller. “It gives us a data point that helps constrain models of volatile transport, especially for models that describe how volatile material can get transported from warm to cold areas on the moon.” 

LRO’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) was able to make an image of the craters from the GRAIL impacts despite their relatively small size. 

LRO LROC before-and-after view of GRAIL impacts.

Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University
› Before impacts › After impacts › Full-size animation › Both impacts in same field-of-view

“The two spacecraft were relatively small — cubes about the size of a washing machine with a mass of about 200 kg (440 lbs.) each at the time of impact,” said Mark Robinson, LROC principal investigator at Arizona State University’s School of Earth and Space Sciences, Tempe, Ariz. “When they were launched, the individual spacecraft mass was slightly more than 300 kg (661 lbs.), but each consumed just over 100 kg of fuel during the mission. The spacecraft were traveling about 6,070 kilometers per hour (3,771 mph) when they hit the surface. Both craters are relatively small, perhaps 4 to 6 meters (about 13 to 20 feet) in diameter and both have faint, dark, ejecta patterns, which is unusual. Fresh impact craters on the moon are typically bright, but these may be dark due to spacecraft material being mixed with the ejecta.” 

“Both impact sites lie on the southern slope of an unnamed massif (mountain) that lies south of the crater Mouchez and northeast of the crater Philolaus,” adds Robinson. “The massif stands as much as 2,500 meters (about 8,202 feet) above the surrounding plains. The impact sites are at an elevation of about 700 meters (around 2,296 feet) and 1,000 meters (3,281 feet), respectively, about 500 to 800 meters (approximately 1,640 to 2,625 feet) below the summit. The two impact craters are about 2,200 meters (roughly 7,218 feet) apart. GRAIL B (renamed Flow) impacted about 30 seconds after GRAIL A (Ebb) at a site to the west and north of GRAIL A.” 

“The LRO spacecraft team, with much help and input from the GRAIL navigation team, did an excellent job of tailoring the timing of the LRO spacecraft’s passage nearest the impact site to coincide with the impact events and needed delays for the plumes to rise up into sunlight,” said Retherford. “Our two spacecraft teams communicated well with one another, which was crucial to making this coordinated observation a success.” 

LRO complemented the GRAIL mission in other ways as well. LRO’s Diviner lunar radiometer observed the impact site and confirmed that the amount of heating of the surface there by the relatively small GRAIL spacecraft was within expectations. LRO’s Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) instrument bounced laser pulses off the surface to build up a precise map of the lunar terrain, including the three-dimensional structure of features like mountains and craters. “Combining the LRO LOLA topography map with GRAIL’s gravity map yields some very interesting results,” said Keller. “You expect that areas with mountains will have a little stronger gravity, while features like craters will have a little less. However, when you subtract out the topography, you get another map that reveals gravity differences that are not tied to the surface. It gives insight into structures deeper in the moon’s interior.” 

The research was funded by the LRO mission, currently under NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. LRO is managed by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

Contacts and sources:
Nancy Neal-Jones / Bill Steigerwald
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.