Moon Landing Hoax: Using Bungee System To Create Low Gravity Environment
If you watch the following short youtube video, it becomes obvious the guy is using some
sort of bungee system to make it look like a low gravity environment. Notice how he literally
has to jump up to stretch the bungee to pick up the hammer he dropped on the moon. lol.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,598,750,932 |
| Stories: | 8,136,995 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
The fake moon landing stunts of the past would never be able to happen today with the Internet and its super sleuths. The days of being able to lead the sheeple astray with government produced hocus-pocus has passed away forever.
Every one of their staged events from bo-mb-ings to fake att acks have been debunked. Even the main street media is finally wising up to the charades of employment postings for actors a couple weeks before a made for tv news event. They all look so incredibly silly with their on the site news coverages, fake blood, fake injuries, ded kids that turn up later at a football game, it’s ridiculous.
We can only hope the truth will win in the end.
Alternate explanation:
The bulk and stiffness of the space suit combined with low gravity make it very difficult to move around. Jumping up and down is a means of applying additional force to try to get the suit to bend at the knees.
Wiley motion slowed down is not a simulation of low gravity.
Supporting most of a person’s weight with cables does not simulate lunar gravity.
In lunar gravity, after you jump up, you will fall much more slowly than you do on Earth. Your footsteps would be farther apart.
Watch the hammer fall, hit the actor’s foot and ankle, then hit the ground. There is nothing about lunar gravity that will slow a sideways trajectory like that.
That’s just slow-motion video. The dust falls awfully fast, for lunar gravity, too.
In Earth gravity a young athletic person can jump 3 feet off the ground. The jump from start to finish lasts just over one second.
On the Moon, you’d have a hard time staying so close to the ground, as the actor in that video.
Most importantly, the brightness and contrast are wrong. The Moon absorbs about 90% of the light that strikes it. Compared to a white space suit, the Moon would be black.
Last time he jumps, his knees bend 90 degrees, yet his body stays up straight. It appears that he is being held up by the shoulders. If you watch real close, you can see the wires, and where they are attached. The way the hammer bounces, suggests a hard surface under about 4″ of silt, most likely some kind of wooden stage. I’ve been in construction for 20+ yrs, seen a hammer bounce like that on an unfinished plywood floor.
Lifels, it looks to me like his descent after jumping is slower than it would be on earth, consistent
with lower gravity. The distance between footsteps depends on how much lateral force is
applied, and the restrictiveness of the suit would account for the small steps. The slow sideways
trajectory of the hammer appears to be due to bouncing off the resilient suit which absorbs most
of the force of the hammer as it is thrown down, while the distance it travels is extended by the
low gravity. The dust, or rather what appears to be more like sand, travels fast because it has the
force of being kicked behind it. The astronaut doesn’t jump very high because the suit restricts
how far he can bend his knees, he’s jumping using little more than his calf muscles, and ankle
movement is restricted by the suit. The same kind of jump in earth gravity in bulky, stiff boots
wouldn’t take a person far off the ground. Brightness and contrast may have been adjusted to
produce a better image.
Stompk, his torso remains erect to maintain his balance, which is consistent with trying to pick
something up from the ground while carrying a backpack. The only wire I see is an antenna on
the top of his pack.
Maybe the moon landings were faked, but I don’t see any evidence of it here.
Wiley, no, the white suit would be glare, if you brightened the black surface.
“Consistent with lower gravity” doesn’t do it. You need to be consistent with LUNAR gravity. And you’re looking at slow motion up, as well as down and sideways.
I said the dust FALLS too fast, for lunar gravity. Slow motion doesn’t change that. We still see the trajectory.
That’s the same problem with the footsteps.
Lifels, the speed of the upward motion is dependent on the strength of the force that caused it, which in the case of the astronaut jumping is low.
The fast movement of the dust is due to the force that propelled it, which is relatively high, and the lack of atmosphere to slow its fall back to the surface. I still don’t see anything inconsistent with low lunar gravity and the absence of atmosphere.
The light absorption properties of the moon’s surface aren’t uniform and the surface appears to be varying shades of grey when observed through a telescope. The lighting doesn’t seem abnormal for many areas of the moon’s surface.
I’m open to the possibility that the moon landings were faked, but my mind isn’t so open that my brains fall out. I’m still waiting for evidence of fakery that can’t be explained by normal physics.
Wiley, of course there are variations in darkness, of the lunar surface. The “seas” are darker than the mountains. The “rays” around Tycho are brighter than their surroundings.
All the Apollo fake missions had video and photos of a surface that is too bright — compared to a white space suit — to be real.
In the Apollo videos, you’re not seeing anything that isn’t explained by (1) actors on a stage (2) partially supported by cables (3) taped at 60 frames per second and played at 30 frames per second.
willhart you’re right about the dust.
Photographic film would be ruined by the gamma rays and neutrons emitted by the lunar surface — atoms are split by cosmic rays there — if the film wasn’t ruined already by
solar radiation on the way.
And without all the poorly done fake pictures and video, what have we got, that can’t be explained by unmanned, robot landing craft? The kind of craft that the Soviet Union and the US were using in the 1960s?
There is no evidence, none, that American astronauts landed on the Moon.
Many of us “bought” the lies unfortunately.
Is NASA actually representing this as official footage? I have a hard time believing they would allow themselves to be discredited so easily. This would be a more blatant lie than the “official” long form birth cert.
Is this just a test to draw out the non-”believers”?
It was 1969. Computer video editing hadn’t been perfected yet.
What low gravity environment. If the lunar gravity had been 1/6th as NASA claimed the astronauts would not have been laboring up the hill- they would have weighed a total of lbs with backpacks on…but you see them shuffling around, feet going no higher off the ground than on earth…falling over and struggling to get up…
OK, that does not necessarily mean that they did not land, it means either that or NASA is completely lying about the real strength of the moon’s gravity. I prefer the latter scenarios…because I can prove they also lied about the so-called lunar dust, what dust? Carefully check the NASA photos and ciompare them with the video…where’s the dust that the thruster’s would have kicked up? No dust on their boots. NASA claims that this dust was electrostatically charged…BS…if so it would have clung to everything and it did not.
MOre proof NASA has been lying to cover up the real nature of the moon…they got there they just did not find what they expected tol…
LOL You flat earthers are hilarious. If the US didn’t land on the moon, why would India AND China take pics of the site SHOWING THE LEFTOVER EQUIPMENT AND FOOTSTEPS???
http://greekgeek.squidoo.com/apollo-moon-landing-photos-from-space
They used the same studio.
Larrymh54 they didn’t, and name-calling is a poor substitute for facts.
Your confusion comes in two parts. One, you don’t understand that the Soviet Union and the US both landed unmanned craft on the Moon in the 60s and 70s. The Soviet Union brought samples of the lunar surface back to Earth, 1972-1976.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/lroc-20100316-luna.html
Unmanned craft do leave “leftover hardware” and “disturbed soil.” They can also be seen in photographs. And I’m telling you the same “rocket booster” that was supposed to carry the LEM into orbit, and to lunar orbit, carried an unmanned craft instead.
You were told that Chandrayaan-1 in 2009 photographed “footsteps.” But that’s not true.
It photographed “disturbed soil.” With FIVE METER RESOLUTION. Not enough to see hardware of any kind, let alone footprints.
So much for India. As for China, the Chang’e 2 took pictures with SEVEN METER RESOLUTION.
China has been caught faking its own space achievements. Shenzhou 7 transcripts of radio conversations were published before the event. Space walk pictures show bubbles.
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/CNSA_Shenzhou_7_EVA.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dtp86EMfmn4
In short: The only pictures of landing sites on the Moon come from the same people who faked the originals. The India mission could not see anything smaller than 5 meters across, and the China mission couldn’t see anything smaller than 7 meters across.
No footprints. No Apollo hardware.
And if you want to squint at one-meter resolution LRO pictures and wonder what you’re seeing, go ahead. Just remember, if it’s one meter across, it’s a dot.
And the man who was National Security Adviser, and Secretary of State, during the Apollo era, Henry Kissinger, admitted to fake Moon landing pictures. The US government is not a credible source of information or pictures.
You probably don’t realize that moon rocks land on Earth as meteorites. Or that unmanned craft could bring back soil samples, even core samples. And that they HAVE done so.
The Soviet Luna program did those things, 1972 through 1976.
Or that unmanned craft can carry laser reflectors. Or that unmanned craft can “rove” about on the surface. Or that unmanned craft can be “tracked” by radar, radio transmissions, and telescopes.
Not that you could see detail with a telescope. Even Hubble can’t see something less than a hundred meters across, at the distance of the Moon.
Or that unmanned craft use rocket boosters to get to the Moon.
There is no evidence of a manned flight beyond low earth orbit, from any credible source.
And there’s a reason why we don’t fly beyond low earth orbit. Radiation.
So let me understand this, we didn’t go to the moon, it was all fake. YET at the same time we believe the Apollo missions saw and photographed alien craft and buildings on the moon. So we didn’t go there, but we did go there. Hmmm… I think some conspiracy theorist need to get their facts straight.
Beforeitscrap we didn’t go to the Moon. We didn’t go around the Moon. And I don’t know anybody who believes your straw man story of “alien” whatever on the Moon.