Nibiru 2014 - 2015 New Evidence, New Information today!

See, I don’t write in rhymes, because I’m serious.

We only know what the government says, about IRAS, and it has said contradictory things.

Self-correction by science would have involved correcting the present theory of the solar system,
to account for the rogue planet.

Correction of science by government is what we have seen, in this and in many other matters.

The evidence in our possession is indirect and has been posted by me. As you know.

No, that was background.

Posted for those who can’t imagine how a rogue planet produced the effects seen in geology and recorded in history.

The proof, as I said, is in recognizing what has happened, and been recorded, and in RULING OUT ALL BUT ONE POSSIBLE CAUSE.

The orbits of the known planets are stable.

We don’t see any stars close enough to disrupt the solar system.

But something, a few thousand years ago, made eastern Siberia freeze– suddenly– and made the ice sheet over north America melt.

Something made near-tropical Antarctica very cold.

Something made the path of the Sun across the sky change, four times, as known to the ancient Egyptians and reported to Herodotus.

Something made the Sun rise in the west and set in the east, in the past, as known to the ancient Egyptians and reported to Herodotus.

You have to turn the Earth upside down to make the Sun rise in the west.

You have to change the Earth’s axis, to make a warm place suddenly cold — to freeze large animals before they can rot — and to keep that place frozen for thousands of years, while the ice sheet melts in a previously frozen location.

The something that did these things in the past, does similar things over and over.
As evidenced by geology and history.

THAT rules out stars. We would see a star, if it were close enough to interact with us 4 times in the historical records of ancient Egypt.

That leaves rogue planet.

Now you need to make inferences:

We are not seeing it, because it is dark, like the small, dark comets.

If it has a hydrocarbon atmosphere like a gas giant, it is frozen.

It radiates some heat, more than it receives from the Sun, as some planets do.

Would the Roman Catholic Church tell you the truth, if their Lucifer instruments on Mt. Graham (VATT) were tracking a disruptive planet?

John Paul II said in November, 1980: ” it should be sufficient for all Christians to know this: if there is a message in which it is written that the oceans will flood whole areas of the earth, and that from one moment to the next millions of people will perish, truly the publication of such a message is no longer something to be so much desired.”

(October 1981 issue of the German magazine Stimme des Glaubens )

Would the US government tell you the truth, about what their satellites and their near-infrared South Pole Telescope have been tracking?

When was the last time the US government told the truth about anything?

Anything in the real world, other than a planet, is ruled out, one way or the other.

You don’t see a planet, therefore it is a dark, frozen one. As you might expect, from something that must spend so much time far from any star.

The small, dark comets are not seen until they vaporize a few hundred miles above us.
They are made from hydrocarbons. A gas giant with a frozen atmosphere would be just as dark.

And it could get just as close to the Sun as we are, without flaring up and having a coma or tail. Because the small, dark comets do that.

It is a safe bet that it radiates heat, as other planets do.

That will have to be enough blinking, as I do not intend to explain every little detail.

It is not the same.

(1) We know God/Nature didn’t move the Sun in Biblical times, because there were other
record-keepers in those days, who did not report it, and there is no geological evidence
for it.

(2) The Egyptians told Herodotus their civilization dated back 341 generations. And that
is supported by evidence that the Sphinx is over 10,000 years old.

And 341 generations would take in the axis shift that froze eastern Siberia.

(3) Refraction can create the illusion of the Sun moving, as it did in the Fatima miracle in 1917.
People saw the Sun move, and they saw colors.

Mayhem I used to play a game with small children. I’d have them put three dots on a piece of paper, anywhere. And then connect the dots. “Making triangles” was the game.

I am sorry you have been brainwashed into believing that there is something wrong with putting facts together and seeing the picture they make.

You don’t want to see the picture? That is not my problem.

But those were triangles.

And the planet X dots make nothing but a planet X picture.

Almost everything of what you know is either “theoretical” on your part, or theoretical on someone else’s part….

and observations are interpreted…